{"work":{"id":"8e5fda61-e601-4df4-8204-015bee341570","openalex_id":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":null,"raw_key":"raw:1575400c3d3c0bc71443059b","title":"write newline","authors":null,"authors_text":"\" write newline \"\" before","year":null,"venue":null,"abstract":null,"external_url":null,"cited_by_count":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","metadata_fetched_at":"2026-05-27T09:28:53.972808+00:00","pith_arxiv_id":null,"created_at":"2026-05-09T03:35:49.811744+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-27T09:28:53.972808+00:00","title_quality_ok":false,"display_title":"write newline","render_title":"write newline"},"hub":{"state":{"work_id":"8e5fda61-e601-4df4-8204-015bee341570","tier":"super_hub","tier_reason":"100+ Pith inbound or 10,000+ external citations","pith_inbound_count":301,"external_cited_by_count":null,"distinct_field_count":26,"first_pith_cited_at":"2014-12-22T13:54:29+00:00","last_pith_cited_at":"2026-04-30T17:12:53+00:00","author_build_status":"needed","summary_status":"needed","contexts_status":"needed","graph_status":"needed","ask_index_status":"needed","reader_status":"not_needed","recognition_status":"not_needed","updated_at":"2026-05-28T01:07:59.853424+00:00","tier_text":"super_hub"},"tier":"super_hub","role_counts":[{"context_role":"background","n":8},{"context_role":"other","n":4},{"context_role":"method","n":1}],"polarity_counts":[{"context_polarity":"unclear","n":8},{"context_polarity":"background","n":4},{"context_polarity":"use_method","n":1}],"runs":{"ask_index":{"job_type":"ask_index","status":"succeeded","result":{"title":"write newline","claims":[{"claim_text":"real multi-view scenes to create natural yet inconsistent image pairs. The algorithm requires no manual annotation and operates at more than 5 pairs per second on a single 3090, serving as a scalable tool to enable this study and future works. Given three views of the same static scene, we select the first as a reference, segment an object from the second and third views, and perform three steps: (1) remove the selected object from the second view and inpaint the missing region using an off-the-","claim_type":"other","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"candidate prediction models along three dimensions: 3 Preprint. Under review. • Predictive validity: ROC-AUC, Brier score, and log loss, stratified by turn-progress decile. We expect the loss to go down as the games progress and become clearer. • Construct validity: Whether estimators' learned signals align with strategically plausible indicators. • Convergent validity: (1) Pairwise within-game Spearman rank agreement to test whether induced rankings are estimator-specific; (2) Bradley-Terry (Br","claim_type":"method","confidence":0.8,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"3 70B across 10,800 matches, reveals a clear, statistically significant stratification of model capabilities. Table 1 details the derived BT ratings, 95% Confidence Intervals, and win rates for the evaluated suite. 1Referred to HumorGen-7B as HumorGen SFT 7B in plots and figures. 4 Rank Model BT Rating 95% CI Win Rate 1 GPT-5 1307.5[1288.5, 1325.9]84.0% 2 Kimi-K2 1156.9[1139.9, 1169.1]67.8% 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro 1115.1[1096.6, 1128.1]62.6% 4HumorGen-7B 1 1092.8[1077.6,1108.5]59.8% 5 Claude 3.5 Haiku ","claim_type":"other","confidence":0.7,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"candidate semantic boundary where the topic or pedagogical function shifts. To determine the boundary threshold τ, we leverage sparse ground truth annotations. We identify true boundaries as positions where consecutive labeled utterances have differing labels, and non-boundaries as positions where consecutive labeled utterances share the same label. We then sweep τ over [0.3, 1.0) in increments of 0.01 and select the threshold that maximizes F1 on this boundary classification problem. We additio","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"same-sized outputs, in our initial investigations in this paper, we restrict ourselves to the case where the models are feed-forward networks with identical architectures, but with separate parameters. Let us denote byG(x) andEi(x) the output of the gating network and the output of the i-th expert network for a given inputx. The outputy of the MoE module can be written as follows: y = n∑ i=1 G(x)iEi(x) (1) We save computation based on the sparsity of the output ofG(x). WhereverG(x)i = 0, we need","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"Table A1: Comparison of BAS for frontier models across tasks when varying the risk-prior w(t). Higher scores indicate better alignment with expressed uncertainty. The standardBAS (Uniform: w(t) = 1) serves as the baseline, while Linear and Quadratic weights simulate increasingly safety-critical environments. Identical ECE, different BAS.Consider two models evaluated on four examples with correctness labelsZ= [1, 1, 0, 0]. The models produce the following confidence values: Example 1 2 3 4 Z1 1 0","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks write newline because it crossed a citation-hub threshold. Current citing contexts most often use it as background evidence (5 contexts).","role_counts":[{"n":5,"context_role":"background"},{"n":3,"context_role":"other"},{"n":1,"context_role":"method"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-17T19:20:13.708024+00:00"},"author_expand":{"job_type":"author_expand","status":"succeeded","result":{"authors_linked":[{"id":"ac6873e2-34b6-473a-8aae-6009abdcfe0e","orcid":null,"display_name":"\" write newline \"\" before"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-17T19:20:14.616186+00:00"},"context_extract":{"job_type":"context_extract","status":"succeeded","result":{"enqueued_papers":25},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-16T01:38:32.029254+00:00"},"graph_features":{"job_type":"graph_features","status":"succeeded","result":{"co_cited":[{"title":"@esa (Ref","work_id":"b058608d-98d0-4821-a4ae-403d2b7cd411","shared_citers":37},{"title":null,"work_id":"ea79bfb8-d434-45e9-8607-416d3839ec5c","shared_citers":37},{"title":null,"work_id":"d051d6aa-efca-49eb-a66d-8ea01bf21294","shared_citers":11},{"title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","work_id":"b928e041-6991-4c08-8c81-0359e4097c7b","shared_citers":4},{"title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models","work_id":"1549a635-88af-4ac1-acfe-51ae7bb53345","shared_citers":4},{"title":"gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card","work_id":"178c1f7e-4f19-4392-a45d-45a6dfa88ead","shared_citers":3},{"title":"Qwen3 Technical Report","work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e","shared_citers":3},{"title":"DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models","work_id":"07c85cc5-4086-4abc-823b-6d0f4ff784d0","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities","work_id":"008df105-2fdd-45d8-857a-8e35868aecb6","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size","work_id":"4dd94e2f-2b27-4cbf-88a0-4910f0772a57","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Gemma 3 Technical Report","work_id":"f93e08bf-9e96-409b-8ac6-b8385fd17fd7","shared_citers":2},{"title":"GPT-4o System Card","work_id":"f37bf1c7-4964-4e56-9762-d20da8d9009f","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence","work_id":"d690be8f-5d53-49b0-b1e7-79668eb8fcdb","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know","work_id":"8ca58a10-da41-4f70-baae-7e449512e345","shared_citers":2},{"title":"M 3-embedding: Multi-linguality, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation","work_id":"6f249b44-4b0a-47dd-b5f4-1877fd9269ad","shared_citers":2},{"title":"One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling","work_id":"9d2758a8-0899-488e-adf7-065babd89bba","shared_citers":2},{"title":"OpenAI GPT-5 System Card","work_id":"ca87689a-0d29-4476-b504-b65dbbb08af4","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report","work_id":"d8432992-4980-4a81-85c7-9fa2c2b87f85","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen3-coder-next technical report","work_id":"ad966e68-641d-4b33-a9da-57cf741f35a6","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models","work_id":"bab684a8-d933-426c-a19e-2c855a0d1f59","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen3-VL Technical Report","work_id":"1fe243aa-e3c0-4da6-b391-4cbcfc88d5c0","shared_citers":2},{"title":")R?m? l ?2ɰ߭ - . ,[ S&Ցrt 6`y_gpfu","work_id":"a01ab2f7-e64a-4254-bd36-7afdca5d34c2","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Sentence- BERT : Sentence embeddings using S iamese BERT -networks","work_id":"cf07889b-1f35-4d81-9514-4ad3ed223c57","shared_citers":2},{"title":"& Topic & Pers","work_id":"89321300-2925-4a31-ae58-cb928433b79a","shared_citers":2}],"time_series":[{"n":1,"year":2017},{"n":1,"year":2021},{"n":40,"year":2026}],"dependency_candidates":[]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-16T01:38:37.628278+00:00"},"identity_refresh":{"job_type":"identity_refresh","status":"succeeded","result":{"items":[{"title":"Qwen3 Technical Report","outcome":"unchanged","work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e","resolver":"local_arxiv","confidence":0.98,"old_work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e"}],"counts":{"fixed":0,"merged":0,"unchanged":1,"quarantined":0,"needs_external_resolution":0},"errors":[],"attempted":1},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-16T01:38:37.602120+00:00"},"role_polarity":{"job_type":"role_polarity","status":"succeeded","result":{"title":"write newline","claims":[{"claim_text":"real multi-view scenes to create natural yet inconsistent image pairs. The algorithm requires no manual annotation and operates at more than 5 pairs per second on a single 3090, serving as a scalable tool to enable this study and future works. Given three views of the same static scene, we select the first as a reference, segment an object from the second and third views, and perform three steps: (1) remove the selected object from the second view and inpaint the missing region using an off-the-","claim_type":"other","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"candidate prediction models along three dimensions: 3 Preprint. Under review. • Predictive validity: ROC-AUC, Brier score, and log loss, stratified by turn-progress decile. We expect the loss to go down as the games progress and become clearer. • Construct validity: Whether estimators' learned signals align with strategically plausible indicators. • Convergent validity: (1) Pairwise within-game Spearman rank agreement to test whether induced rankings are estimator-specific; (2) Bradley-Terry (Br","claim_type":"method","confidence":0.8,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"3 70B across 10,800 matches, reveals a clear, statistically significant stratification of model capabilities. Table 1 details the derived BT ratings, 95% Confidence Intervals, and win rates for the evaluated suite. 1Referred to HumorGen-7B as HumorGen SFT 7B in plots and figures. 4 Rank Model BT Rating 95% CI Win Rate 1 GPT-5 1307.5[1288.5, 1325.9]84.0% 2 Kimi-K2 1156.9[1139.9, 1169.1]67.8% 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro 1115.1[1096.6, 1128.1]62.6% 4HumorGen-7B 1 1092.8[1077.6,1108.5]59.8% 5 Claude 3.5 Haiku ","claim_type":"other","confidence":0.7,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"candidate semantic boundary where the topic or pedagogical function shifts. To determine the boundary threshold τ, we leverage sparse ground truth annotations. We identify true boundaries as positions where consecutive labeled utterances have differing labels, and non-boundaries as positions where consecutive labeled utterances share the same label. We then sweep τ over [0.3, 1.0) in increments of 0.01 and select the threshold that maximizes F1 on this boundary classification problem. We additio","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"same-sized outputs, in our initial investigations in this paper, we restrict ourselves to the case where the models are feed-forward networks with identical architectures, but with separate parameters. Let us denote byG(x) andEi(x) the output of the gating network and the output of the i-th expert network for a given inputx. The outputy of the MoE module can be written as follows: y = n∑ i=1 G(x)iEi(x) (1) We save computation based on the sparsity of the output ofG(x). WhereverG(x)i = 0, we need","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"Table A1: Comparison of BAS for frontier models across tasks when varying the risk-prior w(t). Higher scores indicate better alignment with expressed uncertainty. The standardBAS (Uniform: w(t) = 1) serves as the baseline, while Linear and Quadratic weights simulate increasingly safety-critical environments. Identical ECE, different BAS.Consider two models evaluated on four examples with correctness labelsZ= [1, 1, 0, 0]. The models produce the following confidence values: Example 1 2 3 4 Z1 1 0","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks write newline because it crossed a citation-hub threshold. Current citing contexts most often use it as background evidence (5 contexts).","role_counts":[{"n":5,"context_role":"background"},{"n":3,"context_role":"other"},{"n":1,"context_role":"method"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-17T19:20:13.712064+00:00"},"summary_claims":{"job_type":"summary_claims","status":"succeeded","result":{"title":"write newline","claims":[{"claim_text":"Table A1: Comparison of BAS for frontier models across tasks when varying the risk-prior w(t). Higher scores indicate better alignment with expressed uncertainty. The standardBAS (Uniform: w(t) = 1) serves as the baseline, while Linear and Quadratic weights simulate increasingly safety-critical environments. Identical ECE, different BAS.Consider two models evaluated on four examples with correctness labelsZ= [1, 1, 0, 0]. The models produce the following confidence values: Example 1 2 3 4 Z1 1 0","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks write newline because it crossed a citation-hub threshold. Current citing contexts most often use it as background evidence (1 contexts).","role_counts":[{"n":1,"context_role":"background"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-16T01:38:37.635540+00:00"}},"summary":{"title":"write newline","claims":[{"claim_text":"Table A1: Comparison of BAS for frontier models across tasks when varying the risk-prior w(t). Higher scores indicate better alignment with expressed uncertainty. The standardBAS (Uniform: w(t) = 1) serves as the baseline, while Linear and Quadratic weights simulate increasingly safety-critical environments. Identical ECE, different BAS.Consider two models evaluated on four examples with correctness labelsZ= [1, 1, 0, 0]. The models produce the following confidence values: Example 1 2 3 4 Z1 1 0","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.6,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks write newline because it crossed a citation-hub threshold. Current citing contexts most often use it as background evidence (1 contexts).","role_counts":[{"n":1,"context_role":"background"}]},"graph":{"co_cited":[{"title":"@esa (Ref","work_id":"b058608d-98d0-4821-a4ae-403d2b7cd411","shared_citers":37},{"title":null,"work_id":"ea79bfb8-d434-45e9-8607-416d3839ec5c","shared_citers":37},{"title":null,"work_id":"d051d6aa-efca-49eb-a66d-8ea01bf21294","shared_citers":11},{"title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","work_id":"b928e041-6991-4c08-8c81-0359e4097c7b","shared_citers":4},{"title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models","work_id":"1549a635-88af-4ac1-acfe-51ae7bb53345","shared_citers":4},{"title":"gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card","work_id":"178c1f7e-4f19-4392-a45d-45a6dfa88ead","shared_citers":3},{"title":"Qwen3 Technical Report","work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e","shared_citers":3},{"title":"DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models","work_id":"07c85cc5-4086-4abc-823b-6d0f4ff784d0","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities","work_id":"008df105-2fdd-45d8-857a-8e35868aecb6","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size","work_id":"4dd94e2f-2b27-4cbf-88a0-4910f0772a57","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Gemma 3 Technical Report","work_id":"f93e08bf-9e96-409b-8ac6-b8385fd17fd7","shared_citers":2},{"title":"GPT-4o System Card","work_id":"f37bf1c7-4964-4e56-9762-d20da8d9009f","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence","work_id":"d690be8f-5d53-49b0-b1e7-79668eb8fcdb","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know","work_id":"8ca58a10-da41-4f70-baae-7e449512e345","shared_citers":2},{"title":"M 3-embedding: Multi-linguality, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation","work_id":"6f249b44-4b0a-47dd-b5f4-1877fd9269ad","shared_citers":2},{"title":"One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling","work_id":"9d2758a8-0899-488e-adf7-065babd89bba","shared_citers":2},{"title":"OpenAI GPT-5 System Card","work_id":"ca87689a-0d29-4476-b504-b65dbbb08af4","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report","work_id":"d8432992-4980-4a81-85c7-9fa2c2b87f85","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen3-coder-next technical report","work_id":"ad966e68-641d-4b33-a9da-57cf741f35a6","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models","work_id":"bab684a8-d933-426c-a19e-2c855a0d1f59","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Qwen3-VL Technical Report","work_id":"1fe243aa-e3c0-4da6-b391-4cbcfc88d5c0","shared_citers":2},{"title":")R?m? l ?2ɰ߭ - . ,[ S&Ցrt 6`y_gpfu","work_id":"a01ab2f7-e64a-4254-bd36-7afdca5d34c2","shared_citers":2},{"title":"Sentence- BERT : Sentence embeddings using S iamese BERT -networks","work_id":"cf07889b-1f35-4d81-9514-4ad3ed223c57","shared_citers":2},{"title":"& Topic & Pers","work_id":"89321300-2925-4a31-ae58-cb928433b79a","shared_citers":2}],"time_series":[{"n":1,"year":2017},{"n":1,"year":2021},{"n":40,"year":2026}],"dependency_candidates":[]},"authors":[{"id":"ac6873e2-34b6-473a-8aae-6009abdcfe0e","orcid":null,"display_name":"\" write newline \"\" before","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72}]}}