Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference

Canonical reference. 71% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

74 Pith papers citing it
322 external citations · Pith
Background 71% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have unlocked new capabilities and applications; however, evaluating the alignment with human preferences still poses significant challenges. To address this issue, we introduce Chatbot Arena, an open platform for evaluating LLMs based on human preferences. Our methodology employs a pairwise comparison approach and leverages input from a diverse user base through crowdsourcing. The platform has been operational for several months, amassing over 240K votes. This paper describes the platform, analyzes the data we have collected so far, and explains the tried-and-true statistical methods we are using for efficient and accurate evaluation and ranking of models. We confirm that the crowdsourced questions are sufficiently diverse and discriminating and that the crowdsourced human votes are in good agreement with those of expert raters. These analyses collectively establish a robust foundation for the credibility of Chatbot Arena. Because of its unique value and openness, Chatbot Arena has emerged as one of the most referenced LLM leaderboards, widely cited by leading LLM developers and companies. Our demo is publicly available at \url{https://chat.lmsys.org}.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 10 method 2 baseline 1 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Meta-Benchmarks for Financial-Services LLM Evaluation

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.

ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For

cs.LG · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ProactBench measures LLM conversational proactivity in three phases using 198 multi-agent dialogues and finds recovery behavior hard to predict from existing benchmarks.

TSVer: A Benchmark for Fact Verification Against Time-Series Evidence

cs.CL · 2025-11-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

TSVer is a new benchmark dataset for fact verification against time-series evidence, with 304 annotated real-world claims, 400 time series, verdicts, and justifications, plus baseline results showing current models struggle.

PRIMETIME : Limits of LLMs in Temporal Primitives

cs.NE · 2025-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PRIMETIME generator reveals that LLM datetime parsing and arithmetic primitives are individually unreliable but fully learnable via fine-tuning, enabling frontier-level accuracy on event planning with small LoRA models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 74 citing papers.