{"work":{"id":"a23cfe92-7f7c-424b-98d4-b386a83002fb","openalex_id":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2303.12712","raw_key":null,"title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4","authors":null,"authors_text":"S\\'ebastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar","year":2023,"venue":"cs.CL","abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition. The latest model developed by OpenAI, GPT-4, was trained using an unprecedented scale of compute and data. In this paper, we report on our investigation of an early version of GPT-4, when it was still in active development by OpenAI. We contend that (this early version of) GPT-4 is part of a new cohort of LLMs (along with ChatGPT and Google's PaLM for example) that exhibit more general intelligence than previous AI models. We discuss the rising capabilities and implications of these models. We demonstrate that, beyond its mastery of language, GPT-4 can solve novel and difficult tasks that span mathematics, coding, vision, medicine, law, psychology and more, without needing any special prompting. Moreover, in all of these tasks, GPT-4's performance is strikingly close to human-level performance, and often vastly surpasses prior models such as ChatGPT. Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4's capabilities, we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system. In our exploration of GPT-4, we put special emphasis on discovering its limitations, and we discuss the challenges ahead for advancing towards deeper and more comprehensive versions of AGI, including the possible need for pursuing a new paradigm that moves beyond next-word prediction. We conclude with reflections on societal influences of the recent technological leap and future research directions.","external_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712","cited_by_count":null,"metadata_source":"pith","metadata_fetched_at":"2026-05-25T07:45:29.760172+00:00","pith_arxiv_id":"2303.12712","created_at":"2026-05-09T22:54:16.425743+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572+00:00","title_quality_ok":true,"display_title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4","render_title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4"},"hub":{"state":{"work_id":"a23cfe92-7f7c-424b-98d4-b386a83002fb","tier":"super_hub","tier_reason":"100+ Pith inbound or 10,000+ external citations","pith_inbound_count":136,"external_cited_by_count":null,"distinct_field_count":16,"first_pith_cited_at":"2023-03-30T16:01:52+00:00","last_pith_cited_at":"2026-05-22T17:45:49+00:00","author_build_status":"needed","summary_status":"needed","contexts_status":"needed","graph_status":"needed","ask_index_status":"needed","reader_status":"not_needed","recognition_status":"not_needed","updated_at":"2026-06-12T07:29:14.159019+00:00","tier_text":"super_hub"},"tier":"super_hub","role_counts":[{"context_role":"background","n":35},{"context_role":"method","n":4},{"context_role":"baseline","n":1},{"context_role":"dataset","n":1}],"polarity_counts":[{"context_polarity":"background","n":30},{"context_polarity":"support","n":4},{"context_polarity":"use_method","n":4},{"context_polarity":"baseline","n":2},{"context_polarity":"unclear","n":1}],"runs":{"ask_index":{"job_type":"ask_index","status":"succeeded","result":{"title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4","claims":[{"claim_text":"Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition. The latest model developed by OpenAI, GPT-4, was trained using an unprecedented scale of compute and data. In this paper, we report on our investigation of an early version of GPT-4, when it was still in active development by OpenAI. We contend that (this early version of) GPT-4 is part of a new cohort of LLMs (along with ChatGPT and Google's PaLM for example) ","claim_type":"abstract","evidence_strength":"source_metadata"},{"claim_text":"Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 7(PLDI):1946-1969, 2023. [5] Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901, 2020. [6] Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, ","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.95,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"of domains, including natural language processing [ 5-9], computer vision [ 10-13], multimodal learning [8, 14-17], graph learning [18, 19], and programming languages [20]. These models demonstrate remarkable capabilities in understanding human instructions, exhibiting knowledge and logical reasoning, and even aligning with human values, thereby paving a promising path toward general artificial intelligence [ 21]. The crux behind these successes lies the phenomenon of emergent intelligence in fo","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.95,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"(2022) Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35. pp. 24824-24837. 18. Kojima T, Gu SS, Reid M, Matsuo Y , Iwasawa Y (2022) Large language models are zero-shot reasoners inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35. pp. 22199-22213. 19. Schaeffer R, Miranda B, Koyejo S (2023) Are emergent abilities of large language models a mirage? inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36. pp. 55565-55581","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"function configured to retrieve pairs exhibiting po- tential semantic divergence. This high-recall fil- tering ensures that the system retains subtle con- tradictions while discarding clear agreements, pro- viding a unified candidate set for intensity assess- ment. Across review pairs, extracted evidence is accumulated into anAspect-Specific Evidence Pool E={E a1, . . . ,EaM }, where Eam = [ (i,j) E (i,j) am .(2) Deliberative Intensity Agent (DIA):A Delib- erative Intensity Agent (DIA) serves as","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"entropy cognitive bifurcation points and encouraging verification of subsequent steps against the visual input, thereby translating external debiasing interventions into an intrinsic capability for hallucination mitigation. Index Terms-Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs), Vision Language Reasoning, Hallucination Mitigation, Visual Attention. ✦ 1 INTRODUCTION T HEadvent of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) [1], [2], [3], [4] has marked a paradigm shift in artificial intelligence, enabling model","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"Evaluating the Formal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through Chomsky Hierarchy 5 Table 1. Difference of ChomskyBench and previous formal language benchmark, where each task of Chom- skyBench can change the structural complexity by modifying the input length of strings. Dataset Chomsky Level (Task Num)Total Question Focus I/O Type RE CS NCF DCF Regular NNCH [10] ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ 15 Final state One-hot Vectors0 7 0 4 4 FLaRe [5] ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 18 Final state One-hot Vectors0 7 3 1 7 ChomskyBe","claim_type":"dataset","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 because it crossed a citation-hub threshold. Current citing contexts most often use it as background evidence (22 contexts).","role_counts":[{"n":22,"context_role":"background"},{"n":3,"context_role":"method"},{"n":1,"context_role":"dataset"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-18T06:10:33.568453+00:00"},"author_expand":{"job_type":"author_expand","status":"succeeded","result":{"authors_linked":[{"id":"1bfa2323-ac8e-448e-9c18-9ac61eb17d31","orcid":null,"display_name":"S\\'ebastien Bubeck"},{"id":"259f9356-2f2e-4b9b-9a82-61b348ea69e6","orcid":null,"display_name":"Varun Chandrasekaran"},{"id":"4819041d-4322-431a-aac2-8cc6d048411d","orcid":null,"display_name":"Ronen Eldan"},{"id":"b1849e9d-f0be-49ea-b266-b8f905939dad","orcid":null,"display_name":"Johannes Gehrke"},{"id":"a45bd1c1-25ea-4fe1-81bc-d02e19c17e06","orcid":null,"display_name":"Eric Horvitz"},{"id":"359ba01e-f1e1-469e-8c8f-8422194aa407","orcid":null,"display_name":"Ece Kamar"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-18T06:10:33.563287+00:00"},"context_extract":{"job_type":"context_extract","status":"succeeded","result":{"enqueued_papers":25},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-14T12:30:44.581592+00:00"},"graph_features":{"job_type":"graph_features","status":"succeeded","result":{"co_cited":[{"title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","work_id":"b928e041-6991-4c08-8c81-0359e4097c7b","shared_citers":22},{"title":"LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models","work_id":"c018fc23-6f3f-4035-9d02-28a2173b2b9d","shared_citers":15},{"title":"Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code","work_id":"042493e9-b26f-4b4e-bbde-382072ca9b08","shared_citers":14},{"title":"PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways","work_id":"a94f3ef7-2c49-4445-93fe-6ec16aafd966","shared_citers":13},{"title":"Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems","work_id":"acab1aa8-b4d6-40e0-a3ee-25341701dca2","shared_citers":13},{"title":"Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models","work_id":"68a5177f-d644-44c1-bd4f-4e5278c22f5d","shared_citers":12},{"title":"Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models","work_id":"83f7c85b-3f11-450f-ac0c-64d9745220b2","shared_citers":10},{"title":"Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models","work_id":"b7dd8749-9c45-4977-ab9b-64478dce1ae8","shared_citers":10},{"title":"Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models","work_id":"d1cf6693-a082-403c-ada9-dac7b96341f9","shared_citers":9},{"title":"On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models","work_id":"a18039e9-928d-47c9-a836-32656a71bf71","shared_citers":9},{"title":"OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models","work_id":"d7ff3b21-1fff-4cf4-952a-4714e3ef2307","shared_citers":9},{"title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models","work_id":"1549a635-88af-4ac1-acfe-51ae7bb53345","shared_citers":9},{"title":"Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback","work_id":"a1f2574b-a899-4713-be60-c87ba332656c","shared_citers":9},{"title":"Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms","work_id":"240c67fe-d14d-4520-91c1-38a4e272ca19","shared_citers":8},{"title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","work_id":"faaaa4e0-2676-4fac-a0b4-99aef10d2095","shared_citers":7},{"title":"Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models","work_id":"6ea3375b-837c-4640-a175-be7525aa3c6d","shared_citers":7},{"title":"MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models","work_id":"a7e3a737-e007-42bc-be89-c4d34c5ee071","shared_citers":7},{"title":"Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models","work_id":"b2faf28d-86b7-429c-bc42-469458efc246","shared_citers":7},{"title":"Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models","work_id":"bb63abb3-0d50-4362-b97c-b5e725b03b39","shared_citers":6},{"title":"Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models","work_id":"8405abb1-7558-4fdf-af24-f4c52fa77a06","shared_citers":6},{"title":"Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools","work_id":"9bce40c8-cfd7-4983-80e0-c3bd4402322a","shared_citers":6},{"title":"Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback","work_id":"52aff42f-4fa9-4fcf-bdb3-1459b9bebf65","shared_citers":6},{"title":"WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback","work_id":"e25ef3e1-4848-4cb9-bf28-67a420591165","shared_citers":6},{"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12017 , year=","work_id":"dd464d2b-4adb-40de-9148-c19470e7533b","shared_citers":5}],"time_series":[{"n":14,"year":2023},{"n":5,"year":2024},{"n":38,"year":2026}],"dependency_candidates":[]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-14T12:30:34.308013+00:00"},"identity_refresh":{"job_type":"identity_refresh","status":"succeeded","result":{"items":[{"title":"Qwen3 Technical Report","outcome":"unchanged","work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e","resolver":"local_arxiv","confidence":0.98,"old_work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e"}],"counts":{"fixed":0,"merged":0,"unchanged":1,"quarantined":0,"needs_external_resolution":0},"errors":[],"attempted":1},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-14T12:30:38.041872+00:00"},"role_polarity":{"job_type":"role_polarity","status":"succeeded","result":{"title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4","claims":[{"claim_text":"Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition. The latest model developed by OpenAI, GPT-4, was trained using an unprecedented scale of compute and data. In this paper, we report on our investigation of an early version of GPT-4, when it was still in active development by OpenAI. We contend that (this early version of) GPT-4 is part of a new cohort of LLMs (along with ChatGPT and Google's PaLM for example) ","claim_type":"abstract","evidence_strength":"source_metadata"},{"claim_text":"Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 7(PLDI):1946-1969, 2023. [5] Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901, 2020. [6] Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, ","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.95,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"of domains, including natural language processing [ 5-9], computer vision [ 10-13], multimodal learning [8, 14-17], graph learning [18, 19], and programming languages [20]. These models demonstrate remarkable capabilities in understanding human instructions, exhibiting knowledge and logical reasoning, and even aligning with human values, thereby paving a promising path toward general artificial intelligence [ 21]. The crux behind these successes lies the phenomenon of emergent intelligence in fo","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.95,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"(2022) Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35. pp. 24824-24837. 18. Kojima T, Gu SS, Reid M, Matsuo Y , Iwasawa Y (2022) Large language models are zero-shot reasoners inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35. pp. 22199-22213. 19. Schaeffer R, Miranda B, Koyejo S (2023) Are emergent abilities of large language models a mirage? inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36. pp. 55565-55581","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"function configured to retrieve pairs exhibiting po- tential semantic divergence. This high-recall fil- tering ensures that the system retains subtle con- tradictions while discarding clear agreements, pro- viding a unified candidate set for intensity assess- ment. Across review pairs, extracted evidence is accumulated into anAspect-Specific Evidence Pool E={E a1, . . . ,EaM }, where Eam = [ (i,j) E (i,j) am .(2) Deliberative Intensity Agent (DIA):A Delib- erative Intensity Agent (DIA) serves as","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"entropy cognitive bifurcation points and encouraging verification of subsequent steps against the visual input, thereby translating external debiasing interventions into an intrinsic capability for hallucination mitigation. Index Terms-Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs), Vision Language Reasoning, Hallucination Mitigation, Visual Attention. ✦ 1 INTRODUCTION T HEadvent of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) [1], [2], [3], [4] has marked a paradigm shift in artificial intelligence, enabling model","claim_type":"background","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"},{"claim_text":"Evaluating the Formal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through Chomsky Hierarchy 5 Table 1. Difference of ChomskyBench and previous formal language benchmark, where each task of Chom- skyBench can change the structural complexity by modifying the input length of strings. Dataset Chomsky Level (Task Num)Total Question Focus I/O Type RE CS NCF DCF Regular NNCH [10] ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ 15 Final state One-hot Vectors0 7 0 4 4 FLaRe [5] ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 18 Final state One-hot Vectors0 7 3 1 7 ChomskyBe","claim_type":"dataset","confidence":0.9,"evidence_strength":"citation_context"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 because it crossed a citation-hub threshold. Current citing contexts most often use it as background evidence (22 contexts).","role_counts":[{"n":22,"context_role":"background"},{"n":3,"context_role":"method"},{"n":1,"context_role":"dataset"}]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-18T06:10:33.572043+00:00"},"summary_claims":{"job_type":"summary_claims","status":"succeeded","result":{"title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4","claims":[{"claim_text":"Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition. The latest model developed by OpenAI, GPT-4, was trained using an unprecedented scale of compute and data. In this paper, we report on our investigation of an early version of GPT-4, when it was still in active development by OpenAI. We contend that (this early version of) GPT-4 is part of a new cohort of LLMs (along with ChatGPT and Google's PaLM for example) ","claim_type":"abstract","evidence_strength":"source_metadata"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 because it crossed a citation-hub threshold.","role_counts":[]},"error":null,"updated_at":"2026-05-14T12:30:34.202029+00:00"}},"summary":{"title":"Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4","claims":[{"claim_text":"Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have been developing and refining large language models (LLMs) that exhibit remarkable capabilities across a variety of domains and tasks, challenging our understanding of learning and cognition. The latest model developed by OpenAI, GPT-4, was trained using an unprecedented scale of compute and data. In this paper, we report on our investigation of an early version of GPT-4, when it was still in active development by OpenAI. We contend that (this early version of) GPT-4 is part of a new cohort of LLMs (along with ChatGPT and Google's PaLM for example) ","claim_type":"abstract","evidence_strength":"source_metadata"}],"why_cited":"Pith tracks Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 because it crossed a citation-hub threshold.","role_counts":[]},"graph":{"co_cited":[{"title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","work_id":"b928e041-6991-4c08-8c81-0359e4097c7b","shared_citers":22},{"title":"LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models","work_id":"c018fc23-6f3f-4035-9d02-28a2173b2b9d","shared_citers":15},{"title":"Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code","work_id":"042493e9-b26f-4b4e-bbde-382072ca9b08","shared_citers":14},{"title":"PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways","work_id":"a94f3ef7-2c49-4445-93fe-6ec16aafd966","shared_citers":13},{"title":"Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems","work_id":"acab1aa8-b4d6-40e0-a3ee-25341701dca2","shared_citers":13},{"title":"Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models","work_id":"68a5177f-d644-44c1-bd4f-4e5278c22f5d","shared_citers":12},{"title":"Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models","work_id":"83f7c85b-3f11-450f-ac0c-64d9745220b2","shared_citers":10},{"title":"Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models","work_id":"b7dd8749-9c45-4977-ab9b-64478dce1ae8","shared_citers":10},{"title":"Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models","work_id":"d1cf6693-a082-403c-ada9-dac7b96341f9","shared_citers":9},{"title":"On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models","work_id":"a18039e9-928d-47c9-a836-32656a71bf71","shared_citers":9},{"title":"OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models","work_id":"d7ff3b21-1fff-4cf4-952a-4714e3ef2307","shared_citers":9},{"title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models","work_id":"1549a635-88af-4ac1-acfe-51ae7bb53345","shared_citers":9},{"title":"Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback","work_id":"a1f2574b-a899-4713-be60-c87ba332656c","shared_citers":9},{"title":"Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms","work_id":"240c67fe-d14d-4520-91c1-38a4e272ca19","shared_citers":8},{"title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","work_id":"faaaa4e0-2676-4fac-a0b4-99aef10d2095","shared_citers":7},{"title":"Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models","work_id":"6ea3375b-837c-4640-a175-be7525aa3c6d","shared_citers":7},{"title":"MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models","work_id":"a7e3a737-e007-42bc-be89-c4d34c5ee071","shared_citers":7},{"title":"Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models","work_id":"b2faf28d-86b7-429c-bc42-469458efc246","shared_citers":7},{"title":"Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models","work_id":"bb63abb3-0d50-4362-b97c-b5e725b03b39","shared_citers":6},{"title":"Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models","work_id":"8405abb1-7558-4fdf-af24-f4c52fa77a06","shared_citers":6},{"title":"Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools","work_id":"9bce40c8-cfd7-4983-80e0-c3bd4402322a","shared_citers":6},{"title":"Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback","work_id":"52aff42f-4fa9-4fcf-bdb3-1459b9bebf65","shared_citers":6},{"title":"WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback","work_id":"e25ef3e1-4848-4cb9-bf28-67a420591165","shared_citers":6},{"title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12017 , year=","work_id":"dd464d2b-4adb-40de-9148-c19470e7533b","shared_citers":5}],"time_series":[{"n":14,"year":2023},{"n":5,"year":2024},{"n":38,"year":2026}],"dependency_candidates":[]},"authors":[{"id":"359ba01e-f1e1-469e-8c8f-8422194aa407","orcid":null,"display_name":"Ece Kamar","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72},{"id":"a45bd1c1-25ea-4fe1-81bc-d02e19c17e06","orcid":null,"display_name":"Eric Horvitz","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72},{"id":"b1849e9d-f0be-49ea-b266-b8f905939dad","orcid":null,"display_name":"Johannes Gehrke","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72},{"id":"4819041d-4322-431a-aac2-8cc6d048411d","orcid":null,"display_name":"Ronen Eldan","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72},{"id":"1bfa2323-ac8e-448e-9c18-9ac61eb17d31","orcid":null,"display_name":"S\\'ebastien Bubeck","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72},{"id":"259f9356-2f2e-4b9b-9a82-61b348ea69e6","orcid":null,"display_name":"Varun Chandrasekaran","source":"manual","import_confidence":0.72}]}}