People show little ability to distinguish AI-generated from human-written health advice in online communities, with detection varying by health condition and unreliable heuristics.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.
citing papers explorer
-
Discerning Authorship in Online Health Communities: Experience, Trust, and Transparency Implications for Moderating AI
People show little ability to distinguish AI-generated from human-written health advice in online communities, with detection varying by health condition and unreliable heuristics.
-
From Trust to Appropriate Reliance: Measurement Constructs in Human-AI Decision-Making
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.