Pith. Sign in

Kearns and Seth Neel and Aaron Roth and Logan Stapleton and Zhiwei Steven Wu , title =

5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

5 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We consider settings in which the right notion of fairness is not captured by simple mathematical definitions (such as equality of error rates across groups), but might be more complex and nuanced and thus require elicitation from individual or collective stakeholders. We introduce a framework in which pairs of individuals can be identified as requiring (approximately) equal treatment under a learned model, or requiring ordered treatment such as "applicant Alice should be at least as likely to receive a loan as applicant Bob". We provide a provably convergent and oracle efficient algorithm for learning the most accurate model subject to the elicited fairness constraints, and prove generalization bounds for both accuracy and fairness. This algorithm can also combine the elicited constraints with traditional statistical fairness notions, thus "correcting" or modifying the latter by the former. We report preliminary findings of a behavioral study of our framework using human-subject fairness constraints elicited on the COMPAS criminal recidivism dataset.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Avoiding Resentment Via Monotonic Fairness

stat.ML · 2019-09-03 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Monotonic fairness, enforced by positive-weight neural networks, avoids both class and score resentment by construction while still allowing a demographic parity trade-off.

citing papers explorer

Showing 5 of 5 citing papers.