Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Splitwise: Efficient generative llm inference using phase splitting

Canonical reference. 83% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

22 Pith papers citing it
Background 83% of classified citations
abstract

Recent innovations in generative large language models (LLMs) have made their applications and use-cases ubiquitous. This has led to large-scale deployments of these models, using complex, expensive, and power-hungry AI accelerators, most commonly GPUs. These developments make LLM inference efficiency an important challenge. Based on our extensive characterization, we find that there are two main phases during an LLM inference request: a compute-intensive prompt computation, and a memory-intensive token generation, each with distinct latency, throughput, memory, and power characteristics. Despite state-of-the-art batching and scheduling, the token generation phase underutilizes compute resources. Specifically, unlike compute-intensive prompt computation phases, token generation phases do not require the compute capability of the latest GPUs, and can be run with lower power and cost. With Splitwise, we propose splitting the two phases of a LLM inference request on to separate machines. This allows us to use hardware that is well-suited for each phase, and provision resources independently per phase. However, splitting an inference request across machines requires state transfer from the machine running prompt computation over to the machine generating tokens. We implement and optimize this state transfer using the fast back-plane interconnects available in today's GPU clusters. We use the Splitwise technique to design LLM inference clusters using the same or different types of machines for the prompt computation and token generation phases. Our clusters are optimized for three key objectives: throughput, cost, and power. In particular, we show that we can achieve 1.4x higher throughput at 20% lower cost than current designs. Alternatively, we can achieve 2.35x more throughput with the same cost and power budgets.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 5 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Beyond Prediction: Tail-Aware Scheduling for LLM Inference

cs.LG · 2026-06-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Presents a distribution-aware scheduling framework for LLM inference that reduces P99 TTLT by 35-50% and TTFT by 34-47% versus SRPT with perfect length knowledge using statistical signals instead of predictions.

The Price of Anarchy in Disaggregated Inference

cs.AR · 2026-06-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Disaggregated inference is modeled as three games whose price of anarchy rises at GPU saturation; an adaptive controller reduces the empirical PoA-hat by up to 3.1x on real clusters at modest throughput cost.

Sparse Prefix Caching for Hybrid and Recurrent LLM Serving

cs.LG · 2026-04-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Sparse prefix caching via dynamic programming for optimal checkpoint placement under overlap distributions improves the Pareto frontier for recurrent and hybrid LLM serving on shared-prefix data.

Think Before You Grid-Search: Floor-First Triage for LLM Serving

cs.PF · 2026-07-07 · conditional · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

LLM serving should triage by five-resource analytical floors and wall ordering, not grid search; on 16×H20, TP16 is capacity-capped at ~70 while EP+DP attention reaches ~644 concurrent 8K requests.

A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-04-22 · accept · novelty 3.0

The paper surveys techniques to speed up and reduce the resource needs of LLM inference, organized by data-level, model-level, and system-level changes, with comparative experiments on representative methods.

citing papers explorer

Showing 22 of 22 citing papers.