Pith. sign in

hub

AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models

44 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 61 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

44 Pith papers citing it
61 external citations · Pith
abstract

Evaluating the general abilities of foundation models to tackle human-level tasks is a vital aspect of their development and application in the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Traditional benchmarks, which rely on artificial datasets, may not accurately represent human-level capabilities. In this paper, we introduce AGIEval, a novel benchmark specifically designed to assess foundation model in the context of human-centric standardized exams, such as college entrance exams, law school admission tests, math competitions, and lawyer qualification tests. We evaluate several state-of-the-art foundation models, including GPT-4, ChatGPT, and Text-Davinci-003, using this benchmark. Impressively, GPT-4 surpasses average human performance on SAT, LSAT, and math competitions, attaining a 95% accuracy rate on the SAT Math test and a 92.5% accuracy on the English test of the Chinese national college entrance exam. This demonstrates the extraordinary performance of contemporary foundation models. In contrast, we also find that GPT-4 is less proficient in tasks that require complex reasoning or specific domain knowledge. Our comprehensive analyses of model capabilities (understanding, knowledge, reasoning, and calculation) reveal these models' strengths and limitations, providing valuable insights into future directions for enhancing their general capabilities. By concentrating on tasks pertinent to human cognition and decision-making, our benchmark delivers a more meaningful and robust evaluation of foundation models' performance in real-world scenarios. The data, code, and all model outputs are released in https://github.com/ruixiangcui/AGIEval.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

PRIMETIME : Limits of LLMs in Temporal Primitives

cs.NE · 2025-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PRIMETIME generator reveals that LLM datetime parsing and arithmetic primitives are individually unreliable but fully learnable via fine-tuning, enabling frontier-level accuracy on event planning with small LoRA models.

Dr.LLM: Dynamic Layer Routing in LLMs

cs.CL · 2025-10-14 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Dr. LLM retrofits frozen LLMs with MCTS-supervised per-layer routers for skip/execute/repeat decisions, delivering up to +3.4% accuracy and 5-layer savings on reasoning tasks with strong out-of-domain generalization.

Pixtral 12B

cs.CV · 2024-10-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Pixtral-12B is a 12B multimodal LLM with a custom vision encoder that ingests images at native resolution and aspect ratio, achieving leading benchmark results among open models while preserving text capabilities.

GPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if Grounded

cs.IR · 2024-01-03 · conditional · novelty 6.0

GPT-4V achieves 51.1% success on live web tasks as a generalist agent when plans are manually grounded, outperforming text-only models, but automatic grounding lags far behind oracle performance.

The Falcon Series of Open Language Models

cs.CL · 2023-11-28 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Falcon-180B is a 180B-parameter open decoder-only model trained on 3.5 trillion tokens that approaches PaLM-2-Large performance at lower cost and is released with dataset extracts.

citing papers explorer

Showing 44 of 44 citing papers.