Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners

Canonical reference. 88% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

86 Pith papers citing it
1,108 external citations · Pith
Background 88% of classified citations
abstract

Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are widely used in many sub-fields of natural language processing (NLP) and generally known as excellent few-shot learners with task-specific exemplars. Notably, chain of thought (CoT) prompting, a recent technique for eliciting complex multi-step reasoning through step-by-step answer examples, achieved the state-of-the-art performances in arithmetics and symbolic reasoning, difficult system-2 tasks that do not follow the standard scaling laws for LLMs. While these successes are often attributed to LLMs' ability for few-shot learning, we show that LLMs are decent zero-shot reasoners by simply adding "Let's think step by step" before each answer. Experimental results demonstrate that our Zero-shot-CoT, using the same single prompt template, significantly outperforms zero-shot LLM performances on diverse benchmark reasoning tasks including arithmetics (MultiArith, GSM8K, AQUA-RAT, SVAMP), symbolic reasoning (Last Letter, Coin Flip), and other logical reasoning tasks (Date Understanding, Tracking Shuffled Objects), without any hand-crafted few-shot examples, e.g. increasing the accuracy on MultiArith from 17.7% to 78.7% and GSM8K from 10.4% to 40.7% with large InstructGPT model (text-davinci-002), as well as similar magnitudes of improvements with another off-the-shelf large model, 540B parameter PaLM. The versatility of this single prompt across very diverse reasoning tasks hints at untapped and understudied fundamental zero-shot capabilities of LLMs, suggesting high-level, multi-task broad cognitive capabilities may be extracted by simple prompting. We hope our work not only serves as the minimal strongest zero-shot baseline for the challenging reasoning benchmarks, but also highlights the importance of carefully exploring and analyzing the enormous zero-shot knowledge hidden inside LLMs before crafting finetuning datasets or few-shot exemplars.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 14 baseline 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Large Language Models as Optimizers

cs.LG · 2023-09-07 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Large language models can optimize by being prompted with histories of past solutions and scores to propose better ones, producing prompts that raise accuracy up to 8% on GSM8K and 50% on Big-Bench Hard over human-designed baselines.

Let's Verify Step by Step

cs.LG · 2023-05-31 · accept · novelty 7.0

Process supervision significantly outperforms outcome supervision for training models on the MATH dataset, achieving 78% accuracy on a representative test subset with active learning and a released 800k step-label dataset.

Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems

cs.CL · 2023-03-20 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

GPT-4 exceeds the USMLE passing score by more than 20 points and outperforms both GPT-3.5 and the medically fine-tuned Med-PaLM on the MultiMedQA benchmarks.

Guava: An Effective and Universal Harness for Embodied Manipulation

cs.RO · 2026-06-16 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Guava harness enables 4B open-source models to achieve performance comparable to frontier models on embodied manipulation tasks by distilling capabilities from under 2K simulation trajectories using three identified design principles.

Arithmetic Pedagogy for Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A small GPT-2 model trained from scratch on GASING-derived CoT supervision for arithmetic reaches over 80% held-out accuracy, exhibits three learning phases, and develops both procedural and associative reasoning.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 86 citing papers.