{"total":10,"items":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28102","ref_index":30,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Mellin Moments of Pion and Kaon Unpolarized PDFs from Nonlocal Operators in Lattice QCD","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2026-06-26T13:59:12+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":6.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"First lattice QCD results for Mellin moments of pion and kaon unpolarized PDFs from nonlocal operator matrix elements on a 32^3×64 twisted-mass ensemble at m_π=260 MeV, extracted at NNLO and μ=2 GeV.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26752","ref_index":50,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Global analysis of a minimally extended scotogenic model","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-06-25T08:36:08+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":3.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Global analysis constrains fermionic DM to 120-350 GeV and CP-odd scalar to 350-600 GeV in a scotogenic extension, with DESI potentially ruling out inverted neutrino hierarchy and Z invisible width compatible with data at 3 sigma.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25004","ref_index":25,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Muon $g$$-$2: correlation-induced uncertainties in precision data combinations","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-04-27T21:06:15+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":6.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"A general framework quantifies correlation-induced uncertainties in precision data combinations and applies it to e+e- to hadrons cross sections for muon g-2 HVP determinations.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"taining the long-standing tension with experiment. As a result, current evaluations ofa SM µ span a range that covers both agreement witha exp µ and significant devia- tion potentially indicative of new physics, highlighting FIG. 2. Comparison of the results of the CMD-3 [103, 104], KLOE [113-116] and BaBar [111, 112] measurements of theσ ππ spectrum to the combined KNT19σ ππ values [25] which did not include CMD-3. The differences normalized to KNT19 are shown on the left axis whereas the (faded) unnor- malized cross sections are shown on the right axis. the sensitivity of the result to the treatment and combi- nation of input data. While ongoing experimental and theoretical efforts - including newσ had measurements [118-123], improved"},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.18382","ref_index":113,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Lepton anomalous magnetic moments: Theory","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-12-20T14:46:51+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":2.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"The paper provides an overview of theoretical calculations for lepton anomalous magnetic moments arising from quantum corrections in the Standard Model.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"integration procedure, the region in which perturbative QCD is used and which additional theoretical constraints are applied. At the release of the first White Paper in 2020 [11], tensions among different input data sets and different procedures to determinea lo,hvp µ could always be accommodated through a moderate scaling of the error. The quoted result was based on merging the results from Refs. [64, 111, 113, 115-117], i.e. alo,hvp µ WP20 =6931(40)·10 −11 [0.6%],(77) where the error accounts for experimental uncertainties, as well as tensions in the input data fore +e− hadronic cross sections and among different anal- yses. The number in square brackets denotes the relative precision, and the absolute uncertainty of±40·10 −11 dominated the error of the 2020 SM"},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.10709","ref_index":95,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Disperon QED","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-12-11T14:48:02+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":6.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Disperon QED is a new technique that feeds experimental data into higher-order QED loop calculations in Monte Carlo generators via dispersion relations and threshold subtraction.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.00501","ref_index":43,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Dispersive analysis of the $J/\\psi\\to\\pi^0 \\gamma^\\ast$ transition form factor with $\\rho$-$\\omega$ mixing effects","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-11-29T14:16:10+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":7.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Dispersive analysis with ρ-ω mixing produces a two-parameter fit describing BESIII data on the J/ψ→π⁰γ* form factor from 0 to 2.8 GeV and extracts a (62 ± 21)° relative phase between strong and electromagnetic modes.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.01962","ref_index":19,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Dispersion relations: foundations","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-10-02T12:32:52+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":2.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Pedagogical review explaining how causality implies analyticity and its use in scattering amplitudes, form factors, and resonance extraction in hadronic physics.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.21476","ref_index":226,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-05-27T17:48:30+00:00","verdict":"ACCEPT","verdict_confidence":"MODERATE","novelty_score":5.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"The updated SM prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is 116592033(62)×10^{-11}, showing no tension with the experimental average of 38(63)×10^{-11}.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"baseline","top_context_polarity":"baseline","context_text":"We note that the quoted references did not include IB in theρππcoupling. The origin and possible size of this correction is discussed in Sec. 2.3.6. These corrections were evaluated using a number of different parameterizations in Ref. [209], taking inputs for IB in theρmasses and widths consistent with Ref. [194] and the PDG [225]. Based on analyticity tests, the dis- persive form factor based on Ref. [226] is taken as the reference result. The central value is obtained from the dispersive result in the case where it has a conformal polynomial of fourth degree (constrained to comply with P-wave behavior) accounting for inelasticities. This yields∆a HVP, LO µ [ππ, τ]=1.53 +1.74 −1.73 ×10 −10 for the form fac- tor correction [209]. The sum of all IB corrections entering (2."},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2407.10913","ref_index":65,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Hybrid calculation of hadronic vacuum polarization in muon g-2 to 0.48\\%","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2024-07-15T17:12:09+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":4.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Lattice QCD on finer grids yields a_μ^LO-HVP = 715.1(3.4)×10^{-10}, producing a standard-model prediction for a_μ that differs from experiment by only 0.5 sigma.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2006.04822","ref_index":4,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-06-08T18:00:04+00:00","verdict":"ACCEPT","verdict_confidence":"MODERATE","novelty_score":2.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"The Standard Model value for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is 116591810(43)×10^{-11}, 3.7σ below the Brookhaven experimental measurement.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"method","top_context_polarity":"use_method","context_text":"plitudes have to fulfill, such as analyticity, unitarity, and crossing symmetry. These additional constraints can allow for an improved evaluation in energy regions where data are scarce, and, more importantly, provide valuable cross-checks on the data sets because an incompatibility with the resulting global fit function may point towards inconsistencies in the data. Such analyses have recently been performed for the 2π [4, 6, 243] and 3π [5] channels. In the absence of radiative corrections, the hadronic cross section for the 2π channel is directly related to the pion vector form factor by means of σ(e+e−→ π+π−) = πα2 3s σ3 π(s) ⏐⏐⏐FV π (s) ⏐⏐⏐2 , (2.23) where σπ(s) = √ 1− 4M2π/s and FV π (s) describes the pion matrix element of the electromagnetic current ⟨π±(p′)| jµ(0)|π±(p)⟩ =±(p′ + p)µFV"}],"limit":50,"offset":0}