Empirical analysis of 1,524 AI incident reports shows 83% arise from worker-AI trait misalignments, with 74% of those traceable to developers prioritizing efficiency over precision or personalization.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Large-scale review of 5300 AI incident reports shows harms are amplified up to three times at specific intersections including adolescent girls, lower-class people of color, and upper-class political elites.
citing papers explorer
-
The Quiet Path from Seemingly Minor Design Errors to Workplace AI Incidents
Empirical analysis of 1,524 AI incident reports shows 83% arise from worker-AI trait misalignments, with 74% of those traceable to developers prioritizing efficiency over precision or personalization.
-
Why AI Harms Can't Be Fixed One Identity at a Time: What 5300 Incident Reports Reveal About Intersectionality
Large-scale review of 5300 AI incident reports shows harms are amplified up to three times at specific intersections including adolescent girls, lower-class people of color, and upper-class political elites.