Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit.
hub
How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits
2 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 2,814 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
2,814
external citations · OpenAlex
hub tools
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
The paper proposes a companion app for autonomous vehicles enabling trusted-person tracking and configuration for supported passengers, while identifying influencing values and safety aspects.
citing papers explorer
-
Perception Gaps in Risk, Benefit, and Value Between Experts and Public Challenge Socially Accepted AI
Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit.