{"schema":"pith.reference-change-event.v1","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109","json_url":"https://pith.science/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109.json","not_a_judgment":"This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.","primary":{"event_id":237287,"doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","event_type":"correction","event_type_label":"Correction","source":"crossref","source_label":"Crossref","event_date":"2012-03-28","title":"Correction for Wyart et al., Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity","work_title":"D” in repose to U or R directions, and “Z","work_doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","work_arxiv_id":null,"notice_doi":"10.1073/pnas.1204601109","flag_count":0,"flags_open":0,"flags_disputed":0,"latest_flag_at":null,"human_href":"/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109","json_href":"/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109.json"},"events":[{"event_id":237287,"doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","event_type":"correction","event_type_label":"Correction","source":"crossref","source_label":"Crossref","event_date":"2012-03-28","title":"Correction for Wyart et al., Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity","work_title":"D” in repose to U or R directions, and “Z","work_doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","work_arxiv_id":null,"notice_doi":"10.1073/pnas.1204601109","flag_count":0,"flags_open":0,"flags_disputed":0,"latest_flag_at":null,"human_href":"/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109","json_href":"/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109.json"}],"flags":[{"id":8898,"status":"open","status_label":"Open","citing_arxiv_id":"2506.21781","citing_title":"Recency effect disappears when information is integrated from independent perceptual sources","ref_index":12,"evidence_raw":"Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012b). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Figure Legends Figure 1. Direction discrimination task with single - and double-pulse random dot motions. In single-pulse trials, the motion was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R) and six coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%, 25.6%, 51.2%) , and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec). In double-pulse trials, the first motion pulse was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R), and three coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec); the second pulse was randomly selected from U and R if the first pulse was U or R, and from D or L if the first pulse was D or L. The coherence of the second pulse was always different from that of the first pulse; either weaker or stronger. In both trial types, participants were instructed to press “D” in repose to U or R ","evidence_cleaned":"Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012b). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120118109 Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Figure Legends Figure 1. Direction discrimination task with single - and double-pulse random dot motions. In single-pulse trials, the motion was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R) and six coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%, 25.6%, 51.2%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec). In double-pulse trials, the first motion pulse was randomly chosen among four direction conditions (U, D, L, R), and three coherence levels (0%, 6.4%, 12.8%), and the delay was chosen from two conditions (500 or 1000 msec); the second pulse was randomly selected from U and R if the first pulse was U or R, and from D or L if the first pulse was D or L. The coherence of the second pulse was always different from that of the first pulse; either weaker or stronger. In both trial types, participants were instructed to press “D” in repose to U or R","evidence_source_label":"bibliography line","event_type":"correction","event_type_label":"Correction","source_label":"Crossref","event_date":"2012-03-28","work_title":"D” in repose to U or R directions, and “Z","work_doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","event_doi":"10.1073/pnas.1120118109","flag_href":"/flags/8898","event_href":"/event/10.1073/pnas.1120118109","paper_href":"/paper/2506.21781","created_at":"2026-08-07T06:19:18.710000Z","dispute_note":null,"disputed_at":null,"disputed_by":null}],"flag_count":1,"flags_open":1,"flags_disputed":0,"desk_url":"https://pith.science/flags"}