{"schema":"pith.reference-change-event.v1","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","canonical_url":"https://pith.science/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","json_url":"https://pith.science/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557.json","not_a_judgment":"This page records that a citing paper's bibliography includes a work with a published notice. It is not a judgment on the citing paper.","primary":{"event_id":344201,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","event_type":"correction","event_type_label":"Correction","source":"crossref","source_label":"Crossref","event_date":"2015-09-29","title":"Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals","work_title":null,"work_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","work_arxiv_id":null,"notice_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0139783","flag_count":0,"flags_open":0,"flags_disputed":0,"latest_flag_at":null,"human_href":"/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","json_href":"/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557.json"},"events":[{"event_id":344201,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","event_type":"correction","event_type_label":"Correction","source":"crossref","source_label":"Crossref","event_date":"2015-09-29","title":"Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals","work_title":null,"work_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","work_arxiv_id":null,"notice_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0139783","flag_count":0,"flags_open":0,"flags_disputed":0,"latest_flag_at":null,"human_href":"/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","json_href":"/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557.json"}],"flags":[{"id":8193,"status":"open","status_label":"Open","citing_arxiv_id":"2607.05454","citing_title":"Publishing Without Journals: An Open, Forkable Archive with Attributed Review","ref_index":12,"evidence_raw":"doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557. D. P. Peters and S. J. Ceci. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2):187–195,","evidence_cleaned":"doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557. D. P. Peters and S. J. Ceci. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2):187–195","evidence_source_label":"bibliography line","event_type":"correction","event_type_label":"Correction","source_label":"Crossref","event_date":"2015-09-29","work_title":null,"work_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","event_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","flag_href":"/flags/8193","event_href":"/event/10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","paper_href":"/paper/2607.05454","created_at":"2026-08-02T12:19:31.273375Z","dispute_note":null,"disputed_at":null,"disputed_by":null}],"flag_count":1,"flags_open":1,"flags_disputed":0,"desk_url":"https://pith.science/flags"}