pith. sign in

arxiv: 1208.5190 · v1 · pith:F5WPEGOHnew · submitted 2012-08-26 · 💻 cs.CR

On Bringer-Chabanne EPIR Protocol for Polynomial Evaluation

classification 💻 cs.CR
keywords epircitedatabaseevaluatedfunctionprotocoluserbc09
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Extended private information retrieval (EPIR) was defined by \cite{BCPT07} at CANS'07 and generalized by \cite{BC09} at AFRICACRYPT'09. In the generalized setting, EPIR allows a user to evaluate a function on a database block such that the database can learn neither which function has been evaluated nor on which block the function has been evaluated and the user learns no more information on the database blocks except for the expected result. An EPIR protocol for evaluating polynomials over a finite field $L$ was proposed by Bringer and Chabanne in \cite{BC09}. We show that the protocol does not satisfy the correctness requirement as they have claimed. In particular, we show that it does not give the user the expected result with large probability if one of the coefficients of the polynomial to be evaluated is primitive in $L$ and the others belong to the prime subfield of $L$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.