pith. sign in

arxiv: 1212.4372 · v3 · pith:5HKRGONHnew · submitted 2012-12-18 · 💻 cs.CC · cs.DS

Sliding Windows with Limited Storage

classification 💻 cs.CC cs.DS
keywords sliding-windowslidingwindowsalgorithmboundcomputingdistinctnesselement
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider time-space tradeoffs for exactly computing frequency moments and order statistics over sliding windows. Given an input of length 2n-1, the task is to output the function of each window of length n, giving n outputs in total. Computations over sliding windows are related to direct sum problems except that inputs to instances almost completely overlap. We show an average case and randomized time-space tradeoff lower bound of TS in Omega(n^2) for multi-way branching programs, and hence standard RAM and word-RAM models, to compute the number of distinct elements, F_0, in sliding windows over alphabet [n]. The same lower bound holds for computing the low-order bit of F_0 and computing any frequency moment F_k for k not equal to 1. We complement this lower bound with a TS in \tilde O(n^2) deterministic RAM algorithm for exactly computing F_k in sliding windows. We show time-space separations between the complexity of sliding-window element distinctness and that of sliding-window $F_0\bmod 2$ computation. In particular for alphabet [n] there is a very simple errorless sliding-window algorithm for element distinctness that runs in O(n) time on average and uses O(log{n}) space. We show that any algorithm for a single element distinctness instance can be extended to an algorithm for the sliding-window version of element distinctness with at most a polylogarithmic increase in the time-space product. Finally, we show that the sliding-window computation of order statistics such as the maximum and minimum can be computed with only a logarithmic increase in time, but that a TS in Omega(n^2) lower bound holds for sliding-window computation of order statistics such as the median, a nearly linear increase in time when space is small.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.