pith. sign in

arxiv: 1810.12665 · v1 · pith:E3LPK6JBnew · submitted 2018-10-30 · 💻 cs.DL

A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators

classification 💻 cs.DL
keywords indicatorsmncssize-independentotherresearchargumentsarticleauthors
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The arguments presented demonstrate that the Mean Normalized Citation Score (MNCS) and other size-independent indicators based on the ratio to publications are not indicators of research performance. The article provides examples of the distortions when rankings by MNCS are compared to those based on indicators of productivity. The authors propose recommendations for the scientometric community to switch to ranking by research efficiency, instead of MNCS and other size-independent indicators.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.