Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters
read the original abstract
Practical or scientific considerations often lead to selecting a subset of parameters as ``important.'' Inferences about those parameters often are based on the same data used to select them in the first place. That can make the reported uncertainties deceptively optimistic: confidence intervals that ignore selection generally have less than their nominal coverage probability. Controlling the probability that one or more intervals for selected parameters do not cover---the ``simultaneous over the selected'' (SoS) error rate---is crucial in many scientific problems. Intervals that control the SoS error rate can be constructed in ways that take advantage of knowledge of the selection rule. We construct SoS-controlling confidence intervals for parameters deemed the most ``important'' $k$ of $m$ shift parameters because they are estimated (by independent estimators) to be the largest. The new intervals improve substantially over \v{S}id\'{a}k intervals when $k$ is small compared to $m$, and approach the standard Bonferroni-corrected intervals when $k \approx m$. Standard, unadjusted confidence intervals for location parameters have the correct coverage probability for $k=1$, $m=2$ if, when the true parameters are zero, the estimators are exchangeable and symmetric.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Weighted Holm Procedures: Theory, Properties, and Recommendations
The weighted Holm procedure (WHP) based on ordered weighted p-values is uniformly more powerful than the weighted alternative Holm procedure (WAP) based on ordered raw p-values, with stronger optimality properties und...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.