pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.14325 · v2 · pith:KFP34CLZnew · submitted 2023-11-24 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph

Universal characterization of Efimovian D⁰ nn System via Faddeev Techniques

Ghanashyam Meher , Sourav Mondal , Udit Raha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-ph
keywords Efimov effecthalo nucleiFaddeev equationsD0nn systemthree-body universalityzero-coupling limitnuclear three-body systemseffective field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

For sufficiently shallow three-body binding the D0nn system exhibits a universal halo-bound structure in the zero-coupling limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses momentum-space Faddeev equations to study a possible S-wave two-neutron halo state of D0nn in the J=0, T=3/2 channel. Working inside the zero-coupling limit that removes sub-threshold decay channels, the authors expand the three-body wave function in a complete partial-wave basis built from Jacobi momenta and reduce the problem to coupled integral equations with separable interactions. These equations map onto the Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan equations of leading-order halo effective field theory. Ground-state observables show strong cutoff dependence that is removed once a three-body force is added, restoring renormalization-group invariance. The resulting picture is that shallow binding produces universal halo structure whose one- and two-body densities, radii, and opening angle become independent of short-distance details.

Core claim

We demonstrate remnant structural universality in a putative S-wave 2n-halo-bound D0nn system in the J=0, T=3/2 channel by invoking the zero-coupling limit (ZCL), which eliminates sub-threshold decay channels. Within this framework, we evaluate the one- and two-body matter density form factors, their associated root mean-square radii, and the n-D0-n opening angle. Our analysis is carried out at leading order using a quantum mechanical Faddeev technique in the momentum representation. By introducing short-range separable interactions and expressing the two-body scattering amplitudes via spectator functions, we establish a direct correspondence with the familiar Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan eqs.

What carries the argument

Coupled Faddeev integral equations in Jacobi momenta with separable two-body interactions, reduced via spectator functions in the zero-coupling limit.

If this is right

  • Ground-state properties exhibit marked sensitivity to cutoff variations at leading order without a three-body force.
  • Inclusion of a three-body force suppresses cutoff dependence and restores renormalization-group invariance.
  • The one- and two-body matter density form factors and n-D0-n opening angle become universal for shallow binding.
  • The setup establishes a direct correspondence with the Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan equations of halo effective field theory at leading order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar universality may appear in other charmed-meson plus two-neutron systems provided their binding remains shallow.
  • Precision measurements of radii or opening angles in a candidate D0nn state could test the predicted independence from short-range physics.
  • Range corrections beyond leading order could limit the universality window to even shallower bindings.

Load-bearing premise

The zero-coupling limit is a valid and sufficient approximation that safely eliminates sub-threshold decay channels for the D0nn system.

What would settle it

A measured D0nn binding energy together with root-mean-square radii or opening angle that lie far outside the universal band predicted for shallow binding would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.14325 by Ghanashyam Meher, Sourav Mondal, Udit Raha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Faddeev component wavefunctions for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feynman diagrams for the leading order coupled-ch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Renormalized dressed dimeron propagators associ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Feynman diagrams modifying the single D0 -meson and neutron exchange kernel func￾tions, K(D) and K(n) , respectively, into their renormalized versions, KR (D) and KR (n) , contributing to the STM3 integral equations. The red-filled circles represent insertions of the regulator (Λreg) dependent three-body contact interactions with coupling g3 = g3(Λreg). In the asymptotic limit of the above equations, i.e.,… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: RG limit cycle for the three-body coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reconstruction of the full three-body S-wave wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized momentum-space S-wave radial probabi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The matter radii defining the geometrical structur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cut-off scale (Λreg) dependence of the D0nn trimer binding energy BT = B3 − BnD, (where the BnD = 1.82 MeV is D0n + n dimer-particle threshold energy) obtained as a nontrivial solution to the Faddeev integral equations at leading order. Here we display three sets of curves corresponding to the ground (m = 0) and the first two excited trimer (m = 1, 2) states. Left panel: Solutions obtained using the unreno… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Leading order S-wave one- and two-body matter den [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The variation of the effective or mean geometrical m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Residual regulator Λreg dependence of the renormalized leading order rms radii of the D0nn ground state for input three-body binding energies B (0) 3 = 1.92, 2.82, and 3.82 MeV. In each case, the numerical data points are fitted with a smooth function defined by Eq. (92). The horizontal lines denote the asymptotic values of the respective rms radii r∞ α (α = 1, ...6), as Λreg → ∞. These results correspond… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Variation of the effective geometrical radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The Jacobi momenta (pi = |pi |, qi = |qi |) for an arbitrary three-body system. pi = µjk  kj mj − kk mk  ; µjk = mjmk mj + mk , (A1) qi = µi(jk)  ki mi − kj + kk mj + mk  ; µi(jk) = mi(mj + mk) M . (A2) 13 The spectator notation is used throughout this work. However, it must be noted that this notation is not applicable while defining the individual particle masses (mi) and laboratory/inertial frame m… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The re-arrangement channels and Jacobi momenta fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate remnant structural universality in a putative S-wave $2n$-halo-bound $D^0nn$ system in the $J=0, T=3/2$ channel by invoking the zero-coupling limit (ZCL), which eliminates sub-threshold decay channels. Within this framework, we evaluate the one- and two-body matter density form factors, their associated root mean-square radii, and the $n$-$D^0$-$n$ opening angle. Our analysis is carried out at leading order using a quantum mechanical Faddeev technique in the momentum representation. Employing Jacobi momenta, we construct a complete partial-wave basis to expand the full three-body $D^0nn$ wave function across distinct rearrangement channels. Projection onto this basis yields a coupled set of Faddeev integral equations that govern the multiple-scattering dynamics of the constituent coupled spin-isospin subsystems. By introducing short-range separable interactions and expressing the two-body scattering amplitudes via spectator functions, we establish a direct correspondence with the familiar Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan equations from halo-EFT approach at leading order. A regulator-dependent analysis highlights the Efimov-like character of the three-body observables, with ground state properties exhibiting marked sensitivity to cutoff variations. However, the inclusion of a three-body force suppresses this dependence, as expected from renormalization-group invariance. We thereby conclude that, for sufficiently shallow three-body binding, the $D^0nn$ system in the ZCL exhibits a universal halo-bound structure. The subtle implications of range-like corrections at LO are addressed at a qualitative level in this analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in the zero-coupling limit (ZCL), which eliminates sub-threshold decay channels, the putative S-wave D^0 nn halo-bound system in the J=0, T=3/2 channel exhibits remnant structural universality for sufficiently shallow three-body binding. This is shown via a leading-order momentum-space Faddeev calculation with separable two-body interactions, a complete partial-wave basis in Jacobi momenta, and a three-body force introduced to suppress cutoff dependence in observables such as rms radii, opening angle, and form factors, establishing correspondence with Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan equations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a concrete demonstration of renormalization-group invariance and universality in an Efimovian three-body system involving a charmed meson, using standard halo-EFT techniques at LO. It supplies falsifiable predictions for structural observables that could inform future lattice or experimental studies of exotic nuclei.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on ZCL): the assumption that the zero-coupling limit is a valid and sufficient approximation for the D^0 nn system is load-bearing for the universality conclusion, yet the manuscript provides only a qualitative discussion of range-like corrections without a quantitative estimate of their effect on the claimed remnant universality.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that ground-state properties exhibit marked sensitivity to cutoff variations before the three-body force is included, but no explicit numerical values or figures quantifying the pre- and post-renormalization dependence are referenced in the provided text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment regarding the zero-coupling limit. We address the point below and agree that a revision will improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on ZCL): the assumption that the zero-coupling limit is a valid and sufficient approximation for the D^0 nn system is load-bearing for the universality conclusion, yet the manuscript provides only a qualitative discussion of range-like corrections without a quantitative estimate of their effect on the claimed remnant universality.

    Authors: We agree that the ZCL approximation is load-bearing for the universality claim and that the discussion of range-like corrections remains qualitative. A quantitative estimate of their impact would require a next-to-leading-order calculation that incorporates finite-range effects and sub-threshold channels, which lies beyond the leading-order Faddeev framework of the present work. We will revise the abstract to state explicitly that remnant universality is established within the ZCL and that range corrections, while expected to be perturbative for shallow bindings, are not quantified at this order. This revision will better frame the scope of the conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation employs standard leading-order Faddeev integral equations in Jacobi momenta with separable two-body interactions, projects onto a partial-wave basis, and introduces a three-body force solely to restore cutoff independence in observables, as required by RG invariance for Efimov systems. This is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction, nor does any step reduce by construction to a self-definition or self-citation chain. The universality conclusion follows directly from the renormalized ZCL calculation for shallow binding, with no load-bearing ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks of halo-EFT and Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the zero-coupling limit, leading-order halo-EFT with separable potentials, and a three-body force introduced for renormalization; these are standard domain assumptions rather than new postulates.

free parameters (2)
  • regulator cutoff
    Varied to demonstrate sensitivity of ground-state properties; its value is not fixed by external data in the abstract.
  • three-body force strength
    Introduced to suppress cutoff dependence and restore RG invariance at leading order.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption S-wave dominance in the J=0, T=3/2 channel
    Assumed to restrict the partial-wave basis and simplify the coupled equations.
  • domain assumption Validity of the zero-coupling limit for removing sub-threshold decay channels
    Invoked at the outset to reduce the problem to a pure bound-state calculation.
  • domain assumption Separable short-range two-body interactions suffice at leading order
    Allows reduction to Skornyakov-Ter-Martirosyan equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5832 in / 1596 out tokens · 31361 ms · 2026-05-24T06:37:03.410897+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For a detailed exposition, we refer the reader to Ref

    Jacobi momentum basis in quantum mechanics We now briefly discuss the construction of a complete set of basis st ates for a momentum- space quantum mechanical description of an arbitrary three-bod y system. For a detailed exposition, we refer the reader to Ref. [70]. The basic objects ar e the Jacobi plane wave state vectors denoted as |p, q⟩i ≡ | pi, qi⟩i...

    work page

  2. [2]

    For the simplicity of analytical derivations, we find it convenient to ex press the mass MD of the D0-meson in terms of the nucleon (neutron) mass, namely, MD = yMn

    Jacobi momenta for the D0nn system The three different re-arrangement channels for the D0nn system are displayed in Fig.15. For the simplicity of analytical derivations, we find it convenient to ex press the mass MD of the D0-meson in terms of the nucleon (neutron) mass, namely, MD = yMn. Also, in order to distinguish between the momenta of the two identica...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This is indicated by the pole position of the two-body T-matrix , represented by the condition: 1 C0 = I(E = − B2, Λreg)

    is produced at leading order. This is indicated by the pole position of the two-body T-matrix , represented by the condition: 1 C0 = I(E = − B2, Λreg) . (B12) Utilizing the pole position we can now fix the running of the two-body co upling C0 → C0(Λreg) in order to reproduce the scattering length a0. In particular with a0Λreg >> 1 leads to a simpler expres...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Energy levels arising from the resonant two-b ody forces in a three-body system

    V. Efimov, “Energy levels arising from the resonant two-b ody forces in a three-body system”, Phys. Lett. B 33, 563 (1970)

    work page 1970

  5. [5]

    Weakly-bound states of 3 resonantly-inter acting particle

    V. N. Efimov, “Weakly-bound states of 3 resonantly-inter acting particle”,, Yad. Fiz. 12, 1080 (1970) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 12, 589 (1971)]. 46

    work page 1970

  6. [6]

    Energy levels of three resonantly interactin g particles

    V. Efimov, “Energy levels of three resonantly interactin g particles”, Nucl. Phys. A 210, 157 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    G. S. Danilov, ”On the three-body problem with short-ran ge forces”, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 40, 498 (1961) [Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 349 (1961)]

    work page 1961

  8. [8]

    Scattering theory for a three-particle s ystem

    L. D. Faddeev, “Scattering theory for a three-particle s ystem”, Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 1014 (1961) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 39, 1459 (1960)]

    work page 1961

  9. [9]

    Universality in few-body sy stems with large scattering length

    E. Braaten and H. W. Hammer, “Universality in few-body sy stems with large scattering length”, Phys. Rept. 428, 259-390 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Efimov Physics: a review

    P. Naidon and S. Endo, “Efimov Physics: a review”, Rept. Pr og. Phys. 80, no.5, 056001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Nucleon - nucleo n scattering from effective field theory

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, “Nucleon - nucleo n scattering from effective field theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 478, 629 (1996)

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    A New expansion for nucleon-nucleon interac- tions

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, “A New expansion for nucleon-nucleon interac- tions”, Phys. Lett. B 424, 390-396 (1998)

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Two nucleon sy stems from effective field theory

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, “Two nucleon sy stems from effective field theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 534, 329-355 (1998)

    work page 1998

  14. [14]

    A Perturbativ e calculation of the electromag- netic form-factors of the deuteron

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, “A Perturbativ e calculation of the electromag- netic form-factors of the deuteron”, Phys. Rev. C 59, 617 (1999)

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Effective field theory of short-range force s

    U. van Kolck, “Effective field theory of short-range force s”, Nucl. Phys. A 645, 273 (1999)

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    Three body problem for short-range forces. I. Scattering of low energy neutrons by deuterons

    G. V. Skornyakov and K. A. Ter-Martirosyan, “Three body problem for short-range forces. I. Scattering of low energy neutrons by deuterons”, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 648 (1957) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31, 775 (1956)]

    work page 1957

  17. [17]

    G. V. Skornyakov and K. A. Ter-Martirosyan, Sov. Phys. J ETP 31, 775 (1956)

    work page 1956

  18. [18]

    Effective the ory for neutron deuteron scattering: Energy dependence

    P. F. Bedaque, H. W. Hammer and U. van Kolck, “Effective the ory for neutron deuteron scattering: Energy dependence”, Phys. Rev. C 58, 641 (1998)

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    Renormali zation of the three-body system with short range interactions

    P. F. Bedaque, H. W. Hammer, and U. Van Kolck, “Renormali zation of the three-body system with short range interactions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 463 (1999)

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Effective th eory of the triton

    P. F. Bedaque, H. W. Hammer, and U. Van Kolck, “Effective th eory of the triton”, Nucl. Phys. A 676, 357 (2000)

    work page 2000

  21. [21]

    Effective fi eld theory for halo nuclei

    C. A. Bertulani, H. W. Hammer and U. Van Kolck, “Effective fi eld theory for halo nuclei”, Nucl. Phys. A 712, 37-58 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    Low-energy expansion in the three-body system to all orders and the triton channel

    P. F. Bedaque, G. Rupak, H. W. Griesshammer and H. W. Hamm er, “Low-energy expansion in the three-body system to all orders and the triton channel ”, Nucl. Phys. A 714, 589-610 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    Universal properties and structure of halo nuclei

    D. L. Canham and H. W. Hammer, “Universal properties and structure of halo nuclei”, Eur. Phys. J. A 37, 367-380 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    D. L. Canham, Ph.D. Thesis, Three-Body Halo Nuclei in an Effective Theory Framework

    work page

  25. [25]

    The Hypertriton in effective field theory

    H. W. Hammer, “The Hypertriton in effective field theory”, Nucl. Phys. A 705, 173 (2002)

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    Investigation of the nnΛ bound state in pionless effective theory

    S. I. Ando, U. Raha and Y. Oh, “Investigation of the nnΛ bound state in pionless effective theory”, Phys. Rev. C 92, no. 2, 024325 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Three-Body Hypernuc lei in Pionless Effective Field Theory

    F. Hildenbrand and H.-W. Hammer, “Three-Body Hypernuc lei in Pionless Effective Field Theory”, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    4 ΛΛH in halo effective field theory

    S.-I. Ando, G.-S.Yang and Y. Oh, “ 4 ΛΛH in halo effective field theory”, Phys. Rev. C 89, 014318 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    6 ΛΛ He in cluster effective field theory

    S. I. Ando and Y. Oh, “ 6 ΛΛ He in cluster effective field theory”, Phys. Rev. C 90, 037301 (2014). 47

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    6He nucleus in halo effective field theory

    C. Ji, Ch. Elster and D. R. Phillips, “ 6He nucleus in halo effective field theory”, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Momentu m-Space Probability Density of 6He in Halo Effective Field Theory

    M. G¨ obel, H.-W. Hammer, C. Ji, D. R. Phillips, “Momentu m-Space Probability Density of 6He in Halo Effective Field Theory”, Few Body Syst. 60, 61 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Investigation of Ξ − nn (S = − 2) Hypernucleus in Low-energy Pionless Halo Effective Theory

    G. Meher and U. Raha, “Investigation of Ξ − nn (S = − 2) Hypernucleus in Low-energy Pionless Halo Effective Theory”, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, no.2, 579-601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    5 ΛΛH and 5 ΛΛHe Hypernuclei reexamined in Halo/Cluster Effective Theory

    G. Meher and U. Raha, “ 5 ΛΛH and 5 ΛΛHe Hypernuclei reexamined in Halo/Cluster Effective Theory”, Phys. Rev. C 103, no.1, 014001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Low-energy universality a nd the new charmonium resonance at 3870-MeV

    E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, “Low-energy universality a nd the new charmonium resonance at 3870-MeV”, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074005 (2004)

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    Universal p hysics of the few-body system of two neutrons and one flavored meson

    U. Raha, Y. Kamiya, S. I. Ando, and T. Hyodo, “Universal p hysics of the few-body system of two neutrons and one flavored meson”, Phys. Rev. C 98, no. 3, 034002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Universality of Two Neutrons and One Flavored Meson in Low-Energy Effective Theory

    U. Raha, “Universality of Two Neutrons and One Flavored Meson in Low-Energy Effective Theory”, Springer Proc. Phys. 238, 995-999 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Nuclear effectiv e field theory: status and perspectives

    H. W. Hammer, S. K¨ onig and U. van Kolck, “Nuclear effectiv e field theory: status and perspectives”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Nuclear halo states

    K. Riisager, “Nuclear halo states”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1105-1116 (1994)

    work page 1994

  39. [39]

    Bound state properties of Borromean Halo nuclei: He-6 and Li-11

    M. V. Zhukov et al. , “Bound state properties of Borromean Halo nuclei: He-6 and Li-11”, Phys. Rept. 231, 151-199 (1993)

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    Nuclear halos

    P. G. Hansen, A. S. Jensen and B. Jonson, “Nuclear halos” , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 45, 591-634 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Neutron halo nuclei

    I. Tanihata, “Neutron halo nuclei”, J. Phys. G 22, 157 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Structure and reactions of quantum halos

    A. S. Jensen, K. Riisager, D. V. Fedorov and E. Garrido, “ Structure and reactions of quantum halos”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 215-261 (2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Effective field theo ry description of halo nuclei

    H. W. Hammer, C. Ji and D. R. Phillips, “Effective field theo ry description of halo nuclei”, J. Phys. G 44, no.10, 103002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    A possible resonant state in pion-hyperon scattering

    R. H. Dalitz and S. F. Tuan, “A possible resonant state in pion-hyperon scattering”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 425-428 (1959)

    work page 1959

  45. [45]

    The energy dependence of low energy K- -proton processes

    R. H. Dalitz and S. F. Tuan, “The energy dependence of low energy K- -proton processes”, Annals Phys. 8, 100-118 (1959)

    work page 1959

  46. [46]

    The phenomenological descr iption of -K -nucleon reaction processes

    R. H. Dalitz and S. F. Tuan, “The phenomenological descr iption of -K -nucleon reaction processes”, Annals Phys. 10, 307-351 (1960)

    work page 1960

  47. [47]

    On the strong interactions of the strange particles

    R. H. Dalitz, “On the strong interactions of the strange particles”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 471-492 (1961)

    work page 1961

  48. [48]

    -K -nucleon bound-state interpretation of the 1385-Mev pi-lambda resonance

    R. H. Dalitz, “-K -nucleon bound-state interpretation of the 1385-Mev pi-lambda resonance”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 239-241 (1961)

    work page 1961

  49. [49]

    Possible existence of ¯KNN bound states

    Y. Nogami, “Possible existence of ¯KNN bound states”, Phys. Lett. 7, no.4, 288-289 (1963)

    work page 1963

  50. [50]

    Nuclear anti-K bound state s in light nuclei

    Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, “Nuclear anti-K bound state s in light nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 65, 044005 (2002)

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    The Basic ¯K nuclear cluster K − pp and its enhanced formation in the p + p → K + + X reaction

    T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi, “The Basic ¯K nuclear cluster K − pp and its enhanced formation in the p + p → K + + X reaction”, Phys. Rev. C 76, 045201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Faddeev calculat ion of a K- p p quasi-bound state

    N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal and J. Mares, “Faddeev calculat ion of a K- p p quasi-bound state”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 082301 (2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    anti-K N N quasi-bound state and the anti-K N interaction: Coupled-channel Faddeev calculatio ns of the anti-K NN - pi Sigma N system

    N. V. Shevchenko, A. Gal, J. Mares and J. Revai, “anti-K N N quasi-bound state and the anti-K N interaction: Coupled-channel Faddeev calculatio ns of the anti-K NN - pi Sigma N system”, Phys. Rev. C 76, 044004 (2007). 48

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Strange dibaryon resonance in the anti-K NN - pi Sigma N system

    Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, “Strange dibaryon resonance in the anti-K NN - pi Sigma N system”, Phys. Rev. C 76, 035203 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    On the resonance energy of the anti -K NN - pi YN system

    Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, “On the resonance energy of the anti -K NN - pi YN system”, Phys. Rev. C 79, 035201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    K- pp system with chiral S U(3) effective interaction

    A. Dote, T. Hyodo and W. Weise, “K- pp system with chiral S U(3) effective interaction”, Nucl. Phys. A 804, 197-206 (2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Variational calculatio n of the ppK- system based on chiral SU(3) dynamics

    A. Dote, T. Hyodo and W. Weise, “Variational calculatio n of the ppK- system based on chiral SU(3) dynamics”, Phys. Rev. C 79, 014003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  58. [58]

    Variational calculations fo r K-few-nucleon systems

    S. Wycech and A. M. Green, “Variational calculations fo r K-few-nucleon systems”, Phys. Rev. C 79, 014001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    Energy dependence of ba rKN interactions and resonance pole of strange dibaryons

    Y. Ikeda, H. Kamano and T. Sato, “Energy dependence of ba rKN interactions and resonance pole of strange dibaryons”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 124, 533-539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    The nature of the Lambda(1405) res onance in chiral dynamics

    T. Hyodo and D. Jido, “The nature of the Lambda(1405) res onance in chiral dynamics”, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 55-98 (2012)

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    Realistic calculat ions of ¯KN N, ¯KN N N, and ¯K ¯KN N quasibound states

    N. Barnea, A. Gal and E. Z. Liverts, “Realistic calculat ions of ¯KN N, ¯KN N N, and ¯K ¯KN N quasibound states”, Phys. Lett. B 712, 132-137 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Few-body approach to structure of ¯K-nuclear quasi-bound states

    S. Ohnishi, W. Horiuchi, T. Hoshino, K. Miyahara and T. H yodo, “Few-body approach to structure of ¯K-nuclear quasi-bound states”, Phys. Rev. C 95, no.6, 065202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Strangenes s in nuclear physics

    A. Gal, E. V. Hungerford and D. J. Millener, “Strangenes s in nuclear physics”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Universal physic s of three bosons with isospin

    T. Hyodo, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Nishida, “Universal physic s of three bosons with isospin”, Phys. Rev. C 89, 032201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    Coupled-channel study of c rypto-exotic baryons with charm

    J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, “Coupled-channel study of c rypto-exotic baryons with charm”, Nucl. Phys. A 763, 90-139 (2005)

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    D mesons in nuclear matter: A D N coupled-channel equations approach

    T. Mizutani and A. Ramos, “D mesons in nuclear matter: A D N coupled-channel equations approach”, Phys. Rev. C 74, 065201 (2006)

    work page 2006

  67. [67]

    Energy and width of a narrow I = 1/2 DN N quasibound state

    M. Bayar, C. W. Xiao, T. Hyodo, A. Dote, M. Oka and E. Oset, “Energy and width of a narrow I = 1/2 DN N quasibound state”, Phys. Rev. C 86, 044004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    Exotic nuclei with charm and bott om flavors

    S. Yasui and K. Sudoh, “Exotic nuclei with charm and bott om flavors”, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 186, 199-204 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Radii in wea kly bound light halo nuclei

    M. T. Yamashita, L. Tomio and T. Frederico, “Radii in wea kly bound light halo nuclei”, Nucl. Phys. A 735, 40 (2004)

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    The Four bos on system with short range interactions

    L. Platter, H. W. Hammer and U. G. Meissner, “The Four bos on system with short range interactions”, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  71. [71]

    Universal p roperties of the four boson system in two dimensions

    L. Platter, H. W. Hammer and U. G. Meissner, “Universal p roperties of the four boson system in two dimensions”, Few Body Syst. 35, 169-174 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [72]

    On the corre lation between the binding energies of the triton and the alpha-particle

    L. Platter, H. W. Hammer and U. G. Meissner, “On the corre lation between the binding energies of the triton and the alpha-particle”, Phys. Lett. B 607, 254-258 (2005)

    work page 2005

  73. [73]

    Gl¨ ockle, The Quantum Mechanical Few-Body Problem , Springer Verlag Publication, De- cember 2012

    W. Gl¨ ockle, The Quantum Mechanical Few-Body Problem , Springer Verlag Publication, De- cember 2012

    work page 2012

  74. [74]

    J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Colli sions, Dover Publication, May 2006

    work page 2006

  75. [75]

    Universal as pects of Efimov states and light halo nuclei

    A. E. A. Amorim, T. Frederico and L. Tomio, “Universal as pects of Efimov states and light halo nuclei”, Phys. Rev. C 56, R2378(R)

    work page

  76. [76]

    Three body analy sis of the occurrence of Efimov states in 2n halo nuclei such as B-19, C-22 and C-20

    I. Mazumdar, V. Arora and V. S. Bhasin, “Three body analy sis of the occurrence of Efimov states in 2n halo nuclei such as B-19, C-22 and C-20”, Phys. Re v. C 61, 051303 (2000). 49

    work page 2000

  77. [77]

    Few Body Dynamics, Efimov Effect and Halo Nuclei

    V. S. Bhasin, I. Mazumdar, V. S. Bhasin and I. Mazumdar, “ Few Body Dynamics, Efimov Effect and Halo Nuclei ”, SpringerBriefs in Physics, December 2020

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Measurement of the neutron-neutron scattering length us ing the pi-d capture reaction

    Q. Chen et al. , “Measurement of the neutron-neutron scattering length us ing the pi-d capture reaction”, Phys. Rev. C 77, 054002 (2008)

    work page 2008

  79. [79]

    The nuclear three-body problem

    A. N. Mitra, “The nuclear three-body problem”, Adv. Nuc l. Phys. 3, 1 (1969)

    work page 1969

  80. [80]

    The Three bo son system with short range interactions

    P. F. Bedaque, H. W. Hammer and U. van Kolck, “The Three bo son system with short range interactions”, Nucl. Phys. A 646, 444 (1999)

    work page 1999

Showing first 80 references.