pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.12796 · v2 · pith:VIVZDHM4new · submitted 2025-08-18 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-th

Scaling behaviour of charged particles generated in Xe-Xe collisions at sqrt{s_{rm{NN}}} = 5.44 TeV using the AMPT model

Zarina Banoo , Ramni Gupta , Salman K. Malik , Fakhar Ul Haider , Balwan Singh , Sheetal Sharma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-th
keywords intermittencynormalized factorial momentsscaling exponentXe-Xe collisionsmultiplicity fluctuationsheavy-ion collisionsphase space resolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Normalized factorial moments of charged particles in Xe-Xe collisions grow linearly with phase space resolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper simulates charged-particle production in Xe-Xe collisions at 5.44 TeV and examines how multiplicity fluctuations behave when the available phase space is divided into successively smaller bins. It finds that the normalized factorial moments increase as a power law in the bin size, which is interpreted as intermittency arising from self-similar particle emission. From this scaling the authors extract an anomalous fractal dimension and a scaling exponent that links higher-order moments to the second-order moment and varies with the width of the transverse-momentum intervals. The extracted quantities are presented as quantitative predictions from the chosen transport model that can serve as reference values for experimental measurements.

Core claim

The normalized factorial moments F_q display a linear power-law rise with increasing phase-space resolution, confirming intermittency. The anomalous fractal dimension D_q is obtained from the slope of this rise and exhibits a dependence on moment order q that is captured by the intermittency index φ_q. Relating the q-th-order moment to F_2 yields a scaling exponent ν whose value changes with the transverse-momentum bin width Δp_T, thereby quantifying the dynamical properties of the produced system.

What carries the argument

The scaling exponent ν obtained by expressing the q-th-order normalized factorial moment in terms of F_2; it encodes the strength of intermittency and its variation with transverse-momentum resolution.

If this is right

  • The fractal dimensions D_q increase with moment order q, indicating multifractal structure in the emission pattern.
  • The intermittency index φ_q provides a direct measure of how the scaling strength changes across different moment orders.
  • The dependence of ν on Δp_T implies that the underlying dynamics are sensitive to the momentum scale at which fluctuations are examined.
  • The extracted parameters supply a concrete baseline against which future experimental measurements can be compared.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same scaling is seen in data, it would suggest that the self-similarity is a robust feature of the collision rather than an artifact of one particular simulation approach.
  • The method could be applied to other collision systems or to different observables such as identified-particle yields to test whether the scaling exponent follows a universal pattern.
  • A mismatch between the predicted ν(Δp_T) curve and measured values would point to missing dynamical ingredients in the model.

Load-bearing premise

The transport model used in the simulation reproduces the actual particle-emission process so that the observed scaling reflects the collision dynamics rather than model-specific artifacts.

What would settle it

Experimental data from real Xe-Xe collisions at the same energy in which the measured scaling exponent ν shows no dependence on Δp_T or lies far outside the range obtained from the simulation would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.12796 by Balwan Singh, Fakhar Ul Haider, Ramni Gupta, Salman K. Malik, Sheetal Sharma, Zarina Banoo.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Normalised charged particle density distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Average bin multiplicities of the charged particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. log-log plot of the NFM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Intermittency indices ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The generalized dimension ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The spatial configurations of particles produced in the kinematic phase space during a heavy-ion collision reflect the characteristics of the system created in the collision. The scaling behaviour of the multiplicity fluctuations is studied for the charged particles generated in Xe--Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$~=~5.44~TeV using the String Melting (SM) mode of the AMPT (A Multi-Phase Transport) model. The scaling behaviour of the normalized factorial moments ($F_\text{q}$) give significant information about the dynamics of the system under study. A linear power-law growth of the $F_\text{q}$ with the increasing phase space resolution, termed as intermittency, is investigated. The anomalous fractal dimension $D_\text{q}$ is determined, which is linked to the self-similarity and fractal nature of the particle emission spectra, a dependence of which on the order of the moment ($q$) is characterised by the intermittency index ($\varphi_{\text{q}}$). Relating $q^{\rm{th}}$ order Normalised Factorial Moment (NFM) with $F_{2}$, the scaling exponent ($\nu$) is determined that quantifies the dynamics of the system created by these collisions and is analyzed for its dependence on the transverse momentum bin width ($\Delta p_\text{T}$). Results presented may be interpreted as model predictions and baseline expectations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the scaling behavior of normalized factorial moments F_q for charged particles in Xe-Xe collisions at √s_NN = 5.44 TeV simulated with the String Melting mode of the AMPT model. It reports observation of intermittency via linear power-law growth of F_q with phase-space resolution, extracts anomalous fractal dimensions D_q and intermittency indices φ_q, and determines the scaling exponent ν via the relation of q-th order NFM to F_2, with explicit study of ν's dependence on transverse momentum bin width Δp_T. Results are framed as model predictions and baseline expectations.

Significance. If the reported scaling and dependence hold within the AMPT SM simulations, the work supplies concrete baseline predictions for intermittency parameters in a standard heavy-ion transport model. This is useful for future experimental comparisons and for assessing how well AMPT captures fluctuation dynamics, with the Δp_T dependence of ν providing a quantifiable handle on the modeled emission process.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'Relating q^{th} order Normalised Factorial Moment (NFM) with F_2' should specify the exact functional form (e.g., F_q ∝ F_2^ν) and cite the relevant equation in the methods section for clarity.
  2. The manuscript should include a brief statement on the number of events generated, statistical uncertainties on the F_q values, and the fitting procedure used to extract the power-law slopes, even if only as model output.
  3. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the range of phase-space resolutions (bin sizes) employed and the kinematic cuts applied to the charged particles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment of our manuscript on scaling behaviour and intermittency in AMPT String Melting simulations of Xe-Xe collisions at 5.44 TeV. The recommendation for minor revision is noted; we are prepared to incorporate any specific editorial or presentational improvements in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard analysis of model output

full rationale

The paper generates events with the AMPT String Melting mode and applies conventional definitions of normalized factorial moments F_q, intermittency, anomalous fractal dimensions D_q, intermittency index φ_q, and scaling exponent ν via the F_q–F_2 relation. All quantities are computed directly from the simulated multiplicity distributions in phase-space bins; no parameter is fitted to a subset and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The work is explicitly framed as model predictions and baseline expectations, so the reported scaling behavior is an output of the simulation rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the AMPT model and standard definitions from intermittency literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Normalized factorial moments exhibit linear power-law growth with phase space resolution indicating intermittency.
    Invoked in the abstract when defining intermittency.
  • domain assumption The AMPT String Melting mode provides a reliable representation of particle production in Xe-Xe collisions.
    The entire study rests on this model choice.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5814 in / 1273 out tokens · 26223 ms · 2026-05-25T08:29:14.911106+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In the following section observations and results from this analysis performed on the SM AMPT generated event sample are discussed. FIG. 5. Intermittency indices ( φq) as a function of order of the moments q = 2, 3, 4, 5. IV. OBSER V A TIONS AND RESUL TS The charged particle multiplicity distri- butions obtained from Xe–Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44 TeV usi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    in the various pT bins is shown in Fig. 7. λq is observed to be independent of q as is the case with Dq for all the pT intervals, with no minima at any q and hence there is a single phase sys- tem formation. Large statistical errors for q ≥ 5 has limited the study upto q = 5. λq behaviour with q is same in all pT bins. This means par- ticle generation mec...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Recognizing Critical Behavior amidst Minijets at the Large Hadron Collider

    R. C. Hwa,“Recognizing Critical Behavior amidst Mini- jets at the Large Hadron Collider,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 526908 (2015) doi:10.1155/2015/526908, [arXiv:1411.6083 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1155/2015/526908 2015

  4. [4]

    Search for the QCD critical point in nuclear collisions at the CERN SPS

    T. Anticic et al. [NA49], “Search for the QCD critical point in nuclear collisions at the CERN SPS,” Phys. Rev. C 81, 064907 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.064907, [arXiv:0912.4198 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.064907 2010

  5. [5]

    Recent re- sults from the search for the critical point of strongly interacting matter at the CERN SPS,

    G. Stefanek [NA49 and NA61/SHINE], “Recent re- sults from the search for the critical point of strongly interacting matter at the CERN SPS,” Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 273-275, 2596-2598 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.10.001 [arXiv:1411.2396 [nucl-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.10.001 2016

  6. [6]

    Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview

    X. Luo and N. Xu, “Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview,” Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, no.8, 112 (2017) doi:10.1007/s41365-017-0257- 0 [arXiv:1701.02105 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41365-017-0257- 2017

  7. [7]

    Observable Properties of Quark-Hadron Phase Transition at the Large Hadron Collider

    R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang, “Observable Proper- ties of Quark-Hadron Phase Transition at the Large Hadron Collider,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 48, 23 (2017) doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.48.23 [arXiv:1601.04671 [nucl- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.48.23 2017

  8. [8]

    Fluctuations in Charged Particle Multiplicities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

    M. Mukherjee, S. Basu, S. Choudhury and T. K. Nayak, “Fluctuations in Charged Particle Multiplicities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions,” J. Phys. G 43, no.8, 085102 (2016) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/085102 [arXiv:1603.02083 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/085102 2016

  9. [9]

    Evidence for Intermittent Patterns of Fluctuations in Particle Production in High-Energy Interactions in Nuclear Emulsion,

    R. Holynski et al., “Evidence for Intermittent Patterns of Fluctuations in Particle Production in High-Energy Interactions in Nuclear Emulsion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 733–736

    work page 1989

  10. [10]

    One-dimensional and Two- dimensional Analysis of the Factorial Moments in 200- GeV/nucleon P , 16O and 32S Interactions With Ag / Br Nuclei,

    R. Holynski et al., “One-dimensional and Two- dimensional Analysis of the Factorial Moments in 200- GeV/nucleon P , 16O and 32S Interactions With Ag / Br Nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989) R2449–R2453

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    Intermittency exponents in p-p collisions at 400-GeV/c,

    S. S. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. X. Ye, C. G. Xiao, and Y. Zhong, “Intermittency exponents in p-p collisions at 400-GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 5785–5788

    work page 1994

  12. [12]

    Inves- tigation of Intermittency in Muon–Proton Scattering at 280-GeV,

    I. Derado, G. Jancso, N. Schmitz, and P. Stopa, “Inves- tigation of Intermittency in Muon–Proton Scattering at 280-GeV,” Z. Phys. C 47 (1990) 23–30

    work page 1990

  13. [13]

    Nuclear effects and intermittency in two-dimensions,

    N. Parashar, “Nuclear effects and intermittency in two-dimensions,” J. Phys. G 22, 71-83 (1996) doi:10.1088/0954-3899/22/1/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/22/1/006 1996

  14. [14]

    Intermittency and two particle cor- relations in e+ e- annihilation,

    M. Feindt [CELLO], “Intermittency and two particle cor- relations in e+ e- annihilation,” Conf.Proc.C 900802V1 591-595, ICHEP 90, 591-595

    work page

  15. [15]

    Nor- malized factorial moments of spatial distributions of par- ticles in high multiplicity events: A Toy model study,

    S. Sharma, S. K. Malik, Z. Banoo and R. Gupta, “Nor- malized factorial moments of spatial distributions of par- ticles in high multiplicity events: A Toy model study,” Nucl. Phys. A 1053, 122963 (2025) [arXiv:2309.07712 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    A Multi-Phase Transport Model for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    Z. W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B. A. Li, B. Zhang and S. Pal, “A Multi-phase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064901 [arXiv:nucl-th/0411110 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.72.064901 2005

  17. [17]

    Current status and further improvements of a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model,

    Z. W. Lin, “Current status and further improvements of a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model,” Indian J. Phys. 85, 837-841 (2011) doi:10.1007/s12648-011-0086-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12648-011-0086-7 2011

  18. [18]

    A Transport model for heavy ion collisions at RHIC,

    B. Zhang, C. M. Ko, B. A. Li and Z. w. Lin, “A Transport model for heavy ion collisions at RHIC,” [arXiv:nucl- th/9904075 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions,

    X. N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, “HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions,” Phys. Rev. D 44, 3501-3516 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.3501 1991

  20. [20]

    Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders

    C. Loizides, J. Kamin and D. d’Enterria, “Im- proved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders,” Phys. Rev. C 97, no.5, 054910 (2018) [erratum: Phys. Rev. C 99, no.1, 019901 (2019)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054910 [arXiv:1710.07098 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.054910 2018

  21. [21]

    Centrality and pseudorapidity dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity density in Xe-Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV

    S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], “Centrality and pseudorapid- ity dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity den- sity in Xe–Xe collisions at √sNN =5.44TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 790, 35-48 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.048 [arXiv:1805.04432 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.048 2019

  22. [22]

    Event by event fluctu- ations,

    S. Jeon and V. Koch, “Event by event fluctu- ations,”. doi:10.1142/9789812795533 0007, [arXiv:hep- ph/0304012 [hep-ph]]. 10

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812795533

  23. [23]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics , Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac097

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022

  24. [24]

    Local Multiplicity Fluctuations as a Signature of Critical Hadronization at LHC

    R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang, “Local Multiplicity Fluctuations as a Signature of Critical Hadroniza- tion at LHC,” Phys. Rev. C 85, 044914 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044914, [arXiv:1111.6651 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.044914 2012

  25. [25]

    Scal- ing laws for density correlations and fluctuations in multiparticle dynamics,

    E. A. De Wolf, I. M. Dremin and W. Kittel, “Scal- ing laws for density correlations and fluctuations in multiparticle dynamics,” Phys. Rept. 270, 1-141 (1996). doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00069-0, [arXiv:hep- ph/9508325 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00069-0 1996

  26. [26]

    Extremely High Multiplicities in High-Energy Nucleus Nucleus Col- lisions,

    T. H. Burnett, S. Dake, M. Fuki, J. C. Gregory, T. Hayashi, R. Holynski, J. Iwai, W. V. Jones, A. Jurak and J. J. Lord, et al. “Extremely High Multiplicities in High-Energy Nucleus Nucleus Col- lisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2062-2065 (1983) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.2062 2062

  27. [27]

    Fractality and fluctuations in charged particle pseudo- rapidity distributions in central C (Ne, Cu) collisions at 4.5-A/GeV/c,

    E. K. Sarkisian, L. K. Gelovani and G. G. Taran, “Fractality and fluctuations in charged particle pseudo- rapidity distributions in central C (Ne, Cu) collisions at 4.5-A/GeV/c,” Phys. Lett. B 302, 331-335 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90404-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90404-6 1993

  28. [28]

    E. K. Sarkisian, L. K. Gelovani, and G. G. Taran, “Frac- tality in central collisions of C-12 nuclei with Ne and Cu nuclei at 4.5-A/GeV/c, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 56, 832 (1993)

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    Study of Fractality and Chaoticity in Central 4.5A GeV/c C-Cu Collisions

    L. K. Gelovani, G. L. Gogiberidze and E. K. G. Sark- isian, “Study of fractality and chaoticity in central 4.5- A-GeV/c C-Cu collisions,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9803240 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    From strong to weak intermittency,

    P. Lipa and B. Buschbeck, “From strong to weak intermittency,” Phys. Lett. B 223, 465-469 (1989). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91634-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91634-1 1989

  31. [31]

    Intermittency study of charged particles generated in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN= 2.76 TeV using EPOS3,

    R. Gupta and S. K. Malik, “Intermittency study of charged particles generated in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN= 2.76 TeV using EPOS3,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2020, 5073042 (2020) [erratum: Adv. High Energy Phys. 2020, 7319894 (2020)] doi:10.1155/2020/5073042 [arXiv:1911.13111 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1155/2020/5073042 2020

  32. [32]

    Phase Structure of Selfsimi- lar Multiparticle Systems and Experimental Determina- tion of Intermittency Parameters,

    A. Bialas and K. Zalewski, “Phase Structure of Selfsimi- lar Multiparticle Systems and Experimental Determina- tion of Intermittency Parameters,” Phys. Lett. B 238, 413-416 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91757-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91757-3 1990

  33. [33]

    Three Loop Beta Functions for the Superstring and Heterotic String,

    R. B. Peschanski, “On the Existence of a Nonther- mal Phase Transition in Multiparticle Production,” Nucl. Phys. B 327, 144-156 (1989). doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(89)90289-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1989

  34. [34]

    R. B. Peschanski, ”Intermittency in particle collisions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 6 (1991) 3681-3722

    work page 1991

  35. [35]

    Intermittent and scaling behaviour of shower particles produced in the collsions of Si-28-Em at 14.6-A-GeV,

    M. A. Ahmad, S. Ahmad and M. Zafar, “Intermittent and scaling behaviour of shower particles produced in the collsions of Si-28-Em at 14.6-A-GeV,” Indian J. Phys.84, 1675-1681 (2010). doi:10.1007/s12648-010-0156-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s12648-010-0156-2 2010

  36. [36]

    Intermittency in second order phase transition,

    R. C. Hwa and M. T. Nazirov, “Intermittency in second order phase transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 741-744 (1992). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.741

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.741 1992

  37. [37]

    Laporta and E

    W. Ochs and J. Wosiek, “Intermittency and Jets,” Phys. Lett. B 214, 617-620 (1988). doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(88)90131-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1988

  38. [38]

    Scaling Properties of Multiplicity Fluctuations in the AMPT Model

    R. Sharma and R. Gupta, “Scaling Properties of Multiplicity Fluctuations in the AMPT Model,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 6283801 (2018). doi:10.1155/2018/6283801 [arXiv:1806.10854 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1155/2018/6283801 2018

  39. [39]

    Scaling exponent of multiplicity fluctuation in phase transition,

    R. C. Hwa, “Scaling exponent of multiplicity fluctuation in phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D 47, 2773-2781 (1993). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.2773

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.2773 1993

  40. [40]

    Multidimensional intermittency analysis,

    W. Ochs, “Multidimensional intermittency analysis,” Z. Phys. C 50, 339-344 (1991). doi:10.1007/BF01474088

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01474088 1991

  41. [41]

    Intermittency in the Ginzburg-Landau theory,

    R. C. Hwa and J. C. Pan, “Intermittency in the Ginzburg-Landau theory,” Phys. Lett. B 297, 35-38 (1992) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91065-H

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91065-h 1992

  42. [42]

    Scaling prop- erties of hadron production in the Ising model for quark - hadron phase transition,

    Z. Cao, Y. Gao and R. C. Hwa, “Scaling prop- erties of hadron production in the Ising model for quark - hadron phase transition,” Z. Phys. C 72, 661-670 (1996) doi:10.1007/s002880050290 [arXiv:nucl- th/9601011 [nucl-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s002880050290 1996