pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10584 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-11 · 💱 q-fin.CP

Volatility time series modeling by single-qubit quantum circuit learning

Tetsuya Takaishi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💱 q-fin.CP
keywords quantum circuit learningvolatility time seriesasymmetric volatilityRational GARCHHurst exponentmultifractal analysisfinancial time series
0
0 comments X

The pith

Single-qubit quantum circuit learning models volatility time series while preserving negative return-volatility correlation and multifractal structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies single-qubit quantum circuit learning to forecast volatility dynamics in synthetic financial time series. Data come from the Rational GARCH model, chosen because it incorporates volatility asymmetry. The quantum predictions maintain the negative correlation between returns and volatility that marks asymmetric behavior. They also keep the anti-persistent character measured by the Hurst exponent and the multifractal spectrum of the original series.

Core claim

A single-qubit quantum circuit trained by quantum circuit learning on volatility series generated by the Rational GARCH model produces predictions that preserve the negative return-volatility correlation, a signature of asymmetric volatility dynamics. The predicted series further exhibit anti-persistent behavior according to the Hurst exponent and retain the multifractal structure of the input synthetic data.

What carries the argument

Single-qubit quantum circuit learning (QCL), which optimizes the parameters of a one-qubit quantum circuit to approximate the mapping from past volatility to future values.

If this is right

  • QCL captures asymmetric volatility features directly from data without explicit asymmetry parameters.
  • The predicted series retain anti-persistent scaling and multifractal properties observed in the generating process.
  • Single-qubit circuits can reproduce statistical signatures of financial volatility time series.
  • The approach works for data designed to exhibit the leverage effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the preservation results hold on real market data, single-qubit QCL could serve as a lightweight alternative to classical GARCH variants for short-term volatility forecasting.
  • The implicit learning of nonlinear dependencies may extend to joint modeling of returns and volatility in one circuit.
  • Computational cost comparisons with classical recurrent networks on the same task would clarify any efficiency edge.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic volatility series produced by the Rational GARCH model are representative of the dynamics found in real financial markets.

What would settle it

Train the same single-qubit circuit on real historical volatility data from equity markets and check whether the negative return-volatility correlation and multifractal spectrum are still preserved in the out-of-sample predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10584 by Tetsuya Takaishi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: illustrates the single-qubit PQC employed in this study. |0i Rr X Rr Z Rv X Rv Z U(θ) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) C2(j) computed from RGARCH data with asymmetric volatility (α = 0.11, β = 0.85, ω = 0.005, γ = 0.1). (b) C2(j) computed from symmetric volatility data (α = 0.11, β = 0.85, ω = 0.005, γ = 0.0). 4. Volatility Modeling via Quantum Circuit Learning We first generate 1,095 data points (corresponding to three years of daily data) using the RGARCH model with parameters (α = 0.11, β = 0.85, ω = 0.005, γ = 0.1)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Return rt and volatility σ 2 t used as input data. Using the rescaled data, we estimate volatilities via QCL with the single-qubit quantum circuit shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the original volatility and the volatility estimates obtained via QCL. The first 500 data points are displayed. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 r p t 0 500 1000 1500 2000 t 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 v t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Predicted return r p t and volatility vt generated using QCL. the original data. Next, using the optimized parameters from QCL, we generate 100,000 data points for the predicted return r p t and volatility vt , where r p t = √ vtǫt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: C2(j) computed from QCL-generated data. 0 10 20 30 40 50 j 0.001 0.01 0.1 -C2(j) (a) 0 20 40 60 80 100 j 0.001 0.01 0.1 -C2(j) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) −C2(j) derived from QCL predictions, with an exponential fit (red line) to ∼ exp(−j/τ ), yielding τ ≈ 12. (b) −C2(j) derived from the original data. The exponential fit yields τ ≈ 33. Empirically, volatility increment time series are known to exhibit anti-persistent behavior, with a Hurst exponent less than 0.5. The volatility increment dVt is defined as dVt = log vt −log vt−1. We compute the Hurst exp… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hurst exponent h(2) computed from QCL and original data. 0 50 100 t -0.05 -0.025 0 0.025 Autocorrelation (a) 0 50 100 t -0.05 -0.025 0 0.025 Autocorrelation (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Autocorrelation function from QCL predictions. (b) Autocorrelation function from original data. -4 -2 0 2 4 q 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 h(q) QCL Original data (a) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 α 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 f(α) QCL Orignal data (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Generalized Hurst exponent h(q). (b) Singularity spectrum f(α) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We employ single-qubit quantum circuit learning (QCL) to model the dynamics of volatility time series. To assess its effectiveness, we generate synthetic data using the Rational GARCH model, which is specifically designed to capture volatility asymmetry. Our results show that QCL-based volatility predictions preserve the negative return-volatility correlation, a hallmark of asymmetric volatility dynamics. Moreover, analysis of the Hurst exponent and multifractal characteristics indicates that the predicted series, like the original synthetic data, exhibits anti-persistent behavior and retains its multifractal structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that single-qubit quantum circuit learning (QCL) can model volatility time series dynamics. Using synthetic data generated by the Rational GARCH model (chosen to embed volatility asymmetry), the authors show that QCL predictions preserve the negative return-volatility correlation, anti-persistent behavior via the Hurst exponent, and the multifractal structure of the original series.

Significance. If the results hold, this demonstrates that a minimal single-qubit variational circuit can reproduce key stylized facts of volatility without explicit asymmetry modeling, contributing to quantum machine learning applications in quantitative finance. The focus on multifractal and correlation preservation rather than point forecasts is a strength, though the exclusive use of synthetic data limits immediate practical impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that QCL predictions preserve the negative return-volatility correlation, Hurst exponent, and multifractal structure provides no numerical values, error bars, statistical tests, or quantitative measures of preservation. This absence prevents assessment of how closely the properties are retained.
  2. [Experimental results] Experimental results section: All demonstrations use synthetic series from the Rational GARCH model, which is constructed to exhibit the exact asymmetry, anti-persistence, and multifractality being measured. No validation on real-market volatility data (e.g., realized volatility or VIX) is reported, leaving the generalization of the modeling claim untested.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] The manuscript should specify circuit depth, number of variational parameters, optimizer, training epochs, and data length to enable reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that QCL predictions preserve the negative return-volatility correlation, Hurst exponent, and multifractal structure provides no numerical values, error bars, statistical tests, or quantitative measures of preservation. This absence prevents assessment of how closely the properties are retained.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative details are needed for proper assessment. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to report the specific measured values (e.g., return-volatility correlation coefficient, Hurst exponent with standard error, and key multifractal spectrum parameters) together with the statistical tests used to confirm preservation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental results] Experimental results section: All demonstrations use synthetic series from the Rational GARCH model, which is constructed to exhibit the exact asymmetry, anti-persistence, and multifractality being measured. No validation on real-market volatility data (e.g., realized volatility or VIX) is reported, leaving the generalization of the modeling claim untested.

    Authors: The exclusive use of Rational GARCH synthetic data was intentional to create a controlled setting in which the ground-truth properties are known exactly, enabling a direct and unambiguous test of whether the single-qubit QCL can reproduce them. We will revise the experimental-results and discussion sections to state this scope explicitly, to quantify the degree of preservation with the numerical measures requested above, and to outline concrete next steps for empirical validation on real volatility series. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical evaluation on external synthetic generator

full rationale

The paper generates synthetic volatility series from the Rational GARCH model (an external parametric process), trains a single-qubit QCL model on a training subset, and evaluates statistical properties (negative return-volatility correlation, Hurst exponent, multifractality) on held-out test series. No derivation chain, equation, or self-citation reduces the reported preservation results to fitted parameters by construction. The data-generating process is independent of the QCL training loop, and the measured properties are computed post-hoc on model outputs rather than being imposed as targets. This is a standard empirical modeling study with no load-bearing circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard variational quantum circuit framework and the Rational GARCH data generator. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • variational circuit parameters
    The single-qubit circuit contains rotation angles that are optimized to minimize prediction error on the training portion of the synthetic series.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and measurement postulates for a single qubit
    The QCL procedure assumes the usual Hilbert-space description and projective measurement.
  • domain assumption Rational GARCH model correctly generates asymmetric volatility
    The paper treats the Rational GARCH output as ground-truth synthetic data whose statistical properties must be reproduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5375 in / 1393 out tokens · 32346 ms · 2026-05-16T23:27:10.266401+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Answering the skep tics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts

    Torben G Andersen and Tim Bollerslev. Answering the skep tics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International economic review , pages 885–905, 1998

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Dec oupling the short-and long-term behavior of stochastic volatility

    Mikkel Bennedsen, Asger Lunde, and Mikko S Pakkanen. Dec oupling the short-and long-term behavior of stochastic volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics , 20(5):961–1006, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Studies of stock market volatility chang es

    Fischer Black. Studies of stock market volatility chang es. 1976 Proceedings of the American Statisticsl Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section , pages 177–181, 1976

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Bollerslev

    T. Bollerslev. Generalized autoregressive conditiona l heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics , 31:307– 327, 1986

    work page 1986

  5. [5]

    Leverage effect in financial markets: The retarded volatility model

    Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, Andrew Matacz, and Marc Potter s. Leverage effect in financial markets: The retarded volatility model. Physical Review Letters , 87(22):228701, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Multiscaling and rough v olatility: An empirical investigation

    Giuseppe Brandi and T Di Matteo. Multiscaling and rough v olatility: An empirical investigation. International Review of Financial Analysis , 84:102324, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Empirical properties of asset returns: Styli zed facts and statistical issues

    Rama Cont. Empirical properties of asset returns: Styli zed facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1:223–236, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility

    Fulvio Corsi. A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of financial econometrics, 7(2):174–196, 2009

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    A lon g memory property of stock market returns and a new model

    Zhuanxin Ding, Clive WJ Granger, and Robert F Engle. A lon g memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of empirical finance , 1(1):83–106, 1993

    work page 1993

  10. [10]

    Le Floc’h

    Fabien Le Floc’h. Roughness of the implied volatility. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04930 , 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Volatility is rough

    Jim Gatheral, Thibault Jaisson, and Mathieu Rosenbaum . Volatility is rough. Quantitative Finance , 18(6):933–949, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Glosten, R

    L.R. Glosten, R. Jaganathan, and D. Runkle. On the relat ion between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess on stocks. Journal of Finance , 48:1779–1801, 1993

    work page 1993

  13. [13]

    Realized garch: a joint model for returns and realized measures of volatility

    Peter Reinhard Hansen, Zhuo Huang, and Howard Howan She k. Realized garch: a joint model for returns and realized measures of volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics , 27(6):877–906, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Multifractal detrended fluctuation analy sis of nonstationary time series

    Jan W Kantelhardt, Stephan A Zschiegner, Eva Koscielny -Bunde, Shlomo Havlin, Armin Bunde, and H Eugene Stanley. Multifractal detrended fluctuation analy sis of nonstationary time series. Physica A, 316(1):87–114, 2002

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Rough volatility: evidence from option prices

    Giulia Livieri, Saad Mouti, Andrea Pallavicini, and Ma thieu Rosenbaum. Rough volatility: evidence from option prices. IISE transactions, 50(9):767–776, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Realized volat ility: A review

    Michael McAleer and Marcelo C Medeiros. Realized volat ility: A review. Econometric Reviews, 27(1-3):10– 45, 2008

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Quantum circuit learning

    Kosuke Mitarai, Makoto Negoro, Masahiro Kitagawa, and Keisuke Fujii. Quantum circuit learning. Physical Review A , 98(3):032309, 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    D.B. Nelson. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59:347–370, 1991

    work page 1991

  19. [19]

    Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier

    Adri´ an P´ erez-Salinas, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Elies G il-Fuster, and Jos´ e I Latorre. Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier. Quantum, 4:226, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    One qubit as a universal approximant

    Adri´ an P´ erez-Salinas, David L´ opez-N´ u˜ nez, ArturGarc ´ ıa-S´ aez, Pol Forn-D ´ ıaz, and Jos´ e I Latorre. One qubit as a universal approximant. Physical Review A , 104(1):012405, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Return-volatility c orrelation in financial dynamics

    T Qiu, B Zheng, F Ren, and S Trimper. Return-volatility c orrelation in financial dynamics. Physical Review E, 73(6):065103, 2006

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Skewness, long-time memor y, and non-stationarity: application to leverage effect in financial time series

    HE Roman, M Porto, and C Dose. Skewness, long-time memor y, and non-stationarity: application to leverage effect in financial time series. Europhysics Letters, 84(2):28001, 2008

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    E. Sentana. Quadratic ARCH models. Review of Economic Studies , 62:639–661, 1995

    work page 1995

  24. [24]

    On return-volatility correlation in financial dynamics

    J Shen and B Zheng. On return-volatility correlation in financial dynamics. Europhysics Letters, 88(2):28003, 2009

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Estimating stochastic volatility models using daily returns and realized volatility simultaneously

    Makoto Takahashi, Yasuhiro Omori, and Toshiaki Watana be. Estimating stochastic volatility models using daily returns and realized volatility simultaneously. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , 53:2404– 2426, 2009

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Power-law return-volatility cross-corre lations of bitcoin

    T Takaishi. Power-law return-volatility cross-corre lations of bitcoin. EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 129(2):28001, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Bayesian estimation of realized sto chastic volatility model by Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm

    Tetsuya Takaishi. Bayesian estimation of realized sto chastic volatility model by Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 490:012092, 2014

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    GPU computing in bayesian inference of realized stochastic volatility model

    Tetsuya Takaishi. GPU computing in bayesian inference of realized stochastic volatility model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 574:012143, 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Rational GARCH model: An empirical t est for stock returns

    Tetsuya Takaishi. Rational GARCH model: An empirical t est for stock returns. Physica A , 473:451–460, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Bias correction in the realized stoc hastic volatility model for daily volatility on the tokyo stock exchange

    Tetsuya Takaishi. Bias correction in the realized stoc hastic volatility model for daily volatility on the tokyo stock exchange. Physica A , 500:139–154, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Volatility estimation using a ratio nal GARCH model

    Tetsuya Takaishi. Volatility estimation using a ratio nal GARCH model. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2(1):127–36, 2018

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Rough volatility of Bitcoin

    Tetsuya Takaishi. Rough volatility of Bitcoin. Finance Research Letters, 32:101379, 2020

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Multifractality and sample size infl uence on Bitcoin volatility patterns

    Tetsuya Takaishi. Multifractality and sample size infl uence on Bitcoin volatility patterns. Finance Research Letters, 74:106683, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Taylor effect in B itcoin time series

    Tetsuya Takaishi and Takanori Adachi. Taylor effect in B itcoin time series. Economics Letters , 172:5–7, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    An appl ication of the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for realized stochastic volatility model

    Tetsuya Takaishi, Yubin Liu, and Ting Ting Chen. An appl ication of the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for realized stochastic volatility model. Proceedings of Science, LATTICE 2015:039, 2015

    work page 2015