pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.23510 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-29 · 🌀 gr-qc

Quasinormal mode/grey-body factor correspondence for Kerr black holes

Zun-Xian Huang , Peng-Cheng Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quasinormal modesgreybody factorsKerr black holesWKB approximationTeukolsky equationgravitational perturbationssuperradiance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasinormal modes predict greybody factors for gravitational perturbations of Kerr black holes via higher-order WKB.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that quasinormal mode frequencies determine the greybody factors for waves scattering off rotating black holes, at least in the eikonal limit. It converts the radial Teukolsky equation into a Schrödinger form with a short-range potential and applies WKB corrections to gravitational perturbations. The resulting analytic expressions match numerical integrations from the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura equation, with the match improving at large angular quantum numbers. The same framework flags the regime where the link fails, namely when superradiance is active. This link lets one read scattering properties directly from the ringing frequencies without solving the full scattering problem each time.

Core claim

In the eikonal limit the greybody factors for gravitational perturbations of Kerr black holes are given by the imaginary parts of the quasinormal mode frequencies through a WKB correspondence; the radial Teukolsky equation is first recast as a Schrödinger equation with short-range potential, higher-order WKB terms are included, and the resulting transmission probabilities agree with numerical solutions of the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura equation, the agreement becoming tighter at large angular quantum number, while the correspondence ceases to hold inside the superradiant regime.

What carries the argument

Higher-order WKB applied to the Schrödinger-type equation obtained from the radial Teukolsky equation, which converts the imaginary part of the quasinormal frequency into the greybody factor.

If this is right

  • Greybody factors for gravitational waves on Kerr backgrounds can be read off from quasinormal frequencies without separate integration of the scattering problem.
  • Accuracy of the correspondence increases systematically with angular quantum number.
  • The method extends the earlier Schwarzschild and scalar-field results to gravitational perturbations of rotating holes.
  • The correspondence supplies an analytic diagnostic for the boundary of the superradiant regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same WKB mapping may simplify estimates of energy extraction or absorption cross-sections in astrophysical settings.
  • Testing the correspondence at intermediate angular quantum numbers could reveal how far the eikonal approximation can be pushed before higher-order effects dominate.
  • If the link survives for other fields, it would connect the ringdown spectrum directly to the transmission spectrum for any spin.

Load-bearing premise

The WKB approximation remains valid outside the superradiant regime.

What would settle it

A numerical mismatch between the WKB greybody factor and the value obtained from the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura equation at large but finite angular quantum number and spin parameter below the superradiant threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.23510 by Peng-Cheng Li, Zun-Xian Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Different regions for the radial wavefunction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left: Exact GBFs (black lines) and the approximations by QNM/GBF correspondence (colored lines) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Left: Exact GBFs (black lines) and the approximations by QNM/GBF correspondence (colored lines) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Left: Exact GBFs (black lines) and the approximations by the correspondence (colored lines) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: GBFs of a Kerr BH for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Left: Exact GBFs (black lines) and the approximations by the correspondence (colored lines) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We revisit the quasinormal-mode/greybody factor correspondence for Kerr black holes in the eikonal limit and develop a systematic WKB-based formulation by recasting the radial Teukolsky equation into a Schr\"odinger-type equation with a short-range potential. Building on earlier studies of the correspondence in rotating backgrounds, we extend the analysis to gravitational perturbations and incorporate higher-order WKB corrections beyond the leading eikonal approximation. For gravitational perturbations, the predicted greybody factors are in good agreement with numerical results obtained from the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura equation, with increasing accuracy at large angular quantum number. We also identify the breakdown of the correspondence in the superradiant regime, where the WKB assumptions cease to be valid.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the quasinormal-mode/greybody factor correspondence for Kerr black holes in the eikonal limit. It develops a systematic WKB-based formulation by recasting the radial Teukolsky equation into a Schrödinger-type equation with a short-range potential. The analysis is extended to gravitational perturbations with higher-order WKB corrections. The predicted greybody factors show good agreement with numerical results from the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura equation, improving at large angular quantum number, while the correspondence breaks down in the superradiant regime where WKB assumptions fail.

Significance. If the reported numerical agreement holds, this work provides a useful analytic framework for computing greybody factors from quasinormal mode data in rotating black hole spacetimes. The WKB approach with higher-order corrections and the explicit identification of the superradiant breakdown are strengths. It could aid in understanding wave scattering in astrophysical contexts, though the lack of quantified errors limits immediate applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section] The claim of good agreement with generalized Sasaki-Nakamura numerics for gravitational perturbations is stated without quantitative support such as relative errors, maximum deviations, or error bands on any comparison plots. This makes it difficult to evaluate the asserted improvement at large angular quantum number.
  2. [Discussion section] The breakdown of the correspondence in the superradiant regime is identified but not quantified: no specific threshold (e.g., range of aω or m) is provided where WKB assumptions fail, nor is the size of the deviation from numerical results measured as a function of parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states increasing accuracy at large angular quantum number but does not specify the tested range of l or the WKB order employed in the comparisons.
  2. [Notation] Notation for angular momentum quantum numbers should be checked for consistency between the Teukolsky equation recasting and the numerical comparison sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in the revised version to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section] The claim of good agreement with generalized Sasaki-Nakamura numerics for gravitational perturbations is stated without quantitative support such as relative errors, maximum deviations, or error bands on any comparison plots. This makes it difficult to evaluate the asserted improvement at large angular quantum number.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative measures would improve the clarity and rigor of the results section. In the revised manuscript we will add a table listing relative errors and maximum deviations between the WKB greybody factors and the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura numerical values for representative spins and frequencies, together with error bands on the comparison plots. These additions will directly illustrate the improvement with increasing angular quantum number. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion section] The breakdown of the correspondence in the superradiant regime is identified but not quantified: no specific threshold (e.g., range of aω or m) is provided where WKB assumptions fail, nor is the size of the deviation from numerical results measured as a function of parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a more precise quantification of the breakdown is desirable. In the revised discussion we will specify the superradiant threshold (aω > m) as the regime where the WKB assumptions cease to hold, and we will include explicit comparisons showing the growth of deviations from numerical results as a function of a and m. This will be supported by additional numerical checks in the superradiant domain to quantify the failure of the correspondence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard radial Teukolsky equation, recasts it into Schrödinger form with a short-range potential, and applies WKB (including higher-order corrections) to obtain greybody factor predictions for gravitational perturbations. These predictions are validated against independent numerical results from the generalized Sasaki-Nakamura equation rather than being computed from the same WKB output or fitted parameters. The paper explicitly notes the breakdown in the superradiant regime where WKB assumptions fail, and the eikonal-limit strengthening of the correspondence is a standard expectation rather than a self-referential claim. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, self-citations are not required for the central numerical agreement, and the chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Teukolsky equation for Kerr perturbations and the validity of the WKB approximation in the eikonal limit; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the usual black-hole spin and mode numbers, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The radial Teukolsky equation governs linear gravitational perturbations of Kerr spacetime.
    Invoked when recasting the equation into Schrödinger form; this is a standard result in black-hole perturbation theory.
  • domain assumption WKB approximation is applicable in the eikonal (high-frequency, high-angular-momentum) limit.
    Stated as the regime of the correspondence; the paper notes its breakdown in the superradiant regime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5420 in / 1590 out tokens · 17576 ms · 2026-05-16T19:23:43.787935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of Schwarzschild--Tangherlini black holes

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quasinormal modes correspond well to grey-body factors for vector and tensor perturbations of Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black holes in all dimensions, but fail for scalar l=2 modes in D≥7 because of multiple potential...

  2. Grey-body factors of higher dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological theories

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Higher dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity have suppressed grey-body factors and Hawking radiation compared to singular black holes in general relativity.

  3. Parametrized quasinormal modes, greybody factors and their correspondence

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In the parametrized quasinormal mode framework, QNMs and GBFs depend on the order and polynomial power of potential modifications, with the QNM-GBF correspondence valid only in limited regimes.

  4. Grey-body factors of higher dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological theories

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Higher-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity exhibit significantly suppressed grey-body factors and Hawking evaporation compared to singular black holes in general relativity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Remarkably, these curvature perturbations satisfy a single, decoupled master equation valid for fields of arbitrary spin weight

    instead focused on perturbations of certain New- man–Penrose components of the curvature, specifi- cally the Weyl scalars Ψ 0 and Ψ 4, which encode the ingoing and outgoing radiative degrees of freedom. Remarkably, these curvature perturbations satisfy a single, decoupled master equation valid for fields of arbitrary spin weight. This Teukolsky equation a...

    work page

  2. [2]

    −iK p −2V02 1 +A 3(K2) +A 5(K2)

    To determine Kand so the GBF, we need to solve the following equation [15] Ω2 =V00 +A 2(K2) +A 4(K2) +. . . −iK p −2V02 1 +A 3(K2) +A 5(K2). . . , (2.24) whereA i is the i-th order WKB correction term be- yond the eikonal approximation and depends onKand the derivatives of the radial potential at its maximum up to the order 2i, andV 0i denotes the i-th de...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Here,ωis a complex number andnis the overtone number. To summarize, by recasting the radial Teukolsky equation into the Schr¨ odinger-like form (2.12) with a short-range potential, the WKB method—previously successfully applied to the calculation of QNMs and GBFs for spherically symmetric BHs such as the Schwarzschild BH—can also be applied to Kerr BHs. I...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Possible future directions include computing GBFs from exact solutions [72] of the Teukolsky equation and exploring alternative approaches based on Kerr/CFT correspon- dence [73]

    and higher-dimensional Kerr BHs [71]. Possible future directions include computing GBFs from exact solutions [72] of the Teukolsky equation and exploring alternative approaches based on Kerr/CFT correspon- dence [73]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Xin-Dong Du for helpful discus- sions. This work makes use of theBlack Hole Perturbations Toolkit[69]. The work is...

    work page

  5. [5]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel. 2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Bertiet al., (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]. 9 FIG. 6: Left: Exact GBFs (black lines) and the approximations by the correspondence (colored lines) of the gravitational perturbations for Kerr BH witha= 0.9 forl=m= 2,3,4,5 (left to right). Right: The difference between the GBFs obtained by the correspondence...

    work page 1975

  10. [10]

    M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5042 (2000)

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    Oshita, (2023), arXiv:2309.05725 [gr-qc]

    N. Oshita, Phys. Rev. D109, 104028 (2024), arXiv:2309.05725 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Okabayashi and N

    K. Okabayashi and N. Oshita, Phys. Rev. D110, 064086 (2024), arXiv:2403.17487 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    R. F. Rosato, S. Yi, E. Berti, and P. Pani, (2025), arXiv:2512.15877 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    R. F. Rosato, K. Destounis, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D110, L121501 (2024), arXiv:2406.01692 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Oshita, K

    N. Oshita, K. Takahashi, and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D110, 084070 (2024), arXiv:2406.04525 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Xie, L.-B

    L. Xie, L.-B. Wu, and Z.-K. Guo, Phys. Rev. D112, 024054 (2025), arXiv:2505.21303 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JCAP09, 068 (2024), arXiv:2406.11694 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    work page 1987

  19. [19]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zin- hailo, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 155002 (2019), arXiv:1904.10333 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B861, 139288 (2025), arXiv:2408.11162 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Pedrotti and M

    D. Pedrotti and M. Calz` a, Phys. Rev. D111, 124056 (2025), arXiv:2504.01909 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Malik,Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors for massive fields in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime,JCAP04(2025) 042 [2412.19443]

    Z. Malik, JCAP04, 042 (2025), arXiv:2412.19443 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Malik,Grey-Body Factors for Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Euler-Heisenberg Electrodynamics,Int

    Z. Malik, Theor. Phys.1, 6 (2025), arXiv:2509.15995 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Signatures of a de Sitter-core black hole in ringing, transmission and optical appearance

    N. Heidari, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, V. Vertogradov, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, (2024), arXiv:2412.05072 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Skvortsova,Quantum corrected black holes: testing the correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes,Eur

    M. Skvortsova, (2024), arXiv:2411.06007 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Dubinsky, Int

    A. Dubinsky, (2025), arXiv:2511.00778 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    C. Tang, Y. Ling, and Q.-Q. Jiang, (2025), arXiv:2503.21597 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, (2025), arXiv:2505.06966 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Q.-L. Shi, R. Wang, W. Xiong, and P.-C. Li, (2025), arXiv:2506.16217 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.1, 3 (2025), arXiv:2507.07196 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Malik,Gravitational perturbations of the Hayward spacetime and testing the correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors,2508.19178

    Z. Malik, (2025), arXiv:2508.19178 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Dubinsky,Gravitational perturbations of Dymnikova black holes: grey-body factors and absorption cross-sections,2509.11017

    A. Dubinsky, (2025), arXiv:2509.11017 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, E. U. Saka, A. Shermatov, J. Ray- imbaev, I. Ibragimov, and S. Muminov, (2025), arXiv:2509.15923 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Malik, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2510.06689 [gr- qc]

    Z. Malik, (2025), arXiv:2510.06689 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Dubinsky, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2510.11643 [gr-qc]

    A. Dubinsky, (2025), arXiv:2510.11643 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Han and B

    H. Han and B. Gwak, (2025), arXiv:2508.12989 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, JCAP06, 026 (2025), arXiv:2501.00927 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Heidari and A

    N. Heidari and A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, (2025), arXiv:2512.08604 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Theor. Phys.1, 4 (2025), arXiv:2507.09246 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Hamil, A

    B. Hamil, A. Al-Badawi, and B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, (2025), arXiv:2505.18611 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Yan, Z.-Y

    H.-P. Yan, Z.-Y. Zhang, X.-J. Yue, and X.-Q. Li, (2025), arXiv:2511.21205 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Khrabustovskyi, J. Kˇ r´iˇ z, and A. Zhidenko, JCAP04, 062 (2025), arXiv:2501.16134 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    S. N. Sajadi, S. Ponglertsakul, and D. J. Gogoi, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 943 (2025), arXiv:2503.18289 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Malik, (2024), arXiv:2412.13385 [gr-qc]

    Z. Malik, (2024), arXiv:2412.13385 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, JCAP04, 025 (2025), arXiv:2412.11166 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 1114 (1972)

    work page 1972

  47. [47]

    R. H. Boyer and R. W. Lindquist, J. Math. Phys.8, 265 (1967)

    work page 1967

  48. [48]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

    work page 1973

  49. [49]

    H. Yang, D. A. Nichols, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D86, 104006 (2012), arXiv:1207.4253 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    work page 1957

  51. [51]

    F. J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    work page 1970

  52. [52]

    R. Tang, N. Franchini, S. H. V¨ olkel, and E. Berti, (2025), arXiv:2512.17786 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Seidel and S

    E. Seidel and S. Iyer, Phys. Rev. D41, 374 (1990)

    work page 1990

  54. [54]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A345, 145 (1975)

    work page 1975

  55. [55]

    Chandrasekhar, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    S. Chandrasekhar, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences348, 39 (1976)

    work page 1976

  56. [56]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A350, 165 (1976)

    work page 1976

  57. [57]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A352, 325 (1977). 10

    work page 1977

  58. [58]

    G. F. Torres del Castillo and G. Silva-Ortigoza, Phys. Rev. D46, 5395 (1992)

    work page 1992

  59. [59]

    Arbey and J

    A. Arbey and J. Auffinger, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 693 (2019), arXiv:1905.04268 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Arbey, M

    A. Arbey, M. Calz` a, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101903 (2025), arXiv:2502.17240 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Nakamura, Phys. Lett. A89, 68 (1982)

    work page 1982

  62. [62]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Nakamura, Prog. Theor. Phys.67, 1788 (1982)

    work page 1982

  63. [63]

    Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0306120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  64. [64]

    S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D62, 044029 (2000), [Er- ratum: Phys.Rev.D 67, 089902 (2003)], arXiv:gr- qc/0002043

    work page arXiv 2000

  65. [65]

    R. K. L. Lo, Phys. Rev. D110, 124070 (2024), arXiv:2306.16469 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, (2021), 10.1007/978-981- 15-4702-7 38-1, arXiv:2101.04592 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981- 2021

  67. [67]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  68. [68]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Phys. Rev. D96, 024011 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 245005 (2023), arXiv:2309.02560 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    L. C. Stein, J. Open Source Softw.4, 1683 (2019), arXiv:1908.10377 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    librosa/librosa: 0.6.3,

    A. Hussain, “Potatoasad/KerrQuasinormalModes.jl: Initial release,”https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 14171824(2024)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo 2024

  72. [72]

    Superradiance -- the 2020 Edition

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Lect. Notes Phys. 906, pp.1 (2015), arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit,

    “Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit,” (bhptoolkit.org)

    work page

  74. [74]

    Li, T.-C

    P.-C. Li, T.-C. Lee, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Phys. Rev. D104, 084044 (2021), arXiv:2105.14268 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    StrongCosmicCensorshipandeigenvaluerepulsions for rotating de Sitter black holes in higher-dimensions,

    A. Davey, O. J. C. Dias, P. Rodgers, and J. E. Santos, JHEP07, 086 (2022), arXiv:2203.13830 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Motohashi and S

    H. Motohashi and S. Noda, PTEP2021, 083E03 (2021), arXiv:2103.10802 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Black Hole Superradiance From Kerr/CFT

    I. Bredberg, T. Hartman, W. Song, and A. Stro- minger, JHEP04, 019 (2010), arXiv:0907.3477 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010