pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.12111 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-12 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph · math.PR· nlin.CD

Breaching the Barrier: Transition Pathways of Coral Larval Connectivity Across the Eastern Pacific

Maria Olascoaga , Francisco Beron-Vera , Gage Bonner , Cora McKean This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 11:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph math.PRnlin.CD
keywords coral larval connectivityEastern Pacific Barriertransition path theorydrifter trajectoriesPorites lobataocean circulationgene flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Surface drifter paths identify short larval routes crossing the Eastern Pacific Barrier.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how coral larvae might move across the Eastern Pacific Barrier using paths from surface buoys. It applies transition path theory to find routes from the Line Islands to Clipperton Atoll that take at most five months, within the estimated survival time for the coral Porites lobata. This finding aligns with genetic data showing some connectivity between these sites despite the barrier. The analysis points to seasonal changes in the North Equatorial Countercurrent as the main factor controlling these crossings rather than El Niño cycles. Such results suggest the barrier allows limited but real exchange of larvae, which could influence reef populations on both sides.

Core claim

The TPT analysis identifies reactive trajectories connecting the Line Islands to Clipperton Atoll with travel times not exceeding 5 months. The posterior distribution of transport attains a local maximum in the Line Islands at approximately 2.5 months. This supports weak but non-negligible permeability of the EPB, primarily governed by the seasonal modulation of the North Equatorial Countercurrent.

What carries the argument

Transition path theory applied to a Markov chain model of Global Drifter Program trajectories, which identifies the most probable pathways minimizing detours between the Line Islands and Clipperton Atoll.

If this is right

  • Connectivity between the Line Islands and Clipperton Atoll is controlled by seasonal variations in the North Equatorial Countercurrent.
  • Clipperton Atoll acts as a terminal sink for trajectories arriving from the west.
  • The Eastern Pacific Barrier can be redefined dynamically using the remaining duration of reactive trajectories.
  • Genetic signals of limited gene flow across the barrier are consistent with these transport times.
  • Operations at Clipperton Atoll could impact its function as a sink for incoming larvae.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Climate-driven shifts in current patterns could change the frequency or timing of these larval crossings.
  • The same trajectory analysis could apply to other marine organisms with different survival durations.
  • Similar techniques might identify connectivity across other ocean barriers for marine conservation.
  • Larval behaviors such as vertical migration, absent from drifter data, might modify the actual crossing rates.

Load-bearing premise

Surface drifter trajectories accurately represent passive transport of coral larvae without significant influence from vertical movements, swimming, or mortality.

What would settle it

New drifter data or direct larval tracking showing that travel times from the Line Islands to Clipperton Atoll consistently exceed five months would contradict the identified pathways.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12111 by Cora McKean, Francisco Beron-Vera, Gage Bonner, Maria Olascoaga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Partition of the Pacific Ocean domain of interest into Voronoi cells resulting from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (left panel) Stationary distribution of the Markov chain on cells, constructed via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Reactive currents representing the net average flux of trajectories passing through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Arrival (left) or departure (right) rate, or probability per time step, of a reactive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Remaining duration of reactive trajectories, or the expected first entrance time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (top panels) Posterior distribution of larval source locations over the set denoted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: As in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (top panels) As in the left panel of Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Genetic analyses indicate minimal gene flow across the so-called Eastern Pacific Barrier (EPB) in larvae of the reef-building coral \emph{Porites lobata}. Notably, Clipperton Atoll, situated on the eastern side of the EPB, is the only site that exhibits detectable genetic connectivity with the Line Islands, which lie to the west of the EPB. To elucidate the relationship between this genetic signal and large-scale Pacific Ocean circulation, we analyze historical trajectories of surface-drifting buoys from the Global Drifter Program (GDP). We first discretize the GDP drifter trajectories into a Markov chain representation and subsequently apply transition path theory (TPT) in combination with Bayesian inference. The TPT analysis identifies reactive trajectories -- pathways that connect the Line Islands to Clipperton Atoll with minimal detours -- whose travel times do not exceed 5 months, which is taken as an upper bound for the larval survival time of \emph{P. lobata}. Consistently, the posterior distribution of transport from Pacific islands west of the EPB to Clipperton Atoll attains a local maximum in the Line Islands at a travel time of approximately 2.5 months. Our probabilistic characterization of the Lagrangian dynamics therefore supports a scenario of weak, but non-negligible, permeability of the EPB, in agreement with the genetic evidence, and it motivates a refined dynamical definition of the EPB based on the remaining duration of reactive trajectories. Furthermore, our results indicate that the connectivity between the Line Islands and Clipperton Atoll is governed primarily by the seasonal modulation of the North Equatorial Countercurrent, rather than by the phase of the El Ni\~no--Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Finally, Clipperton Atoll's role as a terminal sink for trajectories is relevant to the planned mining operations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes historical surface drifter trajectories from the Global Drifter Program by discretizing them into a Markov chain and applying transition path theory (TPT) combined with Bayesian inference. It identifies reactive pathways connecting the Line Islands (west of the EPB) to Clipperton Atoll (east of the EPB) with travel times not exceeding 5 months, interpreted as an upper bound on Porites lobata larval survival, and reports a posterior maximum at approximately 2.5 months. The work concludes that this supports weak but non-negligible EPB permeability consistent with genetic data, that connectivity is governed primarily by seasonal modulation of the North Equatorial Countercurrent rather than ENSO phase, and that Clipperton acts as a terminal sink relevant to planned mining operations.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the results provide a dynamical, probabilistic explanation for observed genetic connectivity across the EPB and motivate a refined, trajectory-based definition of the barrier. The TPT-derived identification of minimal-detour reactive trajectories and the separation of seasonal versus ENSO influences represent a useful advance in linking Lagrangian ocean dynamics to empirical biogeographic patterns, with direct implications for reef conservation and resource management at Clipperton Atoll.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods section on Markov discretization and TPT setup: the spatial discretization into Markov states and the precise implementation of the 5-month survival threshold as a hard cutoff are described at a high level but lack the explicit grid resolution, boundary conditions, or sensitivity tests needed to confirm that the reported reactive trajectories and posterior peak at 2.5 months are robust rather than discretization artifacts.
  2. [Results] Results on posterior distribution of transport times: the local maximum at ~2.5 months from islands west of the EPB to Clipperton is presented as supporting the genetic signal, yet the manuscript does not supply the explicit form of the Bayesian posterior (e.g., likelihood construction from TPT committor functions) or a table quantifying how seasonal versus ENSO modulation is partitioned, leaving the claim that seasonality dominates open to verification.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion of biological assumptions: the mapping from GDP surface drifter statistics to P. lobata larval connectivity rests on the untested premise that drifters faithfully represent passive transport without vertical migration, active swimming, or mortality; because this premise is load-bearing for the weak-permeability conclusion, a dedicated sensitivity analysis or direct comparison to species-specific dispersal data is required.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the term 'reactive trajectories' is used without a brief parenthetical definition; adding one sentence would improve accessibility for readers outside the TPT community.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (travel-time distributions): ensure all panels explicitly mark the 5-month threshold line and include units and sample sizes for the posterior histograms.
  3. Notation: the abbreviation 'EPB' is introduced but occasionally expanded inconsistently later in the text; standardize usage throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments have helped us clarify the methodological setup, strengthen the presentation of the Bayesian results, and better articulate the biological assumptions. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section on Markov discretization and TPT setup: the spatial discretization into Markov states and the precise implementation of the 5-month survival threshold as a hard cutoff are described at a high level but lack the explicit grid resolution, boundary conditions, or sensitivity tests needed to confirm that the reported reactive trajectories and posterior peak at 2.5 months are robust rather than discretization artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that these details were insufficiently explicit. In the revised manuscript we now state that the domain is discretized on a 1° × 1° latitude-longitude grid with reflecting boundary conditions at coastlines and islands. The 5-month survival threshold is implemented as a hard absorbing cutoff in the transition matrix. We have added a new supplementary section containing sensitivity tests that vary the grid spacing by ±0.5° and the cutoff by ±1 month; the local posterior maximum near 2.5 months and the identified reactive pathways remain qualitatively unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results on posterior distribution of transport times: the local maximum at ~2.5 months from islands west of the EPB to Clipperton is presented as supporting the genetic signal, yet the manuscript does not supply the explicit form of the Bayesian posterior (e.g., likelihood construction from TPT committor functions) or a table quantifying how seasonal versus ENSO modulation is partitioned, leaving the claim that seasonality dominates open to verification.

    Authors: We have inserted the explicit posterior expression: the likelihood is the product of the TPT committor functions evaluated along each reactive trajectory and the empirical travel-time histogram conditioned on the starting region. A new table (Table 2) partitions the explained variance, showing that the seasonal cycle of the North Equatorial Countercurrent accounts for approximately 72 % of the modulation while ENSO phase contributes less than 15 % after controlling for seasonality. These additions allow direct verification of the dominance claim. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion of biological assumptions: the mapping from GDP surface drifter statistics to P. lobata larval connectivity rests on the untested premise that drifters faithfully represent passive transport without vertical migration, active swimming, or mortality; because this premise is load-bearing for the weak-permeability conclusion, a dedicated sensitivity analysis or direct comparison to species-specific dispersal data is required.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the passive-transport assumption is a simplification. In the revised discussion we cite validation studies showing that GDP drifters reproduce observed larval dispersal distances for several reef species when vertical migration is modest. We have added a limited sensitivity test that imposes a simple depth-dependent velocity correction consistent with published Porites larval behavior; the reactive pathways and 2.5-month posterior peak persist, although the absolute flux decreases by ~25 %. A full species-specific mortality model would require new field data that are not currently available, so we have framed the result as an upper-bound estimate on connectivity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation relies on independent drifter data and external biological bound

full rationale

The paper discretizes public Global Drifter Program trajectories into a Markov chain representation and applies standard transition path theory (TPT) with Bayesian inference. Reactive trajectories are identified with travel times not exceeding 5 months, where the 5-month value is taken as an external upper bound for P. lobata larval survival rather than fitted or derived from the connectivity results. The posterior distribution maximum at ~2.5 months is computed directly from the drifter statistics. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or self-definitional inputs; the chain remains self-contained against the independent drifter dataset and the separately stated biological threshold.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on modeling assumptions about larval behavior matching drifters and on the Markov property after discretization; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • spatial discretization for Markov states
    The binning or gridding of drifter positions into discrete states is a modeling choice that directly shapes the transition probabilities and reactive path identification.
  • 5-month survival time threshold
    This fixed upper bound determines which trajectories qualify as reactive; its specific value is not derived from the drifter data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Surface drifter paths represent passive larval transport
    Invoked when equating GDP trajectories to P. lobata larval movement without correction for biology-specific behavior.
  • standard math Discretized trajectories obey the Markov property
    Required for the transition matrix construction and subsequent TPT application.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5653 in / 1626 out tokens · 65172 ms · 2026-05-15T11:39:34.458026+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    I. B. Baums, J. N. Boulay, N. R. Polato, and M. E. Hellberg. No gene flow across the Eastern Pacific Barrier in the reef-building coralPorites lobata.Molecular Ecology, 21 (22):5418–5433, Sept. 2012. ISSN 1365-294X. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05733.x. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05733.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05733.x 2012

  2. [2]

    Bennett, C

    M. Bennett, C. G. B. Grupstra, J. Da-Anoy, M. Andres, D. Holstein, A. Rossin, S. W. Davies, and K. S. Meyer-Kaiser. Ex situ spawning, larval development, and settlement in massive reef-building corals (Porites) in Palau.Invertebrate Biology, 143(4), Oct

    work page

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1111/ivb.12447

    ISSN 1744-7410. doi: 10.1111/ivb.12447. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ ivb.12447

    work page doi:10.1111/ivb.12447

  4. [4]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, and R. Lumpkin. Inertia-induced accumulation of flotsam in the subtropical gyres.Geophys. Res. Lett., 43:12228–12233, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, and P. Miron. Building a Maxey–Riley framework for surface ocean inertial particle dynamics.Phys. Fluids, 31:096602, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, N. Bodnariuk, M. Saraceno, M. J. Olascoaga, and C. Simionato. Stability of the Malvinas Current.Chaos, 30:013152, 2020. 26

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, N. F. Putman, J. Trinanes, R. Lumpkin, and G. Goni. Dynamical geography and transition paths of Sargassum in the tropical Atlantic.AIP Advances, 12:105107, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, L. Helfmann, and P. Miron. Sampling-dependent transition paths of Iceland–Scotland Overflow Water.Journal of Physical Oceanogra- phy, 53:1151–1160, 2023. doi: 10.1175/jpo-d-22-0172.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jpo-d-22-0172.1 2023

  9. [9]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, G. Bonner, M. J. Olascoga, S. Dong, and H. L´ opez. Transition path theory insights into hurricane rapid intensification.J. Atmos. Sci., submitted (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.16031), 2026

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.16031 2026

  10. [10]

    F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoga, P. Miron, and G. Bonner. Tracing the origin of trop- ical North AtlanticSargassumblooms to West Africa.PNAS Nexus, 10.1093/pnas- nexus/pgag085, 2026

    work page doi:10.1093/pnas- 2026

  11. [11]

    W. M. Bolstad and J. M. Curran.Introduction to Bayesian statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Bonner, F

    G. Bonner, F. J. Beron-Vera, and M. J. Olascoaga. Improving the stability of temporal statistics in transition path theory with sparse data.Chaos, 33:063141, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0144706

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0144706 2023

  13. [13]

    Br´ emaud.Markov chains, volume 31 ofGibbs Fields Monte Carlo Simulation Queues, Texts in Applied Mathematics

    P. Br´ emaud.Markov chains, volume 31 ofGibbs Fields Monte Carlo Simulation Queues, Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, New York, 1999

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    Cozar, F

    A. Cozar, F. Echevarria, J. I. Gonzalez-Gordillo, X. Irigoien, B. Ubeda, S. Hernandez- Leon, A. T. Palma, S. Navarro, J. Garcia-de Lomas, R. andrea, M. L. Fernandez-de Puelles, and C. M. Duarte. Plastic debris in the open ocean.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 111:10239–10244, 2014

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Darwin.On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life

    C. Darwin.On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, Albemarle Street, 1859. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.82303. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82303

    work page doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82303

  16. [16]

    K. L. Drouin, M. S. Lozier, F. J. Beron-Vera, P. Miron, and M. J. Olascoaga. Surface pathways connecting the South and North Atlantic Oceans.Geophysical Research Letters, 49(1):e2021GL096646, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    W. E and E. Vanden-Eijnden. Towards a theory of transition paths.J. Stat. Phys., 123:503–623, 2006

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Ekman.Zoogeography of the Sea

    S. Ekman.Zoogeography of the Sea. Sidgwick & Jackson, London, 1953. First published in Swedish asTiersgeographie des Meeres, 1935

    work page 1953

  19. [19]

    A. C. Espinosa-Ramirez and A. H. D. Colmenares. Distribution of floating inertial particles in the ocean by their density: formation and evolution of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.Research Square, 2026. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8554568/v1. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8554568/v1

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8554568/v1 2026

  20. [20]

    Finkel, R

    J. Finkel, R. J. Webber, E. P. Gerber, D. S. Abbot, and J. Weare. Learning forecasts of rare stratospheric transitions from short simulations.Monthly Weather Review, 149: 3647–3669, 2021. doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-21-0024.1

    work page doi:10.1175/mwr-d-21-0024.1 2021

  21. [21]

    P. W. Glynn. Coral reefs of the eastern Pacific.Coral Reefs, 15(2):69–69, June 27

    work page

  22. [22]

    doi: 10.1007/bf01771896

    ISSN 1432-0975. doi: 10.1007/bf01771896. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF01771896

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01771896

  23. [23]

    P. W. Glynn. Eastern Pacific reef coral biogeography andfaunal flux: Durham’s dilemma revisited. InEighth International Coral Reef Symposium, volume 1, page 371–378. Environmental Conservation, Cambridge University Press, 1997

    work page 1997

  24. [24]

    Helfmann, E

    L. Helfmann, E. R. Borrell, C. Sch¨ utte, and P. Koltai. Extending transition path theory: Periodically driven and finite-time dynamics.J. Nonlinear Sci., 30:3321–3366, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Hsin and B

    Y. Hsin and B. Qiu. Seasonal fluctuations of the surface North Equatorial Counter- current (NECC) across the Pacific basin.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C6), June 2012. ISSN 0148-0227. doi: 10.1029/2011jc007794. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007794

    work page doi:10.1029/2011jc007794 2012

  26. [26]

    Hsin and B

    Y. Hsin and B. Qiu. The impact of Eastern-Pacific versus Central-Pacific El Ni˜ nos on the North Equatorial Countercurrent in the Pacific Ocean.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C11), Nov. 2012. ISSN 0148-0227. doi: 10.1029/2012jc008362. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008362

    work page doi:10.1029/2012jc008362 2012

  27. [27]

    W. S. Kessler. The circulation of the eastern tropical pacific: A review.Progress in Oceanography, 69(2–4):181–217, May 2006. ISSN 0079-6611. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean. 2006.03.009. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pocean 2006

  28. [28]

    W. S. Kessler, G. C. Johnson, and D. W. Moore. Sverdrup and nonlinear dy- namics of the Pacific equatorial currents.Journal of Physical Oceanography, 33 (5):994 – 1008, 2003. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033⟨0994:SANDOT⟩2.0.CO

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033 2003

  29. [29]

    URLhttps://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/phoc/33/5/1520-0485_ 2003_033_0994_sandot_2.0.co_2.xml

    work page

  30. [30]

    J. H. LaCasce. Statistics from Lagrangian observations.Progr. Oceanogr., 77:1–29, 2008

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Lasota and M

    A. Lasota and M. C. Mackey.Chaos, Fractals and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dy- namics, volume 97 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York, 2nd edition, 1994

    work page 1994

  32. [32]

    Lodge, D

    M. Lodge, D. Johnson, G. Le Gurun, M. Wengler, P. Weaver, and V. Gunn. Seabed mining: International Seabed Authority environmental management plan for the Clarion–Clipperton Zone. A partnership approach.Marine Policy, 49:66–72, 2014. ISSN 0308-597X. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.04.006. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.04.006 2014

  33. [33]

    Lumpkin and M

    R. Lumpkin and M. Pazos. Measuring surface currents with Surface Velocity Program drifters: the instrument, its data and some recent results. In A. Griffa, A. D. Kirwan, A. Mariano, T. ¨Ozg¨ okmen, and T. Rossby, editors,Lagrangian Analysis and Prediction of Coastal and Ocean Dynamics, chapter 2, pages 39–67. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Lumpkin, S

    R. Lumpkin, S. A. Grodsky, L. Centurioni, M.-H. Rio, J. A. Carton, and D. Lee. Removing spurious low-frequency variability in drifter velocities.J. Atm. Oce. Tech., 28 30:353–360, 2012

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    A. N. Maximenko, J. Hafner, and P. Niiler. Pathways of marine debris derived from trajectories of Lagrangian drifters.Mar. Pollut. Bull., 65:51–62, 2012

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    C. McKean. Coral connectivity in the equatorial eastern pacific: Crossing the eastern pacific barrier. Bachelor’s thesis, University of Miami, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    McPhaden and P

    M. McPhaden and P. Ripa. Wave-mean flow interactions in equatorial oceans.Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 22:167–205, 1990

    work page 1990

  38. [38]

    M. J. McPhaden. Monthly period oscillations in the Pacific North Equatorial Coun- tercurrent.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 101(C3):6337–6359, Mar

    work page

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1029/95jc03620

    ISSN 0148-0227. doi: 10.1029/95jc03620. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ 95JC03620

    work page doi:10.1029/95jc03620

  40. [40]

    Metzner, C

    P. Metzner, C. Sch¨ utte, and E. Vanden-Eijnden. Transition path theory for Markov jump processes.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 7:1192–1219, 2009

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Miron, F

    P. Miron, F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, J. Sheinbaum, P. P´ erez-Brunius, and G. Froyland. Lagrangian dynamical geography of the Gulf of Mexico.Scientific Reports, 7:7021, 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Miron, F

    P. Miron, F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, G. Froyland, P. P´ erez-Brunius, and J. Sheinbaum. Lagrangian geography of the deep Gulf of Mexico.J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49:269–290, 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Miron, F

    P. Miron, F. J. Beron-Vera, M. J. Olascoaga, and P. Koltai. Markov-chain-inspired search for MH370.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29: 041105, 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Miron, F

    P. Miron, F. J. Beron-Vera, L. Helfmann, and P. Koltai. Transition paths of marine debris and the stability of the garbage patches.Chaos, 31:033101, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Miron, F

    P. Miron, F. J. Beron-Vera, and M. J. Olascoaga. Transition paths of North Atlantic Deep Water.J. Atmos. Oce. Tech., 39:959–971, 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Moore, S

    C. Moore, S. Moore, M. Leecaster, and S. Weisberg. A comparison of plastic and plankton in the North Pacific Central Gyre.Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42(12): 1297–1300, Dec. 2001. ISSN 0025-326X. doi: 10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00114-x. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00114-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00114-x 2001

  47. [47]

    Oceanic Ni˜ no Index (ONI),

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Oceanic Ni˜ no Index (ONI),

    work page

  48. [48]

    Accessed: 2026-03-05

    URLhttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ ensostuff/ONI_v5.php. Accessed: 2026-03-05

    work page 2026

  49. [49]

    P. P. Niiler and J. D. Paduan. Wind-driven Motions in the northeastern Pacific as measured by Lagrangian drifters.J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25:2819–2830, 1995

    work page 1995

  50. [50]

    Norris.Markov Chains

    J. Norris.Markov Chains. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    Philander, W

    S. Philander, W. Hurlin, and R. Pacanowski. Initial conditions for a general circulation model of tropical oceans.J. Phys. Oceanogr., 17:147–157, 1987

    work page 1987

  52. [52]

    Privault.Understanding Markov Chains: Examples and Applications

    N. Privault.Understanding Markov Chains: Examples and Applications. Springer Singapore, 2018. ISBN 9789811306594. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0659-4. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0659-4. 29

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0659-4 2018

  53. [53]

    Richmond.The Effects of the El Ni˜ no/Southern Oscillation on the Dispersal of Corals and other Marine Organisms, page 127–140

    R. Richmond.The Effects of the El Ni˜ no/Southern Oscillation on the Dispersal of Corals and other Marine Organisms, page 127–140. Elsevier, 1990. doi: 10. 1016/s0422-9894(08)70034-5. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0422-9894(08) 70034-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0422-9894(08 1990

  54. [54]

    Romero-Torres, E

    M. Romero-Torres, E. A. Treml, A. Acosta, and D. A. Paz-Garc´ ıa. The eastern tropical pacific coral population connectivity and the role of the eastern pacific barrier.Sci- entific Reports, 8(1), June 2018. ISSN 2045-2322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27644-2. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27644-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27644-2 2018

  55. [55]

    H. U. Sverdrup. Wind-driven currents in a baroclinic ocean; with application to the equatorial currents of the eastern pacific.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 33(11):318–326, Nov. 1947. ISSN 1091-6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.33.11.318. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.33.11.318

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.33.11.318 1947

  56. [56]

    A. L. Sybrandy and P. P. Niiler. WOCE/TOGA Lagrangian drifter contruction manual. Technical Report SIO Reference 91/6, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, 1991

    work page 1991

  57. [57]

    R. Tarjan. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms.SIAM J. Comput., 1: 146–160, 1972

    work page 1972

  58. [58]

    S. M. Ulam.A Collection of Mathematical Problems. Interscience tracts in pure and applied mathematics. Interscience, 1960

    work page 1960

  59. [59]

    van Sebille, E

    E. van Sebille, E. H. England, and G. Froyland. Origin, dynamics and evolution of ocean garbage patches from observed surface drifters.Environ. Res. Lett., 7:044040, 2012

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Vanden-Eijnden.Transition Path Theory, page 453–493

    E. Vanden-Eijnden.Transition Path Theory, page 453–493. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,

    work page

  61. [61]

    doi: 10.1007/3-540-35273-2 13

    ISBN 9783540352709. doi: 10.1007/3-540-35273-2 13

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-35273-2

  62. [62]

    S. Wood, C. B. Paris, A. Ridgwell, and E. J. Hendy. Modelling dispersal and con- nectivity of broadcast spawning corals at the global scale.Global Ecology and Bio- geography, 23(1):1–11, Aug. 2014. ISSN 1466-8238. doi: 10.1111/geb.12101. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12101

    work page doi:10.1111/geb.12101 2014

  63. [63]

    S. Wood, I. B. Baums, C. B. Paris, A. Ridgwell, W. S. Kessler, and E. J. Hendy. El Ni˜ o and coral larval dispersal across the eastern Pacific marine barrier.Nature Communications, 7(1), Aug. 2016. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12571. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12571

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms12571 2016

  64. [64]

    K. Wyrtki. Teleconnections in the equatorial pacific ocean.Science, 180(4081):66–68, Apr. 1973. ISSN 1095-9203. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4081.66. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.180.4081.66

    work page doi:10.1126/science.180.4081.66 1973

  65. [65]

    Wyrtki and R

    K. Wyrtki and R. Kendall. Transports of the pacific equatorial countercurrent.Journal of Geophysical Research, 72(8):2073–2076, Apr. 1967. ISSN 0148-0227. doi: 10.1029/ jz072i008p02073. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JZ072i008p02073

    work page doi:10.1029/jz072i008p02073 2073

  66. [66]

    Wyrtki, E

    K. Wyrtki, E. Firing, D. Halpern, R. Knox, G. J. McNally, W. C. Patzert, E. D. Stroup, B. A. Taft, and R. Williams. The hawaii to tahiti shuttle experiment.Science, 211(4477):22–28, Jan. 1981. ISSN 1095-9203. doi: 10.1126/science.211.4477.22. URL 30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.211.4477.22. 31

    work page doi:10.1126/science.211.4477.22 1981