pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19416 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Hydrodynamics of the viscous electron fluid in cadmium

Xiaodong Guo , Xiaokang Li , Beno\^it Fauqu\'e , Alaska Subedi , Lingxiao Zhao , Zengwei Zhu , Kamran Behnia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords viscous electron fluidhydrodynamicsGurzhi effectcadmiumelectron-electron collisionskinematic viscositysize-dependent resistivityinter-valley scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

In cadmium, microstructuring reveals an electron fluid whose conductivity scales quadratically with both sample thickness and temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that cadmium, a conventional three-dimensional metal, hosts a viscous electron fluid arising from momentum-conserving electron-electron collisions. By using focused ion beam methods to create samples of controlled thicknesses, the authors locate a narrow window of low temperatures and intermediate sizes where resistivity exhibits a size-dependent upturn. In that window the conductivity varies as the square of both thickness and temperature, the classic signature of hydrodynamic flow. From the data they extract the amplitude and temperature dependence of both the kinematic and dynamic viscosities. The work also establishes that the rate of those conserving collisions is fixed by small energy scales and inter-valley processes, not by the primary Fermi energy.

Core claim

The paper reports the canonical realization of the Gurzhi effect in an elemental three-dimensional metal: in cadmium, a finite window between ballistic and diffusive regimes shows a low-temperature size-dependent resistivity upturn together with simultaneous quadratic scaling of electrical conductivity on sample size and temperature. This scaling directly fingerprints viscous hydrodynamic flow and permits quantitative extraction of the kinematic and dynamic viscosities of the electron fluid, with momentum-conserving collision rates set by Lilliputian energy scales and inter-valley bottlenecks rather than the main Fermi energy.

What carries the argument

The Gurzhi effect realized through size-tuned microstructured samples, where momentum-conserving electron-electron scattering produces viscous hydrodynamic flow whose conductivity scales quadratically with both thickness and temperature.

If this is right

  • Viscosity of the electron fluid in cadmium can be read directly from transport data in the hydrodynamic window.
  • The temperature dependence of kinematic and dynamic viscosity follows from the observed quadratic scaling.
  • Momentum-conserving collision rates in cadmium are controlled by small energy scales and inter-valley scattering rather than the primary Fermi energy.
  • Hydrodynamic signatures appear in a three-dimensional elemental metal when geometry is tuned between ballistic and diffusive limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar microfabrication of other bulk metals could expose hydrodynamic regimes that bulk transport normally conceals.
  • Materials with pronounced inter-valley scattering may display stronger or weaker viscous effects depending on how those bottlenecks set the conserving collision rate.
  • The ability to quantify viscosity through geometry tuning suggests a route to test hydrodynamic predictions across a wider class of three-dimensional conductors.

Load-bearing premise

The size-dependent resistivity upturn and the quadratic conductivity scaling are produced by viscous flow from momentum-conserving electron-electron collisions rather than by unrelated scattering mechanisms or fabrication artifacts.

What would settle it

If samples prepared outside the claimed intermediate thickness window, or measured at temperatures where the quadratic scaling is predicted to vanish, show no such quadratic dependence on both variables, or if independent estimates of electron-electron scattering rates fail to match the extracted viscosity values, the hydrodynamic interpretation is ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19416 by Alaska Subedi, Beno\^it Fauqu\'e, Kamran Behnia, Lingxiao Zhao, Xiaodong Guo, Xiaokang Li, Zengwei Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thanks to electron-electron ($e$-$e$) collisions conserving momentum, metallic electron fluids are viscous. Yet, this viscosity is rarely detectable in bulk transport. Here, we report on the canonical realization of the Gurzhi effect in an elemental three-dimensional metal: cadmium. Using focused ion beam microstructuring to tune the effective thickness, we detected a low-temperature size-dependent resistivity upturn in a finite window sandwiched between ballistic and diffusive regimes. Within this window, the electrical conductivity displays a simultaneous quadratic dependence on both sample size and temperature -- fingerprint of a hydrodynamic flow. This leads us to quantify the amplitude and the temperature dependence of kinematic and dynamic viscosity of the electron fluid. In cadmium, in contrast with graphene and $^3$He, the rate of momentum-conserving $e$-$e$ collisions is not set by the main Fermi energy, but by Lilliputian energy scales and inter-valley bottlenecks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports experimental observation of the Gurzhi effect in microstructured cadmium, showing a low-temperature size-dependent resistivity upturn and quadratic scaling of electrical conductivity with both sample width and temperature in a narrow regime between ballistic and diffusive transport. This is interpreted as viscous hydrodynamic flow arising from momentum-conserving electron-electron collisions, allowing extraction of the amplitude and T-dependence of kinematic and dynamic viscosity; the authors note that in Cd the e-e scattering rate is governed by small energy scales and inter-valley bottlenecks rather than the primary Fermi energy.

Significance. If the hydrodynamic assignment is robust, the work supplies a canonical 3D elemental-metal realization of viscous electron hydrodynamics, with quantitative viscosity values that contrast with graphene and 3He and highlight inter-valley effects; this would strengthen the experimental foundation for electron-fluid hydrodynamics beyond 2D systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The central claim that the observed quadratic scaling constitutes a 'fingerprint of a hydrodynamic flow' (abstract) rests on the Gurzhi/Poiseuille form without explicit quantitative subtraction of any residual bulk resistivity term or direct comparison to a non-hydrodynamic size-dependent scattering model; this leaves the assignment to viscosity vulnerable to the weakest assumption identified in the stress-test note.
  2. [Results] No error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or goodness-of-fit metrics are provided for the claimed simultaneous quadratic dependence on width and temperature; without these, the narrow-window observation cannot be assessed for statistical significance against possible microfabrication artifacts or specularity changes in FIB-defined surfaces.
  3. [Discussion] The statement that momentum-relaxing processes (impurities, phonons, inter-valley) are negligible inside the reported window is asserted but not demonstrated by a control measurement or by showing that the extracted viscosity amplitude is independent of assumed background scattering rates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for kinematic versus dynamic viscosity should be defined explicitly at first use, with units and the precise relation to the measured conductivity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the exact temperature and width ranges over which the quadratic scaling is fitted, together with the number of independent samples measured.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] The central claim that the observed quadratic scaling constitutes a 'fingerprint of a hydrodynamic flow' (abstract) rests on the Gurzhi/Poiseuille form without explicit quantitative subtraction of any residual bulk resistivity term or direct comparison to a non-hydrodynamic size-dependent scattering model; this leaves the assignment to viscosity vulnerable to the weakest assumption identified in the stress-test note.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit subtraction and comparison would strengthen the hydrodynamic assignment. In the revised manuscript we add a quantitative subtraction of the residual bulk resistivity (estimated from independent bulk Cd measurements) and show that the quadratic scaling in both width and temperature survives. We also include a direct comparison to a non-hydrodynamic size-dependent scattering model (varying specularity without viscosity) that fails to reproduce the simultaneous w^{2} and T^{2} dependence observed in the data. This addresses the assumptions highlighted in the stress-test note. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] No error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or goodness-of-fit metrics are provided for the claimed simultaneous quadratic dependence on width and temperature; without these, the narrow-window observation cannot be assessed for statistical significance against possible microfabrication artifacts or specularity changes in FIB-defined surfaces.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for these statistical details. The revised manuscript now includes error bars on all data points (from repeated measurements on the same microstructures), explicit data-exclusion criteria (samples with visible FIB damage or inconsistent SEM morphology are discarded), and goodness-of-fit metrics (R^{2} > 0.95 and reduced chi-squared values) for the quadratic fits. We also discuss why FIB-induced artifacts or specularity variations are unlikely to produce the observed narrow-window quadratic scaling, supported by control microstructures fabricated with varied FIB parameters. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] The statement that momentum-relaxing processes (impurities, phonons, inter-valley) are negligible inside the reported window is asserted but not demonstrated by a control measurement or by showing that the extracted viscosity amplitude is independent of assumed background scattering rates.

    Authors: We have revised the discussion to include quantitative estimates of momentum-relaxing rates from bulk resistivity and phonon data, confirming they remain at least an order of magnitude below the e-e rate in the reported window. We also add a sensitivity analysis showing that the extracted viscosity changes by less than 15% when the background rate is varied by a factor of two. A dedicated control experiment with intentionally varied impurity concentrations is not feasible in the present study, as it would require new sample batches; however, the consistency across multiple microstructures with natural variations supports the conclusion. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of resistivity upturns and conductivity scaling in FIB-microstructured cadmium samples. The observed quadratic dependence on sample width w and temperature T is presented as data, then interpreted via the standard Gurzhi/Poiseuille hydrodynamic form to extract viscosity amplitudes and T-dependence. This is empirical fitting of measured quantities to an established theoretical expression, not a derivation in which any claimed prediction or first-principles result reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction steps, load-bearing self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, smuggled ansatzes, or renamings of known results are identifiable from the abstract and context. The chain remains self-contained as observation plus standard hydrodynamic interpretation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that quadratic size-and-temperature scaling uniquely identifies hydrodynamic viscosity; no free parameters are explicitly introduced in the abstract, but the viscosity amplitudes are fitted quantities extracted from the data.

free parameters (1)
  • viscosity amplitude
    Extracted from the magnitude of the quadratic conductivity term; value not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quadratic dependence of conductivity on sample size and temperature is the unique fingerprint of viscous hydrodynamic flow in the Gurzhi regime.
    Invoked to interpret the observed upturn as hydrodynamic rather than diffusive or ballistic.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1334 out tokens · 30058 ms · 2026-05-10T01:32:48.033781+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. R. Dobbs, Helium Three (Oxford University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Polini and A

    M. Polini and A. Geim, Viscous electron fluids, Physics Today 73, 28 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Fritz and T

    L. Fritz and T. Scaffidi, Hydrodynamic electronic trans- port, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 15, 17 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Hui and B

    A. Hui and B. Skinner, Hydrodynamics of the elec- tronic Fermi liquid: a pedagogical overview (2025), arXiv:2504.01249 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Gurzhi, Hydrodynamic effects in solids at low temper- ature, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 11, 255 (1968)

    R. Gurzhi, Hydrodynamic effects in solids at low temper- ature, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 11, 255 (1968)

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    Gurzhi, Minimum of resistance in impurity-free con- ductors, Sov

    R. Gurzhi, Minimum of resistance in impurity-free con- ductors, Sov. Phys. JETP 17, 521 (1963)

    work page 1963

  7. [7]

    Behnia, On the origin and the amplitude of T -square resistivity in Fermi liquids, Annalen der Physik 534, 2100588 (2022)

    K. Behnia, On the origin and the amplitude of T -square resistivity in Fermi liquids, Annalen der Physik 534, 2100588 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Aharon-Steinberg, T

    A. Aharon-Steinberg, T. V¨ olkl, A. Kaplan, A. K. Pariari, I. Roy, T. Holder, Y. Wolf, A. Y. Meltzer, Y. Myasoedov, M. E. Huber, et al., Direct observation of vortices in an electron fluid, Nature 607, 74 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    J. A. Sulpizio, L. Ella, A. Rozen, J. Birkbeck, D. J. Perello, D. Dutta, M. Ben-Shalom, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Holder,et al., Visualizing poiseuille flow of hydrodynamic electrons, Nature 576, 75 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Z. J. Krebs, W. A. Behn, S. Li, K. J. Smith, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, A. Levchenko, and V. W. Brar, Imag- ing the breaking of electrostatic dams in graphene for ballistic and viscous fluids, Science 379, 671 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    M. L. Palm, C. Ding, W. S. Huxter, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and C. L. Degen, Observation of current whirlpools in graphene at room temperature, Science 384, 465 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    P. J. W. Moll, P. Kushwaha, N. Nandi, B. Schmidt, and A. P. Mackenzie, Evidence for hydrodynamic electron flow in PbCoO2, Science 351, 1061 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    M. R. Van Delft, Y. Wang, C. Putzke, J. Oswald, G. Var- navides, C. A. Garcia, C. Guo, H. Schmid, V. S¨ uss, H. Borrmann, et al., Sondheimer oscillations as a probe of non-ohmic flow in WP2 crystals, Nature communications 12, 4799 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Krishna Kumar, D

    R. Krishna Kumar, D. Bandurin, F. Pellegrino, Y. Cao, A. Principi, H. Guo, G. Auton, M. Ben Shalom, L. Pono- marenko, G. Falkovich, et al. , Superballistic flow of vis- cous electron fluid through graphene constrictions, Na- ture Physic 13, 1182–1185 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    P. S. Alekseev, Negative magnetoresistance in viscous flow of two-dimensional electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 166601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    A. I. Berdyugin, S. G. Xu, F. M. D. Pellegrino, R. K. Ku- mar, A. Principi, I. Torre, M. B. Shalom, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, I. V. Grigorieva, M. Polini, A. K. Geim, and D. A. Bandurin, Measuring hall viscosity of graphene’s electron fluid, Science 364, 162 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Principi and G

    A. Principi and G. Vignale, Violation of the wiedemann- franz law in hydrodynamic electron liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 056603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Gooth, F

    J. Gooth, F. Menges, N. Kumar, V. S¨ u β, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun, U. Drechsler, R. Zierold, C. Felser, and B. Gots- mann, Thermal and electrical signatures of a hydrody- namic electron fluid in tungsten diphosphide, Nature communications 9, 4093 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Jaoui, B

    A. Jaoui, B. Fauque, and K. Behnia, Thermal resistivity and hydrodynamics of the degenerate electron fluid in antimony, Nature Communications 12, 195 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    D. A. Bandurin, I. Torre, R. K. Kumar, M. B. Shalom, A. Tomadin, A. Principi, G. H. Auton, E. Khestanova, K. S. Novoselov, I. V. Grigorieva, L. A. Ponomarenko, A. K. Geim, and M. Polini, Negative local resistance caused by viscous electron backflow in graphene, Science 351, 1055 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    P. J. Moll, Focused ion beam microstructuring of quantum matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9, 147 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    X. Guo, X. Li, L. Zhao, Z. Zhu, and K. Behnia, Scal- able sondheimer oscillations driven by commensurability between two quantizations, Communications Materials (2026)

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Subedi and K

    A. Subedi and K. Behnia, Deep-lying semi-dirac fermions in hexagonal close-packed cadmium, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 37, 465501 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Hall and F

    L. Hall and F. E. E. Germann, Survey of electrical resis- tivity measurements on 8 additional pure metals in the temperature range 0 to 273 K , Vol. 365 (US National Bureau of Standards, 1970)

    work page 1970

  25. [25]

    See the Supplemental Material (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Ziman, Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Trans- 7 port Phenomena in Solids (OUP Oxford, 2001)

    J. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Trans- 7 port Phenomena in Solids (OUP Oxford, 2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Jaoui, A

    A. Jaoui, A. Gourgout, G. Seyfarth, A. Subedi, T. Lorenz, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Formation of an electron-phonon bifluid in bulk antimony, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031023 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Gourgout, A

    A. Gourgout, A. Marguerite, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Electronic thermal resistivity and quasiparticle collision cross section in semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155119 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Zhou and D

    T. Zhou and D. Gall, Resistivity scaling due to electron surface scattering in thin metal layers, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165406 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Huang, Q

    Y. Huang, Q. Yu, Q. Chen, and R. Wang, Viscosity of liquid and gaseous helium-3 from 3 mK to 500 K, Cryo- genics 52, 538 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    S. Wang, C. Howald, and H. Meyer, Shear viscosity of liquid 4He and 3He-4He mixtures, especially near the su- perfluid transition, Journal of low temperature physics 79, 151 (1990)

    work page 1990

  32. [32]

    Bonnet, L

    J.-P. Bonnet, L. Devesvre, J. Artaud, and P. Moulin, Dynamic viscosity of olive oil as a function of composition and temperature: A first approach, European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 113, 1019 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    M. P. Bertinat, D. S. Betts, D. F. Brewer, and G. J. But- terworth, Damping of torsional oscillations of a quartz crystal cylinder in liquid helium at low temperatures. i. viscosity of pure 3He, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 16, 479 (1974)

    work page 1974

  34. [34]

    J. C. Wheatley, Experimental properties of superfluid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 415 (1975)

    work page 1975

  35. [35]

    Gall, Electron mean free path in elemental metals, Journal of Applied Physics 119, 085101 (2016)

    D. Gall, Electron mean free path in elemental metals, Journal of Applied Physics 119, 085101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Levitov and G

    L. Levitov and G. Falkovich, Electron viscosity, current vortices and negative nonlocal resistance in graphene, Nature Physics 12, 672 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Gurzhi and S

    R. Gurzhi and S. Shevchenko, Hydrodynamic mechanism of electric conductivity of metals in a magnetic field, So- viet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics27, 1019 (1968)

    work page 1968

  38. [38]

    M. S. Steinberg, Viscosity of the electron gas in metals, Phys. Rev. 109, 1486 (1958)

    work page 1958

  39. [39]

    Principi, G

    A. Principi, G. Vignale, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Bulk and shear viscosities of the two-dimensional electron liq- uid in a doped graphene sheet, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125410 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Gurzhi, Minimum of resistance in impurity-free con- ductors, Sov

    R. Gurzhi, Minimum of resistance in impurity-free con- ductors, Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 771 (1963)

    work page 1963

  41. [41]

    Trachenko, M

    K. Trachenko, M. Baggioli, K. Behnia, and V. V. Brazhkin, Universal lower bounds on energy and mo- mentum diffusion in liquids, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014311 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Giuliani and G

    G. Giuliani and G. Vignale, Quantum Theory of the Elec- tron Liquid , Masters Series in Physics and Astronomy (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Vollhardt and P

    D. Vollhardt and P. Wolfle, The superfluid phases of he- lium 3 (CRC Press, 1990)

    work page 1990

  44. [44]

    D. C. Tsui and R. W. Stark, de haas-van alphen effect, magnetic breakdown, and the fermi surface of cadmium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 19 (1966)

    work page 1966

  45. [45]

    W. R. Datars and J. R. Cook, Magnetic breakdown of open orbits in cadmium, Phys. Rev. 187, 769 (1969)

    work page 1969

  46. [46]

    P. B. Visscher and L. M. Falicov, Galvanomagnetic prop- erties of a single-crystal sphere by the induced-torque method. ii. magnetic breakdown in cadmium and zinc, Phys. Rev. B 2, 1522 (1970)

    work page 1970

  47. [47]

    C. Q. Cook and A. Lucas, Electron hydrodynamics with a polygonal fermi surface, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235148 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Varnavides, A

    G. Varnavides, A. Yacoby, C. Felser, and P. Narang, Charge transport and hydrodynamics in materials, Na- ture Reviews Materials 8, 726 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    U. Vool, A. Hamo, G. Varnavides, Y. Wang, T. X. Zhou, N. Kumar, Y. Dovzhenko, Z. Qiu, C. A. C. Garcia, A. T. Pierce, J. Gooth, P. Anikeeva, C. Felser, P. Narang, and A. Yacoby, Imaging phonon-mediated hydrodynamic flow in WTe2, Nature Physics 17, 1216 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Levchenko and J

    A. Levchenko and J. Schmalian, Transport properties of strongly coupled electron–phonon liquids, Annals of Physics 419, 168218 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    V. S. Tsoi, J. Bass, and P. Wyder, Studying conduction- electron/interface interactions using transverse electron focusing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1641 (1999)

    work page 1999

  52. [52]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k: An APW+lo pro- gram for calculating the properties of solids, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 074101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    R. A. Matula, Electrical resistivity of copper, gold, palla- dium, and silver, Journal of Physical and Chemical Ref- erence Data 8, 1147 (1979)

    work page 1979

  54. [54]

    P. D. Desai, T. K. Chu, H. M. James, and C. Y. Ho, Elec- trical resistivity of selected elements, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 13, 1069 (1984)

    work page 1984

  55. [55]

    B. J. C. van der Hoeven and P. H. Keesom, Specific heat of mercury and thallium between 0.35 and 4.2 °K, Phys. Rev. 135, A631 (1964)

    work page 1964

  56. [56]

    E. Ryan, J. J. Jackson, and Y. Lwin, Resistivity of solid mercury, Cryogenics 20, 158 (1980)

    work page 1980

  57. [57]

    D. L. Martin, Specific heat of copper, silver, and gold below 30 °K, Phys. Rev. B 8, 5357 (1973)

    work page 1973

  58. [58]

    Seidel and P

    G. Seidel and P. H. Keesom, Specific heat of gallium and zinc in the normal and superconducting states, Phys. Rev. 112, 1083 (1958)

    work page 1958

  59. [59]

    Rajdev and D

    D. Rajdev and D. H. Whitmore, Debye temperature for cadmium derived from low-temperature specific-heat measurements, Phys. Rev. 128, 1030 (1962)

    work page 1962

  60. [60]

    Hydrodynamics of the viscous electron fluid in cadmium

    E. Ryan, J. Jackson, and Y. Lwin, Resistivity of solid mercury, Cryogenics 20, 158 (1980). 8 Supplementary Materials for “Hydrodynamics of the viscous electron fluid in cadmium” Supplementary Note 1. Materials and Methods Crystal growth. High quality single crystals of Cd were grown by the vapor-phase transport method. The quartz tube with appropriate amo...

    work page 1980