pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22329 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

The antiferromagnetic Chern insulator phase in the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model

Bao-Qing Wang , Can Shao , Takami Tohyama , Hong-Gang Luo , Hantao Lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 09:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords antiferromagnetic Chern insulatorKane-Mele-Hubbard modelexact diagonalizationtwisted boundary conditionsChern numbertime-reversal symmetrytopological phase
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Kane-Mele-Hubbard model with sublattice potential supports an antiferromagnetic Chern insulator phase with quantized Hall conductance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the possibility of an antiferromagnetic Chern insulator emerging in the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model, a system that preserves time-reversal symmetry overall. Exact diagonalization calculations on finite lattices track the excitation gap, anisotropic spin correlations, and fidelity susceptibility under twisted boundary conditions. These diagnostics converge on a phase in which antiferromagnetic order coexists with a topological response. The authors further show that the Hubbard term drives an instability that breaks adiabatic continuity in twist-angle space, and they introduce a modified scheme that recovers a stable Chern number of one.

Core claim

In the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model with a finite sublattice potential, exact diagonalization establishes an antiferromagnetic Chern insulator phase in which Hubbard-induced antiferromagnetic correlations along the z-axis and in the xy-plane coexist with a quantized Hall conductance. The (spin) Chern number computation reveals a breakdown of adiabatic continuity in twist-angle space, signaling an instability toward time-reversal symmetry breaking; a modified evaluation scheme then yields a robust quantized value C=1 throughout the phase.

What carries the argument

Hubbard-induced antiferromagnetic perturbations that produce a breakdown of adiabatic continuity in twist-angle space, together with the modified computational scheme that extracts the quantized Chern number from the resulting non-adiabatic regime.

If this is right

  • The antiferromagnetic order and the topological invariant remain compatible inside the same parameter window.
  • The excitation gap and fidelity susceptibility both serve as reliable indicators for locating the phase boundary.
  • The modified Chern-number scheme produces C=1 consistently once the adiabaticity breakdown is accounted for.
  • The phase can be reached by increasing the Hubbard interaction strength while keeping the sublattice potential finite.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Interaction-driven magnetic order may stabilize topological responses in other time-reversal-symmetric lattice models without explicit symmetry-breaking terms.
  • Edge-state transport measurements in candidate materials could test whether the Hall conductance remains quantized when antiferromagnetic correlations are present.
  • Similar modifications to topological invariant calculations may be needed whenever interactions induce order that competes with adiabatic continuity.

Load-bearing premise

Finite-size effects and the particular choice of twisted boundary conditions in exact diagonalization do not alter the existence or stability of the antiferromagnetic Chern insulator phase in the thermodynamic limit.

What would settle it

A calculation on substantially larger lattices or with a different method such as density-matrix renormalization group that finds either the disappearance of the excitation gap or a non-quantized Hall response at the same interaction and potential strengths.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22329 by Bao-Qing Wang, Can Shao, Hantao Lu, Hong-Gang Luo, Takami Tohyama.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. ED Phase diagram of the KMH model ( view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Contour plots of (a) the excitation gap ∆ view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) CDW and SDW structure factors, view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evaluation of the Chern number view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Excitation gap ∆ view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Ground-state energy view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. ED phase diagram of the KMH Hamiltonian ( view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of the excitation gaps as functions of view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Excitation gap ∆ view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. MF phase diagram of the KMH model ( view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. MF analysis of the topological phase transitions in view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The emergence of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) Chern insulator (AFCI) phase in the Kane-Mele-Hubbard (KMH) model with a finite sublattice potential is investigated. The AFCI, characterized by AFM correlations coexisting with quantized Hall conductance, has long raised the question of whether it can exist in the KMH model that respects time-reversal symmetry (TRS). Using exact diagonalization, we analyze the excitation gap, anisotropic AFM correlations along the $z$ axis and in the $xy$ plane, and the fidelity susceptibility under twisted boundary conditions, all of which provide consistent evidence for the AFCI phase. In particular, our numerical evaluation on the (spin) Chern number reveals a breakdown of adiabatic continuity in the twist-angle space, indicating an instability toward TRS breaking driven by Hubbard-induced AFM perturbations. A modified computational scheme is further proposed, which yields a robust quantized Chern number $C=1$ within this phase.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model with finite sublattice potential hosts an antiferromagnetic Chern insulator (AFCI) phase in which AFM correlations coexist with a quantized Hall conductance (Chern number C=1). Evidence is obtained from exact diagonalization on small clusters via consistent signals in the excitation gap, anisotropic AFM correlations, fidelity susceptibility under twisted boundary conditions, and a modified scheme for computing the (spin) Chern number after observing breakdown of adiabatic continuity in twist-angle space.

Significance. If the result holds, the work would establish that Hubbard-driven AFM order can induce an instability toward TRS breaking and stabilize a topological phase with C=1 inside a TRS-preserving microscopic model, addressing a long-standing question in interacting topological insulators. The multi-observable consistency (gap, correlations, fidelity, Chern number) on small clusters is a methodological strength that lends internal coherence to the finite-size evidence.

major comments (1)
  1. [numerical evaluation of the (spin) Chern number] The central claim of an AFCI phase with Hall conductance relies on the modified Chern-number scheme yielding a robust C=1. The manuscript reports breakdown of adiabatic continuity under twisted boundary conditions (indicating possible level crossings or gap closings), which invalidates the standard Berry-phase integration over the torus. The modified scheme is introduced without benchmarking against known limits, alternative invariants (entanglement spectrum, edge-mode counting), or the Kubo response formula. This is load-bearing because finite-size ED alone cannot confirm the thermodynamic topological phase without a reliable invariant.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Chern number section] Clarify the precise definition and implementation of the modified Chern-number scheme (e.g., which states are included or excluded in the integration) and state any assumptions about the gap remaining open.
  2. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and text use the parenthetical '(spin) Chern number'; define this quantity explicitly at first use and distinguish it from the total Chern number if necessary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for recognizing the internal consistency of our multi-observable evidence for the antiferromagnetic Chern insulator phase. We address the central concern regarding the modified Chern-number evaluation below, offering clarifications while agreeing to strengthen the presentation in revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of an AFCI phase with Hall conductance relies on the modified Chern-number scheme yielding a robust C=1. The manuscript reports breakdown of adiabatic continuity under twisted boundary conditions (indicating possible level crossings or gap closings), which invalidates the standard Berry-phase integration over the torus. The modified scheme is introduced without benchmarking against known limits, alternative invariants (entanglement spectrum, edge-mode counting), or the Kubo response formula. This is load-bearing because finite-size ED alone cannot confirm the thermodynamic topological phase without a reliable invariant.

    Authors: We agree that a reliable topological invariant is essential and that the breakdown of adiabatic continuity requires careful handling. The modified scheme computes the Chern number by integrating the Berry curvature along paths that avoid the observed level crossings in twist-angle space, yielding a quantized value C=1 that is stable across the parameter region identified by the gap, anisotropic correlations, and fidelity susceptibility. In the non-interacting limit the scheme recovers the standard result (C=1 for the topological phase), providing an internal consistency check. Alternative invariants such as the entanglement spectrum or edge-mode counting are not directly accessible in our periodic-boundary ED clusters; the fidelity susceptibility under twisted boundaries serves as a complementary diagnostic of the topological transition. We acknowledge that the Kubo formula is not implemented here and that finite-size ED cannot by itself prove the thermodynamic limit. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit benchmarking against the non-interacting case and the standard Chern number where adiabatic continuity holds, together with a clearer discussion of the scheme's assumptions and the limitations imposed by system size. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct numerical evaluation of observables from the KMH Hamiltonian with no self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on exact diagonalization computations of the excitation gap, AFM correlations, fidelity susceptibility, and a modified Chern number under twisted boundary conditions. These are direct outputs from the model Hamiltonian without fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its inputs. The modified scheme for the Chern number is introduced after observing breakdown of adiabatic continuity, but the provided description shows no equation-level reduction where the scheme is constructed to force C=1 by definition. This is a standard numerical study whose evidence is independent of the target phase claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Kane-Mele-Hubbard Hamiltonian plus a sublattice potential term; all quantities are computed directly from exact diagonalization without additional fitted constants or new postulated entities.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard interaction U
    Model parameter varied to locate the phase window; not fitted to external data.
  • sublattice potential Delta
    Finite value introduced to enable the phase; treated as a tunable model parameter.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The underlying lattice model respects time-reversal symmetry when Delta is finite.
    Stated explicitly in the abstract as the starting point for the question.
  • domain assumption Exact diagonalization on finite clusters with twisted boundaries accurately captures bulk topological properties.
    Implicit in the use of fidelity susceptibility and Chern number calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5477 in / 1577 out tokens · 63691 ms · 2026-05-08T09:56:15.550749+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hohenadler and F

    M. Hohenadler and F. F. Assaad, Correlation effects in two-dimensional topological insulators, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter25, 143201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep

    S. Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 116501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    He, Y.-H

    J. He, Y.-H. Zong, S.-P. Kou, Y. Liang, and S. Feng, Topological spin density waves in the Hubbard model on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B84, 035127 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    T. I. Vanhala, T. Siro, L. Liang, M. Troyer, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Topological phase transitions in the repul- sively interacting Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 225305 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Jiang, S

    K. Jiang, S. Zhou, X. Dai, and Z. Wang, Antiferromag- netic Chern insulators in noncentrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 157205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Wang and F

    Y.-X. Wang and F. Li, Repulsive Fermi gases in a two- dimensional lattice with non-Abelian gauge fields, EPL 123, 37001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Wang and D.-X

    Y.-X. Wang and D.-X. Qi, Spontaneous symmetry break- ing of an interacting Chern insulator on a topological square lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 075204 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Ebrahimkhas, M

    M. Ebrahimkhas, M. Hafez-Torbati, and W. Hofstetter, Lattice symmetry and emergence of antiferromagnetic quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B103, 155108 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Ebrahimkhas, G

    M. Ebrahimkhas, G. S. Uhrig, W. Hofstetter, and M. Hafez-Torbati, Antiferromagnetic Chern insulator in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B106, 205107 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Hafez-Torbati, Antiferromagnetic topological insula- tors in heavy-fermion systems, Phys

    M. Hafez-Torbati, Antiferromagnetic topological insula- tors in heavy-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 115147 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Hafez-Torbati and G

    M. Hafez-Torbati and G. S. Uhrig, Antiferromag- netic Chern insulator with large charge gap in heavy transition-metal compounds, Sci. Rep.14, 17168 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    J. a. S. Silva, E. V. Castro, R. Mondaini, M. A. H. Voz- mediano, and M. P. L´ opez-Sancho, Topological Anderson insulating phases in the interacting Haldane model, Phys. Rev. B109, 125145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Shao and H.-G

    C. Shao and H.-G. Luo, Phase diagram of the interact- ing Haldane model with spin-dependent sublattice poten- tials, Phys. Rev. B109, 235101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    B.-Q. Wang, C. Shao, T. Tohyama, H.-G. Luo, and H. Lu, Topological phase in the extended Haldane-Hubbard model with sublattice-dependent repulsion, Phys. Rev. B110, 035107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Hafez-Torbati, From explicit to spontaneous charge order and the fate of the antiferromagnetic quantum Hall state, Phys

    M. Hafez-Torbati, From explicit to spontaneous charge order and the fate of the antiferromagnetic quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B111, 125108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    parity anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    C. Shao, E. V. Castro, S. Hu, and R. Mondaini, Inter- play of local order and topology in the extended Haldane- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B103, 035125 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    I. S. Tupitsyn and N. V. Prokof’ev, Phase diagram topol- 13 ogy of the Haldane-Hubbard-Coulomb model, Phys. Rev. B99, 121113 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    W.-X. He, R. Mondaini, H.-G. Luo, X. Wang, and S. Hu, Phase transitions in the Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B109, 035126 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    X. Liu, Y. He, C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Gate-tunable antiferromagnetic Chern insula- tor in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    P. Mai, J. Zhao, and P. W. Phillips, Incipient quantum spin Hall insulator under strong correlations, Phys. Rev. B112, L041116 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    C. N. Varney, K. Sun, M. Rigol, and V. Galitski, Interac- tion effects and quantum phase transitions in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B82, 115125 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    C. N. Varney, K. Sun, M. Rigol, and V. Galitski, Topolog- ical phase transitions for interacting finite systems, Phys. Rev. B84, 241105(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    C. Shao, P. D. Sacramento, and R. Mondaini, Photoin- duced anomalous Hall effect in the interacting Haldane model: Targeting topological states with pump pulses, Phys. Rev. B104, 125129 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    Rachel and K

    S. Rachel and K. Le Hur, Topological insulators and Mott physics from the Hubbard interaction, Phys. Rev. B82, 075106 (2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    D. N. Sheng, Z. Y. Weng, L. Sheng, and F. D. M. Hal- dane, Quantum spin-Hall effect and topologically invari- ant Chern numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 036808 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Prodan, Robustness of the spin-Chern number, Phys

    E. Prodan, Robustness of the spin-Chern number, Phys. Rev. B80, 125327 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Fukui and Y

    T. Fukui and Y. Hatsugai, Topological aspects of the quantum spin-Hall effect in graphene:Z 2 topological or- der and spin Chern number, Phys. Rev. B75, 121403 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Topological invariants of time-reversal-invariant band structures, Phys. Rev. B75, 121306 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump, Phys. Rev. B74, 195312 (2006)

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y.-S. Wu, Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant, Phys. Rev. B31, 3372 (1985)

    work page 1985

  38. [38]

    D. P. Arovas, R. N. Bhatt, F. D. M. Haldane, P. B. Lit- tlewood, and R. Rammal, Localization, wave-function topology, and the integer quantized Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 619 (1988)

    work page 1988

  39. [39]

    Sinha, D

    S. Sinha, D. Y. Pan, and B. Bradlyn, Computing theZ 2 invariant in two-dimensional strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 085116 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized Hall conductivity in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981)

    work page 1981

  41. [41]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern numbers in discretized Brillouin zone: efficient method of computing (spin) Hall conductances, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.74, 1674 (2005)

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    H. Yuan, Y. Guo, R. Lu, H. Lu, and C. Shao, Phase tran- sitions in the Haldane-Hubbard model with ionic poten- tials, Phys. Rev. B107, 075150 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Zanardi and N

    P. Zanardi and N. Paunkovi´ c, Ground state overlap and quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. E74, 031123 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Campos Venuti and P

    L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Quantum critical scal- ing of the geometric tensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 095701 (2007)

    work page 2007

  45. [45]

    Zanardi, P

    P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information- theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 100603 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    T.-L. Dao, M. Ferrero, P. S. Cornaglia, and M. Capone, Mott transition of fermionic mixtures with mass imbal- ance in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A85, 013606 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    L. Du, L. Huang, and G. A. Fiete, Spin-selective thermal- ization plateau in the mass-imbalanced Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B96, 165151 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Z. Xie, M. Zhao, H. Lu, Z. Huang, G. A. Fiete, X. Hu, and L. Du, Quench dynamics in the one-dimensional mass- imbalanced ionic Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B107, 195147 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Ezawa, Y

    M. Ezawa, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Topological phase transition without gap closing, Sci. Rep.3, 2790 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    P. Mai, J. Zhao, T. A. Maier, B. Bradlyn, and P. W. Phillips, Topological phase transition without single par- ticle gap closing in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 075105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    J¨ ordens, N

    R. J¨ ordens, N. Strohmaier, K. G¨ unter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Nature455, 204 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Soltan-Panahi, J

    P. Soltan-Panahi, J. Struck, P. Hauke, A. Bick, W. Plenkers, G. Meineke, C. Becker, P. Windpassinger, M. Lewenstein, and K. Sengstock, Multi-component quantum gases in spin-dependent hexagonal lattices, Nat. Phys.7, 434 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultra- cold fermions, Nature515, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Z. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, B.-Z. Wang, S.-C. Ji, Y. Deng, S. Chen, X.-J. Liu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of two-dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates, Science354, 83 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    X. Li, S. Wang, X. Luo, Y.-Y. Zhou, K. Xie, H.-C. Shen, Y.-Z. Nie, Q. Chen, H. Hu, Y.-A. Chen, X.-C. Yao, and J.-W. Pan, Observation and quantification of the pseu- dogap in unitary fermi gases, Nature626, 288 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDonald, Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 086402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu,et al., Quan- tum anomalous Hall effect from intertwined moir´ e bands, Nature600, 641 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, 14 K. Watanabe,et al., Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature622, 63 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu,et al., Obser- vation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous Hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    B. A. Foutty, C. R. Kometter, T. Devakul, A. P. Reddy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and B. E. Feld- man, Mapping twist-tuned multiband topology in bilayer WSe2, Science384, 343 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    W. Zhao, K. Kang, Y. Zhang, P. Kn¨ uppel, Z. Tao, L. Li, C. L. Tschirhart, E. Redekop, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Realization of the Haldane Chern insulator in a moir´ e lattice, Nat. Phys.20, 275 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Fractional Chern insulator in twisted bilayer MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature628, 522 (2024)

    work page 2024