pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22837 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

OAMVOS:2nd Report for 5th PVUW MOSE Track

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords video object segmentationocclusion handlingreappearance recoverySAM-based trackermemory managementDAM4SAMPVUW MOSE
0
0 comments X

The pith

An occlusion-aware extension to DAM4SAM switches to branch-based recovery when confidence drops to handle long disappearances and small-object reappearances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that augmenting DAM4SAM with memory-control changes rather than backbone modifications allows the tracker to stay efficient on easy sequences while gaining robustness under occlusion and reappearance. It does this by monitoring internal confidence to trigger a state machine that maintains a small set of candidate branches instead of immediately updating memory with potentially bad predictions. Once a branch is reconfirmed, memory is committed, and for small-object cases the method temporarily bypasses normal memory selection while preserving the first conditioning frame and modestly increasing the conditioning budget. A reader would care because a few erroneous memory updates can dominate later predictions for small objects, a common failure in real video where objects vanish and return amid motion or distractors.

Core claim

The central claim is that the OAMVOS design augments the original SAM3 tracker with a reliability-aware tracking state machine, branch-based recovery, delayed DRM promotion, and a selective policy for native SAM3 memory selection. During stable tracking the model follows the original single-path propagation process. When confidence drops the tracker enters ambiguous or recovery mode, maintains candidate branches, and commits memory only after reconfirmation. For small-object disappearance and reappearance, native memory selection is bypassed so older anchors remain accessible, the first conditioning frame is preserved, and the conditioning-memory budget is moderately enlarged.

What carries the argument

A reliability-aware tracking state machine that detects confidence drops and activates branch-based recovery with selective memory commitment.

Load-bearing premise

Drops in the tracker's internal confidence score reliably indicate true ambiguity or occlusion rather than other failure modes, and maintaining a small set of branches will not introduce excessive false recoveries or computational cost.

What would settle it

A test sequence in which confidence drops because of a distractor rather than occlusion, to check whether the state machine still activates branches and whether performance degrades compared with the baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22837 by Deshui Miao, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Xiaogang Yu, Xingsen Huang, Xin Li, Yameng Gu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pipeline of our methods. 2. Methods 2.1. Overview The method is built on top of the SAM3-based DAM4SAM tracker. Let It denote frame t, mt the predicted mask, and pt ∈ R d the corresponding object pointer. After initializa￾tion, each frame is processed in one of three modes: z_t \in \{\texttt {stable},\texttt {ambiguous},\texttt {recovery}\}. (1) In the stable mode, the tracker follows the original DAM4SAM … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

SAM-based dense trackers provide strong short-term mask propagation but remain fragile under long occlusion, fast motion, viewpoint change, and distractors. The problem is especially severe for small objects, where a few incorrect memory updates can dominate later predictions. This report presents an occlusion- and reappearance-aware extension of DAM4SAM that improves memory control rather than changing the backbone. The method augments the original SAM3 tracker with four ingredients: a reliability-aware tracking state machine, branch-based recovery, delayed DRM promotion, and a selective policy for native SAM3 memory selection. During stable tracking, the model follows the original single-path propagation process. Once confidence drops, the tracker enters an ambiguous or recovery mode, maintains a small set of candidate branches, and commits memory only after a branch is reconfirmed. For small-object disappearance and reappearance, native memory selection is temporarily bypassed so older anchors remain accessible. In addition, the first conditioning frame is explicitly preserved, and the conditioning-memory budget is moderately enlarged to improve long-gap recovery. The resulting design keeps DAM4SAM efficient in easy cases while improving robustness in sequences dominated by occlusion and reappearance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents OAMVOS, an occlusion- and reappearance-aware extension to the DAM4SAM SAM-based dense tracker for the 5th PVUW MOSE Track. It augments the original single-path SAM3 propagation with four ingredients: a reliability-aware tracking state machine that switches to ambiguous/recovery mode on confidence drops, branch-based recovery maintaining a small set of candidate branches, delayed DRM promotion that commits memory only after reconfirmation, and a selective policy that bypasses native SAM3 memory selection for small-object disappearance/reappearance while preserving the first conditioning frame and enlarging the conditioning-memory budget. The design aims to retain efficiency in stable cases while improving robustness under long occlusions, fast motion, viewpoint changes, and distractors.

Significance. If the claimed robustness gains are confirmed experimentally, the work would provide a lightweight, memory-control-focused modification to existing SAM-based trackers that targets a well-known failure mode in long-term video object segmentation. The engineering emphasis on state machines and selective anchoring rather than backbone redesign could facilitate adoption in other dense trackers and support more reliable performance on challenging MOSE sequences without substantial computational cost.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the four-ingredient extension 'improves robustness in sequences dominated by occlusion and reappearance' while 'keeping DAM4SAM efficient' is load-bearing for the contribution, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative results, ablation studies, error analysis, or direct measurements of false-positive recovery rates, added latency, or comparisons against the DAM4SAM baseline on the MOSE track.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation for major revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the four-ingredient extension 'improves robustness in sequences dominated by occlusion and reappearance' while 'keeping DAM4SAM efficient' is load-bearing for the contribution, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative results, ablation studies, error analysis, or direct measurements of false-positive recovery rates, added latency, or comparisons against the DAM4SAM baseline on the MOSE track.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript, prepared as a concise report for the 5th PVUW MOSE Track, focuses on the methodological description and does not contain the requested quantitative support. In the revised version we will add direct comparisons to the DAM4SAM baseline on the MOSE validation set, ablation studies for each of the four components, error analysis including recovery-rate metrics under long occlusions and reappearances, and latency measurements confirming that efficiency is retained in stable cases. These additions will be placed in a new experimental section to substantiate the abstract claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is an engineering report describing a set of heuristic extensions (state machine, branch recovery, delayed promotion, selective memory) to an existing SAM-based tracker. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations are present that could reduce to their own inputs by construction. All design choices are presented as explicit policy decisions rather than derived results. External citations to prior trackers (DAM4SAM, SAM3) are used only to identify the baseline; they do not form a self-citation chain that justifies the central claim. The paper is therefore self-contained as a descriptive recipe and receives the lowest circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that SAM3 provides reliable short-term propagation and that confidence scores can be used as a proxy for tracking state; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SAM3-based trackers provide strong short-term mask propagation
    Explicitly stated as the foundation that the extension improves upon.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5518 in / 1094 out tokens · 44653 ms · 2026-05-10T05:01:00.411215+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    SAM 3: Segment Anything with Concepts

    Nicolas Carion, Laura Gustafson, Yuan-Ting Hu, Shoub- hik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Didac Suris, Chaitanya Ryali, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Haitham Khedr, Andrew Huang, et al. Sam 3: Segment anything with concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719, 2025. 1

  2. [2]

    Putting the object back into video object segmentation

    Ho Kei Cheng, Seoung Wug Oh, Brian Price, Joon-Young Lee, and Alexander Schwing. Putting the object back into video object segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3151–3161, 2024. 1

  3. [3]

    Mevis: A large-scale benchmark for video segmentation with motion expressions

    Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Xudong Jiang, and Chen Change Loy. Mevis: A large-scale benchmark for video segmentation with motion expressions. InICCV, pages 2694– 2703, 2023. 1

  4. [4]

    Mose: A new dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes

    Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Xudong Jiang, Philip HS Torr, and Song Bai. Mose: A new dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 20224–20234, 2023. 1

  5. [5]

    Mevis: A multi-modal dataset for referring motion expression video segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

    Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Kaining Ying, Xudong Jiang, Chen Change Loy, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Mevis: A multi-modal dataset for referring motion expression video segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025. 1

  6. [6]

    MOSEv2: A more challenging dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes,

    Henghui Ding, Kaining Ying, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Xudong Jiang, Yu-Gang Jiang, Philip HS Torr, and Song Bai. Mosev2: A more challenging dataset for video object segmen- tation in complex scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05630,

  7. [7]

    Lasot: A high-quality benchmark for large-scale single object tracking

    Heng Fan, Liting Lin, Fan Yang, Peng Chu, Ge Deng, Sijia Yu, Hexin Bai, Yong Xu, Chunyuan Liao, and Haibin Ling. Lasot: A high-quality benchmark for large-scale single object tracking. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5374–5383,

  8. [8]

    Got-10k: A large high-diversity benchmark for generic object tracking in the wild.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 43(5):1562–1577, 2019

    Lianghua Huang, Xin Zhao, and Kaiqi Huang. Got-10k: A large high-diversity benchmark for generic object tracking in the wild.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 43(5):1562–1577, 2019. 1

  9. [9]

    The tenth visual object tracking vot2022 challenge results

    Matej Kristan, Aleš Leonardis, Jiˇrí Matas, Michael Felsberg, Roman Pflugfelder, Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Hyung Jin Chang, Martin Danelljan, Luka ˇCehovin Zajc, Alan Lukežiˇc, et al. The tenth visual object tracking vot2022 challenge results. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 431–460. Springer, 2022. 1 4

  10. [10]

    The first visual object tracking segmentation vots2023 chal- lenge results

    Matej Kristan, Ji ˇrí Matas, Martin Danelljan, Michael Fels- berg, Hyung Jin Chang, Luka ˇCehovin Zajc, Alan Lukežiˇc, Ondrej Drbohlav, Zhongqun Zhang, Khanh-Tung Tran, et al. The first visual object tracking segmentation vots2023 chal- lenge results. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 1796–1818, 2023

  11. [11]

    The second visual object tracking segmentation vots2024 chal- lenge results

    Matej Kristan, Jiˇrí Matas, Pavel Tokmakov, Michael Felsberg, Luka ˇCehovin Zajc, Alan Lukežiˇc, Khanh-Tung Tran, Xuan- Son Vu, Johanna Björklund, Hyung Jin Chang, et al. The second visual object tracking segmentation vots2024 chal- lenge results. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 357–383. Springer, 2024. 1

  12. [12]

    Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection

    Shilong Liu, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Jie Yang, Qing Jiang, Chunyuan Li, Jianwei Yang, Hang Su, et al. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. InEuropean con- ference on computer vision, pages 38–55. Springer, 2024. 1

  13. [13]

    DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

    Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Huy V o, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023. 1

  14. [14]

    SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman Rädle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. Sam 2: Segment any- thing in images and videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714,

  15. [15]

    Breaking the" object" in video object segmentation

    Pavel Tokmakov, Jie Li, and Adrien Gaidon. Breaking the" object" in video object segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22836–22845, 2023. 1

  16. [16]

    A distractor-aware memory for visual object tracking with sam2

    Jovana Videnovic, Alan Lukezic, and Matej Kristan. A distractor-aware memory for visual object tracking with sam2. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion Conference, pages 24255–24264, 2025. 1

  17. [17]

    Associating objects with transformers for video object segmentation.Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:2491– 2502, 2021

    Zongxin Yang, Yunchao Wei, and Yi Yang. Associating objects with transformers for video object segmentation.Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:2491– 2502, 2021. 1

  18. [18]

    Rmem: Re- stricted memory banks improve video object segmentation

    Junbao Zhou, Ziqi Pang, and Yu-Xiong Wang. Rmem: Re- stricted memory banks improve video object segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18602–18611, 2024. 1 5