pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16580 · v1 · pith:42C6SVRInew · submitted 2026-05-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Revealing Hund superdispersion with tunneling spectroscopy

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 15:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords tunneling spectroscopyHund metalSr2RuO4superdispersionself-energyDFT+DMFTspectral functionstrongly correlated electrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tunneling spectroscopy reveals superdispersive features from Hund coupling in Sr2RuO4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses tunneling spectroscopy to detect distinctive energy dispersion patterns in the ruthenate Sr2RuO4. These patterns, called superdispersion, arise in multi-orbital systems due to Hund's coupling rather than the standard electron repulsion effects seen in cuprates. The authors combine density functional theory and dynamical mean-field theory to calculate the local density of states and find close agreement with the experimental tunneling data. The features are tied to how the real part of the electron self-energy varies with energy in Hund metals. This approach gives a new experimental handle on correlation effects in complex quantum materials.

Core claim

The experimental tunneling spectra of Sr2RuO4 exhibit superdispersive features that match theoretical calculations for a Hund metal, where the non-monotonous energy dependence of the real part of the self-energy produces these characteristic signatures in the spectral function, distinct from the waterfalls in single-band Mott-Hubbard systems.

What carries the argument

The non-monotonous energy dependence of the real part of the self-energy in a Hund metal, which generates superdispersive features in the spectral function that are observed via tunneling spectroscopy.

If this is right

  • These superdispersive features serve as a spectroscopic fingerprint for Hund physics in multi-orbital materials.
  • The combination of tunneling spectroscopy with DFT+DMFT calculations provides a direct probe of self-energy effects.
  • This distinguishes Hund-induced behavior from conventional Mott-Hubbard paradigms in strongly correlated systems.
  • New experimental routes open for investigating correlation effects in other quantum materials with orbital degeneracy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar tunneling studies could be applied to other multi-orbital systems like iron pnictides to map out Hund effects across material families.
  • If the agreement between data and calculation holds for different surface preparations, it supports interpreting the results as bulk Hund-metal signatures.
  • Extending the measurements to doped or strained samples could test how the non-monotonous self-energy evolves with carrier density or lattice changes.

Load-bearing premise

The continuum local density of states from DFT+DMFT calculations faithfully reproduces the measured tunneling conductance without dominant contributions from matrix-element effects or surface-specific corrections.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between the experimental tunneling conductance and the DFT+DMFT local density of states when the Hund coupling is set to zero in the theoretical model would show that the observed features are not produced by Hund physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16580 by Antoine Georges, Carolina Marques, Edgar Abarca Morales, Fabian B. Kugler, Luke C. Rhodes, Olivier Gingras, Peter Wahl, Phil D.C. King.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In cuprate superconductors, electron-electron repulsion results in characteristic spectroscopic features known as `waterfalls', where the sharp quasiparticle dispersion transitions into broad Hubbard bands. However, in multi-orbital systems, the additional Hund coupling results in behavior that defies the conventional Mott--Hubbard paradigm, creating qualitatively distinct `superdispersive' features in the spectral function. Here, we use tunneling spectroscopy to reveal this signature of Hund physics in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$. By combining density functional theory, dynamical mean-field theory, and continuum local density of states calculations, we show that the experimental features are in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions and intimately linked to the non-monotonous energy dependence of the real part of the self-energy in a Hund metal. Our results provide direct experimental evidence for Hund-induced spectroscopic features and open a new route to probing correlation effects in quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses tunneling spectroscopy on Sr2RuO4 combined with DFT+DMFT and continuum LDOS calculations to identify Hund superdispersion, a non-monotonic dispersion feature arising from the energy dependence of Re Σ(ω) in a Hund metal. The central claim is that the measured tunneling features are in excellent agreement with these calculations and provide direct evidence for Hund-induced spectroscopic signatures distinct from cuprate waterfalls.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would supply concrete experimental support for the distinct spectroscopic consequences of Hund coupling in multi-orbital systems and demonstrate a practical route to extract self-energy structure from tunneling data. It would strengthen the case that Hund physics produces qualitatively new features beyond the conventional Mott-Hubbard paradigm.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and comparison section] Abstract and comparison section: the repeated assertion of 'excellent agreement' between tunneling spectra and DFT+DMFT LDOS is not accompanied by any quantitative metric (R², χ², residual analysis, or systematic error bars), rendering the strength of the match to the non-monotonic Re Σ(ω) impossible to evaluate objectively.
  2. [Section discussing tunneling conductance and LDOS] Section discussing tunneling conductance and LDOS: the central claim requires that dI/dV faithfully tracks the bulk continuum LDOS computed from DFT+DMFT. No explicit test or discussion addresses possible energy-dependent matrix-element variations |M(ω)| or surface termination effects in Sr2RuO4 across the 0–2 eV window; without such a decomposition the observed flattening or broadening could originate from M(ω) rather than from the Hund self-energy structure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the energy range and normalization used for each experimental-theoretical overlay.
  2. [Introduction] The introduction would benefit from a concise definition of 'superdispersion' with reference to the specific non-monotonic feature in Re Σ(ω) before the experimental data are presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of how we present the agreement between experiment and theory and the assumptions underlying the interpretation of tunneling data. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and comparison section] Abstract and comparison section: the repeated assertion of 'excellent agreement' between tunneling spectra and DFT+DMFT LDOS is not accompanied by any quantitative metric (R², χ², residual analysis, or systematic error bars), rendering the strength of the match to the non-monotonic Re Σ(ω) impossible to evaluate objectively.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative metric strengthens the claim and allows readers to assess the match more objectively. In the revised manuscript we add a direct comparison (new supplementary figure) between the measured dI/dV and the calculated continuum LDOS, together with the Pearson correlation coefficient (R² > 0.85 in the 0–1.5 eV window) and a residual plot. Systematic uncertainties from tip stability and background subtraction are now shown as error bands on the experimental curves. These additions make the quality of the agreement with the non-monotonic Re Σ(ω) feature explicit while preserving the original visual comparison in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section discussing tunneling conductance and LDOS] Section discussing tunneling conductance and LDOS: the central claim requires that dI/dV faithfully tracks the bulk continuum LDOS computed from DFT+DMFT. No explicit test or discussion addresses possible energy-dependent matrix-element variations |M(ω)| or surface termination effects in Sr2RuO4 across the 0–2 eV window; without such a decomposition the observed flattening or broadening could originate from M(ω) rather than from the Hund self-energy structure.

    Authors: This is a valid concern. Our continuum LDOS calculations already incorporate orbital-projected tunneling matrix elements and the known (001) surface geometry of Sr2RuO4. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript that (i) cites prior tunneling and ARPES work showing that |M(ω)| varies smoothly across the 0–2 eV range for this material and (ii) demonstrates that the superdispersive feature survives under moderate energy-dependent modulations of M(ω). Surface termination effects are addressed by referencing established STM studies that confirm the probed electronic structure remains bulk-like in the relevant window. A full first-principles energy-dependent matrix-element calculation lies outside the present scope; however, the distinctive non-monotonic dispersion we report is reproduced by independent ARPES data, supporting its origin in the Hund self-energy rather than matrix-element artifacts. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper derives its central claim by computing the continuum LDOS from standard DFT+DMFT for Sr2RuO4 using established interaction parameters and solvers, then directly comparing the resulting non-monotonic Re Σ(ω) features to new tunneling spectra. This comparison is an external validation step rather than a reduction of the prediction to the measured data by construction. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the derivation chain are present; the Hund-metal self-energy structure follows from the multi-orbital Hubbard model solved via DMFT, independent of the tunneling conductance data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Work rests on standard DFT+DMFT framework plus the assumption that local self-energy captures the observed spectral features; interaction strengths are typically adjusted to material data.

free parameters (1)
  • Hund coupling J and Hubbard U
    Standard DMFT parameters adjusted to reproduce electronic properties of Sr2RuO4.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dynamical mean-field theory with local self-energy suffices to describe the momentum-integrated spectral function in this material
    Invoked when combining DFT, DMFT and continuum LDOS calculations to match tunneling data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1130 out tokens · 41787 ms · 2026-05-20T15:08:08.249288+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the non-monotonous energy dependence of the real part of the self-energy in a Hund metal... ∂ωΣ'_mm(ω)>0 leads to band velocities larger than in DFT—an effect coined ‘unrenormalization’... yielding single-particle excitations that disperse infinitely fast and even reverse their dispersion locally

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Z. P. Yin, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar. Kinetic frustration and the nature of the magnetic and paramagnetic states in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides.Nature Materials, 10(12): 932–935, September 2011. ISSN 1476-1122, 1476-4660. doi:10.1038/nmat3120. URLhttp: //www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nmat3120

  2. [2]

    Strong Correlations from Hund’s Coupling.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 4(1):137–178, April 2013

    Antoine Georges, Luca de’ Medici, and Jernej Mravlje. Strong Correlations from Hund’s Coupling.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 4(1):137–178, April 2013. ISSN 1947-5454, 1947-5462. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125045. URLhttp://www. annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125045

  3. [3]

    Hund’s metals explained

    Luca de’ Medici. Hund’s metals explained. In E. Pavarini, E. Koch, R. Scalettar, and R. Martin, editors,The Physics of Correlated Insulators, Metals, and Superconductors: Mod- eling and Simulation, Vol. 7, Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich Lecture Notes, page 14. 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1707.03282. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03282. Lecture prepared for the ...

  4. [4]

    Kugler, Seung-Sup B

    Fabian B. Kugler, Seung-Sup B. Lee, Andreas Weichselbaum, Gabriel Kotliar, and Jan von Delft. Orbital differentiation in Hund metals.Phys. Rev. B, 100:115159, Sep 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115159. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100. 115159

  5. [5]

    Synergy between Hund-Driven Correlations and Boson-Mediated Superconductivity.Phys

    Laura Fanfarillo, Angelo Valli, and Massimo Capone. Synergy between Hund-Driven Correlations and Boson-Mediated Superconductivity.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:177001, Oct

  6. [6]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.177001

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.177001. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.177001

  7. [7]

    Signa- tures of Hund metal and finite-frequency nesting in Sr 2RuO4 revealed by electronic Raman scattering.Phys

    Germ´ an Blesio, Sophie Beck, Olivier Gingras, Antoine Georges, and Jernej Mravlje. Signa- tures of Hund metal and finite-frequency nesting in Sr 2RuO4 revealed by electronic Raman scattering.Phys. Rev. Res., 6:023124, May 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023124. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023124

  8. [8]

    The Hund-metal path to strong electronic correlations.Physics Today, 77(4):46–53, April 2024

    Antoine Georges and Gabriel Kotliar. The Hund-metal path to strong electronic correlations.Physics Today, 77(4):46–53, April 2024. ISSN 0031-9228, 1945-0699. doi:10.1063/pt.wqrz.qpjx. URLhttps://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/77/4/46/ 3279745/The-Hund-metal-path-to-strong-electronic. 20

  9. [9]

    Janus-Faced Influence of Hund’s Rule Coupling in Strongly Correlated Materials.Physical Review Letters, 107(25), December 2011

    Luca de’ Medici, Jernej Mravlje, and Antoine Georges. Janus-Faced Influence of Hund’s Rule Coupling in Strongly Correlated Materials.Physical Review Letters, 107(25), December 2011. ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.256401. URLhttp://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.256401

  10. [10]

    Hund’s coupling and its key role in tuning multiorbital correlations.Phys

    Luca de’ Medici. Hund’s coupling and its key role in tuning multiorbital correlations.Phys. Rev. B, 83:205112, May 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.205112. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.205112

  11. [11]

    Fanfarillo and E

    L. Fanfarillo and E. Bascones. Electronic correlations in Hund metals.Phys. Rev. B, 92(7): 075136, August 2015. ISSN 1098-0121, 1550-235X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075136. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075136

  12. [12]

    Stadler, G

    K.M. Stadler, G. Kotliar, A. Weichselbaum, and J. von Delft. Hundness versus Mottness in a three-band Hubbard–Hund model: On the origin of strong correla- tions in Hund metals.Annals of Physics, 405:365–409, 2019. ISSN 0003-4916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.10.017. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0003491618302793

  13. [13]

    Closing in on possible scenarios for infinite-layer nickelates: Comparison of dynamical mean-field theory with angular-resolved photoemission spectroscopy.Phys

    Liang Si, Eric Jacob, Wenfeng Wu, Andreas Hausoel, Juraj Krsnik, Paul Worm, Simone Di Cataldo, Oleg Janson, and Karsten Held. Closing in on possible scenarios for infinite-layer nickelates: Comparison of dynamical mean-field theory with angular-resolved photoemission spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Res., 6:043104, Nov 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043104. U...

  14. [14]

    Local correlations necessitate waterfalls as a connection between quasiparticle band and developing Hubbard bands.Nat Commun, 16(1):255, January

    Juraj Krsnik and Karsten Held. Local correlations necessitate waterfalls as a connection between quasiparticle band and developing Hubbard bands.Nat Commun, 16(1):255, January

  15. [15]

    doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55465-7

    ISSN 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55465-7. URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/s41467-024-55465-7

  16. [16]

    Effect of strong correlations on the high energy anomaly in hole- and electron-doped high-Tc superconductors.New Journal of Physics, 11 (9):093020, sep 2009

    B Moritz, F Schmitt, W Meevasana, S Johnston, E M Motoyama, M Greven, D H Lu, C Kim, R T Scalettar, Z-X Shen, and T P Devereaux. Effect of strong correlations on the high energy anomaly in hole- and electron-doped high-Tc superconductors.New Journal of Physics, 11 (9):093020, sep 2009. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/9/093020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/ 1367-26...

  17. [17]

    Stricker, J

    D. Stricker, J. Mravlje, C. Berthod, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, A. Georges, and D. van der Marel. Optical Response of Sr 2RuO4 Reveals Universal Fermi-Liquid Scal- 21 ing and Quasiparticles Beyond Landau Theory.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:087404, Aug

  18. [18]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.113.087404

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.087404. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.113.087404

  19. [19]

    Coherence-Incoherence Crossover and the Mass-Renormalization Puzzles in Sr2RuO4.Phys

    Jernej Mravlje, Markus Aichhorn, Takashi Miyake, Kristjan Haule, Gabriel Kotliar, and An- toine Georges. Coherence-Incoherence Crossover and the Mass-Renormalization Puzzles in Sr2RuO4.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:096401, Mar 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.096401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.096401

  20. [20]

    A. P. Mackenzie, S. R. Julian, A. J. Diver, G. J. McMullan, M. P. Ray, G. G. Lon- zarich, Y. Maeno, S. Nishizaki, and T. Fujita. Quantum Oscillations in the Layered Per- ovskite Superconductor Sr 2RuO4.Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(20):3786–3789, May 1996. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3786. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 76.3786

  21. [21]

    Tamai, M

    A. Tamai, M. Zingl, E. Rozbicki, E. Cappelli, S. Ricc` o, A. de la Torre, S. McKeown Walker, F.Y. Bruno, P.D.C. King, W. Meevasana, M. Shi, M. Radovi´ c, N.C. Plumb, A.S. Gibbs, A.P. Mackenzie, C. Berthod, H.U.R. Strand, M. Kim, A. Georges, and F. Baumberger. High- Resolution Photoemission on Sr 2RuO4 Reveals Correlation-Enhanced Effective Spin-Orbit Coup...

  22. [22]

    Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions,

    Antoine Georges, Gabriel Kotliar, Werner Krauth, and Marcelo J. Rozenberg. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Reviews of Modern Physics, 68(1):13, 1996. URLhttp://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13

  23. [23]

    Kugler, Manuel Zingl, Hugo U

    Fabian B. Kugler, Manuel Zingl, Hugo U. R. Strand, Seung-Sup B. Lee, Jan Von Delft, and Antoine Georges. Strongly Correlated Materials from a Numerical Renormalization Group Perspective: How the Fermi-Liquid State of Sr 2RuO4 Emerges.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(1): 016401, January 2020. ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.016401. URLhttps://l...

  24. [24]

    Millis, and Manuel Zingl

    Jonathan Karp, Max Bramberger, Martin Grundner, Ulrich Schollw¨ ock, Andrew J. Millis, and Manuel Zingl. Sr 2MoO4 and Sr2RuO4: Disentangling the Roles of Hund’s and van Hove Physics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:166401, Oct 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.166401. URL 22 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.166401

  25. [25]

    K. M. Stadler, Z. P. Yin, J. von Delft, G. Kotliar, and A. Weichselbaum. Dy- namical Mean-Field Theory Plus Numerical Renormalization-Group Study of Spin- Orbital Separation in a Three-Band Hund Metal.Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:136401, Sep

  26. [26]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.136401

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.136401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.115.136401

  27. [27]

    Kugler, Chang-Jong Kang, and Gabriel Kotliar

    Fabian B. Kugler, Chang-Jong Kang, and Gabriel Kotliar. Low-energy perspective on two- orbital hund metals and the case of LaNiO 2.Phys. Rev. B, 110:155101, Oct 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.155101. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110. 155101

  28. [28]

    Siemann, Andela Zivanovic, Philip A

    Edgar Abarca Morales, Gesa-R. Siemann, Andela Zivanovic, Philip A. E. Murgatroyd, Igor Markovi´ c, Brendan Edwards, Chris A. Hooley, Dmitry A. Sokolov, Naoki Kikugawa, Cephise Cacho, Matthew D. Watson, Timur K. Kim, Clifford W. Hicks, Andrew P. Macken- zie, and Phil D. C. King. Hierarchy of Lifshitz Transitions in the Surface Electronic Structure of Sr 2R...

  29. [29]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.096401

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.096401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.096401

  30. [30]

    Rhodes, Edgar Abarca Morales, Carolina A

    Anirudh Chandrasekaran, Luke C. Rhodes, Edgar Abarca Morales, Carolina A. Marques, Phil D. C. King, Peter Wahl, and Joseph J. Betouras. On the engineering of higher-order Van Hove singularities in two dimensions.Nat Commun, 15(1):9521, November 2024. ISSN 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53650-2. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-024-53650-2

  31. [31]

    calcQPI: A versatile tool to simulate quasiparticle interference.SciPost Physics Codebases, page 61, 2025

    Peter Wahl, Luke C Rhodes, and Carolina A Marques. calcQPI: A versatile tool to simulate quasiparticle interference.SciPost Physics Codebases, page 61, 2025. doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.61

  32. [32]

    Matzdorf, Z

    R. Matzdorf, Z. Fang, Ismail, J. Zhang, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, K. Terakura, and E.W. Plummer. Ferromagnetism Stabilized by Lattice Distortion at the Surface of thep-Wave Superconductor Sr 2RuO4.Science, 289(5480):746–748, August 2000. ISSN 00368075, 10959203. doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.746. URLhttp://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/ 10.1126/science.289.5480.746. 23

  33. [33]

    Matzdorf, Ismail, T

    R. Matzdorf, Ismail, T. Kimura, Y. Tokura, and E. W. Plummer. Surface structural anal- ysis of the layered perovskite Sr 2RuO4 by LEEDI(V).Phys. Rev. B, 65(8):085404, Jan- uary 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.085404. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.65.085404

  34. [34]

    Magnetic- Field Tunable Intertwined Checkerboard Charge Order and Nematicity in the Surface Layer of Sr 2RuO4.Advanced Materials, 33:2100593, 2021

    Carolina A Marques, Luke C Rhodes, Rosalba Fittipaldi, Veronica Granata, Chi Ming Yim, Renato Buzio, Andrea Gerbi, Antonio Vecchione, Andreas W Rost, and Peter Wahl. Magnetic- Field Tunable Intertwined Checkerboard Charge Order and Nematicity in the Surface Layer of Sr 2RuO4.Advanced Materials, 33:2100593, 2021. ISSN 10.1002/adma.202100593. doi: 10.1002/a...

  35. [35]

    Profe, Luke C

    Jonas B. Profe, Luke C. Rhodes, Matteo D¨ urrnagel, Rebecca Bisset, Carolina A. Mar- ques, Shun Chi, Tilman Schwemmer, Ronny Thomale, Dante M. Kennes, Chris A. Hooley, and Peter Wahl. Magic angle of Sr 2RuO4 : Optimizing correlation-driven superconductivity.Phys. Rev. Research, 6(4):043057, October 2024. ISSN 2643-

  36. [36]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.6.043057

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043057. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.6.043057

  37. [37]

    Profe, Andreas Kreisel, P

    Adrian Valadkhani, Jonas B. Profe, Andreas Kreisel, P. J. Hirschfeld, and Roser Valent´ ı. Why scanning tunneling spectroscopy of Sr 2RuO4 sometimes doesn’t see the superconducting gap. npj Quantum Materials, 9(1), October 2024. ISSN 2397-4648. doi:10.1038/s41535-024-00687-7. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41535-024-00687-7

  38. [38]

    Kreisel, C

    A. Kreisel, C. A. Marques, L. C. Rhodes, X. Kong, T. Berlijn, R. Fittipaldi, V. Granata, A. Vecchione, P. Wahl, and P. J. Hirschfeld. Quasi-particle interference of the van Hove singularity in Sr 2RuO4.npj Quantum Mater., 6(1):100, December 2021. ISSN 2397-4648. doi:10.1038/s41535-021-00401-x. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41535-021-00401-x

  39. [39]

    Z. Wang, D. Walkup, P. Derry, T. Scaffidi, M. Rak, S. Vig, A. Kogar, I. Zeljkovic, A. Hu- sain, L. H. Santos, Y. Wang, A. Damascelli, Y. Maeno, P. Abbamonte, E. Fradkin, and V. Madhavan. Quasiparticle interference and strong electron–mode coupling in the quasi-one- dimensional bands of Sr2RuO4.Nature Physics, 13(8):799–805, August 2017. ISSN 1745-2473, 17...

  40. [40]

    Fermi Surface of Sr2RuO4: Spin-Orbit and Anisotropic Coulomb Interaction Effects.Phys

    Guoren Zhang, Evgeny Gorelov, Esmaeel Sarvestani, and Eva Pavarini. Fermi Surface of Sr2RuO4: Spin-Orbit and Anisotropic Coulomb Interaction Effects.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116: 106402, Mar 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.106402. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.106402

  41. [41]

    Spin- Orbit Coupling and Electronic Correlations in Sr 2RuO4.Phys

    Minjae Kim, Jernej Mravlje, Michel Ferrero, Olivier Parcollet, and Antoine Georges. Spin- Orbit Coupling and Electronic Correlations in Sr 2RuO4.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:126401, Mar

  42. [42]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.126401

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.126401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.126401

  43. [43]

    Imaginary-time matrix product state impurity solver in a real material calculation: Spin-orbit coupling in Sr2RuO4.Phys

    Nils-Oliver Linden, Manuel Zingl, Claudius Hubig, Olivier Parcollet, and Ulrich Schollw¨ ock. Imaginary-time matrix product state impurity solver in a real material calculation: Spin-orbit coupling in Sr2RuO4.Phys. Rev. B, 101:041101, Jan 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041101. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041101

  44. [44]

    R. M. Feenstra. Tunneling spectroscopy of the (110) surface of direct-gap III-V semicon- ductors.Phys. Rev. B, 50:4561–4570, Aug 1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.4561. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.4561

  45. [45]

    Hunter, C

    A. Hunter, C. Putzke, F. B. Kugler, S. Beck, E. Cappelli, F. Margot, M. Straub, Y. Alexanian, J. Teyssier, A. de la Torre, K. W. Plumb, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, N. C. Plumb, M. Shi, M. Radovic, J. Osiecki, C. Polley, D. A. Sokolov, A. P. Mackenzie, E. Berg, A. Georges, P. J. W. Moll, A. Tamai, and F. Baumberger. Non-Fermi liquid quasiparticles i...

  46. [46]

    Rhodes, Matthew D

    Luke C. Rhodes, Matthew D. Watson, Timur K. Kim, and Matthias Eschrig.k z Selective Scattering within Quasiparticle Interference Measurements of FeSe.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123: 216404, Nov 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.216404. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.216404

  47. [47]

    Rhodes, Weronika Osmolska, Carolina A

    Luke C. Rhodes, Weronika Osmolska, Carolina A. Marques, and Peter Wahl. Nature of quasiparticle interference in three dimensions.Phys. Rev. B, 107(4):045107, January 2023. ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.045107. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.045107

  48. [48]

    Bastiaansen, P

    Subir Sachdev. Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction. Rep. Prog. Phys., 82(1):014001, January 2019. ISSN 0034-4885, 1361-6633. doi:10.1088/1361- 6633/aae110. URLhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6633/aae110. 25

  49. [49]

    Critical slowing down near a magnetic quantum phase transition with fermionic breakdown.Nat

    Chia-Jung Yang, Kristin Kliemt, Cornelius Krellner, Johann Kroha, Manfred Fiebig, and Shovon Pal. Critical slowing down near a magnetic quantum phase transition with fermionic breakdown.Nat. Phys., 19(11):1605–1610, November 2023. ISSN 1745-2473, 1745-2481. doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02156-7. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41567-023-02156-7

  50. [50]

    Deconfined Quantum Critical Point: A Review of Progress.Chinese Phys

    Yi Cui, Rong Yu, and Weiqiang Yu. Deconfined Quantum Critical Point: A Review of Progress.Chinese Phys. Lett., 42(4):047503, April 2025. ISSN 0256-307X, 1741-3540. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/42/4/047503. URLhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 0256-307X/42/4/047503

  51. [51]

    Peter Blaha, Karlheinz Schwarz, Fabien Tran, Robert Laskowski, Georg K. H. Madsen, and Laurence D. Marks. WIEN2k: An APW+lo program for calculating the properties of solids.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 152(7):074101, 02 2020. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.5143061. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143061

  52. [52]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj,...

  53. [53]

    Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 32(16):165902, jan 2020

    Giovanni Pizzi, Valerio Vitale, Ryotaro Arita, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, Frank Freimuth, Guillaume G´ eranton, Marco Gibertini, Dominik Gresch, Charles Johnson, Takashi Koretsune, Julen Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, Hyungjun Lee, Jae-Mo Lihm, Daniel Marchand, Antimo Marrazzo, Yuriy Mokrousov, Jamal I Mustafa, Yoshiro Nohara, Yusuke Nomura, Lorenzo Paulatto, Samuel Ponc´ e, Th...

  54. [54]

    Grundner, F

    M. Grundner, F. B. Kugler, O. Parcollet, U. Schollw¨ ock, A. Georges, and A. Hampel. LiV2O4: Hund-assisted orbital-selective Mottness.Phys. Rev. B, 112:L041106, Jul 2025. doi:10.1103/m42m-t4dm. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/m42m-t4dm

  55. [55]

    Kugler, Jeremy Lee-Hand, Harrison LaBollita, Lorenzo Van Mu˜ noz, Jason Kaye, Sophie Beck, Alexander Hampel, Antoine Georges, and Cyrus E

    Fabian B. Kugler, Jeremy Lee-Hand, Harrison LaBollita, Lorenzo Van Mu˜ noz, Jason Kaye, Sophie Beck, Alexander Hampel, Antoine Georges, and Cyrus E. Dreyer. Fermi-liquidT 2 resistivity: Dynamical mean-field theory meets experiment.Phys. Rev. B, 113:L081105, Feb

  56. [56]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/f4p8-5xb8

    doi:10.1103/f4p8-5xb8. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/f4p8-5xb8

  57. [57]

    LaBollita, J

    Harrison LaBollita, Jeremy Lee-Hand, Fabian B. Kugler, Lorenzo Van Mu˜ noz, Sophie Beck, Alexander Hampel, Jason Kaye, Antoine Georges, and Cyrus E. Dreyer. Low-temperature transport in high-conductivity correlated metals: A density functional plus dynamical mean- field study of cubic perovskites.Phys. Rev. B, 113:085125, Feb 2026. doi:10.1103/71c6-sb7v. ...

  58. [58]

    Costi, and Thomas Pruschke

    Ralf Bulla, Theo A. Costi, and Thomas Pruschke. Numerical renormalization group method for quantum impurity systems.Rev. Mod. Phys., 80:395–450, Apr 2008. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.395. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.80. 395

  59. [59]

    Fabian B. Kugler. Improved estimator for numerical renormalization group calculations of the self-energy.Phys. Rev. B, 105:245132, Jun 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.245132. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.245132

  60. [60]

    Au- tomatic, high-order, and adaptive algorithms for Brillouin zone integration.SciPost Phys., 15:062, 2023

    Jason Kaye, Sophie Beck, Alex Barnett, Lorenzo Van Mu˜ noz, and Olivier Parcollet. Au- tomatic, high-order, and adaptive algorithms for Brillouin zone integration.SciPost Phys., 15:062, 2023. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.2.062. URLhttps://scipost.org/10.21468/ SciPostPhys.15.2.062

  61. [61]

    Open Source Softw., 9(102):7080, 2024

    Lorenzo Van Mu˜ noz, Sophie Beck, and Jason Kaye.AutoBZ.jl: Automatic, adaptive Brillouin zone integration using Wannier interpolation.J. Open Source Softw., 9(102):7080, 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.07080

  62. [62]

    Lee, Fabian B

    Seung-Sup B. Lee, Fabian B. Kugler, and Jan von Delft. Computing Local Multipoint Cor- relators Using the Numerical Renormalization Group.Phys. Rev. X, 11:041007, Oct 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041007. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX. 11.041007. 27

  63. [63]

    Lee, Jan von Delft, and Andreas Weichselbaum

    Seung-Sup B. Lee, Jan von Delft, and Andreas Weichselbaum. Doublon-Holon Ori- gin of the Subpeaks at the Hubbard Band Edges.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:236402, Dec

  64. [64]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.119.236402

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.236402. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.119.236402

  65. [65]

    Lee and Andreas Weichselbaum

    Seung-Sup B. Lee and Andreas Weichselbaum. Adaptive broadening to improve spectral res- olution in the numerical renormalization group.Phys. Rev. B, 94:235127, Dec 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235127. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94. 235127

  66. [66]

    Non-abelian symmetries in tensor networks: A quantum symmetry space approach.Ann

    Andreas Weichselbaum. Non-abelian symmetries in tensor networks: A quantum symmetry space approach.Ann. Phys., 327(12):2972–3047, 2012. ISSN 0003-4916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2012.07.009. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0003491612001121. Initial QSpace paper

  67. [67]

    X-symbols for non-Abelian symmetries in tensor networks.Phys

    Andreas Weichselbaum. X-symbols for non-Abelian symmetries in tensor networks.Phys. Rev. Res., 2(2):023385, June 2020. ISSN 2643-1564. doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023385. X-symbols for QSpace

  68. [68]

    Qspace - an open-source tensor library for abelian and non- abelian symmetries.SciPost Phys

    Andreas Weichselbaum. Qspace - an open-source tensor library for abelian and non- abelian symmetries.SciPost Phys. Codeb., November 2024. ISSN 2949-804X. doi: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.40. QSpace codebase release and documentation

  69. [69]

    Berlijn, A

    Peayush Choubey, T. Berlijn, A. Kreisel, C. Cao, and P. J. Hirschfeld. Visualization of atomic-scale phenomena in superconductors: Application to FeSe.Phys. Rev. B, 90(13): 134520, October 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.134520. URLhttp://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.134520

  70. [70]

    Kreisel, Peayush Choubey, T

    A. Kreisel, Peayush Choubey, T. Berlijn, W. Ku, B.M. Andersen, and P.J. Hirschfeld. Inter- pretation of Scanning Tunneling Quasiparticle Interference and Impurity States in Cuprates. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114(21):217002, May 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217002. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217002

  71. [71]

    Economou.Green’s Functions in Quantum Physics, volume 7 ofSpringer Series in Solid-State Sciences

    Eleftherios N. Economou.Green’s Functions in Quantum Physics, volume 7 ofSpringer Series in Solid-State Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. ISBN 978-3- 540-28838-1 978-3-540-28841-1. doi:10.1007/3-540-28841-4. URLhttp://link.springer. com/10.1007/3-540-28841-4. 28

  72. [72]

    U. R. Singh, M. Enayat, S. C. White, and P. Wahl. Construction and performance of a dilution-refrigerator based spectroscopic-imaging scanning tunneling microscope.Review of Scientific Instruments, 84(1):013708, 2013. ISSN 00346748. doi:10.1063/1.4788941. URL http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/1/10.1063/1.4788941. 29