An extended correction to ``Combinatorial Scalar Curvature and Rigidity of Ball Packings,'' (by D. Cooper and I. Rivin)
classification
🧮 math.MG
math.GT
keywords
argumentcorrectlemmasauthorballbeencloselycombinatorial
read the original abstract
It has been pointed out to the author by David Glickenstein that the proof of the (closely related) Lemmas 1.2 and 3.2 in the title paper is incorrect. The statements of both Lemmas are correct, and the purpose of this note is to give a correct argument. The argument is of some interest in its own right.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.