On the Worst-Case Approximability of Sparse PCA
read the original abstract
It is well known that Sparse PCA (Sparse Principal Component Analysis) is NP-hard to solve exactly on worst-case instances. What is the complexity of solving Sparse PCA approximately? Our contributions include: 1) a simple and efficient algorithm that achieves an $n^{-1/3}$-approximation; 2) NP-hardness of approximation to within $(1-\varepsilon)$, for some small constant $\varepsilon > 0$; 3) SSE-hardness of approximation to within any constant factor; and 4) an $\exp\exp\left(\Omega\left(\sqrt{\log \log n}\right)\right)$ ("quasi-quasi-polynomial") gap for the standard semidefinite program.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Randomized Algorithm for Sparse PCA based on the Basic SDP Relaxation
A randomized algorithm based on the basic SDP relaxation for sparse PCA achieves an approximation ratio bounded by the sparsity constant with high probability and O(log d) on average under a technical assumption satis...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.