{"as_of":"2026-08-23T14:37:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:aa248c27c3cf15302144c29d25fd042d563eaa9c0501de788a03e2bda3f36cf7","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:49:15.323444Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:49:34.881298Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1510.03706","last_updated":"2015-10-09T20:27:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T22:28:30.155239Z","submitted_at":"2015-10-09T20:27:39Z","title":"Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1510.03706","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1510.03706","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:49:34.881298Z","title":"Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?","venue":"quant-ph","work_id":"baa41c9b-fecc-484e-96fc-d85c0ce3120a","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.15128","last_updated":"2025-08-01T23:59:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T01:05:16.182067Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-20T21:38:17Z","title":"Taming Entanglement","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:49:15.323444Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1510.03706","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.15128"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0555664915f8ee1b0b565f28e576e8a51d9bcd06144276ba238d568059653a13","observation_id":"b630e891-b293-44c7-9269-ac818c3103b9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:49:35.018293Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1510.03706","last_updated":"2015-10-09T20:27:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T22:28:30.155239Z","submitted_at":"2015-10-09T20:27:39Z","title":"Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1510.03706","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:19:16.556276Z","title":"(2016), ‘Are retrocausal accounts of entanglement unnaturally fine-tuned?’,International Journal of Quantum Foundations2, 1–16.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.03706","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.11300","last_updated":"2026-07-14T18:00:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T01:06:34.244328Z","submitted_at":"2026-02-11T19:21:23Z","title":"Extending Bell's Theorem: Nonlocality via Measurement Dependence","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:19:16.556276Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1510.03706","citing_paper":"/paper/2602.11300"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4937e3d6d96958ea38eab2b89169608660abe920ff14f490373327629cd29c0","observation_id":"6faa2d40-ac0d-427b-b9c0-e0cd7b973e63","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:19:16.556276Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1510.03706/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1510.03706/integrity","json":"/paper/1510.03706/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1510.03706"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1510.03706","last_updated":"2015-10-09T20:27:39Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"quant-ph","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T22:28:30.155239Z","submitted_at":"2015-10-09T20:27:39Z","title":"Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 23 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1510.03706."}