{"as_of":"2026-08-11T05:08:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:c21839a31ca5c83882e0014f7837519a8599a4e82db297ae1118e28af612d499","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1604.01450","last_updated":"2016-04-05T23:36:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T04:51:51.920659Z","submitted_at":"2016-04-05T23:36:12Z","title":"Does Technical Debt Lead to the Rejection of Pull Requests?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1604.01450","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.01450 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.09524","last_updated":"2026-07-10T15:33:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:37:38.871636Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-10T15:33:47Z","title":"Balancing Usefulness and Naturalness: An LLM-based Curation Pipeline for Code Review Comments","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1604.01450","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.09524"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f43d10631b413eac515665e80b2b4cc144fb76501e5529c72d2f72ebd39c744f","observation_id":"aac8ad6e-5105-4e88-81b4-ca1e11d673dc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-13T02:24:25.366633Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1604.01450/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1604.01450/integrity","json":"/paper/1604.01450/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1604.01450"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1604.01450","last_updated":"2016-04-05T23:36:12Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T04:51:51.920659Z","submitted_at":"2016-04-05T23:36:12Z","title":"Does Technical Debt Lead to the Rejection of Pull Requests?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:1604.01450."}