{"as_of":"2026-08-10T21:16:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:9b2a3fd085b2269db25438591b4a5b868a4a0568e38a552e82cd1cdb9a844fbc","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T14:27:41.057081Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-05-21T20:40:36.237310Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1604.06915","last_updated":"2016-04-23T15:13:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T03:30:43.330377Z","submitted_at":"2016-04-23T15:13:43Z","title":"On the Sample Complexity of End-to-end Training vs. Semantic Abstraction Training","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1604.06915","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T14:27:41.057081Z","title":"On the sample complexity of end-to-end training vs","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.01828","last_updated":"2025-05-02T17:53:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T14:17:11.433619Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-03T21:11:02Z","title":"From Foresight to Forethought: VLM-In-the-Loop Policy Steering via Latent Alignment","version":3},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T14:27:41.057081Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1604.06915","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.01828"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b06c8751cfb25dbfdbf6c392393f53d07fea6e58fc2d4fa9dd96234c166525fb","observation_id":"830ee759-6941-415a-89d7-067b2ea4ccce","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T14:27:41.057081Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1604.06915","last_updated":"2016-04-23T15:13:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T03:30:43.330377Z","submitted_at":"2016-04-23T15:13:43Z","title":"On the Sample Complexity of End-to-end Training vs. Semantic Abstraction Training","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1604.06915","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1604.06915","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"On the Sample Complexity of End-to-end Training vs. Semantic Abstraction Training","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"83b55853-aabb-413b-8a3a-d0cb9b825b3d","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.26745","last_updated":"2026-05-18T17:56:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T20:19:54.425869Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-30T17:40:22Z","title":"Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why","version":3},"reference_index":162,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-21T20:38:18.005002Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1604.06915","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.26745"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8c175ee273a0afb28a10b80fff722d6f95ffb227fdfa31066bc9255f78b99f8e","observation_id":"fdebfc3e-10a6-4f43-88da-5c262bc498d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-21T20:40:36.239104Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1604.06915/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1604.06915/integrity","json":"/paper/1604.06915/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1604.06915"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1604.06915","last_updated":"2016-04-23T15:13:43Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T03:30:43.330377Z","submitted_at":"2016-04-23T15:13:43Z","title":"On the Sample Complexity of End-to-end Training vs. Semantic Abstraction Training"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1604.06915."}