{"as_of":"2026-08-16T20:01:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:53311df496fa4207ef9d4487ae87c634c120e61c74dd9d804120d343acbc3c56","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:13:41.069984Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:23:12.899986Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1801.03680","last_updated":"2021-02-28T19:53:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:29:49.533715Z","submitted_at":"2018-01-11T09:16:55Z","title":"The time interpretation of expected utility theory","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1801.03680","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:13:41.069984Z","title":"The time interpretation of expected utility theory","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.01709","last_updated":"2023-04-11T18:56:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:03:15.989187Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-05T16:15:54Z","title":"Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation","version":3},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:13:41.069984Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1801.03680","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.01709"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13e2d1b6255e036cc8b072cfaa36976251d11e446db34db38938b9193b892fee","observation_id":"d0da8fb6-4e9e-4d67-9336-d59e998188fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:13:41.069984Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1801.03680","last_updated":"2021-02-28T19:53:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:29:49.533715Z","submitted_at":"2018-01-11T09:16:55Z","title":"The time interpretation of expected utility theory","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1801.03680","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1801.03680","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:23:12.899986Z","title":"The time interpretation of expected utility theory","venue":"econ.GN","work_id":"dbc02103-e025-4077-966a-31a187f4fde8","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.21443","last_updated":"2025-08-29T09:12:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T08:37:32.754093Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-29T09:12:41Z","title":"Beyond expected value: geometric mean optimization for long-term policy performance in reinforcement learning","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:23:12.015329Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1801.03680","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.21443"},"observation_digest":"sha256:959e58ae047d114e7467abd3fe9276bf77c7b644db532b068b9279b7c85e26ce","observation_id":"51f104c9-7e90-4b61-b2c8-39faabb455d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:23:12.989244Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1801.03680/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1801.03680/integrity","json":"/paper/1801.03680/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1801.03680"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1801.03680","last_updated":"2021-02-28T19:53:04Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"econ.GN","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:29:49.533715Z","submitted_at":"2018-01-11T09:16:55Z","title":"The time interpretation of expected utility theory"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1801.03680."}