{"as_of":"2026-08-08T00:19:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:6c767bebccadb3c4fdc6b99470231d386573fe195d98e37d7ba401905d3e0bee","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T18:21:09.410698Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T14:40:49.285254Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1802.00791","last_updated":"2018-06-11T21:05:58Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T06:21:31.375147Z","submitted_at":"2018-02-02T18:08:47Z","title":"Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1802.00791","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"1802.00791","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T23:03:55.010342Z","title":"& Hu, W., Does Planck 2015 polarization data favor high redshift reionization? 2018, Phys","venue":null,"work_id":"91e25422-9eb5-4184-b446-2f752cc36f0a","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1807.06209","last_updated":"2021-08-09T10:43:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2018-07-17T04:05:07Z","title":"Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters","version":4},"reference_index":165,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T14:40:47.851452Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1802.00791","citing_paper":"/paper/1807.06209"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b5f482c9eedb8b247f40988239560d30369dd3c818fddd0ede8aa22f2ff6674b","observation_id":"df2a51d0-166a-4583-8d71-3d5284ca72a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-04T23:03:55.010342Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1802.00791","last_updated":"2018-06-11T21:05:58Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T06:21:31.375147Z","submitted_at":"2018-02-02T18:08:47Z","title":"Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1802.00791","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T18:21:09.410698Z","title":"Heinrich and W","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01919","last_updated":"2026-08-03T08:53:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T20:20:19.398331Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T08:53:16Z","title":"Boosting the optical depth to Thomson scattering with primordial black hole evaporation at high redshift","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T18:21:09.410698Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1802.00791","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01919"},"observation_digest":"sha256:31c4f2e59370786f4195611b5f6390265fe2b9c779b4e4799dbad3943f671370","observation_id":"bd70e8d4-d48c-4de9-957a-f9af3e05f391","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T18:21:09.410698Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1802.00791/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1802.00791/integrity","json":"/paper/1802.00791/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1802.00791"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1802.00791","last_updated":"2018-06-11T21:05:58Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"astro-ph.CO","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T06:21:31.375147Z","submitted_at":"2018-02-02T18:08:47Z","title":"Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1802.00791."}