{"as_of":"2026-08-17T03:41:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ab74a7c658759b8c59eaa7011e486f6240b4589cac0838124f1bb3ec5005ec4c","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:25:16.290332Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:16:42.563056Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1809.10735","last_updated":"2019-07-02T00:34:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T18:22:31.126207Z","submitted_at":"2018-09-27T19:33:03Z","title":"A Qualitative Comparison of CoQA, SQuAD 2.0 and QuAC","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1809.10735","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:25:16.290332Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.05117","last_updated":"2020-01-17T08:47:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T10:45:13.562475Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-14T13:34:40Z","title":"FlowDelta: Modeling Flow Information Gain in Reasoning for Conversational Machine Comprehension","version":3},"reference_index":18,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:25:16.290332Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1809.10735","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.05117"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3a8b422a9ddc02722fc2868d7c2bda602bc80a1ad885d0434a140b14e97680b0","observation_id":"21d4febd-58cc-4a24-a903-cf8e7129112a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:25:16.290332Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1809.10735","last_updated":"2019-07-02T00:34:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T18:22:31.126207Z","submitted_at":"2018-09-27T19:33:03Z","title":"A Qualitative Comparison of CoQA, SQuAD 2.0 and QuAC","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1809.10735","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1809.10735","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:16:42.563056Z","title":"A Qualitative Comparison of CoQA, SQuAD 2.0 and QuAC","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"be86ed6c-5f46-4af8-a029-08b81418a0d1","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.09456","last_updated":"2019-08-26T03:39:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:43:05.809541Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-26T03:39:51Z","title":"Attentive History Selection for Conversational Question Answering","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:16:42.513290Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1809.10735","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.09456"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b094ecfb7642d73d86b3c22978b53fa3b2b291f5d673b18914bee703a3e35165","observation_id":"d64435e1-1508-4fd6-9403-970d9d7760b6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:16:42.569913Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1809.10735/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1809.10735/integrity","json":"/paper/1809.10735/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1809.10735"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1809.10735","last_updated":"2019-07-02T00:34:44Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T18:22:31.126207Z","submitted_at":"2018-09-27T19:33:03Z","title":"A Qualitative Comparison of CoQA, SQuAD 2.0 and QuAC"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1809.10735."}