{"as_of":"2026-08-08T01:16:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:9d99ee80516bdd1647a72ce12596e3a24a924b3ad8d0e41600b57aa5a8e3ef80","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T13:00:04.498427Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1905.13714","last_updated":"2019-05-31T16:49:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T07:57:04.916745Z","submitted_at":"2019-05-31T16:49:57Z","title":"Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1905.13714","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z","title":"Do human rationales improve machine explanations? arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13714, 2019","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1905},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.07168","last_updated":"2025-06-08T14:34:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:51:47.659500Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-08T14:34:29Z","title":"Efficient Text-Attributed Graph Learning through Selective Annotation and Graph Alignment","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1905.13714","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.07168"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2ce5f94db2760d44265910ceaaed8edd68712ec1c4e91c20253697e6ae38ed84","observation_id":"6112f007-52cb-4558-b759-a9c2806e13ed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1905.13714","last_updated":"2019-05-31T16:49:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T07:57:04.916745Z","submitted_at":"2019-05-31T16:49:57Z","title":"Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1905.13714","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1905.13714","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T13:00:04.498427Z","title":"Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"4dee5a0e-388c-47f4-9d49-c458b5d2f5fc","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.21302","last_updated":"2025-07-28T19:44:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:31:50.776660Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-28T19:44:25Z","title":"Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models?","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T13:00:04.191173Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1905.13714","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.21302"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5294047218f6032e4fbae05a52dc9c583d59ab649491f59b4069569608075095","observation_id":"f7b6eee7-9ae4-4345-8474-de28a295db67","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T13:00:04.503196Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1905.13714/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1905.13714/integrity","json":"/paper/1905.13714/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1905.13714"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1905.13714","last_updated":"2019-05-31T16:49:57Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T07:57:04.916745Z","submitted_at":"2019-05-31T16:49:57Z","title":"Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1905.13714."}