pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12234 · v1 · pith:3RMWA4R3new · submitted 2019-06-28 · 🧮 math.AP

The dot W^(-1,p) Neumann problem for higher order elliptic equations

Ariel Barton This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords Neumann problemhigher order elliptic equationshalf-spacedot W^{-1,p}layer potentialsvariable coefficientsnontangential estimatessquare function estimates
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Neumann problem for higher-order elliptic equations with variable self-adjoint t-independent coefficients is well-posed in the half-space for boundary data in dot W^{-1,p} when max(0, 1/2 - 1/n - eps) < 1/p < 1/2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes solvability of the Neumann problem in the upper half-space for higher-order elliptic equations whose coefficients are variable, self-adjoint, and independent of the transverse variable. Boundary data are taken from the negative Sobolev space dot W^{-1,p} inside the interval max(0, 1/2 - 1/n - eps) < 1/p < 1/2. The argument extends known L^2 well-posedness by means of estimates inspired by Shen. A reader cares because many applications require solutions for data that are less regular than L^2 but still lie in a negative Sobolev space of this type.

Core claim

We solve the Neumann problem in the half space R^{n+1}_+, for higher order elliptic differential equations with variable self-adjoint t-independent coefficients, and with boundary data in the negative smoothness space dot W^{-1,p}, where max(0,1/2-1/n-eps)<1/p<1/2. Our arguments are inspired by an argument of Shen and build on known well posedness results in the case p=2. We use the same techniques to establish nontangential and square function estimates on layer potentials with inputs in L^p or dot W^{±1,p} for a similar range of p, based on known bounds for p near 2; in this case we may relax the requirement of self-adjointness.

What carries the argument

Shen-inspired estimates that combine with known p=2 well-posedness to produce nontangential and square-function bounds on layer potentials for p away from 2.

If this is right

  • The Neumann problem admits a unique solution for the indicated range of p.
  • Nontangential and square-function estimates hold for the associated layer potentials when the input lies in L^p or dot W^{±1,p} for a comparable interval of p.
  • Self-adjointness of the coefficients may be dropped when only the layer-potential estimates are required.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the half-space result can be localized, similar solvability statements may hold in Lipschitz domains.
  • The precise lower bound on 1/p may be sharp; explicit counterexamples at the endpoint would clarify the range.
  • The same extension technique could be tested on lower-order equations where the p-range is already known.

Load-bearing premise

The known well-posedness results at p=2 must hold for the given coefficient class and must combine with the Shen-inspired estimates.

What would settle it

A higher-order elliptic operator with self-adjoint t-independent coefficients for which the Neumann problem in the half-space fails to possess a solution (or the layer-potential estimates fail) for some boundary datum in dot W^{-1,p} with 1/p strictly between 1/2 and the lower threshold.

read the original abstract

We solve the Neumann problem in the half space $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}_+$, for higher order elliptic differential equations with variable self-adjoint $t$-independent coefficients, and with boundary data in the negative smoothness space $\dot W^{-1,p}$, where $\max(0,\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{n}-\varepsilon) <\frac{1}{p} <\frac{1}{2}$. Our arguments are inspired by an argument of Shen and build on known well posedness results in the case $p=2$. We use the same techniques to establish nontangential and square function estimates on layer potentials with inputs in $L^p$ or $\dot W^{\pm1,p}$ for a similar range of $p$, based on known bounds for $p$ near $2$; in this case we may relax the requirement of self-adjointess.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to solve the Neumann problem in the half-space R^{n+1}_+ for higher-order elliptic equations with variable self-adjoint t-independent coefficients, with boundary data in dot W^{-1,p} for max(0,1/2-1/n-ε)<1/p<1/2. The arguments build on known p=2 well-posedness and adapt an argument of Shen; the same techniques yield nontangential and square-function estimates for layer potentials in L^p or dot W^{±1,p} (relaxing self-adjointness) based on bounds near p=2.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result extends the range of p for which the Neumann problem is well-posed for higher-order operators under minimal coefficient regularity (measurable, t-independent, self-adjoint), contributing to the theory of elliptic boundary-value problems in non-smooth settings. The layer-potential estimates are a useful byproduct.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central claim rests on 'known well-posedness results in the case p=2' for higher-order operators with merely measurable t-independent self-adjoint coefficients. The manuscript must explicitly identify the precise statement (including any hidden regularity or order restrictions) of the p=2 result being invoked, as the Shen adaptation cannot transfer if that base case requires constant or Lipschitz coefficients.
  2. [§3 or §4 (Shen adaptation)] The section containing the Shen adaptation (likely §3 or §4): the error estimates and perturbation argument must be checked for whether they introduce new restrictions on the order of the operator or on the coefficient class when passing from p=2 to the stated range; without these details the extension to max(0,1/2-1/n-ε)<1/p<1/2 is not verified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the range of p should be clarified to avoid ambiguity with the ε parameter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and helpful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity on the invoked p=2 results and the details of the adaptation argument.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central claim rests on 'known well-posedness results in the case p=2' for higher-order operators with merely measurable t-independent self-adjoint coefficients. The manuscript must explicitly identify the precise statement (including any hidden regularity or order restrictions) of the p=2 result being invoked, as the Shen adaptation cannot transfer if that base case requires constant or Lipschitz coefficients.

    Authors: We agree that the base p=2 result must be identified explicitly. The well-posedness at p=2 that we invoke is the standard result for the Neumann problem for higher-order (order 2m) elliptic operators with measurable t-independent self-adjoint coefficients in the half-space, obtained via the Lax-Milgram theorem in the appropriate energy space (no additional regularity such as Lipschitz or constant coefficients is required). We will add a precise statement and citation to this result in the revised abstract and introduction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 or §4 (Shen adaptation)] The section containing the Shen adaptation (likely §3 or §4): the error estimates and perturbation argument must be checked for whether they introduce new restrictions on the order of the operator or on the coefficient class when passing from p=2 to the stated range; without these details the extension to max(0,1/2-1/n-ε)<1/p<1/2 is not verified.

    Authors: The adaptation in Section 3 uses error estimates controlled by the p=2 bounds and a perturbation whose constants depend only on ellipticity, dimension, and the fixed order 2m; no new restrictions on the coefficient class (measurable t-independent self-adjoint) or operator order are introduced. The range of p follows from the extrapolation theorem applied to the p=2 case. We will add a clarifying remark in the revision to make this explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper explicitly states that its arguments build on known well-posedness results for the p=2 case and are inspired by an argument of Shen. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, fitted inputs presented as predictions, or other enumerated circular patterns appear in the abstract or described derivation chain. The extension to the stated p-range is framed as relying on independent external results rather than reducing to the paper's own equations or inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is populated from explicitly stated assumptions in the abstract. The result depends on prior well-posedness at p=2 and on the coefficients being self-adjoint and t-independent.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The coefficients are self-adjoint and t-independent
    Explicitly required in the abstract for the Neumann problem result.
  • domain assumption Well-posedness holds for the p=2 case
    The abstract states that the argument builds on known well-posedness results when p=2.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1421 out tokens · 27812 ms · 2026-05-25T13:49:08.664157+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Jerison and Carlos E

    David S. Jerison and Carlos E. Kenig. The Dirichlet probl em in nonsmooth domains. Ann. of Math. (2) , 113(2):367–382, 1981. 2, 9, 12

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Kenig and Jill Pipher

    Carlos E. Kenig and Jill Pipher. The Neumann problem for e lliptic equations with nonsmooth coefficients. Invent. Math. , 113(3):447–509, 1993. 2, 3, 9, 10, 12

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    Kenig, H

    C. Kenig, H. Koch, J. Pipher, and T. Toro. A new approach to absolute continuity of elliptic measure, with applications to non-symmetric equations. Adv. Math. , 153(2):231–298, 2000. 2, 9

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Kenig and David J

    Carlos E. Kenig and David J. Rule. The regularity and Neum ann problem for non-symmetric elliptic operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 361(1):125–160, 2009. 2, 5, 10

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    David J. Rule. Non-symmetric elliptic operators on boun ded Lipschitz domains in the plane. Electron. J. Differential Equations , pages No. 144, 1–8, 2007. 2, 5, 10

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Fu nctional calculus of Dirac op- erators and complex perturbations of Neumann and Dirichlet problems

    Pascal Auscher, Andreas Axelsson, and Steve Hofmann. Fu nctional calculus of Dirac op- erators and complex perturbations of Neumann and Dirichlet problems. J. Funct. Anal. , 255(2):374–448, 2008. 2

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    So lvability of elliptic systems with square integrable boundary data

    Pascal Auscher, Andreas Axelsson, and Alan McIntosh. So lvability of elliptic systems with square integrable boundary data. Ark. Mat. , 48(2):253–287, 2010. 2

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Angeles Alfonseca, Pascal Auscher, Andreas Axelsson , Steve Hofmann, and Seick Kim

    M. Angeles Alfonseca, Pascal Auscher, Andreas Axelsson , Steve Hofmann, and Seick Kim. Analyticity of layer potentials and L2 solvability of boundary value problems for divergence form elliptic equations with complex L∞ coefficients. Adv. Math., 226(5):4533–4606, 2011. 2, 5, 8, 18, 21

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Elliptic partial differential equations w ith almost-real coefficients

    Ariel Barton. Elliptic partial differential equations w ith almost-real coefficients. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 223(1051):vi+108, 2013. 2, 5

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Square function/non- tangential maximal function estimates and the Dirichlet pr oblem for non-symmetric elliptic operators

    Steve Hofmann, Carlos Kenig, Svitlana Mayboroda, and J ill Pipher. Square function/non- tangential maximal function estimates and the Dirichlet pr oblem for non-symmetric elliptic operators. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 28(2):483–529, 2015. 2, 8, 9 44 ARIEL BARTON

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    The regularity prob- lem for second order elliptic operators with complex-value d bounded measurable coefficients

    Steve Hofmann, Carlos Kenig, Svitlana Mayboroda, and J ill Pipher. The regularity prob- lem for second order elliptic operators with complex-value d bounded measurable coefficients. Math. Ann. , 361(3-4):863–907, 2015. 2, 5, 8, 10

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Steve Hofmann, Marius Mitrea, and Andrew J. Morris. The method of layer potentials in Lp and endpoint spaces for elliptic operators with L∞ coefficients. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 111(3):681–716, 2015. 2, 5, 8

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Layer potentials and boundary-value problems for second order elliptic operators with data in Besov space s

    Ariel Barton and Svitlana Mayboroda. Layer potentials and boundary-value problems for second order elliptic operators with data in Besov space s. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 243(1149):v+110, 2016. 2, 5, 6, 11, 33

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    On Poisson operat ors and Dirichlet-Neumann maps in H s for divergence form elliptic operators with Lipschitz coeffi cients

    Yasunori Maekawa and Hideyuki Miura. On Poisson operat ors and Dirichlet-Neumann maps in H s for divergence form elliptic operators with Lipschitz coeffi cients. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 368(9):6227–6252, 2016. 2

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Functional cal culus for first order systems of Dirac type and boundary value problems

    Pascal Auscher and Sebastian Stahlhut. Functional cal culus for first order systems of Dirac type and boundary value problems. M´ em. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.), (144):vii+164, 2016. 2, 5, 8, 10

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    On domain of Poiss on operators and factorization for divergence form elliptic operators

    Yasunori Maekawa and Hideyuki Miura. On domain of Poiss on operators and factorization for divergence form elliptic operators. Manuscripta Math. , 152(3-4):459–512, 2017. 2

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Elliptic boundary value problems with fractional regulari ty data, volume 37 of CRM Monograph Series

    Alex Amenta and Pascal Auscher. Elliptic boundary value problems with fractional regulari ty data, volume 37 of CRM Monograph Series . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI,

    work page

  18. [18]

    2, 5, 11

    The first order approach. 2, 5, 11

    work page

  19. [19]

    Representatio n and uniqueness for boundary value elliptic problems via first order systems

    Pascal Auscher and Mihalis Mourgoglou. Representatio n and uniqueness for boundary value elliptic problems via first order systems. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 35(1):241–315, 2019. 2, 5

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    S quare function estimates on layer potentials for higher-order elliptic equations

    Ariel Barton, Steve Hofmann, and Svitlana Mayboroda. S quare function estimates on layer potentials for higher-order elliptic equations. Math. Nachr. , 290(16):2459–2511, 2017. 2, 3, 5, 17

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    B ounds on layer potentials with rough inputs for higher order elliptic equations

    Ariel Barton, Steve Hofmann, and Svitlana Mayboroda. B ounds on layer potentials with rough inputs for higher order elliptic equations. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. to appear (a preprint may be found at arXiv:1703.06847 [math.AP] ). 2, 3, 5, 16, 17, 18

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Dirichlet and Neumann boundary values of solutions to higher order elliptic equations

    Ariel Barton, Steve Hofmann, and Svitlana Mayboroda. D irichlet and Neumann boundary values of solutions to higher order elliptic equations. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) . to appear (a preprint may be found at arXiv:1703.06963 [math.AP] ). 2, 3, 4, 6, 15, 16, 17, 32, 33, 37, 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    T he Neumann problem for higher order elliptic equations with symmetric coefficients

    Ariel Barton, Steve Hofmann, and Svitlana Mayboroda. T he Neumann problem for higher order elliptic equations with symmetric coefficients. Math. Ann. , 371(1-2):297–336, 2018. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 32, 33, 35, 37

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Nontangential estimates on layer potentials and the Neumann problem for higher order elliptic equations

    Ariel Barton, Steve Hofmann, and Svitlana Mayboroda. N ontangential estimates on layer potentials and the Neumann problem for higher order ellipti c equations. submitted, arXiv:1808.07137v1[math.AP]. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17, 18, 28, 29

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Layer potentials for general linear elli ptic systems

    Ariel Barton. Layer potentials for general linear elli ptic systems. Electron. J. Differential Equations, (309):1–23, 2017. 3, 5, 6, 17, 31, 33

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Adjoint boundary val ue problems for the biharmonic equation on C1 domains in the plane

    Jonathan Cohen and John Gosselin. Adjoint boundary val ue problems for the biharmonic equation on C1 domains in the plane. Ark. Mat. , 23(2):217–240, 1985. 3, 5, 10, 15

    work page 1985

  27. [27]

    Verchota

    Gregory C. Verchota. The biharmonic Neumann problem in Lipschitz domains. Acta Math. , 194(2):217–279, 2005. 3, 5, 9, 10, 11

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    The Lp boundary value problems on Lipschitz domains

    Zhongwei Shen. The Lp boundary value problems on Lipschitz domains. Adv. Math. , 216(1):212–254, 2007. 3, 5, 9, 10, 12

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    Boundary value problem s and integral operators for the bi-Laplacian in non-smooth domains

    Irina Mitrea and Marius Mitrea. Boundary value problem s and integral operators for the bi-Laplacian in non-smooth domains. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. , 24(3):329–383, 2013. 3, 5, 11, 15

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Multi-layer potentials and boundary problems for higher- order elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains , volume 2063 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Irina Mitrea and Marius Mitrea. Multi-layer potentials and boundary problems for higher- order elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains , volume 2063 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Heidelberg, 2013. 3, 5, 11, 15

    work page 2063

  31. [31]

    Verchota

    Gregory C. Verchota. Boundary coerciveness and the Neu mann problem for 4th order linear partial differential operators. In Around the research of Vladimir Maz’ya. II , volume 12 of Int. Math. Ser. (N. Y.) , pages 365–378. Springer, New York, 2010. 3 THE ˙W − 1,p NEUMANN PROBLEM FOR HIGHER ORDER ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS 45

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Higher-order ell iptic equations in non-smooth do- mains: a partial survey

    Ariel Barton and Svitlana Mayboroda. Higher-order ell iptic equations in non-smooth do- mains: a partial survey. In Harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, comple x anal- ysis, Banach spaces, and operator theory. Vol. 1 , volume 4 of Assoc. Women Math. Ser. , pages 55–121. Springer, [Cham], 2016. 3, 9

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    The Green’s formula for higher order elli ptic equations

    Ariel Barton. The Green’s formula for higher order elli ptic equations. in preparation. 4, 7, 11, 12

    work page

  34. [34]

    B. E. J. Dahlberg, C. E. Kenig, and G. C. Verchota. Bounda ry value problems for the systems of elastostatics in Lipschitz domains. Duke Math. J. , 57(3):795–818, 1988. 5, 9, 10, 12

    work page 1988

  35. [35]

    E. B. Fabes, C. E. Kenig, and G. C. Verchota. The Dirichle t problem for the Stokes system on Lipschitz domains. Duke Math. J. , 57(3):769–793, 1988. 5, 9, 10, 12

    work page 1988

  36. [36]

    Layer potential methods for boundary val ue problems on Lipschitz domains

    Eugene Fabes. Layer potential methods for boundary val ue problems on Lipschitz domains. In Potential theory—surveys and problems (Prague, 1987) , volume 1344 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 55–80. Springer, Berlin, 1988. 5

    work page 1987

  37. [37]

    Layer potentials and boundary value proble ms for elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains

    W en Jie Gao. Layer potentials and boundary value proble ms for elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains. J. Funct. Anal. , 95(2):377–399, 1991. 5, 9, 10

    work page 1991

  38. [38]

    On the regularity of Gre en functions in Lipschitz domains

    Dorina Mitrea and Irina Mitrea. On the regularity of Gre en functions in Lipschitz domains. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 36(2):304–327, 2011. 5

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Layer potentials and bound- ary value problems for elliptic equations with complex L∞ coefficients satisfying the small Carleson measure norm condition

    Steve Hofmann, Svitlana Mayboroda, and Mihalis Mourgo glou. Layer potentials and bound- ary value problems for elliptic equations with complex L∞ coefficients satisfying the small Carleson measure norm condition. Adv. Math. , 270:480–564, 2015. 5, 8

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    A local T b theorem with vector-valued testing functions

    Ana Grau de la Herr´ an and Steve Hofmann. A local T b theorem with vector-valued testing functions. In Some topics in harmonic analysis and applications , volume 34 of Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) , pages 203–229. Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2016. 5

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Layer potentials beyond singular inte gral operators

    Andreas Ros´ en. Layer potentials beyond singular inte gral operators. Publ. Mat. , 57(2):429– 454, 2013. 5

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Boundary layer s, Rellich estimates and extrapola- tion of solvability for elliptic systems

    Pascal Auscher and Mihalis Mourgoglou. Boundary layer s, Rellich estimates and extrapola- tion of solvability for elliptic systems. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 109(2):446–482, 2014. 5, 8, 10, 12

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Multiple layer potentials and the Dirich let problem for higher order elliptic equations in the plane

    Shmuel Agmon. Multiple layer potentials and the Dirich let problem for higher order elliptic equations in the plane. I. Comm. Pure Appl. Math , 10:179–239, 1957. 5, 15

    work page 1957

  44. [44]

    The Dirichlet proble m for the biharmonic equation in a C1 domain in the plane

    Jonathan Cohen and John Gosselin. The Dirichlet proble m for the biharmonic equation in a C1 domain in the plane. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 32(5):635–685, 1983. 5, 15

    work page 1983

  45. [45]

    E. B. Fabes, M. Jodeit, Jr., and N. M. Rivi` ere. Potentia l techniques for boundary value problems on C1-domains. Acta Math. , 141(3-4):165–186, 1978. 5

    work page 1978

  46. [46]

    Layer potentials and regularity for the Dirichlet problem for Laplace’s equation in Lipschitz domains

    Gregory Verchota. Layer potentials and regularity for the Dirichlet problem for Laplace’s equation in Lipschitz domains. J. Funct. Anal. , 59(3):572–611, 1984. 5, 6, 10, 12, 33

    work page 1984

  47. [47]

    Bj¨ orn E. J. Dahlberg and Carlos E. Kenig. Hardy spaces a nd the Neumann problem in Lp for Laplace’s equation in Lipschitz domains. Ann. of Math. (2) , 125(3):437–465, 1987. 5, 10, 12

    work page 1987

  48. [48]

    Bound ary layers on Sobolev-Besov spaces and Poisson’s equation for the Laplacian in Lipschitz domai ns

    Eugene Fabes, Osvaldo Mendez, and Marius Mitrea. Bound ary layers on Sobolev-Besov spaces and Poisson’s equation for the Laplacian in Lipschitz domai ns. J. Funct. Anal. , 159(2):323– 368, 1998. 5, 11

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    Daniel Z. Zanger. The inhomogeneous Neumann problem in Lipschitz domains. Comm. Par- tial Differential Equations , 25(9-10):1771–1808, 2000. 5, 11

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    The Poisson problem on Lipschitz domains

    Svitlana Mayboroda. The Poisson problem on Lipschitz domains . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2005. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of Missouri-Columbia . 5

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    The Dirichlet pro blem for higher order equations in composition form

    Ariel Barton and Svitlana Mayboroda. The Dirichlet pro blem for higher order equations in composition form. J. Funct. Anal. , 265(1):49–107, 2013. 6, 33

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Campanato

    S. Campanato. Sistemi ellittici in forma divergenza. Regolarit` a all’in terno. Quaderni. [Pub- lications]. Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Pisa, 1980. 7, 1 8

    work page 1980

  53. [53]

    Auscher and M

    P. Auscher and M. Qafsaoui. Equivalence between regula rity theorems and heat kernel esti- mates for higher order elliptic operators and systems under divergence form. J. Funct. Anal. , 177(2):310–364, 2000. 7, 18

    work page 2000

  54. [54]

    Gradient estimates and the fundamental s olution for higher-order elliptic sys- tems with rough coefficients

    Ariel Barton. Gradient estimates and the fundamental s olution for higher-order elliptic sys- tems with rough coefficients. Manuscripta Math. , 151(3-4):375–418, 2016. 7, 18, 19, 37

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    A. Nadai. Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids , volume II. McGraw-Hill, 1963. 9

    work page 1963

  56. [56]

    A new system of boundary integral equations for plates with free edges

    Jean Giroire and Jean-Claude N´ ed´ elec. A new system of boundary integral equations for plates with free edges. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. , 18(10):755–772, 1995. 9 46 ARIEL BARTON

    work page 1995

  57. [57]

    A survey on boundary conditions for the bi harmonic

    Guido Sweers. A survey on boundary conditions for the bi harmonic. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., 54(2):79–93, 2009. 9

    work page 2009

  58. [58]

    Bj¨ orn E. J. Dahlberg. On the Poisson integral for Lipsc hitz and C1-domains. Studia Math. , 66(1):13–24, 1979. 9, 12

    work page 1979

  59. [59]

    The Lp Dirichlet problem for elliptic systems on Lipschitz domain s

    Zhongwei Shen. The Lp Dirichlet problem for elliptic systems on Lipschitz domain s. Math. Res. Lett., 13(1):143–159, 2006. 9, 10, 11, 12, 23

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    The Dirichlet problem for elliptic systems with data in K¨ othe function spaces

    Jos´ e Mar ´ ıa Martell, Dorina Mitrea, Irina Mitrea, and Marius Mitrea. The Dirichlet problem for elliptic systems with data in K¨ othe function spaces. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 32(3):913–970,

    work page

  61. [61]

    B. E. J. Dahlberg, C. E. Kenig, and G. C. Verchota. The Dir ichlet problem for the biharmonic equation in a Lipschitz domain. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 36(3):109–135, 1986. 10

    work page 1986

  62. [62]

    The Dirichlet proble m in Lp for the biharmonic equation on Lipschitz domains

    Jill Pipher and Gregory Verchota. The Dirichlet proble m in Lp for the biharmonic equation on Lipschitz domains. Amer. J. Math. , 114(5):923–972, 1992. 10, 12

    work page 1992

  63. [63]

    Pipher and G

    J. Pipher and G. C. Verchota. Maximum principles for the polyharmonic equation on Lipschitz domains. Potential Anal. , 4(6):615–636, 1995. 10, 12, 15

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    Verchota

    Gregory C. Verchota. Potentials for the Dirichlet prob lem in Lipschitz domains. In Potential theory—ICPT 94 (Kouty, 1994) , pages 167–187. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996. 10, 12

    work page 1994

  65. [65]

    Jerison and Carlos E

    David S. Jerison and Carlos E. Kenig. The Neumann proble m on Lipschitz domains. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 4(2):203–207, 1981. 10

    work page 1981

  66. [66]

    The Dirichlet problem for the polyha rmonic equation in Lipschitz domains

    Gregory Verchota. The Dirichlet problem for the polyha rmonic equation in Lipschitz domains. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 39(3):671–702, 1990. 10

    work page 1990

  67. [67]

    The Lp regularity problem on Lipschitz domains

    Joel Kilty and Zhongwei Shen. The Lp regularity problem on Lipschitz domains. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 363(3):1241–1264, 2011. 10, 11, 15

    work page 2011

  68. [68]

    Theory of function spaces , volume 78 of Monographs in Mathematics

    Hans Triebel. Theory of function spaces , volume 78 of Monographs in Mathematics . Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1983. 11, 16

    work page 1983

  69. [69]

    Sobolev spaces of fractional order, Nemytskij operators, and nonlinear partial differential equations , volume 3 of de Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications

    Thomas Runst and Winfried Sickel. Sobolev spaces of fractional order, Nemytskij operators, and nonlinear partial differential equations , volume 3 of de Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications . W alter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1996. 11, 16

    work page 1996

  70. [70]

    David Jerison and Carlos E. Kenig. The inhomogeneous Di richlet problem in Lipschitz do- mains. J. Funct. Anal. , 130(1):161–219, 1995. 11

    work page 1995

  71. [71]

    Sharp estimates for Green potentials on non-smooth domains

    Svitlana Mayboroda and Marius Mitrea. Sharp estimates for Green potentials on non-smooth domains. Math. Res. Lett. , 11(4):481–492, 2004. 11

    work page 2004

  72. [72]

    Mitrea, M

    I. Mitrea, M. Mitrea, and M. W right. Optimal estimates f or the inhomogeneous problem for the bi-Laplacian in three-dimensional Lipschitz domains. J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.) , 172(1):24– 134, 2011. Problems in mathematical analysis. No. 51. 11

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    Maz’ya, M

    V. Maz’ya, M. Mitrea, and T. Shaposhnikova. The Dirichl et problem in Lipschitz domains for higher order elliptic systems with rough coefficients. J. Anal. Math. , 110:167–239, 2010. 11

    work page 2010

  74. [74]

    Necessary and sufficient conditions for t he solvability of the Lp Dirichlet problem on Lipschitz domains

    Zhongwei Shen. Necessary and sufficient conditions for t he solvability of the Lp Dirichlet problem on Lipschitz domains. Math. Ann. , 336(3):697–725, 2006. 11, 12, 15, 23, 29

    work page 2006

  75. [75]

    Verchota

    Jill Pipher and Gregory C. Verchota. Dilation invarian t estimates and the boundary G ˚ arding inequality for higher order elliptic operators. Ann. of Math. (2) , 142(1):1–38, 1995. 11

    work page 1995

  76. [76]

    B. E. J. Dahlberg and C. E. Kenig. Lp estimates for the three-dimensional systems of elas- tostatics on Lipschitz domains. In Analysis and partial differential equations , volume 122 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. , pages 621–634. Dekker, New York, 1990. 12

    work page 1990

  77. [77]

    P. I. Lizorkin. Boundary properties of functions from “ weight” classes. Soviet Math. Dokl. , 1:589–593, 1960. 16

    work page 1960

  78. [78]

    Some observations on Besov and Lizorki n-Triebel spaces

    Bj¨ orn Jawerth. Some observations on Besov and Lizorki n-Triebel spaces. Math. Scand. , 40(1):94–104, 1977. 16

    work page 1977

  79. [79]

    Calcul font ionnel pr´ ecis´ e pour des op´ erateurs elliptiques complexes en dimension un (et applications ` a c ertaines ´ equations elliptiques com- plexes en dimension deux)

    Pascal Auscher and Philippe Tchamitchian. Calcul font ionnel pr´ ecis´ e pour des op´ erateurs elliptiques complexes en dimension un (et applications ` a c ertaines ´ equations elliptiques com- plexes en dimension deux). Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 45(3):721–778, 1995. 19

    work page 1995

  80. [80]

    Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlin ear elliptic sys- tems, volume 105 of Annals of Mathematics Studies

    Mariano Giaquinta. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations and nonlin ear elliptic sys- tems, volume 105 of Annals of Mathematics Studies . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983. 29, 39

    work page 1983

Showing first 80 references.