{"as_of":"2026-08-16T12:20:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:522f1b0aa4d900c552dfd89f9fcad4a0609ee3d18cc5b3a6202ca1bbd4dffd3f","coverage":[{"denominator":19,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":19,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.351571Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":19,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":19,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1908.00685/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1908.00685/integrity","json":"/paper/1908.00685/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.669833Z","title":"A review on peak load shaving strategies,","venue":null,"work_id":"84155967-1438-43d8-b442-c2ec45c11d7b","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.258165Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bfe77db19a06791b5fa125a1f1b14596efc70933b4761b89987022aaa2252840","observation_id":"618a563e-7bac-402a-b90d-fbd666327a54","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.674314Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.655004Z","title":"Electrical reliability council of texas, four coincident peak calculations,","venue":null,"work_id":"70f511ec-17fe-4caa-bc0c-55039f1e7b2d","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.264429Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:218e8a2d02a52c7099bf9fa169eb0fa596ffd3cc29264cdeda86510e92435332","observation_id":"e428f65a-262e-4c93-b2ce-ccea57516fe0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.659806Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.638897Z","title":"City of fort collins utilies, 2018 rates for large commerical consumers,","venue":null,"work_id":"2e8b03be-ede1-4dc4-ac75-443d1ef28ecd","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.270206Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b8198f6e79f29e372f16a240b720384f9800cf4ebc1245c0347cd99468abd37c","observation_id":"7dec8cd6-5237-4fda-ba33-9071a34ed5d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.644676Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.624090Z","title":"Data center demand response: Avoiding the coinci- dent peak via workload shifting and local generation,","venue":null,"work_id":"2008f255-5c3e-4258-85ab-c6a2e955692a","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.275014Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b64636e7a82b3dd04af310a16a4c46ea00ff4eb080acaed4760ad934a8eb726a","observation_id":"60d91544-448d-496a-93a0-800d1de303c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.629166Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.608359Z","title":"Stakeholder comments review tac structure straw proposal,","venue":null,"work_id":"7c0d91a2-3dd7-4567-93ca-686c3dd4b9ed","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.281061Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f29bde171a99b02d7c34e0f89e1bb90ba1c65cd431ba68a7c212fdcf92bd905","observation_id":"28e51eb8-0042-4596-aec7-872805c37f0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.613306Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.592775Z","title":"The response of large industrial energy consumers to four coincident peak (4cp) transmission charges in the texas (ercot) market,","venue":null,"work_id":"73bb88f5-6249-4685-b2d5-95a9fe9be901","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.286256Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e0858a43fbf1afddf6eee7a8edce46e11c8cdcd8a80e47c3469a193184303fe3","observation_id":"99139bdb-ea30-4246-891c-5c8f2f40f0ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.597922Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.577089Z","title":"Electrical reliability council of texas, long term load forecast,","venue":null,"work_id":"7b69ca02-ba7d-4dd3-8a7b-f6e0a186e24c","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.292175Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af6360d7d75fa88fec4cd38b6385a947a8956206e3d0c54ac59df0450d6d85f9","observation_id":"c698c011-e726-497f-bceb-bd162bf76575","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.581664Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.562989Z","title":"Coincident peak prediction using a feed-forward neural network,","venue":null,"work_id":"ade07ba2-59d1-4e05-90ca-3217a72ddb2f","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.297295Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f066624e6969c2128665eb88da9db009dc7d07885c03e96f8b214ce53edbc94a","observation_id":"c8bbd5c1-afa2-4c04-98e7-19e11dacabf8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.567422Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.548772Z","title":"Industrial customer response to wholesale prices in the restructured texas electricity market,","venue":null,"work_id":"a874abcd-0b93-4ea9-87a1-c106a05f6d04","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.302226Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1d956e531622fcf7e05b3a278cc6e00fe90f9b8b59e88f128158f3f24d0a6609","observation_id":"6607adbf-7bc3-4ebc-9927-a9c711c4bf67","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.553165Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.533725Z","title":"Opportunities and challenges for data center demand response,","venue":null,"work_id":"a7b60ef1-7e79-4f8a-8031-d43c6c8ee2d8","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.307340Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ae6ba84d1f7933740fd866dbf7040f081e7bb63bba865d9926d51a31c0e2b437","observation_id":"8d4481e9-c49d-43d6-92e0-59c966663a34","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.538471Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.518574Z","title":"Leveraging energy storage to optimize data center electricity cost in emerging power markets,","venue":null,"work_id":"4e99169d-e393-4e9a-9983-143f6483ad97","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.312431Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ff266d73e269ddcae2320edd601887ea034c0bf142a47daf0bc1fcfe0b12e7d","observation_id":"444eb79e-129f-40e4-a5c0-f837cadc0801","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.523257Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.503790Z","title":"Data center power cost optimization via workload modulation,","venue":null,"work_id":"381dbccd-903f-45f2-9ad1-c94d78415826","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.317916Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4f2be5678028f20d92f12dca7fc1d45859f40e76c90efe9094e686a343074bef","observation_id":"de93e3a0-7ced-4f0e-90db-ece786079d19","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.508344Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.486304Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"bf54345c-10f0-4aa8-960c-40a1693e2323","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.322769Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2271efcd7e16540c94d81ca9485a8d1991a07ff77cc3134d3f94cefb41045515","observation_id":"978ffd1e-b0c6-44ab-92ed-a440ccf88c07","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.492841Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.469836Z","title":"Incentive design and utility learning via energy disaggregation,","venue":null,"work_id":"b298e539-6b2a-462b-859e-14304fc7578d","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.327753Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c337c07776272c14d37f04f9ef9e646eab91600a22646066cf63667f68415558","observation_id":"9836fe22-cd14-4016-adee-a6442d4ec252","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.474935Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.453076Z","title":"Load forecasting,","venue":null,"work_id":"ef1cc0b2-37d5-4f9f-bcc6-8c7235a19ae5","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.332767Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:466ce78dc170cdc4b09ae55232144b9fa32820ae9f8b66dbb6d2eb205b8d81c8","observation_id":"e836d7c9-0911-4702-b99f-35cdb6f7d7e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.457958Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.436843Z","title":"403, John Wiley & Sons, 2007","venue":null,"work_id":"5466ad73-8fc8-461e-ad1b-71c7943a5c13","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.337593Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e1f5903b3218c811c51dff4f8b90fb8d98ba9e48c75aaa54ddf8264a879cedc5","observation_id":"6f87c052-c0dd-476a-81f6-0e480d4f6832","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.442035Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.418975Z","title":"2, John Wiley & Sons, 2004","venue":null,"work_id":"0bb6bb1e-4a83-4c34-9356-d3b9185bc789","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.341962Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ff9b5edec38876a89c2c87739ca24d08fe340d80c242bbdba5aa7149fd642df","observation_id":"7fb10deb-89e7-486b-a666-3cf67f312983","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.424073Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.401213Z","title":"5, Athena Scientific Belmont, MA, 1996","venue":null,"work_id":"efed52fd-323c-4e7b-9a14-6073f97586e6","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.346951Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5469142fd728a8dbb240b9f9a83db418e0911d76b3e25d393310cd8f308a6a6","observation_id":"20e51fb5-235a-46b8-9e3b-1f154972946c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.407086Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.382913Z","title":"Adaptive dynamic programming: An introduction,","venue":null,"work_id":"49ffe094-bc23-440d-9f5f-76730bac9d0a","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.351571Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00685"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0eeae412374443dd74384336c9aded9dae8f62a3c7e38435f3958b07ee5e9a9d","observation_id":"b7803e34-9b56-4708-a8ab-733f1ec314f5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:42:14.389661Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00685","last_updated":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"math.OC","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T08:39:34.228090Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T02:47:59Z","title":"Mitigation of Coincident Peak Charges via Approximate Dynamic Programming"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":19,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":1,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":18},"total_outbound_references":19},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 19 of 19 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1908.00685."}