{"as_of":"2026-08-16T15:21:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:254040fb02e3a13f2c346f1bfe6e9e9536eca496e875c6e5be88c8df3362feaa","coverage":[{"denominator":48,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":48,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.577266Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":48,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":48,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1908.00982/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1908.00982/integrity","json":"/paper/1908.00982/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.127844Z","title":"An overview of value at risk","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.127844Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a2b6ab89335799c3ce2352234e390e2a16e8772c22e2197dda49bcfd26e6b9e","observation_id":"968432be-6811-419c-a438-a7edf16518e4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.127844Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.134876Z","title":"Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1995},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.134876Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:692cc5ac4ceaa3ae555f0e257edfa8f782e51ce381d8aec94a943b2d3628c7d3","observation_id":"09ea8170-70c5-4b05-a010-2d80cfe62624","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.134876Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.141330Z","title":"Evaluating interval forecasts","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.141330Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa50b5828d8f6afea7e86c2ba2c2ac62f9c90ae302f09cbad762f87ce2ad06ae","observation_id":"9f086823-de43-4704-9548-0c692c84f8cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.141330Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.147102Z","title":"Risk Management and Financial Institutions (3rd Edition)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.147102Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:732d8717cada4701704f9f2ffa75b92df288c84849100f51596c938695265562","observation_id":"49c31d21-7bad-4359-b98e-f726e76b1393","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.147102Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.106345Z","title":"Craig Mackinlay","venue":null,"work_id":"dd0b0a45-e11b-4535-ac8f-77c8f163599e","year":1988},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.153426Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0fa5aa3227019b3e9e1199e9d83e37953df7385b4899395236178da6c971ab74","observation_id":"eaacf8d4-7a2e-463f-b640-491d9faa855f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.112235Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.071174Z","title":"The impact of stationarity assessment on studies of volatility and value-at-risk","venue":null,"work_id":"92a508f0-92b2-4961-9b6c-f4a7a326c439","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.161646Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0011f526843ade1a6f8db8f76bd1cafa913ad03576195cd288b434826276ca6","observation_id":"160493fd-ef58-406d-9e56-ac41d58eb8d4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.082915Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.045074Z","title":"An improved methodology for measuring var","venue":null,"work_id":"c7691577-868d-4e00-b148-c18c79267e04","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.171164Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:455043d3c302c6591fa33246fe157400717c44a74ba143d39e940ca7f027af17","observation_id":"771f8cd1-3e76-42b1-accb-1896e824ef2b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.053555Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.023950Z","title":"Value at risk for a mixture of normal distributions: the use of quasi-bayesian estimation techniques","venue":null,"work_id":"9721ac53-06c4-4d4a-8483-3f8d86b1d76f","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.178747Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e83430b700ac49a7a3110e106de7be5f4e39b58f36a213e71a288a191778b8d0","observation_id":"272e41c1-8fad-403d-815e-e2ad84fabe76","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.031284Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.001316Z","title":"Measuring risk in value-at-risk based on students t-distribution","venue":null,"work_id":"40a40091-6250-4282-9768-518097b47b57","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.184810Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52cd3203a869c8d9f169551063cdbafaa161c0081442caf6ff7e89d8ffc38e61","observation_id":"a68f0096-083d-48ce-b774-0acf04e28909","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:51.010720Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.970277Z","title":"Portfolio valueatrisk with heavytailed risk factors","venue":null,"work_id":"4b4e626e-2fbe-476b-a811-9f330553ba6f","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.191208Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:46f9f990c6bda5e239e6eed2d58f1fbaaa24147b19fa6a567407d5b6af81abc1","observation_id":"019db072-b873-4d60-8181-ce827c6daebc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.980580Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.946725Z","title":"Can the student-t distribution provide accurate value at risk? Journal of Risk Finance, 7(3):292–300, 2006","venue":null,"work_id":"9a9dc8a1-a191-4565-84c9-ba7e01cc0cec","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.197810Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9eb3efc42087cec339abd3dc1c0bb55006d515abdff5b54571e30c94a88483cf","observation_id":"1d6ee505-d20e-45e4-804c-4431dfbedc0b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.953751Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.913844Z","title":"Value at risk based on the volatility, skewness and kurtosis","venue":null,"work_id":"3889fc0b-bc3e-4a26-aa5c-7d4ad854d504","year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.206220Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2ca12be375dd9a636df42687a6942d497c95049bc3ba1dc09b1b98bf5380d0f3","observation_id":"0c1938c9-f74a-480b-b457-051d03aa7898","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.924906Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.880052Z","title":"Value at risk with time varying variance, skewness and kurtosis-the nig-acd model","venue":null,"work_id":"52dc484b-cfed-4d01-a7e8-347e3b9d2138","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.213359Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a358146798a33d9a2445324c3a10d8b687fc7c47e6c085a8cfef511c5fb2b93a","observation_id":"e56beb42-a50b-48c1-b892-358909062fc7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.891347Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.848442Z","title":"Empirical analysis of jump dynamics, heavy-tails and skewness on value-at-risk estimation","venue":null,"work_id":"bc4cb9dd-ea33-4c9a-bd80-ec37e21b7280","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.233008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:de723cbfbfe3e1d58c2342ec7085ccc5a0f3bee47cb7dfc52b6274c2ced84326","observation_id":"1cb15cc0-023a-4578-ac02-b6b422577391","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.859532Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.813856Z","title":"Forecasting value-at-risk with time-varying variance, skewness and kurtosis in an exponential weighted moving average framework","venue":null,"work_id":"3d8419de-1378-432f-9ed7-2806a7d22c7f","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.245885Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b4e6a678fb0655acf42877dab9c2b3dd2ae5267efe080eb4a47f715bcf252c5","observation_id":"15a90f79-116b-4cb2-ae44-38aa84398792","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.826265Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.773148Z","title":"Improved duration-based backtesting of value-at-risk","venue":null,"work_id":"2d94324f-eb2d-4532-88fa-b75b4ecc2782","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.259403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5a05850e2d9db8a9fdb1ce0b044104acc83437ca1e785accd4b7c14b74024eb6","observation_id":"bd51db40-d6b7-450b-9c68-30d8673d6b7c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.792450Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.748712Z","title":"Comparison of certain value-at-risk estimation methods for the two-parameter weibull loss distribution","venue":null,"work_id":"7af3eae4-77d1-47d1-9330-22753af8ffaf","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.271151Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0351ef8cd355cadb72c5506e8513ee4a63d6233871b43649d5295911d5cb42ee","observation_id":"383feddb-fb62-4fd3-a0a4-44b0e2dd1b8c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.757141Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.713905Z","title":"Value at risk when daily changes in market variables are not normally distributed","venue":null,"work_id":"97b3c7da-2778-4c4e-ac39-53db84892cc3","year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.282337Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f5eb558cc9cd28a5c88392646ce469ad25dd83a929292ac922deac8fb0cbc487","observation_id":"3fa34e23-6c4b-4572-9918-daaf39b5ad5f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.728327Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.680260Z","title":"An approach to var for capital markets with gaussian mixture","venue":null,"work_id":"3c4dd7f4-bd8a-4ed0-8c5b-8c036d143460","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.290936Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d0a58650adec1a8b8495b9679a52069137c53f8277f822ce603e338c7aaef9fa","observation_id":"d1bd5eaa-7fd6-4a69-b15f-00fe0270c06d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.687271Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.643894Z","title":"Value-at-risk: a multivariate switching regime approach","venue":null,"work_id":"e1ae1dc8-c6cd-4f43-9f65-5719b33ee6fa","year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.299646Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2cbf779caf32cf5e84f7cccc55166e284f44a073591cfc5d34bcb6d5c2119847","observation_id":"6f3988c5-1138-4697-ba36-78a46202a71c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.660919Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.607896Z","title":"Value-at-risk in a market subject to regime switching","venue":null,"work_id":"c58e5b6e-c092-449d-a38f-e788e3881370","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.307490Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cac843bdd41d94f59c5bc6a109c66e961b9630c0c74e3bd977c7f2ce248a6605","observation_id":"a56c3974-d5b7-40b4-b914-94ee9734d878","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.617554Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.567677Z","title":"Value-at-risk prediction: A comparison of alternative strategies","venue":null,"work_id":"5d2705ea-a854-4538-8741-3ef14cd6cb53","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.331027Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fdea02e4ff2b111cf21a9ef25700132fea4fbc0a08d175f68836f8d93dc5f24","observation_id":"29abcdd9-c325-439f-96af-a2f472d1b466","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.579444Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.517498Z","title":"Risk management","venue":null,"work_id":"c84fa77f-3be3-4ffb-9f62-ca8179898c80","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.339519Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d852ad6feb51e670b4e3bf8c59ca67cff7a6d8832682eaa56a885f519df12a3","observation_id":"9dc6881d-8bca-42af-b9f6-e74af1a92e6a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.535437Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.487940Z","title":"A comprehensive review of value at risk methodologies","venue":null,"work_id":"4928bada-055c-47b6-aec3-979cb2444717","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.347915Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6066e1beb0b6b1f8b10485250ce40a9293b4f68da57f51dc7c9cae54e3dcfd46","observation_id":"2c8905bb-b029-4e08-ab1c-d7ee82043cca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.497285Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.451733Z","title":"A review of backtesting for value at risk","venue":null,"work_id":"7a1161ff-6a07-4449-993a-eeaf36a1174e","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.353563Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b3dacfda7deb8b33833ee750a2c37930e3dee431b5148af924578045b599b2a6","observation_id":"f3a17f23-3e54-4551-8621-f563b91010c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.461615Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.423804Z","title":"Bayesian Inference: Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics","venue":null,"work_id":"7d1dac8a-5bad-4535-8e55-cf28531bc8b2","year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.359943Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e0f6d3462e94b312b15b51c57fc40548008ef0a4e012b786cf312e79bc8d3368","observation_id":"5727942a-610e-4692-8f74-c47509562e03","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.433848Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.388429Z","title":"BayesianTheory","venue":null,"work_id":"c19306a0-36d2-4a2b-bfe8-329997e26224","year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.367495Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bed73c1a4eb9c4399cd87c82d91add52a99c56deb10728c479b3bb06e28ad11a","observation_id":"3c58603d-4996-4196-880c-40c877480b47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.398512Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.361453Z","title":"Quantile uncertainty and value-at-risk model risk.Risk Analysis, 32(8):1293–1308, 2012","venue":null,"work_id":"7c16c017-a83e-4fc2-a767-cc452dd053e2","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.373723Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fea5e276645ec7d492a5db1b6deb032db63759ac5e123be0cf49e1b9738fbd0","observation_id":"a4a9b69c-7894-467d-a9ff-a6831e52b2cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.373842Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.335993Z","title":"Estimation of upper quantiles under model and parameter uncertainty","venue":null,"work_id":"dea2b7cc-cdb3-4cea-81a9-191b989e9b8b","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.382994Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7acc6508b59b25b6f75187227e93b26897af60c09ce3073298e0c272d738e107","observation_id":"7131aa5c-e7f2-4681-bbdd-6a508101e80f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.344610Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.311860Z","title":"Uncertainty of quantile estimates in the measurement of self-similar processes","venue":null,"work_id":"4888357f-0c41-4ec7-ae8b-ab8d4bf4b2fd","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.390565Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:892d4b030e7d5fd17692a911c8ccc5c2a72cce7c81f659d8881e3a78143bd455","observation_id":"c6a675f6-ac94-4f55-a34d-c697811ad677","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.319281Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.280867Z","title":"Estimation error in the assessment of financial risk exposure","venue":null,"work_id":"a8bd4194-f912-4119-8e23-b8c94e43559d","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.396816Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:47eef1bfe04cfa18d35b4a2fc5f1aa1ec866f9358d114866e7c798c033b40e1e","observation_id":"7a1e9f60-cccb-4cf9-9d2b-3e1cb6b5b2c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.289046Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.248018Z","title":"Measuring the risk in value at risk","venue":null,"work_id":"5e4979cd-657f-4c0d-b81b-45240938a93b","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.405348Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dcd7d599e272a34e7d60a1e974bb697f2ed8238370dccd3834e450c0f663ec5a","observation_id":"6ec52019-4de2-4331-b85d-615474269e74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.263645Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.203333Z","title":"Worst case model risk management","venue":null,"work_id":"39980ee8-da78-4d9e-adee-256501abdc30","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.415357Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9df5ccb8552288ea821cf0cc3a050230030114e866d3a3cb42e93bbd269e6687","observation_id":"744a038d-dd31-4177-8d41-b1e875d9caa5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.224011Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.159174Z","title":"Model uncertainty and its impact on the pricing of derivative instruments","venue":null,"work_id":"2d4ef010-8cef-4972-92ac-a73e729af27e","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.424723Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2cd882c056a4386aa6abbc646874c93a39a6bcff966431e2bd91d004d4e8b019","observation_id":"ee141068-947d-4108-b1ce-9816a11a7664","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.169625Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.130583Z","title":"Bounds on a distribution function when its first n moments are given","venue":null,"work_id":"e729de8f-e8b4-41db-92d8-9ca961088e94","year":1953},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.430719Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc9c7031083cb9828954caae38ed6cfc15e63dca364f0ab7a35b05c6b6df5e50","observation_id":"fce4e961-1ed2-4d45-88c9-cb9e3f1b30b4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.140818Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.079052Z","title":"Best bounds for positive distribution with fixed moments","venue":null,"work_id":"759fdd3a-275f-47e6-be9a-a0d1edfc0fb1","year":1984},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.439011Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22bb2936535a4d108f7dadb5a1645d7f86e0f0d9dc2511150066626f57ce08c1","observation_id":"2f1e9146-e1dc-4f82-b9a4-4a3b295a49dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.098961Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.045408Z","title":"How to estimate the value at risk under incomplete information","venue":null,"work_id":"98cdded6-f577-4cf5-b466-58a374873e2c","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.446806Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:932ccde1d4208a1ecc0f7ce4a402ef4c65ab7bf4f5a9eaba80025e021133834e","observation_id":"82275dcc-0f47-4d14-85d0-3f568353847a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.055805Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.005083Z","title":"A semidefinite programming approach to optimal-moment bounds for convex classes of distributions","venue":null,"work_id":"ec6a8ed4-f508-426a-88a6-e20b21d6d7cc","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.457649Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:77ff2136559149d92571e660212cb3d48c9553666be035cdcb645c99dbff87a8","observation_id":"dbad9012-8fa5-4c6a-88f1-86965638cf9b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:50.022605Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.975841Z","title":"Bounding probability of small deviation: A fourth moment approach","venue":null,"work_id":"072184d0-002b-4d70-8ec9-4a9c25edf858","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.469169Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26362c29b5ce64ba6949f3b994a5580110f3255d3c1807ba5b3ad63e2ca36542","observation_id":"16510083-341f-4e74-b2ca-2972cd2ecf2a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.987069Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.947944Z","title":"Filtration consistent nonlinear expectations and evaluations of contingent claims","venue":null,"work_id":"ccadf0e3-40b4-4726-a610-6af274bd84dd","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.479963Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2bb66eb44bc9760e4d2309222c613edb63e361b79d22f36059b752bc9473d5b","observation_id":"464403de-49ef-4922-9524-aa169965faad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.955618Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.915230Z","title":"g- expectation, g-brownian motion and related stochastic calculus of ito type","venue":null,"work_id":"e6239f33-d7b4-4c9c-89ce-13d1f4f31b76","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.493485Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:97b10c2f3cc0a437f3143c16dbcbafc45606854bb722b00abfef248ea4546a54","observation_id":"1bd1954a-d10e-4f4a-a4ce-6f8a676f498d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.924646Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.886459Z","title":"Multi-dimensional g-brownian motion and related stochastic calculus under g- expectation","venue":null,"work_id":"b1bdf0c2-8f68-4f58-a109-302f6bf7e841","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.500684Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f9b495ccbb1932d519dd5de3899489fcbe449e0ce6b2e485a073a3c99aa4ff0","observation_id":"cd94a75c-ae47-486c-9289-7c0d7bcbc1ce","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.899183Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1002.4546","last_updated":"2010-02-24T16:03:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T05:25:39.250269Z","submitted_at":"2010-02-24T16:03:25Z","title":"Nonlinear Expectations and Stochastic Calculus under Uncertainty","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1002.4546","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.506746Z","title":"Nonlinear expectations and stochastic calculus under uncertainty","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.506746Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1002.4546","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cc94d8c139936f20faa859b35191a3c0e6fd6b312464927fdc0dd93a3e082389","observation_id":"80c5a718-3716-4d33-b0b6-f4b6677d1dae","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.506746Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.517634Z","title":"Coherent measures of risk","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.517634Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3dadd34cc1358d49093d87c7aaa783c3cc0e9beaf56b699ec3fe1bc7711c2e52","observation_id":"1400fcea-5b80-422c-84eb-8ec0ae14e5e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.517634Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1805.03890","last_updated":"2020-06-16T10:23:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T19:16:51.512602Z","submitted_at":"2018-05-10T08:46:55Z","title":"Improving Value-at-Risk prediction under model uncertainty","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1805.03890","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1805.03890","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.705228Z","title":"Improving Value-at-Risk prediction under model uncertainty","venue":"q-fin.RM","work_id":"32a4d864-fc32-4b22-90ed-4c6d5769ba02","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.528663Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1805.03890","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d043bb03ac819c94bf7245ccd2c4388af607e1fc6f771d259c8ddca32de20320","observation_id":"512f4394-2055-4cd5-9795-21259fd3ffff","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.717912Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.834353Z","title":"Retrospective mutiple change point estimation with kernels","venue":null,"work_id":"309f5af2-814f-446d-acf1-008977270cb8","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.537039Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:454aa76eb14afab7b7add367fd19dfd0ab5108c5fc5ccc00c6772282671eaf83","observation_id":"a7eabc57-26d6-40ca-8430-36620b42c7c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.850227Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1801.00718","last_updated":"2020-03-26T08:54:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T19:58:33.511662Z","submitted_at":"2018-01-02T16:44:08Z","title":"Selective review of offline change point detection methods","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1801.00718","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.565008Z","title":"Selective review of offline change point detection methods","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.565008Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1801.00718","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa652c852dadc5840e02be0f993d4fc139f1870f53ab01af0c5e195e5034e214","observation_id":"62e234b2-f36d-4644-b88e-d60fa6221de1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.565008Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.797386Z","title":"ruptures: change point detection in python","venue":null,"work_id":"9e64825e-4169-4251-86a6-d5a747b3f4ec","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.577266Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.00982"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5d1b6c23e9ba6e4c18487fa6f81ff2e23b6dfd2f1deb6df806d9f391ff8c5d06","observation_id":"85ce5b8b-8b6a-464e-868b-60407f15baa1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:32:49.809048Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.00982","last_updated":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"q-fin.RM","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:24:55.213752Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-02T16:53:55Z","title":"calculation worst-case Value-at-Risk prediction using empirical data under model uncertainty"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":48,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":7,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":40},"total_outbound_references":48},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 48 of 48 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1908.00982."}