{"as_of":"2026-08-16T18:40:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:dcbb6f2e9b5ab3f079413c29c5d8bd98f52a448ed405b0da42edc98a2a6cc545","coverage":[{"denominator":17,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":17,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.217172Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":17,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":17,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1908.02598/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1908.02598/integrity","json":"/paper/1908.02598/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.370130Z","title":"Data given as number and percentage of total studies included (N = 12)","venue":null,"work_id":"b278953f-c296-4433-a662-3b6bab3f8be0","year":1990},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.169597Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:32d777c4802d13d78624dfb9a47f287ad0c3149817785d93c2c2d306a39ae417","observation_id":"aa6d0d6d-9d0c-49fa-a2b9-1a314334e1f2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.373023Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.319419Z","title":"Evaluated entities identified in the qualitative content analysis are displayed in boxes and regular type","venue":null,"work_id":"7bbc6d69-397c-4a12-b6b8-3fe353442ed8","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.187938Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4c68e4244f4a4dc6bf502e813e8495c6bf73544bc1b1795bf1f2a03c68265efd","observation_id":"86fffab3-8fa3-4cd1-86c1-183ab1dd2693","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.323013Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.348003Z","title":"The coders then compared and discussed their codes and agreed on common codes","venue":null,"work_id":"d9c621f2-d586-40fe-a644-1c171617f882","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.178868Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fb2572f03af5e707712dccf75cf8cc6d7782b6dd6efc5e8132c75c56b55fd41","observation_id":"5cef2464-16f8-41b7-8fbb-58566ca36203","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.350681Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.285209Z","title":"For example, Moed (2005) und Harnad (2008,","venue":null,"work_id":"e870fe0d-928d-424b-b548-74d0f5a65943","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.198140Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37e23f02370c24ca065ac2400844fdbb3ef5df593781a3516465e7b8339468c0","observation_id":"b8f43a69-03df-4c5f-a909-ee208b781a0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.287824Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.269477Z","title":"Cronin and Sugimoto 2015, Harnad 2008, Marsh et al","venue":null,"work_id":"14a1ac27-b424-4bbd-9f34-4421b9e7839b","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.204326Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:802d90bd86f87f89cf49aa77b801adb962a7ebc63cc72df90e12a92fdc45a7da","observation_id":"04c81d7a-1567-4b90-bfb7-e2c4936f3a13","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.272388Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.210594Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.210594Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6e843857b4551f2fa24034d547b918c1296ae8eb8212813a9c18c9f33019cbe2","observation_id":"757fe8e7-7455-4e4a-9108-0bcc44b1b5c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.210594Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.355173Z","title":"Weight of Evidence","venue":null,"work_id":"27f6475f-2515-476f-9b98-c6126cda3b50","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":219,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.176076Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4298cfd11f9513aaf968d6eb54b9c5e3cce05c1749ca825ed2c3dad88a987f35","observation_id":"5339ae39-add1-4731-ba80-f6d71e77b879","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.357496Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.303056Z","title":"The fairness doctrine resembles the ideal of impartiality, which implicitly underlies quantitative research on bias in peer review (Lee et al","venue":null,"work_id":"76c1a287-b622-4337-a696-c88987e8cf64","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":252,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.193315Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:878d9687d5f3a77bdc3d1d0f34b501b8ed4df6526764eba09a1317759e4a765d","observation_id":"89b1bb51-bb3a-4f5e-8156-c6eeea2b95a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.306427Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.329586Z","title":"quality, poor – good, weak – strong)","venue":null,"work_id":"15ffaa4d-2383-4384-8080-ff5ce9196376","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":279,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.185142Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:93d6f25edf405e708f8cecda47b44ff4a606ed3fc7a7dacd57a7969a92c17856","observation_id":"fe8ab301-bcc7-4951-a046-4cab6e8448c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.332868Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.361755Z","title":"Most studies analyzed criteria of individual reviews (n = 7), while only few studies focused on criteria used in panels (n = 3)","venue":null,"work_id":"41539ad8-5cf6-403c-ad80-1bdfeed88985","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":639,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.173447Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2364138cb817a7d9e317d00daba209acedbb0311e72f9ba1bf588a673c221886","observation_id":"022ec76d-f3ff-4f0d-af50-285cfc463a3f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.365421Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.236751Z","title":"research proposal*","venue":null,"work_id":"4a90d78f-f51b-487d-97f0-42d0e67ab2ea","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2005,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.217172Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89fe80552a77199b00517b7b708e3a961ffea2d49c9090f7883d7ccba7020c60","observation_id":"0e92cccf-c4d1-4c98-b9d8-d982d3433bdd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.240845Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.311541Z","title":"Prescriptive criteria of funding agencies, as summarized by Abdoul et al","venue":null,"work_id":"390ba4a2-2777-4ce6-ac15-d13311750673","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2006,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.190601Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d9cc2ab30a4cb4fb8adb5ca2156364cdc0c4fcf2e9c884f39f34d7a1cfce73d","observation_id":"8a4e9a16-d00c-4ce1-9cd3-52d2bec4f7e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.314216Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.277558Z","title":"the criterion variable)","venue":null,"work_id":"cbdacc60-bebe-4d56-b9bb-c36b7f0bf4a4","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2009,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.200878Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c5eb20f617cbe83427c9d204acc9458a91075a1fd6b10c91d227cc65210041c1","observation_id":"bf9321cf-24d2-4b6f-a5bd-a7d7f88b2e28","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.280022Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.261836Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"0ec199c3-7a4d-4139-8399-a2e23020ae96","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2014,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.208098Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:00885ca267a52a11ee3ff7c549cd112197e85df6386fabd5ade23def85ee508d","observation_id":"1b013593-cf30-4a78-95da-63124b4fac74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.264314Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.246996Z","title":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 70(1): 161–164","venue":null,"work_id":"7ffa812b-03d5-43a6-80b0-20a86ad8f355","year":1991},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2015,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.214539Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9e323110897543ef1b53ab1f7a7b500e6e6debf1238cb1467ef7c2ad78440f1f","observation_id":"514d5645-7fdf-4eaf-bbb8-eb8f02cb2e00","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.250744Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.293529Z","title":"Drawing on Douglas (2016) and Elliott (2017), the following questions may guide the development of new normative models for peer review","venue":null,"work_id":"bc5815e7-1dd6-49b3-bca6-5b8967c961ce","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2017,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.195749Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:32e9f9a26946f4040916f45cd776fae46fe85cdd892973cf3bfb79e126d7d1cc","observation_id":"88d2c69e-af35-4389-bfc1-83249d8c5313","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.296935Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.338192Z","title":"Alpha was calculated for each of these variables and the coefficients of the 15 criteria variables were then averaged to provide a single reliability index for the coded criteria","venue":null,"work_id":"cfa07a0c-483a-4fcf-926e-a5e8d485483e","year":1977},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","version":3},"reference_index":2019,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.181534Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/1908.02598"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2e78648ba78494fca924abce2cbc579c038b2dbe1a54eb2774384e4651e11c6c","observation_id":"8381809c-3eab-4c4c-9dd0-004c73cc436a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:19:32.341208Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.02598","last_updated":"2020-03-11T20:16:10Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.CY","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T15:12:37.521937Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":17,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":2,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":15},"total_outbound_references":17},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 17 of 17 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1908.02598."}