{"as_of":"2026-08-17T09:34:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cf781d3494eb06d8562cc47d952901c805ec275b8cd4fda2002de19d36e3d3a4","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:18:47.679078Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:18:48.103877Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1910.06508","last_updated":"2020-06-06T01:09:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:58:04.602131Z","submitted_at":"2019-10-15T03:35:30Z","title":"Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Sampling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1910.06508","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1910.06508","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:18:48.103877Z","title":"Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Sampling","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"84d450a2-ce6a-4b6d-a1f8-7668873825f2","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.19395","last_updated":"2024-11-28T22:15:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T13:12:18.742150Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-28T22:15:06Z","title":"Concept-driven Off Policy Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:18:47.679078Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1910.06508","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.19395"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8caf78c220a13b6a09c4d87b1e85450a277f6788fbda3cabe0b070b4722ad6b6","observation_id":"1362f5a7-43be-4ae6-b85d-ffdad25bbed0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:18:48.109405Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1910.06508/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1910.06508/integrity","json":"/paper/1910.06508/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1910.06508"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1910.06508","last_updated":"2020-06-06T01:09:35Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:58:04.602131Z","submitted_at":"2019-10-15T03:35:30Z","title":"Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Sampling"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:1910.06508."}