pith. sign in

arxiv: 1912.02817 · v1 · pith:COUGJ76Gnew · submitted 2019-12-05 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· math.QA

Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath.QA
keywords fusion category symmetrytopological defect linest Hooft anomaliesgapped phases1+1D quantum field theoryTuraev-Viro modelLevin-Wen modelTambara-Yamagami categories
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fusion categories describe generalized symmetries from non-invertible topological defect lines and their anomalies via inflow from 2+1D models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that generalized discrete symmetries in 1+1D quantum field theories generated by topological defect lines without inverses have an algebra captured by fusion categories rather than groups. This algebraic data defines a corresponding 2+1D topological theory such as a Turaev-Viro or Levin-Wen model, with the 1+1D system realized as a boundary condition of that model. The framework then classifies the 't Hooft anomalies of these symmetries and the gapped phases they stabilize, including new topological phases, and separates symmetry-preserving from symmetry-breaking phases by ungauging. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach handles cases like Kramers-Wannier self-dualities that fall outside ordinary group symmetry analysis.

Core claim

The algebra of these operators is not a group but rather is described by their fusion ring and crossing relations, captured algebraically as a fusion category. Such data defines a Turaev-Viro/Levin-Wen model in 2+1D, while a 1+1D system with this fusion category acting as a global symmetry defines a boundary condition. This is akin to gauging a discrete global symmetry at the boundary of Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. We describe how to 'ungauge' the fusion category symmetry in these boundary conditions and separate the symmetry-preserving phases from the symmetry-breaking ones.

What carries the argument

The fusion category, which encodes the fusion ring and crossing relations of the topological defect lines.

If this is right

  • Anomalies of fusion category symmetries are described by inflow from the 2+1D topological model.
  • Gapped phases stabilized by these symmetries, including new 1+1D topological phases, are classifiable.
  • For Tambara-Yamagami categories linked to Kramers-Wannier self-dualities, gauge theoretic techniques simplify analysis of orbifolding.
  • Ungauging separates symmetry-preserving phases from symmetry-breaking ones in the boundary conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The boundary construction may yield new lattice Hamiltonian realizations of the gapped phases.
  • Methods could extend to fusion category symmetries acting in higher spacetime dimensions.
  • CFT examples derived from such dualities may produce additional dualities explored in a companion paper.

Load-bearing premise

The topological defect lines generate a closed algebraic structure fully captured by a fusion category with no additional hidden relations or continuous parameters, and the 1+1D system realizes consistently as a boundary of the 2+1D model.

What would settle it

A concrete set of topological defect lines whose fusion and crossing relations cannot be realized by any fusion category or whose 1+1D system cannot be consistently placed as a boundary of the associated 2+1D topological model.

read the original abstract

We study generalized discrete symmetries of quantum field theories in 1+1D generated by topological defect lines with no inverse. In particular, we describe 't Hooft anomalies and classify gapped phases stabilized by these symmetries, including new 1+1D topological phases. The algebra of these operators is not a group but rather is described by their fusion ring and crossing relations, captured algebraically as a fusion category. Such data defines a Turaev-Viro/Levin-Wen model in 2+1D, while a 1+1D system with this fusion category acting as a global symmetry defines a boundary condition. This is akin to gauging a discrete global symmetry at the boundary of Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. We describe how to "ungauge" the fusion category symmetry in these boundary conditions and separate the symmetry-preserving phases from the symmetry-breaking ones. For Tambara-Yamagami categories and their generalizations, which are associated with Kramers-Wannier-like self-dualities under orbifolding, we develop gauge theoretic techniques which simplify the analysis. We include some examples of CFTs with fusion category symmetry derived from Kramers-Wannier-like dualities as an appetizer for the Part II companion paper.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that topological defect lines without inverses in 1+1D QFTs generate generalized discrete symmetries whose algebra is captured by a fusion category (via fusion rules and crossing relations). This data defines a Turaev-Viro/Levin-Wen model in 2+1D, with the 1+1D system realized as a boundary condition; the framework is used to describe 't Hooft anomalies, classify gapped phases (including new topological ones), ungauge the symmetry, and separate preserving vs. breaking phases. Gauge-theoretic techniques are developed for Tambara-Yamagami categories and generalizations linked to Kramers-Wannier dualities, with CFT examples provided as preparation for a companion paper.

Significance. If the constructions are valid, the work supplies a systematic algebraic framework for non-invertible symmetries in 1+1D, linking them to bulk topological models and anomaly inflow in a manner that extends group-based orbifold techniques. The explicit gauge-theoretic methods for Tambara-Yamagami categories and the phase classification constitute concrete advances that could be applied to concrete CFTs and lattice models.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sentence 'This is akin to gauging a discrete global symmetry at the boundary of Dijkgraaf-Witten theory' is concise but would benefit from a one-sentence clarification of the precise correspondence being invoked.
  2. [§4] The manuscript would be improved by a short table in the introduction or §4 summarizing the gapped phases obtained for the Tambara-Yamagami examples, including which are symmetry-preserving vs. breaking.
  3. [§2] Notation for the crossing relations and associators in the fusion-category data (around the definition of the Turaev-Viro state sum) should be cross-referenced to a standard reference such as Turaev's book for readers less familiar with the 3D TQFT construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the scope and contributions of the work on fusion category symmetries, anomaly inflow, and phase classification. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's derivation relies on the established algebraic properties of fusion categories (fusion rings, crossing relations) and their standard realization as Turaev-Viro/Levin-Wen models and boundary conditions, drawn from prior independent mathematical literature. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citation to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or tautological renaming; the mapping from fusion-category data to anomaly inflow and gapped phases is presented as a direct application of these external structures without internal circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the construction rests on the standard axioms of fusion categories and the existence of associated 2+1D topological models; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Topological defect lines close under fusion and braiding to form a fusion category
    Invoked in the opening description of the symmetry algebra
  • domain assumption A 1+1D system with fusion-category symmetry can be realized as a boundary condition of the corresponding 2+1D Turaev-Viro model
    Central to the anomaly and phase classification procedure

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5755 in / 1575 out tokens · 20853 ms · 2026-05-24T10:10:23.918602+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 24 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symmetry Spans and Enforced Gaplessness

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Symmetry spans enforce gaplessness when a symmetry E embedded into two larger symmetries C and D has no compatible gapped phase that restricts from both.

  2. Non-Invertible Anyon Condensation and Level-Rank Dualities

    hep-th 2023-12 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    New dualities in 3d TQFTs are derived via non-invertible anyon condensation, generalizing level-rank dualities and providing new presentations for parafermion theories, c=1 orbifolds, and SU(2)_N.

  3. Non-Invertible Duality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions

    hep-th 2021-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Constructs non-invertible duality defects for one-form symmetries in 3+1D by partial gauging, derives fusion rules, proves incompatibility with trivial gapped phases, and realizes explicitly in Maxwell theory and latt...

  4. Algebraic locality and non-invertible Gauss laws

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    For non-invertible on-site symmetries on 2+1D lattices, Haag duality is preserved exactly only for cuspless regions (weak form with collar for cusped regions); disjoint additivity holds for group-based double models a...

  5. Non-Invertible Symmetries on Tensor-Product Hilbert Spaces and Quantum Cellular Automata

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Any weakly integral fusion category admits a QCA-refined realization on tensor-product Hilbert spaces with QCA and symmetry indices fixed by the categorical data under defect assumptions.

  6. A Twist on Scattering from Defect Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect 't Hooft anomalies trap charges at symmetry-line junctions and thereby drive categorical scattering into twist operators.

  7. Characterizing bulk properties of gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Role of duality in unusual ordering

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows exhibit unusual structures outside standard boundary CFT modules and typically break non-group-like symmetries, characterized via smeared boundary CFTs with an example in the tr...

  8. From Baby Universes to Narain Moduli: Topological Boundary Averaging in SymTFTs

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography is reinterpreted as averaging over topological boundary conditions in a fixed SymTFT slab, reproducing Poisson moments in the Marolf-Maxfield model and Zamolodchikov me...

  9. Symmetry breaking phases and transitions in an Ising fusion category lattice model

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The Ising fusion category lattice model features a symmetric critical phase equivalent to the Ising model, a categorical ferromagnetic phase with threefold degeneracy, and a critical categorical antiferromagnetic phas...

  10. Generalized Complexity Distances and Non-Invertible Symmetries

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-invertible symmetries define quantum gates with generalized complexity distances, and simple objects in symmetry categories turn out to be computationally complex in concrete 4D and 2D QFT examples.

  11. Hilbert Space Fragmentation from Generalized Symmetries

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalized symmetries generate exponentially many Krylov sectors in quantum many-body systems, showing that Hilbert space fragmentation does not by itself imply ergodicity breaking.

  12. Taste-splitting mass and edge modes in $3+1$ D staggered fermions

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A kink in a one-link mass term for 3+1D staggered fermions creates a 2+1D domain wall with two-flavor massless Dirac fermions protected by SU(2) and parity, realizing the parity anomaly from the UV lattice Hamiltonian.

  13. Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT

    hep-th 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect charges under generalized symmetries correspond one-to-one with gapped boundary conditions of the Symmetry TFT Z(C) on Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1} via dimensional reduction.

  14. Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A method is given to construct UV anyonic chain lattice models from SymTFT data realizing IR phases and transitions with non-invertible symmetries, illustrated with Rep(S3).

  15. Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects

    hep-th 2022-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Higher gauging of 1-form symmetries on surfaces in 2+1d QFT yields condensation defects whose fusion rules involve 1+1d TQFTs and realizes every 0-form symmetry in TQFTs.

  16. Characterizing bulk properties of gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Role of duality in unusual ordering

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows in 2D CFTs exhibit unusual ordering via spontaneous breaking of non-group-like symmetries and are characterized using smeared boundary CFTs applied to smeared Ishibashi states.

  17. Generalizing quantum dimensions: Symmetry-based classification of local pseudo-Hermitian systems and the corresponding domain walls

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generalized quantum dimensions from SymTFTs classify massless and massive RG flows in pseudo-Hermitian systems and relate coset constructions to domain walls.

  18. Modulated symmetries from generalized Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spatially modulated symmetries arise from gauging ordinary symmetries under generalized LSM anomalies, with explicit lattice models in 2D and 3D plus field-theoretic descriptions in arbitrary dimensions that connect t...

  19. Fusion of Integrable Defects and the Defect $g$-Function

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Derives additivity and fusion rules for defect g-functions in integrable 2D QFT, with effective amplitudes for non-topological cases and lowered entropy contribution in Ising non-topological fusion.

  20. Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking of higher-form non-invertible symmetries in Kitaev's quantum double model

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Decohered non-Abelian Kitaev quantum double states exhibit strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking of non-invertible higher-form symmetries and form an information convex set whose dimension equals the pure-state...

  21. Self-$G$-ality in 1+1 dimensions

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper defines self-G-ality conditions for fusion category symmetries in 1+1D systems and derives LSM-type constraints on many-body ground states along with lattice model examples.

  22. What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    hep-th 2023-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey of non-invertible symmetries with constructions in the Ising model and applications to neutral pion decay and other systems.

  23. ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    hep-th 2023-05 accept novelty 2.0

    Lecture notes explain non-invertible generalized symmetries in QFTs as topological defects arising from stacking with TQFTs and gauging diagonal symmetries, plus their action on charges and the SymTFT framework.

  24. Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond

    hep-th 2022-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review summarizes transformative examples of generalized symmetries in QFT and their applications to anomalies and dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 23 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Fermion condensation and super pivotal categories, 2017

    David Aasen, Ethan Lake, and Kevin Walker. Fermion condensation and super pivotal categories, 2017

  2. [2]

    Topological defects on the lattice: I

    David Aasen, Roger S K Mong, and Paul Fendley. Topological defects on the lattice: I. the ising model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 49(35):354001, Aug 2016

  3. [3]

    Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases.Physical Review B, 100(11), Sep 2019

    Maissam Barkeshli, Parsa Bonderson, Meng Cheng, and Zhenghan Wang. Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases.Physical Review B, 100(11), Sep 2019

  4. [4]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, 2017

    Lakshya Bhardwaj and Yuji Tachikawa. On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, 2017

  5. [5]

    Bridgeman and Dominic J

    Jacob C. Bridgeman and Dominic J. Williamson. Anomalies and entanglement renor- malization. Phys. Rev. B , 96:125104, Sep 2017

  6. [6]

    K.S. Brown. Cohomology of Groups . Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2012

  7. [7]

    Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Con- formal Field Theory

    Matthew Buican and Andrey Gromov. Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Con- formal Field Theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 356(3):1017–1056, Dec 2017

  8. [8]

    Bultinck, M

    N. Bultinck, M. Marin, D.J. Williamson, M.B. ahinolu, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete. Anyons and matrix product operator algebras.Annals of Physics, 378:183233, Mar 2017. 49

  9. [9]

    Topolog- ical defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions

    Chi-Ming Chang, Ying-Hsuan Lin, Shu-Heng Shao, Yifan Wang, and Xi Yin. Topolog- ical defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(1):26, Jan 2019

  10. [10]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group. Physical Review B, 87(15), Apr 2013

  11. [11]

    Cirac, D

    J.I. Cirac, D. Prez-Garca, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete. Matrix product density operators: Renormalization fixed points and boundary theories. Annals of Physics , 378:100149, Mar 2017

  12. [12]

    Freed, Ho Tat Lam, and Nathan Seiberg

    Clay Cordova, Daniel S. Freed, Ho Tat Lam, and Nathan Seiberg. Anomalies in the space of coupling constants and their dynamical applications ii, 2019

  13. [13]

    The witt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories

    Alexei Davydov, Michael Mger, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik. The witt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories. Journal fr die reine und angewandte Mathe- matik (Crelles Journal) , 2013(677), Jan 2013

  14. [14]

    On the structure of the witt group of braided fusion categories, 2011

    Alexei Davydov, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik. On the structure of the witt group of braided fusion categories, 2011

  15. [15]

    Verlinde, and Herman L

    Robbert Dijkgraaf, Cumrun Vafa, Erik P. Verlinde, and Herman L. Verlinde. The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models. Commun. Math. Phys. , 123:485, 1989

  16. [16]

    Topological gauge theories and group cohomol- ogy

    Robbert Dijkgraaf and Edward Witten. Topological gauge theories and group cohomol- ogy. Comm. Math. Phys. , 129(2):393–429, 1990

  17. [17]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik. Tensor Categories. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 2015

  18. [18]

    Weakly group-theoretical and solv- able fusion categories

    Pavel Etingof, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik. Weakly group-theoretical and solv- able fusion categories. Advances in Mathematics, 226(1):176205, Jan 2011

  19. [19]

    Fusion categories and homotopy theory

    Pavel Etingof, Dmitri Nikshych, and Viktor Ostrik. Fusion categories and homotopy theory. Quantum Topology, page 209273, 2010

  20. [20]

    Adrian Feiguin, Simon Trebst, Andreas W. W. Ludwig, Matthias Troyer, Alexei Kitaev, Zhenghan Wang, and Michael H. Freedman. Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain. Physical Review Letters, 98(16), Apr 2007. 50

  21. [21]

    Bicategories for bound- ary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d tft

    Jrgen Fuchs, Christoph Schweigert, and Alessandro Valentino. Bicategories for bound- ary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d tft. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 321(2):543575, May 2013

  22. [22]

    s-duality of boundary conditions in \ = 4 super yang-mills theory

    David Gaiotto and Edward Witten. s-duality of boundary conditions in \ = 4 super yang-mills theory. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 13(3):721896, 2009

  23. [23]

    Generalized global symmetries

    Davide Gaiotto, Anton Kapustin, Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. Generalized global symmetries. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2015(2), Feb 2015

  24. [24]

    Topological quantum field theory, nonlocal opera- tors, and gapped phases of gauge theories, 2013

    Sergei Gukov and Anton Kapustin. Topological quantum field theory, nonlocal opera- tors, and gapped phases of gauge theories, 2013

  25. [25]

    Ground-state degeneracy of topological phases on open surfaces

    Ling-Yan Hung and Yidun Wan. Ground-state degeneracy of topological phases on open surfaces. Physical Review Letters, 114(7), Feb 2015

  26. [26]

    Noninvertible anomalies and mapping-class-group trans- formation of anomalous partition functions

    Wenjie Ji and Xiao-Gang Wen. Noninvertible anomalies and mapping-class-group trans- formation of anomalous partition functions. Physical Review Research, 1(3), Oct 2019

  27. [27]

    and Benjamin Balsam

    Alexander Kirillov Jr. and Benjamin Balsam. Turaev-viro invariants as an extended tqft, 2010

  28. [28]

    Topological field theory, higher categories, and their applications

    Anton Kapustin. Topological field theory, higher categories, and their applications. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 (ICM 2010) , Jun 2011

  29. [29]

    Surface operators in 3d topological field theory and 2d rational conformal field theory

    Anton Kapustin and Natalia Saulina. Surface operators in 3d topological field theory and 2d rational conformal field theory. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory and Perturbative String Theory , page 175198, 2011

  30. [30]

    Topological boundary conditions in abelian chern- simons theory

    Anton Kapustin and Natalia Saulina. Topological boundary conditions in abelian chern- simons theory. Nuclear Physics B , 845(3):393435, Apr 2011

  31. [31]

    Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology, 2014

    Anton Kapustin and Ryan Thorngren. Anomalies of discrete symmetries in various dimensions and group cohomology, 2014

  32. [32]

    Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories

    Anton Kapustin and Ryan Thorngren. Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories. Progress in Mathematics, page 177202, 2017. 51

  33. [33]

    Abelian duality, walls and boundary conditions in diverse dimensions

    Anton Kapustin and Mikhail Tikhonov. Abelian duality, walls and boundary conditions in diverse dimensions. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2009(11):006006, Nov 2009

  34. [34]

    Finite ring groups

    Georgii Isaakovich Kats and VG Palyutkin. Finite ring groups. Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva, 15:224–261, 1966

  35. [35]

    Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls

    Alexei Kitaev and Liang Kong. Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls. Com- munications in Mathematical Physics , 313(2):351373, Jun 2012

  36. [36]

    Classification of (3+1)d bosonic topological orders: The case when pointlike excitations are all bosons

    Tian Lan, Liang Kong, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Classification of (3+1)d bosonic topological orders: The case when pointlike excitations are all bosons. Physical Review X , 8(2), Jun 2018

  37. [37]

    Wang, and Xiao-Gang Wen

    Tian Lan, Juven C. Wang, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Gapped domain walls, gapped bound- aries, and topological degeneracy. Physical Review Letters, 114(7), Feb 2015

  38. [38]

    Protected edge modes without symmetry

    Michael Levin. Protected edge modes without symmetry. Physical Review X, 3(2), May 2013

  39. [39]

    Levin and Xiao-Gang Wen

    Michael A. Levin and Xiao-Gang Wen. String-net condensation:a physical mechanism for topological phases. Physical Review B, 71(4), Jan 2005

  40. [40]

    Classification of pointed fusion categories of dimension p3 up to weak morita equivalence, 2018

    Kevin Maya, Adriana Meja Castao, and Bernardo Uribe. Classification of pointed fusion categories of dimension p3 up to weak morita equivalence, 2018

  41. [41]

    Module categories over graded fusion categories

    Ehud Meir and Evgeny Musicantov. Module categories over graded fusion categories. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra , 216(11):24492466, Nov 2012

  42. [42]

    Classification of pointed fusion categories of dimension 8 up to weak morita equivalence.Communications in Algebra, 46(9):38733888, Feb 2018

    lvaro Muoz and Bernardo Uribe. Classification of pointed fusion categories of dimension 8 up to weak morita equivalence.Communications in Algebra, 46(9):38733888, Feb 2018

  43. [43]

    International Mathematics Research Notices, 2003(27):1507, 2003

    Viktor Ostrik. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2003(27):1507, 2003

  44. [44]

    Robert N. C. Pfeifer, Oliver Buerschaper, Simon Trebst, Andreas W. W. Ludwig, Matthias Troyer, and Guifre Vidal. Translation invariance, topology, and protection of criticality in chains of interacting anyons. Physical Review B, 86(15), Oct 2012

  45. [45]

    N. Yu. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev. Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups. Comm. Math. Phys. , 127(1):1–26, 1990. 52

  46. [46]

    Parker, and Romain Vasseur

    Thomas Scaffidi, Daniel E. Parker, and Romain Vasseur. Gapless symmetry-protected topological order. Physical Review X, 7(4), Nov 2017

  47. [47]

    D. Tambara. Representations of tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for abelian groups. Israel Journal of Mathematics , 118(1):29–60, Dec 2000

  48. [48]

    Tensor categories with fusion rules of self- duality for finite abelian groups

    Daisuke Tambara and Shigeru Yamagami. Tensor categories with fusion rules of self- duality for finite abelian groups. Journal of Algebra, 209(2):692 – 707, 1998

  49. [49]

    Fusion Category Symmetries II

    Ryan Thorngren and Yifan Wang. Fusion Category Symmetries II. to appear

  50. [50]

    V. G. Turaev and O. Y. Viro. State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols. Topology, 31:865–902, 1992

  51. [51]

    VLADIMIR G. TURAEV. Modular categories and 3-manifold invariants. International Journal of Modern Physics B , 06(11n12):1807–1824, 1992

  52. [52]

    Jones, and Frank Pollmann

    Ruben Verresen, Ryan Thorngren, Nick G. Jones, and Frank Pollmann. Gapless topo- logical phases and symmetry-enriched quantum criticality, 2019

  53. [53]

    Self-duality and bound states of the toric code model in a transverse field

    Julien Vidal, Ronny Thomale, Kai Phillip Schmidt, and Sbastien Dusuel. Self-duality and bound states of the toric code model in a transverse field. Physical Review B, 80(8), Aug 2009

  54. [54]

    Williamson, Nick Bultinck, Michael Marin, Mehmet B

    Dominic J. Williamson, Nick Bultinck, Michael Marin, Mehmet B. ahinolu, Jutho Haegeman, and Frank Verstraete. Matrix product operators for symmetry-protected topological phases: Gauging and edge theories. Physical Review B, 94(20), Nov 2016. 53