Pith. sign in

REVIEW 22 references

Zero subsums in vector spaces over finite fields

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-28 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read For every fixed dimension d and every epsilon>0, the Olson constant of F_p^d is at most (d-1+epsilon)p for all sufficiently large primes p, settling the Nguyen-Vu conjecture.

arxiv 2009.08846 v2 pith:IKDPJNAP submitted 2020-09-18 math.CO math.NT

classification math.COmath.NT
keywords mathbbmathcalsubsetconstantepsilonolsonadditivecardinality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Additive combinatorics asks how many elements from a group you need before some nonempty collection of them adds to zero. For the field with p elements, this number is about the square root of p; for d-dimensional vector spaces it was conjectured to be about (d-1)p. This paper proves that upper bound. More precisely, for any fixed d and any tolerance epsilon, once p is large, every subset with more than (d-1+epsilon)p vectors contains a nonempty zero-sum subcollection.

Previous progress stopped at dimensions two and three. The proof decomposes a large set into structured pieces, projects the pieces onto a lower-dimensional space, uses the polynomial method to find a zero-sum combination in the projection, and then lifts that combination back to an actual subset of the original vectors. A probabilistic step ensures the lifted pieces are spread out enough for the lifting to work. The argument borrows and adapts machinery from the second author's work on the Erdos-Ginzburg-Ziv problem.

The theorem is asymptotic: it does not give explicit bounds on p, and it does not compute the Olson constant exactly. The value is in confirming the conjectured linear dependence on dimension and in providing a framework that may be useful for other zero-sum questions.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1: For any fixed d>=2 and epsilon>0, the Olson constant of F_p^d satisfies OL(F_p^d) <= (d-1+epsilon)p for all sufficiently large primes p. If true, this gives the conjectured asymptotic threshold for zero-sum-free subsets: any set of vectors exceeding about (d-1)p elements must contain a nonempty subset summing to zero.

Load-bearing premise

The main theorem depends on the iterative expansion step in Proposition 1, which uses Lemma 4. The second inequality of Lemma 4 is not proved in this paper; the text says 'The second inequality follows from [22, Lemma 3.1]', a result in the second author's earlier preprint. If that expansion estimate is false under the hypotheses used for the difference set X-X (l=0 case) or for the auxiliary function f (l>0 case), the lifting construction fails and the theorem does not follow.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: Theorem 1: For any fixed d>=2 and epsilon>0, the Olson constant of F_p^d satisfies OL(F_p^d) <= (d-1+epsilon)p for all sufficiently large primes p. If true, this gives the conjectured asymptotic threshold for zero-sum-free subsets: any set of vectors exceeding about (d-1)p elements must contain a nonempty subset summing to zero.

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: epsilon is part of the theorem statement, and K0, g, K2, mu, delta are auxiliary constants chosen by the proof. The central argument relies on standard theorems (Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, Loomis-Whitney, Cauchy-Davenport, Chernoff) and imports one nontrivial expansion lemma from the second author's earlier paper [22]. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Combinatorial Nullstellensatz (Alon's theorem)
    Used in Lemma 7 to produce a non-zero coefficient vector with vanishing sum.
  • standard math Loomis-Whitney inequality
    Used in Lemma 4 to lower-bound the expansion of a set under translation by a basis vector.
  • standard math Cauchy-Davenport theorem in F_p^d
    Used in Proposition 1 to show that two sumsets of size greater than p^{d/2} cover the group.
  • standard math Chernoff bound for binomial random variables
    Used in Proposition 2 to show random subsets Z_y are thick with high probability.
  • domain assumption Expansion inequality from [22, Lemma 3.1]
    The second inequality in Lemma 4 is imported without proof from the second author's prior paper; it is essential to the iterative growth step in Proposition 1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Zero subsums in vector spaces over finite fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IKDPJNAP

@misc{pith2026200908846,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Zero subsums in vector spaces over finite fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IKDPJNAP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.08846}
}
abstract

The Olson constant $\mathcal{O}L(\mathbb{F}_{p}^{d})$ represents the minimum positive integer $t$ with the property that every subset $A\subset \mathbb{F}_{p}^{d}$ of cardinality $t$ contains a nonempty subset with vanishing sum. The problem of estimating $\mathcal{O}L(\mathbb{F}_{p}^{d})$ is one of the oldest questions in additive combinatorics, with a long and interesting history even for the case $d=1$. In this paper, we prove that for any fixed $d \geq 2$ and $\epsilon > 0$, the Olson constant of $\mathbb{F}_{p}^{d}$ satisfies the inequality $$\mathcal{O}L(\mathbb{F}_{p}^{d}) \leq (d-1+\epsilon)p$$ for all sufficiently large primes $p$. This settles a conjecture of Hoi Nguyen and Van Vu.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alon, Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, Combin

    N. Alon, Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, Combin. Probab. Comput. 8 (1999), 7–29

  2. [2]

    N. Alon, M. Dubiner, A lattice point problem and additive number theory, Combinatorica 15.3 (1995): 301-309

  3. [3]

    Balandraud, An addition theorem and maximal zero-sum fre e sets in Z/pZ, Israel Journal of Mathematics, 188 (2012), 405–429

    ´E. Balandraud, An addition theorem and maximal zero-sum fre e sets in Z/pZ, Israel Journal of Mathematics, 188 (2012), 405–429

  4. [4]

    Addition Theorems in Fp via the Polynomial Method

    ´E. Balandraud, Addition Theorems in Fp via the Polynomial Method, arXiv:1702.06419

  5. [5]

    Bhowmik, J.-C

    G. Bhowmik, J.-C. Schlage-Puchta, An improvement on Olson’s constant for Zp ⊕ Zp, Acta Arith- metica. 141(4) (2010), 311–319

  6. [6]

    Eliahou and M

    S. Eliahou and M. Kervaire, Sumsets in vector spaces over finite fields, J. Number Theory 71 (1998), 12–39

  7. [7]

    Erd˝ os, H

    P. Erd˝ os, H. Heilbronn, On the addition of residue classes modulo p, Acta Arithmetica. 9 (1964), 149–159. 14

  8. [8]

    W. D. Gao, A. Geroldinger, Zero-sum problems in finite abe lian groups: a survey, Expo. Math. 24 (2006), 337–369

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    W. D. Gao, I. Z. Ruzsa and R. Thangadurai, Olson’s constan t for the group Fp ⊕ Fp, J. of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 107 (2004), 49–67

  2. [10]

    Y. O. Hamidoune and G. Z´ emor, On zero-free subset sums, Acta Arithmetica, 78 2 (1996), 143– 152

  3. [11]

    Janson, T

    S. Janson, T. /suppress Luczak, A. Rucinski,Random graphs, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathe- matics and Optimization, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 20 00

  4. [12]

    R. N. Karasev, F. Petrov, Partitions of nonzero element s of a finite field into pairs, Israel Journal of Mathematics 192 (1), 143–156

  5. [13]

    L. H. Loomis, H. Whitney, An inequality related to the is operimetric inequality, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 55.10 (1949): 961–962

  6. [14]

    H. H. Nguyen, E. Szemer´ edi, V. H. Vu, Subset sums modulo a prime, Acta Arithmetica. 131 (2008), 303–316

  7. [15]

    H. H. Nguyen, V. Vu, A characterization of incomplete se quences in Fd p, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 119 (2012)

  8. [16]

    J. E. Olson, A combinatorial problem on finite abelian gr oups I, J. Number theory , 1(1) (1969) 8–11

  9. [17]

    J. E. Olson, A combinatorial problem on finite abelian gr oups II , J. Number theory , 1(2) (1969) 195–199

  10. [18]

    J. E. Olson, Sum of sets of group elements, Acta Arithmetica, 28 (1975), 147–156

  11. [19]

    Petrov, Combinatorial results implied by many zero divisors in a group ring, arXiv:1606.03256

    F. Petrov, Combinatorial results implied by many zero divisors in a group ring, arXiv:1606.03256

  12. [20]

    Petrov, C

    F. Petrov, C. Pohoata, Improved bounds for progression -free sets in C n 8 , Israel Journal of Math- ematics, 236 (2020),345–363

  13. [21]

    Szemer´ edi, On a conjecture of Erd˝ os and Heilbronn,Acta Arithmetica, 17 (1970), 227–229

    E. Szemer´ edi, On a conjecture of Erd˝ os and Heilbronn,Acta Arithmetica, 17 (1970), 227–229

  14. [22]

    Zakharov, Convex geometry and the Erd˝ os-Ginzburg-Ziv problem, arXiv:2002.09892

    D. Zakharov, Convex geometry and the Erd˝ os-Ginzburg-Ziv problem, arXiv:2002.09892. 15

Pith tools

Reviewed August 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.