Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition in the extended XY model: nonadiabatic to adiabatic topological transition

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read In a periodically driven extended XY chain, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions occur only in the adiabatic window $|J_2-2h_s| < \omega < J_2+2h_s$, with onset tied to a nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic topological transition.

desk verdict The exact Floquet DQPT frequency window and Loschmidt amplitude are solid and worth knowing, but the paper's advertised link to a topological nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition rests on a Chern number derivation that doesn't hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.09008 v1 pith:M6P32GP7 submitted 2020-09-18 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.supr-conquant-ph

classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords FloquetdynamicalquantumphasetransitionextendedXYmodelLoschmidtamplitudeChernnumberadiabatic-nonadiabaticmixed-stateDQPTgeneralizedSchwinger-Rabi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks when a periodically driven quantum many-body system shows dynamical quantum phase transitions, and it answers with an exactly solvable model: a one-dimensional extended XY spin chain with a staggered field and periodic driving. The authors show that the driven chain maps exactly to noninteracting quasi-spins in a rotating magnetic field, and that the Loschmidt amplitude vanishes for a mode $k_*$ exactly when $J_2 \cos(k_*) + 2h_s - \omega = 0$. This zero exists only inside the frequency window $|J_2-2h_s| < \omega < J_2+2h_s$, which is also the window in which the quasi-spins follow the drive adiabatically. They identify the boundary of this window with a topological transition encoded in a Chern number, and show that both pure-state and thermal mixed-state rate functions exhibit nonanalytic cusps only in this window. The result matters because it ties the presence of Floquet DQPTs to a concrete, computable dynamical criterion---adiabaticity---rather than to equilibrium critical points.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rotating-frame Floquet Hamiltonian $H_k = [h_{xy}(k)\sigma_x + (h_z(k)-\omega)\sigma_z + \omega \mathbb{1}]/2$, obtained from the Schwinger-Rabi quasi-spin form of the driven chain. Its eigenstates are parametrized by the angle $\gamma_k = \arctan[\sin\theta_k/(\cos\theta_k - \omega/|\vec{h}_k|)]$, and the geometry of $\gamma_k$ as a function of $k$ determines everything: $\gamma_k$ can run from $0$ to $\pi$ only when $\omega < |\vec{h}_k|$, which is the adiabatic condition. The Loschmidt amplitude's zero condition is the resonance equation $J_2 \cos k_* + 2h_s - \omega = 0$, and the Chern number is computed as $C = \Theta(1 - \omega/|\vec{h}_k|)$. The machinery is exact: Jordan-Wigner fermionization, a two-site unit cell, and a time-dependent unitary rotation reduce the interacting problem to independent two-level systems.

What would settle it

For fixed $J_2$ and $h_s$, compute the Loschmidt rate function for frequencies sweeping across the window boundary $|J_2-2h_s|$: the claim predicts that nonanalytic cusps appear exactly when $\omega$ crosses into the interval and disappear when it leaves, with critical times $t_n^* = (2n+1)\pi/\omega$. A mismatch of even one period would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions in the periodically driven extended XY model occur exactly when the driving frequency falls in the interval $|J_2-2h_s| < \omega < J_2+2h_s$, and that this interval coincides with the adiabatic regime of the quasi-spin dynamics. The proof runs through the exact mapping of the interacting spin chain to a sum of noninteracting quasi-spins subject to a rotating magnetic field (the Schwinger-Rabi model), followed by a rotating-frame transformation. The Loschmidt amplitude for momentum mode $k$ is $L_k(t) = e^{-iE_k^- t}[\cos^2(\gamma_k/2) + \sin^2(\gamma_k/2)e^{i\omega t}]$, which vanishes at times $t_n^* = (2n+1)\pi/\omega$ for a mode $k_*$ satisfying $J_2 \cos(k_*) + 2h_s - \omega = 0$; such a mode exists precisely within the window above. The same condition marks the adiabatic range, where the angle $\gamma_k$ sweeps from $0$ to $\pi$ and the quasi-spins oscillate between up and down, whereas outside the window they feel an average field. A Chern number computed from the Floquet states, $C = \Theta(1 - \omega/|\vec{h}_k|)$, is presented as signaling a topological transition from nonadiabatic ($C=0$) to adiabatic ($C=1$) behavior, so the minimum frequency for DQPT equals the threshold frequency of that transition.

Load-bearing premise

The topological-transition claim rests on treating the polar angle $\theta_k$ of the effective magnetic field as an independent integration variable in the Berry-curvature integral, even though in the model $\theta_k$ is fixed by the momentum $k$; if that step is not legitimate, the nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition is not established, although the DQPT frequency window derived from the Loschmidt zeros may still hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pure-state Floquet DQPT shows periodic, nondecaying cusps in the Loschmidt rate function at $t_n^* = (2n+1)\pi/\omega$, in contrast to quench-induced DQPT where the cusps decay in time.
  • Mixed-state DQPT, defined through the generalized Loschmidt amplitude, inherits the same critical modes and critical times as the pure-state case for temperatures below the minimum-gap temperature; above a crossover temperature the nonanalyticities and the quantization of the mixed-state topological order parameter are washed out.
  • The dynamical topological order parameter $\nu_D(t)$ exhibits unit jumps at the critical times inside the adiabatic window, confirming the topological character of the DQPT in both pure and mixed states (the latter only below the crossover temperature).
  • The DQPT window $|J_2-2h_s| < \omega < J_2+2h_s$ lies strictly inside the full adiabatic range $|J_2-2h_s| \leq \omega \leq \sqrt{4+(J_2+2h_s)^2}$, so DQPT occurs in only part of the adiabatic regime.
  • The model has a single gapless critical point and still shows Floquet DQPT within a frequency window, in contrast to earlier Floquet DQPT mechanisms that require two critical points to define the window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coincidence between DQPT onset and adiabaticity is generic, then any integrable Floquet system reducible to two-level systems should show Loschmidt zeros exactly when a resonance condition of the form $h_z(k_*)-\omega=0$ is satisfied, making the DQPT window predictable without solving the full dynamics.
  • The momentum-dependent Chern number $C(k)=\Theta(1-\omega/|\vec{h}_k|)$ is not a global band invariant as written; a natural extension is to ask what a Brillouin-zone-averaged or edge-resolved topological invariant predicts for finite systems.
  • A direct experimental test is available in quantum simulators of the driven XY chain: sweeping $\omega$ across $|J_2-2h_s|$ should produce a sudden onset of periodic Loschmidt-echo cusps, and the same sweep could measure the crossover temperature above which the mixed-state signature disappears.
  • The mixed-state result suggests a practical diagnostic: temperature acts as a knob that erases the DQPT signature above a crossover scale set by the minimum Floquet gap, which could be used to estimate that gap in cold-atom or trapped-ion experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs) in a periodically driven extended XY spin chain with a staggered field, mapping the model via Jordan-Wigner transformation to noninteracting quasi-spins in a time-dependent effective magnetic field (Schwinger-Rabi model). The authors derive exact expressions for the Loschmidt amplitude and the generalized (mixed-state) Loschmidt amplitude, identify a frequency window |J2−2hs| < ω < J2+2hs in which the Loschmidt amplitude develops periodic real-time zeros, and compute a Chern number that they claim marks a topological transition from a nonadiabatic to an adiabatic driving regime. They conclude that the minimum frequency for the appearance of Floquet DQPT equals the threshold frequency of this nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition, and that both pure and mixed-state DQPTs occur only in the adiabatic regime.

Significance. The exact solution of the periodically driven extended XY model and the derived Loschmidt-amplitude expressions are useful additions to the Floquet DQPT literature. In particular, the condition for Loschmidt zeros, h_z(k*) = ω, is derived cleanly and leads to a well-defined frequency window that can be checked numerically; the mixed-state generalized Loschmidt amplitude is also given in closed form and its zero structure is consistent with the pure-state result. These analytical results are the strongest part of the paper. However, the advertised central claim that the DQPT threshold coincides with a topological nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition rests on a Chern number computation that is not a valid topological invariant for this model. Because that claim is load-bearing for the paper's title, abstract, and conclusions, the manuscript requires substantial revision before the central assertion can be accepted; the DQPT frequency-window result itself appears sound and could form the basis of a revised paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix D, Eqs. (D1)-(D4), and Eq. (10)] The Chern number computation in Appendix D is not a legitimate topological invariant. The model's physical parameter space is the Brillouin-zone coordinate k and time t; the polar angle θ = arctan(h_xy(k)/h_z(k)) is a function of k, not an independent variable. Integrating the Berry curvature over (θ,t) as in Eq. (D4) is therefore not the same as integrating over the physical torus. If one instead computes the first Chern number on the (k,t) torus, the integral of the Berry curvature for the Floquet states vanishes for all ω in this model, because the Bloch vector at the Brillouin-zone boundaries k = ±π is pinned to the z-axis and no net winding over the torus is possible. Additionally, Eq. (10) itself still contains k, so C = Θ(1−ω/|h_k|) is not a global integer invariant. The claim that the calculated Chern number indicates a topological transition from nonadiabatic to adiabatic regime is therefore unsupported.
  2. [Section II.B and the paragraph containing Eq. (6)] The frequency interval stated for adiabatic cyclic processes, |J2−2hs| ≤ ω ≤ √((J2+2hs)^2+4), is inconsistent with the condition that γ_k sweep from 0 to π. That condition requires the denominator of Eq. (6), namely h_z(k)−ω, to change sign, which gives |J2−2hs| < ω < J2+2hs. The upper bound √((J2+2hs)^2+4) is the maximum of |h_k| and is not relevant to the sign of the denominator. Moreover, within the window |J2−2hs| < ω < J2+2hs, not all modes satisfy ω < |h_k|: for the parameters J2 = π, hs = 3π used in Fig. 1, at ω = 6π modes near k = π have |h_k| ≈ 5π < ω, so Eq. (10) would assign C = 0 to those modes, contradicting the paper's classification of this frequency as fully adiabatic with C = 1. Thus the paper's own equations do not support a global nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition at the DQPT boundary.
  3. [Section III.A, paragraph after Eq. (14)] The inference that the DQPT window is contained in the adiabatic regime because J2+2hs < √(4+(J2+2hs)^2) is a non sequitur. The DQPT condition is h_z(k*) − ω = 0, which defines the interval |J2−2hs| < ω < J2+2hs; this interval is not the interval ω < |h_k| of Eq. (10). The conclusion that the minimum required driving frequency for DQPT equals the threshold of a nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic topological transition therefore does not follow from the presented derivations. Unless 'adiabatic' is redefined to mean precisely the condition h_z(k*) − ω = 0, the equivalence between the DQPT window and the adiabatic window is circular and not an independent prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (14)] The notation t* is used both for the critical time (2n+1)π/ω and for the period 2π/ω in the sentence 'with the period Tp = t∗ = 2π/ω'; please disambiguate the two uses.
  2. [Section II.B, final paragraph] The sentence 'In turn, it is required that the driving frequency ranges from |J2−2hs| to √((J2+2hs)^2+4)' should use the upper bound J2+2hs, as derived from the condition h_z(k)−ω = 0; the appearance of the √(...) expression is likely a remnant of an earlier calculation and conflicts with the DQPT window in Section III.A.
  3. [Appendix D, Eq. (D2)] The notation A^ν_k(t) for a function and simultaneously for a differential-form component is confusing; for example, the expression A^ν_k(t) = (ω/2)[−ν cos(γ) + (2m−1)] is used both as a function and as the coefficient of dt in Eq. (D1).
  4. [Section III.A, discussion of Fig. 2] The caption of Fig. 2 labels panels (a)-(f), but the text references only (a), (b), (c) and (d), (e), (f) in a scattered manner; it would help to refer to each panel by its explicit label when discussing the absence or presence of critical points.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The advertised equality between the DQPT frequency threshold and the nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition threshold is self-definitional: both conditions are the same equation h_z(k)=omega, and the Chern number calculation does not supply an independent criterion.

  1. self definitional [Section III.A, paragraph after Eq. (13); cf. Section II.B and Section IV Conclusion.]
    "According to Eq. (13), we find that DQPT happens only whenever there is a mode k∗, which satisfies J2 cos(k∗) + 2hs − ω = 0 , that leads to |J2− 2hs| < ω < J2 + 2hs. Since J2 + 2hs < √ 4 + (J2 + 2hs)2, we come to conclude that the nonanalyticities in the rate function of LA can only exist whenever the system evolves adiabatically."

    The 'adiabatic regime' in Section II.B is operationally defined by requiring gamma_k to vary from 0 to pi, which the paper says 'is possible only if ... the denominator of Eq. (6) can become zero', i.e., h_z(k)-omega=0 for some k. Section III.A then derives that the Loschmidt amplitude vanishes only when 'there is a mode k*, which satisfies J2 cos(k*) + 2hs - omega = 0'. These are the same equation. Thus the lower threshold for DQPT equals the lower threshold for the 'adiabatic' window because both were constructed from the same denominator-crossing condition; the conclusion is a restatement of the definitions, not an emergent prediction. The Chern number expression C=Theta(1-omega/|h_k|) in Eq.

full rationale

The paper's exact derivation of the Floquet DQPT condition is self-contained: from the rotating-frame Hamiltonian, L_k(t) acquires a factor whose zeros require h_z(k*)=omega and omega t=(2n+1)pi, giving the frequency window |J2-2hs|<omega<J2+2hs and periodic Fisher zeros. This part is not circular. The circularity enters in the advertised identification of this window with the nonadiabatic-to-adiabatic transition. In Section II.B the 'adiabatic' regime is characterized by gamma_k sweeping 0 to pi, which the paper explicitly ties to the denominator of Eq. (6) becoming zero, i.e., h_z(k)-omega=0. That is exactly the DQPT condition derived later from L_k(t)=0. So the statement 'DQPT occurs whenever the system evolves adiabatically' is true by construction: both thresholds are the same equation. The Chern number calculation in Appendix D is presented as independent support, but it yields a k-dependent step function rather than a global invariant and is not actually used to obtain the frequency window; moreover the paper's own labels for omega=4pi, 6pi, 8pi are inconsistent with C=Theta(1-omega/|h_k|) evaluated per mode. That is a correctness problem, not itself circularity, but it means the only demonstrated link between DQPT and the topological adiabatic transition is the definitional one identified above. There are no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citations; the core Loschmidt and Fisher-zero analysis stands on its own. Nevertheless, because the central advertised claim reduces by definition, the circularity score is high.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on standard exact-solution techniques (Jordan-Wigner, rotating frame) and on the physical choice of the ground state at t=0 as the initial condition. No parameters are fitted to data; J2, hs, and omega are model inputs.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner transformation maps the spin chain to free fermions exactly (Appendix A).
    Used to derive Eq. (2); relies on the exact spin-fermion duality in one dimension for the given Hamiltonian.
  • standard math The rotating-frame transformation UR(t)=exp[i omega (1-sigma_z) t/2] yields an exact time-independent Floquet Hamiltonian (Eq. (3), Appendix B).
    Standard Floquet rotating-frame approach; exact because the Hamiltonian is linear in Pauli matrices.
  • domain assumption The system is initialized in the ground state of the t=0 Hamiltonian, |chi_k^- >.
    The Loschmidt amplitude is defined with respect to this initial state; other initial states would give different DQPT conditions.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions on the spin chain (after Eq. (1)).
    Selects the momentum quantization k=(2p-1)pi/N; the thermodynamic limit is used for Fisher zeros.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition in the extended XY model: nonadiabatic to adiabatic topological transition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M6P32GP7

@misc{pith2026200909008,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition in the extended XY model: nonadiabatic to adiabatic topological transition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M6P32GP7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.09008}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate both pure and mixed states Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition (DQPT) in the periodically time-dependent extended XY model. We exactly show that the proposed Floquet Hamiltonian of interacting spins can be expressed as a sum of noninteracting quasi-spins imposed by an effective time dependent magnetic field (Schwinger-Rabi model). The calculated Chern number indicates that there is a topological transition from nonadiabatic to adiabatic regime. In the adiabatic regime, the quasi-spins trace the time dependent effective magnetic field and then oscillate between spin up and down states. While in the nonadiabatic regime, the quasi-spins cannot follow the time dependent effective magnetic field and feel an average magnetic field. We find the range of driving frequency over which the quasi-spins experience adiabatic cyclic processes. Moreover, we obtain the exact expression of the Loschmidt amplitude and generalized Loschmidt amplitude of the proposed Floquet system. The results represent that both pure and mixed states dynamical phase transition occurs when the system evolves adiabatically. In other words, the minimum required driving frequency for the appearance of Floquet DQPT is equal to the threshold frequency needed for transition from nonadiabatic to adiabatic regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.09008 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Variation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) The density plot of Loschmidt echo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Lines of Fisher zeros for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) The dynamical topological order parameter as a function of time for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) The density plot of generalized Loschmidt amplitude versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) The mixed state topological order parameter as a function of time for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Density plot of the expectation values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) Density plot of expectation values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jotzu , author M

    author author G. Jotzu , author M. Messer , author R. Desbuquois , author M. Lebrat , author T. Uehlinger , author D. Greif , \ and\ author T. Esslinger ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 515 ,\ pages 237 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    author author A. J. \ Daley , author H. Pichler , author J. Schachenmayer , \ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.020505 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 020505 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice

    author author M. Schreiber , author S. S. \ Hodgman , author P. Bordia , author H. P. \ L \"u schen , author M. H. \ Fischer , author R. Vosk , author E. Altman , author U. Schneider , \ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ 10.1126/science.aaa7432 journal journal Science \ volume 349 ,\ pages 842 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    yoon Choi, S

    author author J.-y. \ Choi , author S. Hild , author J. Zeiher , author P. Schau , author A. Rubio-Abadal , author T. Yefsah , author V. Khemani , author D. A. \ Huse , author I. Bloch , \ and\ author C. Gross ,\ 10.1126/science.aaf8834 journal journal Science \ volume 352 ,\ pages 1547 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    Fl ¨aschner, D

    author author N. Fl\" a schner , author D. Vogel , author M. Tarnowski , author B. S. \ Rem , author D.-S. \ L\" u hmann , author M. Heyl , author J. C. \ Budich , author L. Mathey , author K. Sengstock , \ and\ author C. Weitenberg ,\ 10.1038/s41567-017-0013-8 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 265 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    Jurcevic et al

    author author P. Jurcevic , author H. Shen , author P. Hauke , author C. Maier , author T. Brydges , author C. Hempel , author B. P. \ Lanyon , author M. Heyl and , author R. Blatt , \ and\ author C. F. \ Roos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.080501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 080501 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    author author E. A. \ Martinez , author C. A. \ Muschik , author P. Schindler , author D. Nigg , author A. Erhard , author M. Heyl , author P. Hauke , author M. Dalmonte , author T. Monz , author P. Zoller , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 534 ,\ pages 516 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    Neyenhuis, J

    author author B. Neyenhuis , author J. Zhang , author P. W. \ Hess , author J. Smith , author A. C. \ Lee , author P. Richerme , author Z.-X. \ Gong , author A. V. \ Gorshkov , \ and\ author C. Monroe ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.1700672 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 3 ( year 2017 ),\ 10.1126/sciadv.1700672 NoStop

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Smith , author A

    author author J. Smith , author A. Lee , author P. Richerme , author B. Neyenhuis , author P. W. \ Hess , author P. Hauke , author M. Heyl , author D. A. \ Huse , \ and\ author C. Monroe ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 907 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  2. [10]

    Yang , author L

    author author K. Yang , author L. Zhou , author W. Ma , author X. Kong , author P. Wang , author X. Qin , author X. Rong , author Y. Wang , author F. Shi , author J. Gong , \ and\ author J. Du ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.085308 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 100 ,\ pages 08...

  3. [11]

    \ Guo , author C

    author author X.-Y. \ Guo , author C. Yang , author Y. Zeng , author Y. Peng , author H.-K. \ Li , author H. Deng , author Y.-R. \ Jin , author S. Chen , author D. Zheng , \ and\ author H. Fan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044080 journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 11 ,...

  4. [12]

    Wang , author X

    author author K. Wang , author X. Qiu , author L. Xiao , author X. Zhan , author Z. Bian , author W. Yi , \ and\ author P. Xue ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.020501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 020501 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  5. [13]

    \ Xu , author Q.-Q

    author author X.-Y. \ Xu , author Q.-Q. \ Wang , author M. Heyl , author J. C. \ Budich , author W.-W. \ Pan , author Z. Chen , author M. Jan , author K. Sun , author J.-S. \ Xu , author Y.-J. \ Han , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Light: Science & Applications \ volume 9 ,\ ...

  6. [14]

    Dutta , author G

    author author A. Dutta , author G. Aeppli , author B. K. \ Chakrabarti , author U. Divakaran , author T. F. \ Rosenbaum , \ and\ author D. Sen ,\ 10.1017/CBO9781107706057 title Quantum phase transitions in transverse field spin models: from statistical physics to quantum infor...

  7. [15]

    author author F. H. L. \ Essler \ and\ author M. Fagotti ,\ 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064002 journal journal Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment \ volume 2016 ,\ pages 064002 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  8. [16]

    Fogarty , author S

    author author T. Fogarty , author S. Deffner , author T. Busch , \ and\ author S. Campbell ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.110601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 110601 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  9. [17]

    Campbell ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.184403 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Campbell ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.184403 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 184403 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  10. [18]

    Polkovnikov , author K

    author author A. Polkovnikov , author K. Sengupta , author A. Silva , \ and\ author M. Vengalattore ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.863 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 863 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  11. [19]

    Mitra ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025451 journal journal Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 245 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    author author A. Mitra ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025451 journal journal Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 245 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  12. [20]

    Jafari ,\ @noop journal journal Scientific reports \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    author author R. Jafari ,\ @noop journal journal Scientific reports \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  13. [21]

    Bhattacharya \ and\ author A

    author author U. Bhattacharya \ and\ author A. Dutta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014302 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 014302 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  14. [22]

    Uhrich , author N

    author author P. Uhrich , author N. Defenu , author R. Jafari , \ and\ author J. C. \ Halimeh ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245148 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 245148 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  15. [23]

    Z Z unkovi c c , author M

    author author B. Z Z unkovi c c , author M. Heyl , author M. Knap , \ and\ author A. Silva ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.130601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 130601 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  16. [24]

    Heyl , author A

    author author M. Heyl , author A. Polkovnikov , \ and\ author S. Kehrein ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.135704 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 135704 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  17. [25]

    author author J. C. \ Budich \ and\ author M. Heyl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085416 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 085416 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  18. [26]

    Heyl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.060504 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Heyl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.060504 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 060504 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  19. [27]

    author author S. A. \ Weidinger , author M. Heyl , author A. Silva , \ and\ author M. Knap ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.134313 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 134313 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  20. [28]

    Aidelsburger , author M

    author author M. Aidelsburger , author M. Atala , author S. Nascimb\`ene , author S. Trotzky , author Y.-A. \ Chen , \ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.255301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 107 ,\ pages 255301 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  21. [29]

    Aidelsburger , author M

    author author M. Aidelsburger , author M. Atala , author M. Lohse , author J. T. \ Barreiro , author B. Paredes , \ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 185301 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  22. [30]

    Heyl ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 81 ,\ pages 054001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    author author M. Heyl ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 81 ,\ pages 054001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  23. [31]

    Zvyagin ,\ @noop journal journal Low Temperature Physics \ volume 42 ,\ pages 971 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    author author A. Zvyagin ,\ @noop journal journal Low Temperature Physics \ volume 42 ,\ pages 971 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  24. [32]

    author author M. E. \ Fisher ,\ 10.1088/0034-4885/30/2/306 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 30 ,\ pages 615 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

  25. [33]

    author author T. D. \ Lee \ and\ author C. N. \ Yang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.87.410 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 410 ( year 1952 ) NoStop

  26. [34]

    van Saarloos \ and\ author D

    author author W. van Saarloos \ and\ author D. A. \ Kurtze ,\ 10.1088/0305-4470/17/6/026 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 17 ,\ pages 1301 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

  27. [35]

    Vajna \ and\ author B

    author author S. Vajna \ and\ author B. D\'ora ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155127 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 155127 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  28. [36]

    Sedlmayr , author M

    author author N. Sedlmayr , author M. Fleischhauer , \ and\ author J. Sirker ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045147 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 045147 ( year 2018 a ) NoStop

  29. [37]

    Heyl \ and\ author J

    author author M. Heyl \ and\ author J. C. \ Budich ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.180304 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 180304 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  30. [38]

    Bhattacharya , author S

    author author U. Bhattacharya , author S. Bandyopadhyay , \ and\ author A. Dutta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.180303 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 180303 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  31. [39]

    Karrasch \ and\ author D

    author author C. Karrasch \ and\ author D. Schuricht ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.195104 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 87 ,\ pages 195104 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  32. [40]

    Andraschko \ and\ author J

    author author F. Andraschko \ and\ author J. Sirker ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.125120 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 125120 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  33. [41]

    Sharma , author S

    author author S. Sharma , author S. Suzuki , \ and\ author A. Dutta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.104306 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 104306 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  34. [42]

    Jafari , author H

    author author R. Jafari , author H. Johannesson , author A. Langari , \ and\ author M. A. \ Martin-Delgado ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.054302 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 054302 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  35. [43]

    Zhou , author Q.-h

    author author L. Zhou , author Q.-h. \ Wang , author H. Wang , \ and\ author J. Gong ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022129 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 022129 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  36. [44]

    Canovi , author P

    author author E. Canovi , author P. Werner , \ and\ author M. Eckstein ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.265702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 265702 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  37. [45]

    author author J. M. \ Hickey , author S. Genway , \ and\ author J. P. \ Garrahan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.054301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 054301 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  38. [46]

    Schmitt \ and\ author S

    author author M. Schmitt \ and\ author S. Kehrein ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075114 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 075114 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  39. [47]

    Sun \ and\ author B.-B

    author author G. Sun \ and\ author B.-B. \ Wei ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ,\ pages 2006.00726 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  40. [48]

    Zhou , author C

    author author B. Zhou , author C. Yang , \ and\ author S. Chen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184313 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 100 ,\ pages 184313 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  41. [49]

    Mera , author C

    author author B. Mera , author C. Vlachou , author N. Paunkovi c \' c , author V. R. \ Vieira , \ and\ author O. Viyuela ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.094110 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 094110 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  42. [50]

    Khatun \ and\ author S

    author author A. Khatun \ and\ author S. M. \ Bhattacharjee ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.160603 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 160603 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  43. [51]

    Srivastav , author U

    author author V. Srivastav , author U. Bhattacharya , \ and\ author A. Dutta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144203 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 100 ,\ pages 144203 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  44. [52]

    Abdi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184310 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Abdi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184310 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 100 ,\ pages 184310 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  45. [53]

    Cao , author W

    author author K. Cao , author W. Li , author M. Zhong , \ and\ author P. Tong ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014207 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 014207 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  46. [54]

    Bhattacharyya \ and\ author S

    author author S. Bhattacharyya \ and\ author S. Dasgupta ,\ 10.1088/1751-8121/ab8f3b journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 53 ,\ pages 265002 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  47. [55]

    Ding ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ,\ pages 2005.08660 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    author author C. Ding ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ,\ pages 2005.08660 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  48. [56]

    Rylands \ and\ author V

    author author C. Rylands \ and\ author V. Galitski ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ,\ pages 2001.10084 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  49. [57]

    Hu \ and\ author E

    author author H. Hu \ and\ author E. Zhao ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.160402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 160402 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  50. [58]

    Pastori , author S

    author author L. Pastori , author S. Barbarino , \ and\ author B. J. \ Carl. ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ,\ pages 2003.07874 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  51. [59]

    author author T. H. \ Kyaw , author V. M. \ Bastidas , author J. Tangpanitanon , author G. Romero , \ and\ author L.-C. \ Kwek ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.012111 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 101 ,\ pages 012111 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  52. [60]

    u ller , author R. Gerritsma , author F. Z \

    author author B. P. \ Lanyon , author C. Hempel , author D. Nigg , author M. M \"u ller , author R. Gerritsma , author F. Z \"a hringer , author P. Schindler , author J. T. \ Barreiro , author M. Rambach , author G. Kirchmair , author M. Hennrich , author P. Zoller , author R....

  53. [61]

    author author A. S. \ Buyskikh , author M. Fagotti , author J. Schachenmayer , author F. Essler , \ and\ author A. J. \ Daley ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.053620 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 053620 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  54. [62]

    Bernien , author S

    author author H. Bernien , author S. Schwartz , author A. Keesling , author H. Levine , author A. Omran , author H. Pichler , author S. Choi , author A. S. \ Zibrov , author M. Endres , author M. Greiner , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 551 ,\ pages 579 ( year...

  55. [63]

    Atala , author M

    author author M. Atala , author M. Aidelsburger , author M. Lohse , author J. T. \ Barreiro , author B. Paredes , \ and\ author I. Bloch ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 588 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  56. [64]

    Sharma , author U

    author author S. Sharma , author U. Divakaran , author A. Polkovnikov , \ and\ author A. Dutta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144306 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 144306 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  57. [65]

    Sedlmayr , author P

    author author N. Sedlmayr , author P. Jaeger , author M. Maiti , \ and\ author J. Sirker ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.064304 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 064304 ( year 2018 b ) NoStop

  58. [66]

    Mas owski \ and\ author N

    author author T. Mas owski \ and\ author N. Sedlmayr ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.014301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 014301 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  59. [67]

    Vajna \ and\ author B

    author author S. Vajna \ and\ author B. D\'ora ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.161105 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 161105 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  60. [68]

    Kosior \ and\ author K

    author author A. Kosior \ and\ author K. Sacha ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.053621 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 97 ,\ pages 053621 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  61. [69]

    Kosior , author A

    author author A. Kosior , author A. Syrwid , \ and\ author K. Sacha ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.023612 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 023612 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  62. [70]

    Schwinger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.51.648 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Schwinger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.51.648 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 51 ,\ pages 648 ( year 1937 ) NoStop

  63. [71]

    Jafari , author M

    author author R. Jafari , author M. Kargarian , author A. Langari , \ and\ author M. Siahatgar ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.214414 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 214414 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

  64. [72]

    Titvinidze \ and\ author G

    author author I. Titvinidze \ and\ author G. I. \ Japaridze ,\ https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2003-00113-8 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 32 ,\ pages 383 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

  65. [73]

    author author M. V. \ Berry ,\ http://www.jstor.org/stable/2397741 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences \ volume 392 ,\ pages 45 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

  66. [74]

    Aharonov \ and\ author J

    author author Y. Aharonov \ and\ author J. Anandan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1593 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 58 ,\ pages 1593 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

  67. [75]

    Bohm , author A

    author author A. Bohm , author A. Mostafazadeh , author H. Koizumi , author Q. Niu , \ and\ author J. Zwanziger ,\ 10.1007/978-3-662-10333-3 title The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

  68. [76]

    Jafari ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.10.034 journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 377 ,\ pages 3279 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    author author R. Jafari ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.10.034 journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 377 ,\ pages 3279 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  69. [77]

    G\'omez-Le\'on \ and\ author G

    author author A. G\'omez-Le\'on \ and\ author G. Platero ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115318 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 115318 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  70. [78]

    Zener ,\ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    author author C. Zener ,\ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character \ volume 137 ,\ pages 696 ( year 1932 ) NoStop

  71. [79]

    Betthausen , author T

    author author C. Betthausen , author T. Dollinger , author H. Saarikoski , author V. Kolkovsky , author G. Karczewski , author T. Wojtowicz , author K. Richter , \ and\ author D. Weiss ,\ 10.1126/science.1221350 journal journal Science \ volume 337 ,\ pages 324 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  72. [80]

    author author \'A . G. \ Le \'o n ,\ title Dynamical and topological properties of periodically driven nanostructures ,\ @noop Ph.D. thesis ,\ school Universidad Complutense de Madrid ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  73. [81]

    LeClair , author G

    author author A. LeClair , author G. Mussardo , author H. Saleur , \ and\ author S. Skorik ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00435-U journal journal Nuclear Physics B \ volume 453 ,\ pages 581 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

  74. [82]

    Piroli , author B

    author author L. Piroli , author B. K. \ Pozsgay , \ and\ author E. Vernier ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv:1611.06126 \ ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  75. [83]

    Pollmann , author S

    author author F. Pollmann , author S. Mukerjee , author A. G. \ Green , \ and\ author J. E. \ Moore ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.020101 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 81 ,\ pages 020101 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

  76. [84]

    author author T. c. v. \ Prosen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1808 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 1808 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

  77. [85]

    D'Alessio \ and\ author M

    author author L. D'Alessio \ and\ author M. Rigol ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041048 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 4 ,\ pages 041048 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  78. [86]

    Lazarides , author A

    author author A. Lazarides , author A. Das , \ and\ author R. Moessner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012110 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 90 ,\ pages 012110 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  79. [87]

    Ponte , author A

    author author P. Ponte , author A. Chandran , author Z. Papić , \ and\ author D. A. \ Abanin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.11.008 journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 353 ,\ pages 196 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  80. [88]

    Mori , author T

    author author T. Mori , author T. Kuwahara , \ and\ author K. Saito ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.120401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 120401 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  81. [89]

    Khemani , author A

    author author V. Khemani , author A. Lazarides , author R. Moessner , \ and\ author S. L. \ Sondhi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 250401 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  82. [90]

    author author D. A. \ Abanin , author W. De Roeck , author W. W. \ Ho , \ and\ author F. m. c. \ Huveneers ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014112 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 014112 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  83. [91]

    author author D. V. \ Else , author B. Bauer , \ and\ author C. Nayak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.011026 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 7 ,\ pages 011026 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.