Casimir and Casimir-Polder Forces in Graphene Systems: Quantum Field Theoretical Description and Thermodynamics

G. L. Klimchitskaya; V. M. Mostepanenko

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 151 references

Casimir and Casimir-Polder Forces in Graphene Systems: Quantum Field Theoretical Description and Thermodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the Lifshitz theory of Casimir and Casimir-Polder forces in graphene systems obeys the Nernst heat theorem for every physically realizable graphene sheet, with the exceptional case $\Delta = 2\mu$ dismissed as…

desk verdict A useful review with two genuinely new asymptotics for gapless doped graphene, but the central thermodynamic-consistency claim rests on excluding the Delta=2mu case by a judgment call, and the anomaly at that point may be an artifact of an expansion used outside its domain. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.09979 v1 pith:HTZ3CMOY submitted 2020-09-21 quant-ph

G. L. Klimchitskaya , V. M. Mostepanenko This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph PACS 03.70.+k68.65.Pq05.70.-a

keywords CasimireffectCasimir-PolderforcegraphenepolarizationtensorNernstheattheoremLifshitztheoryMatsubaraformalismentropy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the Lifshitz theory of Casimir and Casimir-Polder forces, when the electromagnetic response of graphene is derived from first principles via the polarization tensor, satisfies the third law of thermodynamics for every physically realizable graphene system. It reviews low-temperature asymptotic expansions of the free energy and entropy for an atom near a graphene sheet and for two graphene sheets, covering pristine graphene and sheets with an energy gap $\Delta$ and chemical potential $\mu$. In all cases with $\Delta > 2\mu$ or $\Delta < 2\mu$, including the newly treated case of zero gap and nonzero chemical potential, the entropy vanishes with temperature. The only exception is the exact equality $\Delta = 2\mu \neq 0$, where a nonzero entropy would remain; the authors argue this singular case is physically unrealizable because $\Delta$ and $\mu$ cannot be known exactly for a real sample. This matters because it provides a concrete, first-principles case where Lifshitz theory is thermodynamically consistent, in contrast to its known tensions for metallic and dielectric plates.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the polarization tensor of graphene in (2+1)-dimensional space-time, computed in the one-loop approximation from the Dirac model with energy gap $\Delta$ and chemical potential $\mu$, and continued to imaginary Matsubara frequencies. Its components $\Pi_{00}$ and $\Pi$ define the TM and TE reflection coefficients of a graphene sheet, which enter the Lifshitz formulas for the Casimir and Casimir-Polder free energies. The argument splits the tensor into a zero-temperature part $\Pi^{(0)}$ and a thermal part $\Pi^{(1)}$, expands the reflection coefficients in the small ratio of these parts, and evaluates the thermal correction using the Abel-Plana formula for the difference between a Matsubara sum and the corresponding integral. This machinery yields the asymptotic low-temperature laws for the free energy and entropy in each regime of $\Delta$ and $\mu$.

What would settle it

Identify a graphene sample whose energy gap and chemical potential are measured to satisfy $\Delta = 2\mu$ and measure its low-temperature Casimir or Casimir-Polder entropy; a nonzero zero-temperature limit would falsify the claim. Alternatively, an exact evaluation of the polarization tensor at $\Delta = 2\mu$ without taking the $\Delta > 2\mu$ limit could show whether the anomalous entropy is an artifact of the asymptotic expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Casimir-Polder and Casimir entropies of graphene systems, computed from the polarization tensor in (2+1)-dimensional space-time, vanish in the zero-temperature limit in accordance with the Nernst heat theorem, for pristine graphene and for real graphene sheets with $\Delta > 2\mu$ or $\Delta < 2\mu$. The low-temperature behavior of the thermal correction to the free energy is obtained asymptotically for each case: for pristine graphene it goes as $(k_B T)^3$ for the atom-sheet configuration and $(k_B T)^3 \ln(a k_B T / \hbar c)$ for two sheets; for $\Delta > 2\mu$ it is a higher power, $T^5$; for $\Delta < 2\mu$ it is $T^2$. The paper also derives new results for the previously untreated case $\mu \neq 0$, $\Delta = 0$, where the free-energy correction is $-\alpha_0 \mu (k_B T)^2 / [(\hbar c)^2 a]$ for an atom and $-a\mu^2 (k_B T)^2 / (\hbar c)^3$ for two sheets, with entropy vanishing linearly in T. In the exceptional case $\Delta = 2\mu \neq 0$ the asymptotic entropy tends to a nonzero constant that depends on system parameters, which would violate the Nernst theorem; the paper argues that this line of parameter space is singular and physically unrealizable.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on treating the exact equality $\Delta = 2\mu$ as physically unrealizable; if a real sample could satisfy that equality, the theory would violate the Nernst heat theorem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Measured Casimir and Casimir-Polder forces in graphene systems should be describable by the Lifshitz theory with the polarization-tensor response and no extra dissipative term, with the entropy tending to zero as temperature goes to zero.
Low-temperature thermal corrections follow definite power laws—such as $T^3$ for pristine graphene and $T^2$ for doped graphene—that can be tested by precision force measurements at low temperature.
For graphene with $\Delta > 2\mu$ the thermal correction is exponentially suppressed by $e^{-(\Delta-2\mu)/(2 k_B T)}$, so the entropy vanishes very rapidly, making the thermodynamic consistency especially robust.
The graphene results suggest a route to resolving the long-standing Casimir conundrum for metals and dielectrics by replacing phenomenological response models with first-principles response functions valid for both propagating and evanescent waves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If $\Delta$ and $\mu$ are never known exactly for a real sample, the anomalous $\Delta = 2\mu$ line is not merely unlikely but generically avoided, so the theory's thermodynamic consistency is effectively guaranteed for any physical graphene sample.
The same split into implicit and explicit thermal corrections could be applied to other two-dimensional materials whose electromagnetic response admits a first-principles description, predicting their Nernst-theorem behavior before measurement.
A testable extension would be to tune the chemical potential of a graphene sheet by gating while keeping the gap fixed, sweeping through $\Delta = 2\mu$; the low-temperature entropy should cross over from a $T^4$ to a $T$-linear behavior as the equality is approached from either side.
The paper's dismissal of $\Delta = 2\mu$ as physically unrealizable could be probed by high-precision determination of $\Delta$ and $\mu$ in engineered graphene samples, since any sample that actually satisfies the equality would exhibit a measurable nonzero zero-temperature Casimir entropy.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things. First, this is mostly a review of the authors' own program, and it is a good one: the Lifshitz-theory context, the polarization-tensor formalism, and the low-temperature asymptotics for pristine, gapped, and doped graphene are laid out clearly. Second, the genuinely new results are the mu != 0, Delta = 0 asymptotics, Eqs. (93)-(94) for Casimir-Polder and (111)-(112) for Casimir. Those follow from the independently published polarization tensor and are not fitted; they look right and extend the earlier derivations in [150,151] to a previously uncovered limit. That is real value.

The soft spot is the central claim. The paper concludes that the Lifshitz theory is thermodynamically consistent for all physically realizable graphene, and the only exception, Delta = 2mu, is dismissed as physically unrealizable because sample parameters cannot be known exactly. That argument is weak: the same inexact-knowledge logic would rule out the pristine limit Delta = mu = 0, which the paper treats as valid. More importantly, the stress-test concern lands. The nonzero entropy at Delta = 2mu comes from taking the limit of results derived under kBT << Delta - 2mu, then setting the exponential to unity exactly at equality. At that point the expansion parameter is not small, so the claimed anomaly may be an artifact of an invalid continuation rather than a property of the exact theory. This matters because if the anomaly is real, the theory is inconsistent on a codimension-one surface; if it is spurious, the stated exception is wrong but the thermodynamic conclusion would be strengthened. Either way, the paper needs a direct numerical evaluation of the entropy at Delta = 2mu from the full polarization tensor to decide. The argument as written does not establish the central claim.

That said, the derivations are sketched and many steps are deferred to references, which is normal for a review but makes independent checking harder. The citation pattern is heavily self-referential, but this is a review of the authors' own body of work, so I would not count that against it.

Who is this for? People working on Casimir forces with graphene, on the thermodynamic consistency of Lifshitz theory, and on the broader Casimir puzzle. They will get a clear map of the low-temperature asymptotic structure and two new formulas worth citing. The paper deserves a serious referee, but the referee should push hard on the Delta = 2mu question. My recommendation: send it to peer review and require either a direct numerical check at Delta = 2mu or an honest reframing of the conclusion that does not depend on calling the only counterexample unrealizable. As it stands, the conclusion is conditional, not established.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the Lifshitz-theory description of the Casimir-Polder and Casimir interactions in graphene systems, with the electromagnetic response of graphene represented by the thermal quantum-field-theory polarization tensor. It collects low-temperature asymptotic results for the free energy and entropy for pristine graphene and for graphene with energy gap Δ and chemical potential μ, distinguishing the regimes Δ>2μ, Δ=2μ, and Δ<2μ, and it adds new asymptotic results for the case Δ=0, μ≠0. The central conclusion is that the Lifshitz theory is thermodynamically consistent, in the sense that the Casimir and Casimir-Polder entropies vanish at zero temperature, for pristine graphene and for real graphene with Δ>2μ or Δ<2μ; the case Δ=2μ≠0 is found to produce an entropic anomaly but is argued to be physically unrealizable. The paper also connects these results to the long-standing Drude-model/plasma-model puzzle in Casimir physics.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a first-principles quantum-field-theory example where the Lifshitz theory satisfies the Nernst heat theorem for a conducting material, lending support to the plasma-model-like description of graphene and suggesting a route to resolving the Casimir conundrum. The review is useful as a systematic compilation of the polarization-tensor formalism and of the published asymptotic formulas, and the new Δ=0, μ≠0 results are a modest but genuine extension. However, the headline thermodynamic-consistency conclusion rests on the treatment of the single exceptional case Δ=2μ, and that treatment is not established by the arguments given.

major comments (3)

[§8, Eqs. (66)–(74); §9, Eqs. (95)–(102)] The claimed entropic anomaly at Δ=2μ is obtained by setting the exponential e^{-(Δ−2μ)/(2kBT)} to unity in asymptotic formulas derived under the condition that this exponential is small, stated as the third inequality in Eq. (71). At equality this expansion parameter is exactly one, so Eqs. (72)–(74) and (100)–(102) are not justified limits of the Lifshitz formulas. The nonzero zero-temperature entropies in Eqs. (74) and (102) may therefore be artifacts of the analytic continuation rather than properties of the exact polarization-tensor theory. Because this anomaly is the sole case excluded from the paper's thermodynamic-consistency claim, the central conclusion requires either a direct numerical evaluation of Eqs. (2) and (5) at Δ=2μ or a rigorous treatment of the limit that does not rely on this invalid small parameter.
[§10] The argument that exact equality Δ=2μ is physically unrealizable because the values of Δ and μ for a sample cannot be known exactly is not a physical exclusion. It applies equally to the pristine case Δ=μ=0, which the paper treats as a valid and thermodynamically consistent case, and in principle Δ and μ can be tuned by substrate and gate-voltage choices. This exclusion is load-bearing for the statement that the Lifshitz theory is consistent in all physically realizable cases. The authors should either prove that exact equality is forbidden by the model or reformulate the conclusion to state that the status at Δ=2μ remains unresolved.
[§§8–9, Eqs. (71), (76), (85), (103)] The Nernst-theorem conclusion for the cases Δ>2μ and Δ<2μ is derived under separation-dependent conditions such as ℏvF/(2aΔ)≪1 and √(4μ²−Δ²)>ℏωc. These conditions fail for sufficiently small separations at fixed Δ and μ, and the paper does not analyze the low-temperature entropy in that regime. As written, the thermodynamic-consistency claim is therefore established only in the asymptotic large-separation regime, not for arbitrary fixed separations as the third law requires.

minor comments (4)

[§7, Eq. (57)] The displayed identity in Eq. (57) is algebraically incorrect: the argument of the logarithm should be 1 − [2r^{(0)}_λ δ_T r_λ + (δ_T r_λ)²] e^{−2aq_l} / [1 − (r^{(0)}_λ)² e^{−2aq_l}], not the expression shown. The subsequent first-order formula (58) is consistent with the corrected form, so this appears to be a typographical error.
[§§1, 2, 4] There are several typographical or conversion artifacts that should be cleaned: 'expressipons' in Section 4, 'with with' in Section 2, 'Caimir-Polder' in the Section 1 outline, and the repeated LaTeX artifact 'l/greaterorequalslant1' in Sections 6–9.
[Tables 1 and 2] The column heading 'Δ > 2µ /≥ 0' is ambiguous; it should be written as 'Δ > 2µ ≥ 0' or 'Δ > 2µ, µ ≥ 0'.
[§§8–9, Eqs. (88)–(94) and (108)–(112)] The new results for Δ=0, μ≠0 are presented with very terse derivations ('we obtain', 'integrating with respect to k⊥, one arrives at'). Since these are claimed to be new findings, the authors should provide more intermediate steps or explicitly state where a full derivation can be found.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The thermodynamic-consistency claim is protected by excluding the only violating case (Δ=2μ) as 'physically unrealizable'; the underlying polarization-tensor and Lifshitz derivations are otherwise self-contained.

self definitional [Section 10 (Discussion), paragraph following Eqs. (100)-(102); echoed in the Abstract.]
"According to the results presented above, the Lifshitz theory of both the Casimir-Polder and Casimir interactions involving real graphene sheets with ∆ > 2µ or ∆ < 2µ satisﬁes the Nernst heat theorem. For real graphene the Nernst heat theorem is violated in the only case of an exact equality ∆ = 2µ ... One should note, however, that the values of ∆ and µ for a speciﬁc graphene sample cannot be known exactly. Thus, from the practical standpoint, the case of graphene sheets with an exact equality ∆ = 2µ should be considered as a singular one and physically unrealizable."

The paper's central conclusion is that Lifshitz theory is thermodynamically consistent for all physically realizable graphene systems. The authors' own asymptotic results show that the only case violating the Nernst theorem is Δ=2μ≠0, and that case is then excluded by declaring it 'physically unrealizable' because Δ and μ cannot be known exactly. This makes the scope of the conclusion true by construction: the set of 'physically realizable' cases is effectively defined to exclude exactly the parameter set on which the claimed consistency fails.

full rationale

The paper's mathematical core is not circular: the polarization tensor is taken from independently published first-principles thermal quantum field theory calculations, and the low-temperature asymptotic behaviors of the Casimir and Casimir-Polder free energies and entropies are parameter-free expansions, not fits to data. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and no external uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work. The one genuinely circular element is the way the central thermodynamic-consistency claim is delimited. The authors find that the Nernst theorem is violated at Δ=2μ≠0, and then declare that exact equality physically unrealizable because sample parameters cannot be known exactly. That exclusion is load-bearing for the conclusion that the theory is consistent 'in all physically realizable cases,' because it removes the only case their own equations flag as anomalous. The justification would equally disqualify pristine graphene, which the paper treats as a valid limiting case, so the exclusion is not a principled physical boundary but a post hoc protection of the desired conclusion. I therefore assign a low-to-moderate circularity score of 3: the central derivations are independent, but the headline claim is partially circular in its definition of which graphene systems count as physically realizable. The validity of the analytic continuation at Δ=2μ is a separate correctness concern, not a circularity, and is not counted here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities; it applies the established polarization tensor and Lifshitz formulas to graphene systems. No free parameters are fitted; the model parameters Δ, µ, and v_F are taken from the prior literature.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The electromagnetic response of graphene is exactly described by the (2+1)-dimensional polarization tensor of the Dirac model given in Eqs. (27)-(30).
The paper relies on the exactness of this tensor, derived in prior QFT work, without rederiving it here.
domain assumption The Lifshitz formulas (Eqs. (2), (5)) with reflection coefficients from the polarization tensor (Eq. (33)) are valid for two-dimensional graphene sheets.
This extends the standard Lifshitz theory to 2D materials, as done in prior work.
ad hoc to paper The exact equality Δ = 2µ is physically unrealizable.
This assumption is introduced in Section 10 to dismiss the entropic anomaly found for Δ=2µ in Sections 8 and 9, based on the impossibility of knowing material parameters exactly.
domain assumption The low-temperature asymptotic expansions are controlled by the small parameters listed in Eq. (71).
The paper uses these expansions to derive the leading temperature dependence of free energies and entropies.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Casimir and Casimir-Polder Forces in Graphene Systems: Quantum Field Theoretical Description and Thermodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HTZ3CMOY

@misc{pith2026200909979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Casimir and Casimir-Polder Forces in Graphene Systems: Quantum Field Theoretical Description and Thermodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HTZ3CMOY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.09979}
}

abstract

We review recent results on the low-temperature behaviors of the Casimir-Polder and Casimir free energy an entropy for a polarizable atom interacting with a graphene sheet and for two graphene sheets, respectively. These results are discussed in the wide context of problems arising in the Lifshitz theory of van der Waals and Casimir forces when it is applied to metallic and dielectric bodies. After a brief treatment of different approaches to theoretical description of the electromagnetic response of graphene, we concentrate on the derivation of response function in the framework of thermal quantum field theory in the Matsubara formulation using the polarization tensor in (2+1)-dimensional space-time. The asymptotic expressions for the Casimir-Polder and Casimir free energy and entropy at low temperature, obtained with the polarization tensor, are presented for a pristine graphene as well as for graphene sheets possessing some nonzero energy gap $\Delta$ and chemical potential $\mu$ under different relationships between the values of $\Delta$ and $\mu$. Along with reviewing the results obtained in the literature, we present some new findings concerning the case of zero gap and nonzero chemical potential. The conclusion is made that the Lifshitz theory of the Casimir and Casimir-Polder forces in graphene systems using the quantum field theoretical description of a pristine graphene, as well as real graphene sheets with $\Delta>2\mu$ or $\Delta<2\mu$, is consistent with the requirements of thermodynamics. The case of graphene with $\Delta=2\mu\neq 0$ leads to an entropic anomaly, but is argued to be physically unrealistic. The way to a resolution of thermodynamic problems in the Lifshitz theory based on the results obtained for graphene is discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.09979 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The mean measured gradients of the Casimir force between an Au-coated sphere and an Au-coated plate are shown by crosses as a function of separations. For clarity only each third experimental data point is plotted. The bottom and top lines demonstrate theoretical predictions of the Lifshitz theory obtained with inclusion and neglect of the relaxation of conduction electrons, respectively. does not play any role. So,… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The mean measured gradients of the Casimir force between a Ni-coated sphere and a Ni-coated plate are shown by crosses as a function of separations. The top and bottom lines demonstrate theoretical predictions of the Lifshitz theory obtained with inclusion and neglect of the relaxation of conduction electrons, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[1]

The inﬂuence of retardation o n the London-van der Waals forces

Casimir, H.B.G.; Polder, D. The inﬂuence of retardation o n the London-van der Waals forces. Phys. Rev. 1948, 73, 360–372

1948
[2]

On the attraction between two perfectly c onducting plates

Casimir, H.B.G. On the attraction between two perfectly c onducting plates. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. B 1948, 51, 793–795

1948
[3]

The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids

Lifshitz, E.M. The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids. Zh. Eksp. T eor. Fiz. 1955, 29, 94–110 ( Sov. Phys. JETP 1956, 2, 73–83)

1955
[4]

The general theory of van der Waals forces

Dzyaloshinskii, I.E.; Lifshitz, E.M.; Pitaevskii, L.P . The general theory of van der Waals forces. Usp. Fiz. Nauk 1961, 73, 381–422 ( Adv. Phys. 1961, 10, 165–209)

1961
[5]

Statistical Physics, Part II ; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980

Lifshitz, E.M.; Pitaevskii, L.P . Statistical Physics, Part II ; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980

1980
[6]

Electrodynamics of Solids: Optical Properties of Electron s in Metals ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003

Dressel, M.; Grüner, G. Electrodynamics of Solids: Optical Properties of Electron s in Metals ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003

2003
[7]

Emig, T.; Graham, N.; Jaffe, R.L.; Kardar, M.; Casimir For ces Between Arbitrary Compact Objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 170403

2007
[8]

Casimir forces in a T-operator appr oach

Kenneth, O.; Klich, I. Casimir forces in a T-operator appr oach. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 014103

2008

Show all 151 references

[9]

Casimir forc es between compact objects: The scalar case

Emig, T.; Graham, N.; Jaffe, R.L.; Kardar, M. Casimir forc es between compact objects: The scalar case. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, 025005

2008
[10]

Scattering theory approach to electromagnetic Casimir forces

Rahi, S.J.; Emig, T.; Graham, N.; Jaffe, R.L.; Kardar, M. Scattering theory approach to electromagnetic Casimir forces. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 085021

2009
[11]

Improved tests of extra-dimensional physics and thermal quantum ﬁeld theory from new Casimir force measurements

Decca, R.S.; Fischbach, E.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Kraus e, D.E.; López, D.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Improved tests of extra-dimensional physics and thermal quantum ﬁeld theory from new Casimir force measurements. Phys. Rev. D 2003, 68, 116003

2003
[12]

Precise comparison of theory and new experiment for the Casimir forc e leads to stronger constraints on thermal quantum effects and long-range interactions

Decca, R.S.; López, D.; Fischbach, E.; Klimchitskaya, G .L.; Krause, D.E.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Precise comparison of theory and new experiment for the Casimir forc e leads to stronger constraints on thermal quantum effects and long-range interactions. Ann. Phys. (NY) 2005, 318, 37–80

2005
[13]

Tests of new physics from precise measurements of the Casimir pressure b etween two gold-coated plates

Decca, R.S.; López, D.; Fischbach, E.; Klimchitskaya, G .L.; Krause, D.E.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Tests of new physics from precise measurements of the Casimir pressure b etween two gold-coated plates. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 077101

2007
[14]

Novel constraints on light elementary particles and extra-dimensional physi cs from the Casimir effect

Decca, R.S.; López, D.; Fischbach, E.; Klimchitskaya, G .L.; Krause, D.E.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Novel constraints on light elementary particles and extra-dimensional physi cs from the Casimir effect. Eur. Phys. J. C 2007, 51, 963–975

2007
[15]

Gradient of the Casimir force between Au surfaces of a sphere and a plate measured using an atomic force microscope in a frequency-shift technique

Chang, C.C.; Banishev , A.A.; Castillo-Garza, R.; Klimc hitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Mohideen, U. Gradient of the Casimir force between Au surfaces of a sphere and a plate measured using an atomic force microscope in a frequency-shift technique. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 165443

2012
[16]

Measurement of the gradient of the Casimir force between a nonmagnetic gold sph ere and a magnetic nickel plate

Banishev , A.A.; Chang, C.C.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Most epanenko, V .M.; Mohideen, U. Measurement of the gradient of the Casimir force between a nonmagnetic gold sph ere and a magnetic nickel plate. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 195422

2012
[17]

M.; Mohideen, U

Banishev , A.A.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V . M.; Mohideen, U. Demonstration of the Casimir Force between Ferromagnetic Surfaces of a Ni-Coated Sphere and a Ni-Coated Plate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 137401

2013
[18]

M.; Mohideen, U

Banishev , A.A.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V . M.; Mohideen, U. Casimir interaction between two magnetic metals in comparison with nonmagnetic test bodies . Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 155410

2013
[19]

Isoelectronic deter mination of the thermal Casimir force

Bimonte, G.; López, D.; Decca, R.S. Isoelectronic deter mination of the thermal Casimir force. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 184434

2016
[20]

Reducing detrimental electrostatic effects in Casimir-force measurements and Casimir-force-based micr odevices

Xu, J.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Mohid een, U. Reducing detrimental electrostatic effects in Casimir-force measurements and Casimir-force-based micr odevices. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 032501

2018
[21]

Examining the Casimir puzzle with an upgraded AFM-based technique and advanced surface cleanin g

Liu, M.; Xu, J.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M .; Mohideen, U. Examining the Casimir puzzle with an upgraded AFM-based technique and advanced surface cleanin g. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 081406(R). Universe 2019, xx, 5 29 of 34

2019
[22]

Precision measurements of the gradient of the Casimir force between ultraclean metallic surfaces a t larger separations

Liu, M.; Xu, J.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M .; Mohideen, U. Precision measurements of the gradient of the Casimir force between ultraclean metallic surfaces a t larger separations. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 052511

2019
[23]

The Casimir force between real materials: Experiment and theory .Rev

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mohideen, U.; Mostepanenko, V .M. The Casimir force between real materials: Experiment and theory .Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 1827–1885

2009
[24]

Advances in the Casimir Effect ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015

Bordag, M.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mohideen, U.; Mostepa nenko, V .M. Advances in the Casimir Effect ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015

2015
[25]

Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals interactions

Woods, L.M.; Dalvit, D.A.R.; Tkatchenko, A.; Rodriguez -Lopez, P .; Rodriguez, A.W.; Podgornik, R. Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2016, 88, 045003

2016
[26]

Control of the Casimir force by the modiﬁcation of dielectric properties with light

Chen, F.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Moh ideen, U. Control of the Casimir force by the modiﬁcation of dielectric properties with light. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 035338

2007
[27]

Conductivity of dielectric and thermal atom-wall interaction

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Conductivity of dielectric and thermal atom-wall interaction. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 2008, 41, 312002

2008
[28]

Reduction of the Casimir Force from Indium Tin Oxide Film by UV Treatment

Chang, C.C.; Banishev , A.A.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Most epanenko, V .M.; Mohideen, U. Reduction of the Casimir Force from Indium Tin Oxide Film by UV Treatment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 090403

2011
[29]

Modifying the Casimir force between indium tin oxide ﬁlm and Au sphere

Banishev , A.A.; Chang, C.C.; Castillo-Garza, R.; Klimc hitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Mohideen, U. Modifying the Casimir force between indium tin oxide ﬁlm and Au sphere. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 045436

2012
[30]

Measurement of the temperature dependence of the Casimir-Polder force

Obrecht, J.M.; Wild, R.J.; Antezza, M.; Pitaevskii, L.P .; Stringari, S.; Cornell, E.A. Measurement of the temperature dependence of the Casimir-Polder force. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 063201

2007
[31]

Experiment an d theory in the Casimir effect

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Experiment an d theory in the Casimir effect. Contemp. Phys. 2006, 47, 131

2006
[32]

Thermodynamic aspects of the Casimir force between real metals at nonzero temperature

Bezerra, V .B.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M . Thermodynamic aspects of the Casimir force between real metals at nonzero temperature. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65, 052113

2002
[33]

Correlation of energy and free energy for the thermal Casimir force between real metals

Bezerra, V .B.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M . Correlation of energy and free energy for the thermal Casimir force between real metals. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 062112

2002
[34]

Violation of the Nernst heat theorem in the theory of thermal Casimir force between Drude metals

Bezerra, V .B.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M .; Romero, C. Violation of the Nernst heat theorem in the theory of thermal Casimir force between Drude metals. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 69, 022119

2004
[35]

Casimir entropy for a ball in f ront of a plane

Bordag, M.; Pirozhenko, I. Casimir entropy for a ball in f ront of a plane. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82, 125016

2010
[36]

Low-temperat ure behavior of the Casimir free energy and entropy of metallic ﬁlms

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Low-temperat ure behavior of the Casimir free energy and entropy of metallic ﬁlms. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 012130

2017
[37]

Analytic results fo r the Casimir free energy between ferromagnetic metals

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Korikov , C.C. Analytic results fo r the Casimir free energy between ferromagnetic metals. Phys. Rev. A 2015, 91, 032119

2015
[38]

Quantum thermodyna mics of overdamped modes in local and spatially dispersive materials

Reiche, D.; Busch, K.; Intravaia, F. Quantum thermodyna mics of overdamped modes in local and spatially dispersive materials. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 101, 012506

2020
[39]

Statistical Physics, Part I ; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980

Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. Statistical Physics, Part I ; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980

1980
[40]

Thermodynamics, Statistical Physics, and Kinetics ; Mir: Moscow , Russia, 1980

Rumer, Yu.B.; Ryvkin, M.S. Thermodynamics, Statistical Physics, and Kinetics ; Mir: Moscow , Russia, 1980

1980
[41]

Entropy of the Casimir effe ct between real metal plates

Boström, S.; Sernelius, Bo E. Entropy of the Casimir effe ct between real metal plates. Physica A 2004, 339, 53–59

2004
[42]

Temp erature dependence of the Casimir effect

Brevik, I.; Aarseth, J.B.; Høye, J.S.; Milton, K.A. Temp erature dependence of the Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 71, 056101

2005
[43]

A nalytical and numerical veriﬁcation of the Nernst theorem for metals

Høye, J.S.; Brevik, I.; Ellingsen, S.A.; Aarseth, J.B. A nalytical and numerical veriﬁcation of the Nernst theorem for metals. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 75, 051127

2007
[44]

The rmal quantum ﬁeld theory and the Casimir interaction between dielectrics

Geyer, B.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. The rmal quantum ﬁeld theory and the Casimir interaction between dielectrics. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 72, 085009

2005
[45]

Casimir-Polder interaction between an atom and a dielectric plate: Thermodynamics and experiment

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mohideen, U.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Casimir-Polder interaction between an atom and a dielectric plate: Thermodynamics and experiment. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 2008, 41, 432001

2008
[46]

Casimir entropy for magnetodielectrics

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Korikov , C.C. Casimir entropy for magnetodielectrics. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 214007

2015
[47]

Casimir free e nergy of dielectric ﬁlms: classical limit, low-temperature behavior and control

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Casimir free e nergy of dielectric ﬁlms: classical limit, low-temperature behavior and control. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 275701. Universe 2019, xx, 5 30 of 34

2017
[48]

Problems in the Lifshitz theory of atom-wall interaction

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Blagov , E.V .; Mostepanenko, V .M. Problems in the Lifshitz theory of atom-wall interaction. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2009, 24, 1777–1788

2009
[49]

Nernst heat theorem f or the Casimir-Polder interaction between a magnetizable atom and ferromagnetic dielectric plate

Korikov , C.C.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Nernst heat theorem f or the Casimir-Polder interaction between a magnetizable atom and ferromagnetic dielectric plate. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2020, 35, 2040010

2020
[50]

Physics of Graphene; Aoki H., Dresselhaus M.S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerl and, 2014

2014
[51]

The electronic properties of graphene

Castro Neto, A.H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N.M.R.; Novoselov , K.S.; Geim, A.K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162

2009
[52]

Graphene: Carbon in Two Dimensions ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012

Katsnelson, M.I. Graphene: Carbon in Two Dimensions ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012

2012
[53]

Chiral tu nnelling and the Klein Paradox in graphene

Katsnelson, M.I.; Novoselov , K.S.; Geim, A.K. Chiral tu nnelling and the Klein Paradox in graphene. Nat. Phys. 2006, 2, 620–625

2006
[54]

Schwinger mechanis m and graphene, Phys

Allor, D.; Cohen, T.D.; McGady , D.A. Schwinger mechanis m and graphene, Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 096009

2008
[55]

Planar QED at ﬁnite temperature and density: Hall conductivity , Berry’s phases and minimal conductivit y of graphene

Beneventano, C.G.; Giacconi, P .; Santangelo, E.M.; Sol dati, R. Planar QED at ﬁnite temperature and density: Hall conductivity , Berry’s phases and minimal conductivit y of graphene. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 2009, 42, 275401

2009
[56]

Dirac fermio ns in strong electric ﬁeld and quantum transport in graphene

Gavrilov , S.P .; Gitman, D.M.; Yokomizo, N. Dirac fermio ns in strong electric ﬁeld and quantum transport in graphene. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 125022

2012
[57]

Creation of qu asiparticles in graphene by a time-dependent electric ﬁeld

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Creation of qu asiparticles in graphene by a time-dependent electric ﬁeld. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 125011

2013
[58]

Low -dimensional approach to pair production in an oscillating electric ﬁeld: Application to bandgap graphene layers

Akal, I.; Egger, R.; Müller, C.; Villarba-Chávez, S. Low -dimensional approach to pair production in an oscillating electric ﬁeld: Application to bandgap graphene layers. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 116006

2016
[59]

Dimensional ity-Driven Photo Production of Massive Dirac Pairs Near Threshold in Gapped Graphene Monolayers

Golub, A.; Müller, C.; Villarba-Chávez, S. Dimensional ity-Driven Photo Production of Massive Dirac Pairs Near Threshold in Gapped Graphene Monolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 110403

2020
[60]

Electronic properties of graphene in a str ong magnetic ﬁeld

Goerbig, M.O. Electronic properties of graphene in a str ong magnetic ﬁeld. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011, 83, 1193–1244

2011
[61]

Nature, Strength, and Consequences of Indirect Adsorbate Interactions on Metals

Bogicevic, A.; Ovesson, S.; Hyldgaard, P .; Lundqvist, B .I.; Brune, H.; Jennison, D.R. Nature, Strength, and Consequences of Indirect Adsorbate Interactions on Metals . Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 1910–1913

2000
[62]

Density-functional calculation of van der Waals forces for free-electron-like surfaces

Hult, E.; Hyldgaard, P .; Rossmeisl, J.; Lundqvist, B.I. Density-functional calculation of van der Waals forces for free-electron-like surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 195414

2001
[63]

Effects beyond the random-phase approximation in calculating the interaction between metal ﬁlms

Jung, J.; García-González, P .; Dobson, J.F.; Godby , R.W . Effects beyond the random-phase approximation in calculating the interaction between metal ﬁlms. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 205107

2004
[64]

Asymptotics of the Dis persion Interaction: Analytic Benchmarks for van der Waals Energy Functionals

Dobson, J.F.; White, A.; Rubio, A. Asymptotics of the Dis persion Interaction: Analytic Benchmarks for van der Waals Energy Functionals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 073201

2006
[65]

Spontaneous-decay dynamics in atomically doped carbon nanotubes

Bondarev I.V .; Lambin, Ph. Spontaneous-decay dynamics in atomically doped carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 035407

2004
[66]

Van der Waals interaction between microparticle and uniaxial crystal with application to hydrogen atoms and mul tiwall carbon nanotubes

Blagov , E.V .; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Van der Waals interaction between microparticle and uniaxial crystal with application to hydrogen atoms and mul tiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 235401

2005
[67]

Casimir-Polder interaction of fullerene molecules with surfaces

Buhmann, S.Y .; Scheel, S.; Ellingsen, S.Å.; Hornberger , K.; Jacob, A. Casimir-Polder interaction of fullerene molecules with surfaces. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85, 042513

2012
[68]

Casimir energies of spherical plasma shells

Barton, G. Casimir energies of spherical plasma shells. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2004, 37, 1011–1050

2004
[69]

Casimir effect for a ﬂat plasma sheet

Barton, G. Casimir effect for a ﬂat plasma sheet. I. Energ ies. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2005, 38, 2997–3020

2005
[70]

Lifshitz-type formulas for graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes: van der Waals and Casimir int eractions

Bordag, M.; Geyer, B.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanen ko, V .M. Lifshitz-type formulas for graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes: van der Waals and Casimir int eractions. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 205431

2006
[71]

van der Waals interaction between a microparticle and a single-walled carbon nanotube

Blagov , E.V .; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. van der Waals interaction between a microparticle and a single-walled carbon nanotube. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 235413

2007
[72]

Quantum reﬂection of ultracold atoms from thin ﬁlms, graphene and semiconductor heterostructur es

Judd, T.E.; Scott, R.G.; Martin, A.M.; Kaczmarek, B.; Fr omhold, T.M. Quantum reﬂection of ultracold atoms from thin ﬁlms, graphene and semiconductor heterostructur es. New J. Phys. 2011, 13, 083020

2011
[73]

Shielding vacuum ﬂuctuations wi th graphene

Ribeiro, S.; Scheel, S. Shielding vacuum ﬂuctuations wi th graphene. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 88, 042519; 2014 89 039904(E). Universe 2019, xx, 5 31 of 34

2013
[74]

Tuning the Casimir-Polder interaction via magneto-optical effects in graphene

Cysne, T.; Kort-Kamp, W.J.M.; Oliver, D.; Pinheiro, F.A .; Rosa, F.S.S.; Farina, C. Tuning the Casimir-Polder interaction via magneto-optical effects in graphene. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 052511

2014
[75]

Casimir-Po lder effect for a stack of conductive planes

Knusnutdinov , N.; Kashapov , R.; Woods, L.M. Casimir-Po lder effect for a stack of conductive planes. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 94, 012513

2016
[76]

Thermal Cas imir and Casimir-Polder interactions in N parallel 2D Dirac materials

Knusnutdinov , N.; Kashapov , R.; Woods, L.M. Thermal Cas imir and Casimir-Polder interactions in N parallel 2D Dirac materials. 2D Materials 2018, 5, 035032

2018
[77]

Thermal van der Waals interaction betw een graphene layers

Gómez-Santos, G. Thermal van der Waals interaction betw een graphene layers. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 245424

2009
[78]

Casimir forces and graphene she ets

Drosdoff D.; Woods, L.M. Casimir forces and graphene she ets. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 155459

2010
[79]

Casimir interaction between gr aphene sheets and metamaterials

Drosdoff D.; Woods, L.M. Casimir interaction between gr aphene sheets and metamaterials. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 84, 062501

2011
[80]

Casimir interactions in graphene syste ms

Sernelius, Bo E. Casimir interactions in graphene syste ms. Europhys. Lett. 2011, 95, 57003

2011
[81]

Many -body effects in the van der Waals-Casimir interaction between graphene layers

Sarabadani, J.; Naji, A.; Asgari, R.; Podgornik, R. Many -body effects in the van der Waals-Casimir interaction between graphene layers. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 155407; Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 239905(E)

2011
[82]

Effects of spatial dispersion on the Casimir force between graphene sheets

Drosdoff, D.; Phan, A.D.; Woods, L.M.; Bondarev , I.V .; D obson, J.F. Effects of spatial dispersion on the Casimir force between graphene sheets. Eur. Phys. J. B 2012, 85, 365

2012
[83]

Retarded interactions in graphene syst ems

Sernelius, Bo E. Retarded interactions in graphene syst ems. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 195427

2012
[84]

Temperature dependent graphene suspension due to thermal Casimir interaction

Phan, A.D.; Woods, L.M.; Drosdoff, D; Bondarev , I.V .; Vi et, N.A. Temperature dependent graphene suspension due to thermal Casimir interaction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 113118

2012
[85]

Interaction of a graphene sheet with a ferromagnetic metal plate

Phan, A.D.; Viet, N.A.; Poklonski, N.A.; Woods, L.M.; Le , C.H. Interaction of a graphene sheet with a ferromagnetic metal plate. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 155419

2012
[86]

Vacuum instability in exte rnal ﬁelds

Gavrilov , S.P .; Gitman, D.M. Vacuum instability in exte rnal ﬁelds. Phys. Rev. D 1996, 53, 7162–7175

1996
[87]

Spin factor in the path integr al representation of the Dirac propagator in external ﬁelds

Gitman, D.M.; Zlatev , S.I. Spin factor in the path integr al representation of the Dirac propagator in external ﬁelds. Phys. Rev. D 1997, 55, 7701–7714

1997
[88]

Derivative expansion of t he effective action for quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions

Gusynin, V .P .; Shovkovy , I.A. Derivative expansion of t he effective action for quantum electrodynamics in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions. J. Math. Phys. 1999, 40, 5406–5439

1999
[89]

Electron-positron pair creation in a va cuum by an electromagnetic ﬁeld in 3+1 and lower dimensions

Lin, Qiong-gui. Electron-positron pair creation in a va cuum by an electromagnetic ﬁeld in 3+1 and lower dimensions. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 1999, 25, 17–26

1999
[90]

Spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking in three-dimensional QED

Appelquist, T.W.; Bowick, M.J.; Karabali, D.; Wijeward hana, L.C.R. Spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking in three-dimensional QED. Phys. Rev. D 1986, 33, 3704–3713

1986
[91]

QED 3 and two-dimensional superconductivity without parity vio lation

Dorey , N.; Mavromatos, N.E. QED 3 and two-dimensional superconductivity without parity vio lation. Nucl. Phys. B 1992, 386, 614–680

1992
[92]

Dynamical polarization, screening, a nd plasmons in gapped graphene

Pyatkovsky , P .K. Dynamical polarization, screening, a nd plasmons in gapped graphene. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 025506

2009
[93]

QED 2+1 with nonzero fermion density and quantum Hall effect

Zeitlin, V . QED 2+1 with nonzero fermion density and quantum Hall effect. Phys. Lett. B 1995, 352, 422–427

1995
[94]

Casimir interaction between a perfect conductor and graphene described by the Dirac model

Bordag, M.; Fialkovsky , I.V .; Gitman, D.M.; Vassilevic h, D.V . Casimir interaction between a perfect conductor and graphene described by the Dirac model. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 245406

2009
[95]

Finite-temperature Casimir effect for graphene

Fialkovsky , I.V .; Marachevsky , V .N.; Vassilevich, D.V. Finite-temperature Casimir effect for graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 035446

2011
[96]

The rmal Casimir effect in the interaction of graphene with dielectrics and metals

Bordag, M; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. The rmal Casimir effect in the interaction of graphene with dielectrics and metals. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 165429

2012
[97]

Thermal Casimir-Polder interaction of different atoms with graphene

Chaichian, M.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M .; Tureanu, A. Thermal Casimir-Polder interaction of different atoms with graphene. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 86, 012515

2012
[98]

Van der Waals a nd Casimir interactions between two graphene sheets

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Van der Waals a nd Casimir interactions between two graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 075439

2013
[99]

C3 coefﬁcients for the alkali atoms interacting with a graphen e and carbon nanotube

Arora, B.; Kaur, H.; Sahoo, B.K. C3 coefﬁcients for the alkali atoms interacting with a graphen e and carbon nanotube. J. Phys. B 2014, 47, 155002

2014
[100]

Emending ther mal dispersion interaction of Li, Na, K and Rb alkali-metal atoms with graphene in the Dirac model

Kaur, K.; Kaur, J.; Arora, B.; Sahoo, B.K. Emending ther mal dispersion interaction of Li, Na, K and Rb alkali-metal atoms with graphene in the Dirac model. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 245405. Universe 2019, xx, 5 32 of 34

2014
[101]

Classical Ca simir-Polder force between polarizable microparticles and thin ﬁlms including graphene

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Classical Ca simir-Polder force between polarizable microparticles and thin ﬁlms including graphene. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 012516

2014
[102]

Classical li mit of the Casimir interaction for thin ﬁlms with applications to graphene

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Classical li mit of the Casimir interaction for thin ﬁlms with applications to graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 035407

2014
[103]

Observabili ty of thermal effects in the Casimir interaction from graphene-coated substrates

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Observabili ty of thermal effects in the Casimir interaction from graphene-coated substrates. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 052512

2014
[104]

Impact of gra phene coating on the atom-plate interaction

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Impact of gra phene coating on the atom-plate interaction. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 062508

2014
[105]

Two approaches for describing the Casimir interaction with graphene: density-density correlation f unction versus polarization tensor

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Sernelius, Bo E. Two approaches for describing the Casimir interaction with graphene: density-density correlation f unction versus polarization tensor. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 125407

2014
[106]

Quantum ﬁeld theoretical description for the reﬂectivity of graphene

Bordag, M.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Petrov , V .M. Quantum ﬁeld theoretical description for the reﬂectivity of graphene. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 045037; 2016, 93, 089907(E)

2015
[107]

Enhanced Casimir effect for doped graphene

Bordag, M.; Fialkovskiy , I.; Vassilevich, D. Enhanced Casimir effect for doped graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 075414; 2017, 95, 119905(E)

2016
[108]

Origin of lar ge thermal effect in the Casimir interaction between two graphene sheets

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Origin of lar ge thermal effect in the Casimir interaction between two graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 174501

2015
[109]

Quantum ﬁeld theory of the Casimir force for graphene

Klimchitskaya, G.L. Quantum ﬁeld theory of the Casimir force for graphene. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2016, 31, 1641026

2016
[110]

How to observe the giant thermal effect in the Casimir force for graphene systems

Bimonte, G.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. How to observe the giant thermal effect in the Casimir force for graphene systems. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 012517

2017
[111]

Thermal effect in the Casimir force for graphene and graphene-coated substrates: Impact of nonzero mass gap and chemical potential

Bimonte, G.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Thermal effect in the Casimir force for graphene and graphene-coated substrates: Impact of nonzero mass gap and chemical potential. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 115430

2017
[112]

I nﬂuence of the chemical potential on the Casimir-Polder interaction between an atom and gapped graphene or a graphen e-coated substrate

Henkel, C.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. I nﬂuence of the chemical potential on the Casimir-Polder interaction between an atom and gapped graphene or a graphen e-coated substrate. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 032504

2018
[113]

Graphene may help to solve the Casimir conundrum in indium tin oxide systems

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Graphene may help to solve the Casimir conundrum in indium tin oxide systems. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 035307

2018
[114]

Conductivit y of pure graphene: Theoretical approach using the polarization tensor

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Conductivit y of pure graphene: Theoretical approach using the polarization tensor. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 245419

2016
[115]

Quantum elec trodynamic approach to the conductivity of gapped graphene

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Quantum elec trodynamic approach to the conductivity of gapped graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 195405

2016
[116]

Conductivity of graphene in the framework of Dirac model: Interplay between nonzero mass gap and chemical pote ntial

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Petrov , V .M . Conductivity of graphene in the framework of Dirac model: Interplay between nonzero mass gap and chemical pote ntial. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 235432

2017
[117]

Kramers-Kro nig relations and causality conditions for graphene in the framework of Dirac model

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Kramers-Kro nig relations and causality conditions for graphene in the framework of Dirac model. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 085001

2018
[118]

Theo ry of reﬂectivity properties of graphene-coated material plates

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Korikov , C.C.; Petrov , V .M. Theo ry of reﬂectivity properties of graphene-coated material plates. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 125419; 2016, 93, 159906(E)

2015
[119]

Reﬂectivity properties of graphene with nonzero mass-gap parameter

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Reﬂectivity properties of graphene with nonzero mass-gap parameter. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 93, 052106

2016
[120]

Optical prop erties of dielectric plates coated with gapped graphene

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Optical prop erties of dielectric plates coated with gapped graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 035425

2017
[121]

Impact of chemical potential on the reﬂectance of graphene in the infrared and microwave domains

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Petrov , V .M . Impact of chemical potential on the reﬂectance of graphene in the infrared and microwave domains. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 023809

2018
[122]

Maximum reﬂe ctance and transmittance of ﬁlms coated with gapped graphene in the context of the Dirac model

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Maximum reﬂe ctance and transmittance of ﬁlms coated with gapped graphene in the context of the Dirac model. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 063817

2018
[123]

Petrov , V .M

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Malyi, V .S.; Mostepanenko, V .M. ; Petrov , V .M. Reﬂectance of graphene-coated dielectric plates in the framework of Dirac model: joint action of energ y gap and chemical potential. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 505003. Universe 2019, xx, 5 33 of 34

2019
[124]

Casimir in teraction of strained graphene

Bordag, M.; Fialkovsky , I.; Vassilevich, D. Casimir in teraction of strained graphene. Phys. Lett. A 2017, 381, 2439–2443

2017
[125]

Measuring the Casimir force gradient from graphene on a SiO 2 substrate

Banishev , A.A.; Wen, H.; Xu, J.; Kawakami, R.K.; Klimch itskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M.; Mohideen, U. Measuring the Casimir force gradient from graphene on a SiO 2 substrate. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 205433

2013
[126]

Theory of the Casimir interaction for graphene-coated substrates using the polarization tensor and comparison wi th experiment

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mohideen, U.; Mostepanenko, V .M . Theory of the Casimir interaction for graphene-coated substrates using the polarization tensor and comparison wi th experiment. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 115419

2014
[127]

Inﬂuence of nonlocality effects on van der Wa als interaction

Kats, E.I. Inﬂuence of nonlocality effects on van der Wa als interaction. Zh. Eksp. T eor. Fiz. 1977, 73, 212–220 ( Sov. Phys. JETP 1977, 46, 109–113)

1977
[128]

Casimir force in absorbing multilayers

Tomaš, M.S. Casimir force in absorbing multilayers. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 052103

2002
[129]

Three-dimensional Casimir force between absorbing multilayer dielectrics

Raabe, C.; Knöll, L.; Welsch, D.-G. Three-dimensional Casimir force between absorbing multilayer dielectrics. Phys. Rev. A 2003, 68, 033810

2003
[130]

Harmonic oscillator model for the atom-surface Casimir-Polder interaction energy .Phys

Passante, R.; Rizzuto, L.; Spagnolo, S.; Tanaka, S.; Pe trosky , T.Y . Harmonic oscillator model for the atom-surface Casimir-Polder interaction energy .Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85, 062109

2012
[131]

N onperturbative theory of atom-surface interaction: corrections at short separations

Bordag, M.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. N onperturbative theory of atom-surface interaction: corrections at short separations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2018, 30, 055003

2018
[132]

Proximi ty force approximation for the Casimir energy as a derivative expansion

Fosco, C.D.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Proximi ty force approximation for the Casimir energy as a derivative expansion. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 105031

2011
[133]

Casimir f orces beyond the proximity force approximation

Bimonte, G.; Emig, T.; Jaffe, R.L.; Kardar, M. Casimir f orces beyond the proximity force approximation. Europhys. Lett. 2012, 97, 50001

2012
[134]

Material dependence o f Casimir force: gradient expansion beyond proximity

Bimonte, G.; Emig, T.; Kardar, M. Material dependence o f Casimir force: gradient expansion beyond proximity . Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 074110

2012
[135]

Going beyond PFA: A precise formula for the s phere-plate Casimir force

Bimonte, G. Going beyond PFA: A precise formula for the s phere-plate Casimir force. Europhys. Lett. 2017, 118, 20002

2017
[136]

Plasma ver sus Drude Modeling of the Casimir Force: Beyond the Proximity Force Approximation

Hartmann, M.; Ingold, G.-L.; Maia Neto, P .A. Plasma ver sus Drude Modeling of the Casimir Force: Beyond the Proximity Force Approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 043901

2017
[137]

Hide It to See It Better: A Robust Setup to Pro be the Thermal Casimir Effect

Bimonte, G. Hide It to See It Better: A Robust Setup to Pro be the Thermal Casimir Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 240401

2014
[138]

Apparatus for Measuring the Thermal Casimi r Force at Large Distances

Bimonte, G. Apparatus for Measuring the Thermal Casimi r Force at Large Distances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 240405

2014
[139]

Isoelectronic apparatus to probe the therm al Casimir force

Bimonte, G. Isoelectronic apparatus to probe the therm al Casimir force. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 205443

2015
[140]

The Casimir effect for thin plasma sheets and the role of the surface plasmons

Bordag, M. The Casimir effect for thin plasma sheets and the role of the surface plasmons. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2006, 39, 6173–6185

2006
[141]

Generalized Lifshitz formula for a cylindri cal plasma sheet in front of a plane beyond proximity force approximation

Bordag, M. Generalized Lifshitz formula for a cylindri cal plasma sheet in front of a plane beyond proximity force approximation. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 065003

2007
[142]

Comparison o f hydrodynamic model of graphene with recent experiment on measuring the Casimir interaction

Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Comparison o f hydrodynamic model of graphene with recent experiment on measuring the Casimir interaction. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 045412

2015
[143]

Optical far-infrar ed properties of a graphene monolayer and multilayer

Falkovsky , L.A.; Pershoguba, S.S. Optical far-infrar ed properties of a graphene monolayer and multilayer. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 153410

2007
[144]

Optical conduct ivity of graphene in the visible region of the spectrum

Stauber, T.; Peres, N.M.R.; Geim, A.K. Optical conduct ivity of graphene in the visible region of the spectrum. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 085432

2008
[145]

Dense Matter in Compact Stars: A Pedagogical Introduction ; Springer: Berlin, Germany , 2010

Schmitt, A. Dense Matter in Compact Stars: A Pedagogical Introduction ; Springer: Berlin, Germany , 2010

2010
[146]

Quantum Electrodynamics; Interscience Publishers: New York, USA, 1965

Akhiezer, A.I.; Berestetskii, V .B. Quantum Electrodynamics; Interscience Publishers: New York, USA, 1965

1965
[147]

Low-temperat ure behavior of the Casimir-Polder free energy and entropy for an atom interacting with graphene

Klimchitskaya G.L.; Mostepanenko, V .M. Low-temperat ure behavior of the Casimir-Polder free energy and entropy for an atom interacting with graphene. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 032506

2018
[148]

Higher T ranscendental Functions, Vol

Erdélyi, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F .G. Higher T ranscendental Functions, Vol. 1 ; Kriger: New York, USA, 1981

1981
[149]

M.; Romero, C

Bezerra, V .B.; Klimchitskaya, G.L.; Mostepanenko, V . M.; Romero, C. Nernst heat theorem for the thermal Casimir interaction between two graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 94, 042501. Universe 2019, xx, 5 34 of 34

2016
[150]

Nernst heat the orem for an atom interacting with graphene: Dirac model with nonzero energy gap and chemical potential

Klimchitskaya G.L.; Mostepanenko V .M. Nernst heat the orem for an atom interacting with graphene: Dirac model with nonzero energy gap and chemical potential. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 116003

2020
[151]

Quantum ﬁeld th eoretical description of the Casimir effect between two real graphene sheets and thermodynamics

Klimchitskaya G.L.; Mostepanenko V .M. Quantum ﬁeld th eoretical description of the Casimir effect between two real graphene sheets and thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 016006. c© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Thi s article is an open access ar...

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The inﬂuence of retardation o n the London-van der Waals forces

Casimir, H.B.G.; Polder, D. The inﬂuence of retardation o n the London-van der Waals forces. Phys. Rev. 1948, 73, 360–372

1948

[2] [2]

On the attraction between two perfectly c onducting plates

Casimir, H.B.G. On the attraction between two perfectly c onducting plates. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. B 1948, 51, 793–795

1948

[3] [3]

The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids

Lifshitz, E.M. The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids. Zh. Eksp. T eor. Fiz. 1955, 29, 94–110 ( Sov. Phys. JETP 1956, 2, 73–83)

1955

[4] [4]

The general theory of van der Waals forces

Dzyaloshinskii, I.E.; Lifshitz, E.M.; Pitaevskii, L.P . The general theory of van der Waals forces. Usp. Fiz. Nauk 1961, 73, 381–422 ( Adv. Phys. 1961, 10, 165–209)

1961

[5] [5]

Statistical Physics, Part II ; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980

Lifshitz, E.M.; Pitaevskii, L.P . Statistical Physics, Part II ; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980

1980

[6] [6]

Electrodynamics of Solids: Optical Properties of Electron s in Metals ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003

Dressel, M.; Grüner, G. Electrodynamics of Solids: Optical Properties of Electron s in Metals ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003

2003

[7] [7]

Emig, T.; Graham, N.; Jaffe, R.L.; Kardar, M.; Casimir For ces Between Arbitrary Compact Objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 170403

2007

[8] [8]

Casimir forces in a T-operator appr oach

Kenneth, O.; Klich, I. Casimir forces in a T-operator appr oach. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 014103

2008