Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 92 references

Interpretation of Coupled-Cluster Many-Electron Dynamics in Terms of Stationary States

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupled-cluster electron dynamics can be decomposed into stationary-state populations that match exact full configuration-interaction results whenever the participating states are well approximated.

desk verdict A useful, honestly hedged pair of projectors for reading stationary-state populations out of TDCC runs; the conditional claim holds as stated, with the main soft spot being that projector reliability is inferred rather than isolated. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.10169 v2 pith:GJOP2TUM submitted 2020-09-21 physics.chem-ph

Thomas Bondo Pedersen , H{aa}kon Emil Kristiansen , Tilmann Bodenstein , Simen Kvaal , {O}yvind Sigmundson Sch{o}yen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords time-dependentcoupled-clusterstationary-statepopulationsequation-of-motionCClinearresponsebivariationalprinciplelaser-drivenelectrondynamicspopulationconservationfullconfigurationinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory simulates laser-driven electron dynamics efficiently, but its wave function is not expressed as a superposition of field-free eigenstates, making state-by-state interpretation difficult. This paper proposes two projection operators, one built from coupled-cluster linear response theory and one from equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory, whose expectation values on the bivariational time-dependent coupled-cluster state give the populations of stationary states. The central assertion is that at the coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles level these populations closely follow full configuration-interaction values whenever all stationary states actively participating in the dynamics are well approximated, and that agreement deteriorates when double-excited states become important. Numerical tests on helium, beryllium, LiH, CH+, and LiF support the claim for single-excitation-dominated dynamics. The paper recommends the equation-of-motion projector because the linear-response projector can show spurious small-amplitude, high-frequency oscillations.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the bivariational time-dependent coupled-cluster state vector $|S(t)\rangle\rangle=(|\Psi(t)\rangle,\langle\tilde{\Psi}(t)|)/\sqrt{2}$, with $|\Psi(t)\rangle=e^{T(t)}|\Phi_0\rangle$ and $\langle\tilde{\Psi}(t)|=\langle\Phi_0|(\lambda_0+\Lambda(t))e^{-T(t)}$, and the two projectors that act on it. The equation-of-motion projector uses the biorthonormal left and right excited states of EOMCC theory, giving $p_n(t)=\mathrm{Re}(\langle\tilde{\Psi}(t)|\Psi_n\rangle\langle\tilde{\Psi}_n|\Psi(t)\rangle)$. The linear-response projector adds a correction term $\langle\breve{\Psi}_n|$ designed to restore size-intensive one-photon transition strengths; this correction vanishes in the full configuration-interaction limit but breaks orthogonality and idempotency of the projector and is the source of the spurious oscillations. Population conservation is analyzed through the Hamiltonian form of the TDCC equations of motion and a Poisson-like bracket, which shows that strict conservation holds only in the full configuration-interaction limit.

What would settle it

Run the CH+ double-excitation scenario of Section 4.3 with a method that describes the participating double-excited states accurately (for example, including triple excitations or using full configuration interaction) and compare post-pulse population conservation under the equation-of-motion projector: the claim implies the observed 0.072 violation shrinks as those states become well approximated, so a violation that persists even when the states are accurate would show that the projector itself, not the CCSD truncation, is the source of error.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that laser-driven many-electron dynamics described by bivariational time-dependent coupled-cluster theory can be meaningfully decomposed into populations of field-free stationary states. The proposed projectors are constructed from the biorthonormal left and right states of equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory and from coupled-cluster linear response theory; excited-state populations take the form $p_n(t)=\mathrm{Re}(\langle\tilde{\Psi}(t)|\Psi_n\rangle\langle\tilde{\Psi}_n|\Psi(t)\rangle)$, with the ground-state population obtained from the coupled-cluster ground state. In the full configuration-interaction limit both projectors coincide and reduce to the exact projector $|n\rangle\langle n|$. Numerical tests on He, Be, LiH, CH+, and LiF show that when the participating states are dominated by single excitations and are well described by CCSD, the extracted populations agree with full configuration-interaction results to about $10^{-3}$ or better and remain nearly conserved after the laser pulse is turned off; when double-excited states take part, deviations grow, with the ground-state population conservation violated by as much as 0.072 for CH+. The equation-of-motion projector emerges as the preferred tool because the linear-response projector contains an extra contribution that vanishes in the full configuration-interaction limit but can produce spurious oscillations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme assumes that the biorthonormal states computed by coupled-cluster theory stand in for the exact field-free stationary states closely enough that the computed population equals the population of the exact eigenstate; the paper itself states in Section 2.3 that a fully consistent set of coupled-cluster excited-state vectors is not known, so this identification is heuristic rather than derived.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • TDCCSD simulations can be used directly to read off Rabi oscillations, chirped-pulse control curves, and final-state compositions without relying on indirect spectral assignment by Fourier transformation of the induced dipole.
  • The equation-of-motion projector is the recommended tool for stationary-state populations, since it avoids the linear-response projector's spurious oscillations and does not require solving the additional response equations.
  • Population conservation after the pulse becomes a practical diagnostic: near-conservation signals that the participating states are well approximated by CCSD, while violations indicate that poorly described double-excited states matter.
  • Weak features in pump-probe spectra can be assigned from final populations alone, as demonstrated by identifying the low-frequency LiF features as direct two-photon absorptions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same projector logic could be transferred to other nonlinear parameterizations of the wave function, such as orbital-adaptive coupled-cluster or multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree-Fock, where stationary states are also not explicit, provided response-type or equation-of-motion-type states are available.
  • The amplitude of the linear-response projector's oscillations, tied to the term that vanishes in the full configuration-interaction limit, could serve as a built-in measure of how far a TDCCSD simulation is from the full configuration-interaction limit.
  • A quantitative error bound may be within reach: if per-state CCSD approximation errors were estimated, the population error could plausibly be bounded by a weighted sum of those state errors, though the paper does not derive such a bound.
  • The authors' condition that all actively participating states be well approximated implies that strong-field ionization or high-harmonic-generation simulations, where continuum channels participate, will need explicit ionization treatment before these projectors can be trusted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. Pedersen et al. propose two heuristic projectors—one based on equation-of-motion coupled-cluster (EOMCC) theory and one based on CC linear response (CCLR)—for extracting stationary-state populations from trajectories generated by bivariational time-dependent coupled-cluster (TDCC) theory. For a TDCC state written as a two-component state vector, the population of state n is computed as p_n(t)=Re(<Psi~(t)|Psi_n><Psi~_n|Psi(t)>) for EOMCC and via a modified expression for CCLR. The paper shows that the EOMCC projectors are idempotent and orthogonal in the bivariational inner product, that the CCLR projectors are not proper projectors but reduce to the EOMCC form in the FCI limit (with a proof in the Appendix), and that strict population conservation is broken in truncated TDCC and restored only in the FCI limit. The central numerical claim is the conditional statement that TDCCSD stationary-state populations closely track TDFCI populations whenever the participating states are well approximated. This is tested on He, Be, LiH, CH+, and LiF, covering Rabi oscillations, chirped pulses, strong-field dynamics involving double excitations, and pump spectra. The results support the EOMCC projector as the recommended analysis tool, while CCLR exhibits spurious high-frequency oscillations in the LiF case.

Significance. If the conditional claim holds, the paper fills a real gap: TDCC simulations—workhorse methods for ultrafast molecular dynamics—can be interpreted state-by-state without a fully consistent CC excited-state basis, which the authors explicitly state is not known. The numerical validation is substantial and independent of the projector construction: RMS deviations from TDFCI populations are 1e-3 for He and 7.4e-3 for Be, LiH final populations agree to a few percent, EOMCC and CCLR agree to 1e-5–1e-7 in most systems, and the LiF analysis reproduces the pump spectrum and explains the weak features as two-photon transitions. The appendix gives a clean analytic proof of the FCI-limit equivalence. The paper is also appropriately cautious: it discloses that EOMCC/CCLR states are used as a substitute basis, that populations can be negative or exceed 1 in truncated calculations, and that the 'sufficiently well approximated' precondition is qualitative, not a sharp criterion.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.5, Eqs. (47)-(60)] The notation with \langle g|f] and [f|g\rangle is difficult to follow, and the definition of the CCLR projector would benefit from a concrete example or a restatement of Eq. (60) in standard bra-ket notation.
  2. [Section 4.4] The statement that the He conservation deviations (1.5e-3) are 'likely caused by discretization' is not accompanied by a time-step convergence test; please provide such a test or soften the attribution.
  3. [Throughout] Several typographical errors remain, e.g., 'dicussed' (Section 2.2), 'wheras' (Section 4.3), 'funtions' (Section 4.3), 'fix-point' (Section 4.5), 'beetwen' (Section 4.2), and 'occuring' (Section 5).
  4. [Figure 8] The classification of states into single-excited, singles-dominated, doubles-dominated, and double-excited uses thresholds (90%/10%) that are described only in the text; adding the thresholds to the caption would improve readability.
  5. [Section 4.1] The statement that the RMS deviation between the simple eigenstate-expansion model and full TDCCSD is 'about twice that between TDFCI and TDCCSD' would be easier to assess if the corresponding RMS values were quoted in the text or figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: heuristic projectors are validated against independent TDFCI simulations, with no fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The central proposal is explicitly heuristic: Section 2.3 states that "a fully consistent set of CC excited-state vectors is not known," and the population expressions in Eqs. (44) and (60) are presented as projectors to be tested rather than as derivations from exact stationary-state populations. The numerical claim is validated against independent TDFCI calculations for He, Be, LiH, and CH+, with no parameter fitted to the target populations; the EOMCC/CCLR states and energies come from standard response theory, and the design requirements of reproducing one-photon transition strengths and the FCI limit are internal consistency conditions, not predictions. The LiF assignment is supported by comparison with the independent pump spectrum of Ref. 38 and by timing and energetics arguments, not by fitting. Self-citations (Refs. 29 and 30) concern integrators and earlier numerical stability studies and are not load-bearing for the projector interpretation. The conditional clause "provided all stationary states actively participating in the dynamics are sufficiently well approximated" is an acknowledged limitation, and the CH+ test demonstrates a falsifiable failure rather than a circular assumption. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central machinery is standard CC theory plus a heuristic identification of EOMCC/CCLR states with stationary states. There are no data-fitted constants in the population formulas; the only hand-chosen numbers are the state-manifold size and a spectral broadening. The main burden is the heuristic projector definition, which the paper tests rather than proves.

free parameters (2)
  • Excitation manifold size (number of EOMCC/CCLR states per system) = 14 (He), 21 (Be), 31 (LiH, CH+), 30 (LiF)
    The projectors are built from a hand-chosen set of low-lying CCSD states; omitted states are not represented, and populations of the omitted manifold appear only as 'Rest'. This truncation affects whether the sum of tracked populations is close to 1, so it is a user-chosen model parameter rather than a physical constant.
  • Lorentzian broadening width gamma = 0.01 eV
    Used only to render the population-based LiF pump spectrum in Fig. 14; it is an artificial broadening chosen by hand and does not enter the projector definitions or the population equations.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TDCC equations of motion from Arponen's time-dependent bivariational principle are correct for the Hamiltonian H(t)=H0+V(t) in a finite basis.
    Section 2.2, Eqs. (18)-(19). The entire framework rests on this variational principle and on the Born-Oppenheimer and semi-classical dipole approximations stated in Sections 1 and 3.
  • domain assumption Static Hartree-Fock reference determinants remain adequate for the laser pulses studied; dynamic orbital relaxation is not needed.
    Section 2.2 states this explicitly and cites Ref. 30; it is a modeling choice that could fail for near-complete ground-state depletion or very intense fields.
  • ad hoc to paper EOMCC/CCLR excited-state vectors computed from the CCSD ground state can serve as a substitute basis for the true stationary states in the population analysis.
    Section 2.3 admits 'a fully consistent set of CC excited-state vectors is not known', yet Eqs. (33) and (47) are proposed as population projectors. This heuristic is the core assumption tested numerically; it is not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper The population expectation values are meaningful even though they can be negative or exceed 1 in truncated CC theory.
    Section 2.4 notes the EOMCC populations 'are neither bounded above by 1 nor below by 0' but asserts problems rarely occur in practice; the numerical results are consistent with this assertion for the tested systems.
  • domain assumption Symplectic Gauss-Legendre integration with the stated time steps and convergence thresholds yields converged TDCCSD/TDFCI trajectories.
    Section 3 states integrator parameters; Section 4.1 attributes small He discrepancies to the time step. This is a standard numerical trust assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interpretation of Coupled-Cluster Many-Electron Dynamics in Terms of Stationary States." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GJOP2TUM

@misc{pith2026200910169,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interpretation of Coupled-Cluster Many-Electron Dynamics in Terms of Stationary States},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GJOP2TUM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.10169}
}
abstract

We demonstrate theoretically and numerically that laser-driven many-electron dynamics, as described by bivariational time-dependent coupled-cluster theory, may be analyzed in terms of stationary-state populations. Projectors heuristically defined from linear response theory and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory are proposed for the calculation of stationary-state populations during interaction with laser pulses or other external forces, and conservation laws of the populations are discussed. Numerical tests of the proposed projectors, involving both linear and nonlinear optical processes for the He and Be atoms, and for the LiH, CH$^+$, and LiF molecules, show that the laser-driven evolution of the stationary-state populations at the coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles (CCSD) level is very close to that obtained by full configuration-interaction theory provided all stationary states actively participating in the dynamics are sufficiently well approximated. When double-excited states are important for the dynamics, the quality of the CCSD results deteriorate. Observing that populations computed from the linear-response projector may show spurious small-amplitude, high-frequency oscillations, the equation-of-motion projector emerges as the most promising approach to stationary-state populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.10169 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Energy-level populations computed with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set through CCLR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Energy-level populations computed with the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set through CCLR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Energy-level populations computed with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set through CCLR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Laser pulses with different chirp rates. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Final population of CCSD energy levels, computed with the CCLR projector, as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Energy-level populations computed with the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set through CCLR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: TDCCSD (full curves) energy-level populations computed with the reduced aug [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Population of different classes of CCSD states for CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Conservation of TDCCSD energy-level populations after the laser pulses have been [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Conservation of TDCCSD energy-level populations after the laser pulses have [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Conservation of TDCCSD energy-level populations of LiH after interaction with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Conservation of TDCCSD energy-level populations of CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: TDCCSD energy-level populations computed with the aug-cc-p(C)VDZ basis set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_13.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The oscillations are caused by the off-diagonal contributions from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Pump spectrum of LiF generated from EOMCC populations assuming one-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y.; Vrakking, M

    L \' e pine, F.; Ivanov, M. Y.; Vrakking, M. J. Attosecond molecular dynamics: Fact or fiction? Nat. Photon. 2014, 8, 195--204

    2014

  2. [2]

    Attosecond science based on high harmonic generation from gases and solids

    Li, J.; Lu, J.; Chew, A.; Han, S.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Ghimire, S.; Chang, Z. Attosecond science based on high harmonic generation from gases and solids . Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1--13

    2020

  3. [3]

    T.; Luu, T

    Hassan, M. T.; Luu, T. T.; Moulet, A.; Raskazovskaya, O.; Zhokhov, P.; Garg, M.; Karpowicz, N.; Zheltikov, A. M.; Pervak, V.; Krausz, F.; Goulielmakis, E. Optical attosecond pulses and tracking the nonlinear response of bound electrons . Nature 2016, 530, 66--70

    2016

  4. [4]

    Runge, E.; Gross, E. K. Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems . Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 997--1000

    1984

  5. [5]

    Mapping from densities to potentials in time-dependent density-functional theory

    van Leeuwen, R. Mapping from densities to potentials in time-dependent density-functional theory . Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 3863--3866

    1999

  6. [6]

    Ullrich, C. A. Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    E.; Lopata, K

    Li, X.; Govind, N.; Isborn, C.; DePrince, A. E.; Lopata, K. Real-Time Time-Dependent Electronic Structure Theory . Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 9951--9993

    2020

  8. [8]

    An MCTDHF Approach to Multielectron Dynamics in Laser Fields

    Zanghellini, J.; Kitzler, M.; Fabian, C.; Brabec, T.; Scrinzi, A. An MCTDHF Approach to Multielectron Dynamics in Laser Fields . Laser Phys. 2003, 13, 1064--1068

    2003

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Time-dependent multiconfiguration theory for electronic dynamics of molecules in an intense laser field

    Kato, T.; Kono, H. Time-dependent multiconfiguration theory for electronic dynamics of molecules in an intense laser field . Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 392, 533--540

    2004

  2. [10]

    Multidimensional Quantum Dynamics: MCTDH Theory and Applications ; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2009

    Meyer, H.-D., Gatti, F., Worth, G., Eds. Multidimensional Quantum Dynamics: MCTDH Theory and Applications ; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    M.; Bonitz, M

    Hochstuhl, D.; Hinz, C. M.; Bonitz, M. Time-dependent multiconfiguration methods for the numerical simulation of photoionization processes of many-electron atoms . Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 2014, 223, 177--336

    2014

  4. [12]

    Sato, T.; Ishikawa, K. L. Time-dependent complete-active-space self-consistent-field method for multielectron dynamics in intense laser fields . Phys. Rev. A 2013, 88, 023402

    2013

  5. [13]

    Miyagi, H.; Madsen, L. B. Time-dependent restricted-active-space self-consistent-field theory for laser-driven many-electron dynamics . Phys. Rev. A 2013, 87, 062511

    2013

  6. [14]

    Miyagi, H.; Madsen, L. B. Time-dependent restricted-active-space self-consistent-field theory for laser-driven many-electron dynamics. II. Extended formulation and numerical analysis . Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 063416

    2014

  7. [15]

    Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry

    Bartlett, R.; Musial, M. Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry . Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007, 79, 291--352

    2007

  8. [16]

    Hoodbhoy, P.; Negele, J. W. Time-dependent coupled-cluster approximation to nuclear dynamics. I. Application to a solvable model . Phys. Rev. C 1978, 18, 2380--2394

    1978

  9. [17]

    Hoodbhoy, P.; Negele, J. W. Time-dependent coupled-cluster approximation to nuclear dynamics. II. General formulation . Phys. Rev. C 1979, 19, 1971--1982

    1979

  10. [18]

    Time-dependent approach to the calculation of spectral functions

    Sch \" o nhammer, K.; Gunnarsson, O. Time-dependent approach to the calculation of spectral functions . Phys. Rev. B 1978, 18, 6606--6614

    1978

  11. [19]

    Dalgaard, E.; Monkhorst, H. J. Some aspects of the time-dependent coupled-cluster approach to dynamic response functions . Phys. Rev. A 1983, 28, 1217--1222

    1983

  12. [20]

    Variational principles and linked-cluster exp S expansions for static and dynamic many-body problems

    Arponen, J. Variational principles and linked-cluster exp S expansions for static and dynamic many-body problems . Ann. Phys. 1983, 151, 311--382

    1983

  13. [21]

    A.; Hagen, G.; Nam, H.; Papenbrock, T

    Pigg, D. A.; Hagen, G.; Nam, H.; Papenbrock, T. Time-dependent coupled-cluster method for atomic nuclei . Phys. Rev. C 2012, 86, 014308

    2012

  14. [22]

    Explicitly time-dependent coupled cluster singles doubles calculations of laser-driven many-electron dynamics

    Huber, C.; Klamroth, T. Explicitly time-dependent coupled cluster singles doubles calculations of laser-driven many-electron dynamics . J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 054113

    2011

  15. [23]

    Ab initio quantum dynamics using coupled-cluster

    Kvaal, S. Ab initio quantum dynamics using coupled-cluster . J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 194109

    2012

  16. [24]

    R.; DePrince, A

    Nascimento, D. R.; DePrince, A. E. Linear Absorption Spectra from Explicitly Time-Dependent Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Theory . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 5834--5840

    2016

  17. [25]

    R.; DePrince, A

    Nascimento, D. R.; DePrince, A. E. Simulation of Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure with Time-Dependent Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Theory . J. Phys. Chem. Lett 2017, 8, 2951--2957

    2017

  18. [26]

    R.; DePrince, A

    Nascimento, D. R.; DePrince, A. E. A general time-domain formulation of equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory for linear spectroscopy . J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 204107

    2019

  19. [27]

    N.; Williams-Young, D

    Koulias, L. N.; Williams-Young, D. B.; Nascimento, D. R.; DePrince, A. E.; Li, X. Relativistic Real-Time Time-Dependent Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6617--6624

    2019

  20. [28]

    C.; Perera, A.; Bartlett, R

    Park, Y. C.; Perera, A.; Bartlett, R. J. Equation of motion coupled-cluster for core excitation spectra: Two complementary approaches . J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 164117

    2019

  21. [29]

    B.; Kvaal, S

    Pedersen, T. B.; Kvaal, S. Symplectic integration and physical interpretation of time-dependent coupled-cluster theory . J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 144106

    2019

  22. [30]

    E.; Sch yen,

    Kristiansen, H. E.; Sch yen, . S.; Kvaal, S.; Pedersen, T. B. Numerical stability of time-dependent coupled-cluster methods for many-electron dynamics in intense laser pulses . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 071102

    2020

  23. [31]

    Sato, T.; Pathak, H.; Orimo, Y.; Ishikawa, K. L. Time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics . J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 051101

    2018

  24. [32]

    Pathak, H.; Sato, T.; Ishikawa, K. L. Time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics. II. A coupled electron-pair approximation . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 124115

    2020

  25. [33]

    Pathak, H.; Sato, T.; Ishikawa, K. L. Time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics. III. A second-order many-body perturbation approximation . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 034110

    2020

  26. [34]

    Pathak, H.; Sato, T.; Ishikawa, K. L. Study of laser-driven multielectron dynamics of Ne atom using time-dependent optimised second-order many-body perturbation theory . Mol. Phys. 2020, e1813910, (in press; arXiv:2008.07091)

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    B.; Madsen, N

    Hansen, M. B.; Madsen, N. K.; Zoccante, A.; Christiansen, O. Time-dependent vibrational coupled cluster theory: Theory and implementation at the two-mode coupling level . J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 154116

    2019

  28. [36]

    B.; Madsen, N

    Hansen, M. B.; Madsen, N. K.; Christiansen, O. Extended vibrational coupled cluster: Stationary states and dynamics . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 044133

    2020

  29. [37]

    J.; Vila, F

    Rehr, J. J.; Vila, F. D.; Kas, J. J.; Hirshberg, N. Y.; Kowalski, K.; Peng, B. Equation of motion coupled-cluster cumulant approach for intrinsic losses in x-ray spectra . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 174113

    2020

  30. [38]

    S.; Balbi, A.; Koch, H

    Skeidsvoll, A. S.; Balbi, A.; Koch, H. Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory for ultrafast transient-absorption spectroscopy . Phys. Rev. A 2020, 102, 023115

    2020

  31. [39]

    F.; Chan, G

    White, A. F.; Chan, G. K. L. Time-Dependent Coupled Cluster Theory on the Keldysh Contour for Nonequilibrium Systems . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6137--6153

    2019

  32. [40]

    F.; Chan, G

    White, A. F.; Chan, G. K. L. Finite-temperature coupled cluster: Efficient implementation and application to prototypical systems . J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 224104

    2020

  33. [41]

    Finite Temperature Coupled Cluster Theories for Extended Systems

    Hummel, F. Finite Temperature Coupled Cluster Theories for Extended Systems . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 6505--6514

    2018

  34. [42]

    The Quantum Theory of Light , 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2000

    Loudon, R. The Quantum Theory of Light , 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2000

    2000

  35. [43]

    Origin of electronic structure and time-dependent state averaging in the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree-Fock approach to electron dynamics

    Padmanaban, R.; Nest, M. Origin of electronic structure and time-dependent state averaging in the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree-Fock approach to electron dynamics . Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 463, 263--266

    2008

  36. [44]

    W.; Haxton, D

    Li, X.; McCurdy, C. W.; Haxton, D. J. Population transfer between valence states via autoionizing states using two-color ultrafast pulses in XUV and the limitations of adiabatic passage . Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 031404

    2014

  37. [45]

    J.; McCurdy, C

    Haxton, D. J.; McCurdy, C. W. Ultrafast population transfer to excited valence levels of a molecule driven by x-ray pulses . Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 053426

    2014

  38. [46]

    B.; Haxton, D

    Greenman, L.; Whaley, K. B.; Haxton, D. J.; McCurdy, C. W. Optimized pulses for Raman excitation through the continuum: Verification using the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree-Fock method . Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 013411

    2017

  39. [47]

    Linear and nonlinear response functions for an exact state and for an MCSCF state

    Olsen, J.; J rgensen, P. Linear and nonlinear response functions for an exact state and for an MCSCF state . J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 3235--3264

    1985

  40. [48]

    Correlated multielectron systems in strong laser fields: A multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree-Fock approach

    Caillat, J.; Zanghellini, J.; Kitzler, M.; Koch, O.; Kreuzer, W.; Scrinzi, A. Correlated multielectron systems in strong laser fields: A multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree-Fock approach . Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 012712

    2005

  41. [49]

    L \" o tstedt, E.; Szidarovszky, T.; Faisal, F. H. M.; Kato, T.; Yamanouchi, K. Excited-state populations in the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree–Fock method . J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2020, 53, 105601

    2020

  42. [50]

    Coupled cluster response functions

    Koch, H.; J rgensen, P. Coupled cluster response functions . J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 3333--3344

    1990

  43. [51]

    Response functions from Fourier component variational perturbation theory applied to a time-averaged quasienergy

    Christiansen, O.; J rgensen, P.; H \" a ttig, C. Response functions from Fourier component variational perturbation theory applied to a time-averaged quasienergy . Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1998, 68, 1--52

    1998

  44. [52]

    An extension of the coupled cluster formalism to excited states (I)

    Emrich, K. An extension of the coupled cluster formalism to excited states (I) . Nucl. Phys. A 1981, 351, 379--396

    1981

  45. [53]

    F.; Bartlett, R

    Stanton, J. F.; Bartlett, R. J. The equation of motion coupled‐cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties . J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 7029--7039

    1993

  46. [54]

    Krylov, A. I. Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Methods for Open-Shell and Electronically Excited Species: The Hitchhiker's Guide to Fock Space . Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2008, 59, 433--462

    2008

  47. [55]

    Single‐reference coupled cluster methods for computing excitation energies in large molecules: The efficiency and accuracy of approximations

    Izs \' a k, R. Single‐reference coupled cluster methods for computing excitation energies in large molecules: The efficiency and accuracy of approximations . Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2019, e1445

    2019

  48. [56]

    T.; Fales, B

    Peng, W. T.; Fales, B. S.; Levine, B. G. Simulating Electron Dynamics of Complex Molecules with Time-Dependent Complete Active Space Configuration Interaction . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 4129--4138

    2018

  49. [57]

    B.; Koch, H.; H \" a ttig, C

    Pedersen, T. B.; Koch, H.; H \" a ttig, C. Gauge invariant coupled cluster response theory . J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 8318--8327

    1999

  50. [58]

    B.; Fern \' a ndez, B.; Koch, H

    Pedersen, T. B.; Fern \' a ndez, B.; Koch, H. Gauge invariant coupled cluster response theory using nonorthogonal optimized orbitals . J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 6983--6993

    2001

  51. [59]

    Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field

    Sambe, H. Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field . Phys. Rev. A 1973, 7, 2203--2213

    1973

  52. [60]

    Higher-order response theory based on the quasienergy derivatives: The derivation of the frequency-dependent polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities

    Sasagane, K.; Aiga, F.; Itoh, R. Higher-order response theory based on the quasienergy derivatives: The derivation of the frequency-dependent polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities . J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 3738--3778

    1993

  53. [61]

    Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory ; John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: Chichester, 2000

    Helgaker, T.; J rgensen, P.; Olsen, J. Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory ; John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: Chichester, 2000

    2000

  54. [62]

    B.; Koch, H

    Pedersen, T. B.; Koch, H. Coupled cluster response functions revisited . J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 8059--8072

    1997

  55. [63]

    Excited state coupled cluster methods

    Sneskov, K.; Christiansen, O. Excited state coupled cluster methods . Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 566--584

    2012

  56. [64]

    Calculation of frequency-dependent polarizabilities using coupled-cluster response theory

    Kobayashi, R.; Koch, H.; J rgensen, P. Calculation of frequency-dependent polarizabilities using coupled-cluster response theory . Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 219, 30--35

    1994

  57. [65]

    Calculation of size‐intensive transition moments from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function

    Koch, H.; Kobayashi, R.; Sanchez de Mer \' a s , A.; J rgensen, P. Calculation of size‐intensive transition moments from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function . J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 4393--4400

    1994

  58. [66]

    D.; Krylov, A

    Nanda, K. D.; Krylov, A. I.; Gauss, J. The pole structure of the dynamical polarizability tensor in equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory . J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149, 141101

    2018

  59. [67]

    S.; Bishop, R

    Arponen, J. S.; Bishop, R. F.; Pajanne, E. Extended coupled-cluster method. II. Excited states and generalized random-phase approximation . Phys. Rev. A 1987, 36, 2539--2549

    1987

  60. [68]

    B.; Koch, H

    Pedersen, T. B.; Koch, H. On the time-dependent Lagrangian approach in quantum chemistry . J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 5194--5204

    1998

  61. [69]

    Zhao, J.; Scuseria, G. E. Drudge/Gristmill. http://jz21.web.rice.edu/, Accessed: 2020-04-20

    2020

  62. [70]

    o m, U.; Enevoldsen, T.; Eriksen, J. J.; Ettenhuber, P.; Fern \' a ndez, B.; Ferrighi, L.; Fliegl, H.; Frediani, L.; Hald, K.; Halkier, A.; H \

    Aidas, K.; Angeli, C.; Bak, K. L.; Bakken, V.; Bast, R.; Boman, L.; Christiansen, O.; Cimiraglia, R.; Coriani, S.; Dahle, P.; Dalskov, E. K.; Ekstr \" o m, U.; Enevoldsen, T.; Eriksen, J. J.; Ettenhuber, P.; Fern \' a ndez, B.; Ferrighi, L.; Fliegl, H.; Frediani, L.; Hald, K.;...

    2014

  63. [71]

    Olsen, J. M. H.; Reine, S.; Vahtras, O.; Kjellgren, E.; Reinholdt, P.; Hjorth Dundas , K. O.; Li, X.; Cukras, J.; Ringholm, M.; Hedeg rd, E. D.; Di Remigio , R.; List, N. H.; Faber, R.; Cabral Tenorio , B. N.; Bast, R.; Pedersen, T. B.; Rinkevicius, Z.; Sauer, S. P. A.; Mikkel...

    2020

  64. [72]

    S.; Helgaker, T.; Christiansen, O

    Koch, H.; De Mer \' a s , A. S.; Helgaker, T.; Christiansen, O. The integral-direct coupled cluster singles and doubles model . J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 4157--4165

    1996

  65. [73]

    Christiansen, O.; Koch, H.; Halkier, A.; J rgensen, P.; Helgaker, T.; De Mer \' a s , A. S. Large-scale calculations of excitation energies in coupled cluster theory: The singlet excited states of benzene . J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 6921--6939

    1996

  66. [74]

    First-order one-electron properties in the integral-direct coupled cluster singles and doubles model

    Halkier, A.; Koch, H.; Christiansen, O.; J rgensen, P.; Helgaker, T. First-order one-electron properties in the integral-direct coupled cluster singles and doubles model . J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 849--866

    1997

  67. [75]

    Integral-direct coupled cluster calculations of frequency-dependent polarizabilities, transition probabilities, and excited-state properties

    Christiansen, O.; Halkier, A.; Koch, H.; J rgensen, P.; Helgaker, T. Integral-direct coupled cluster calculations of frequency-dependent polarizabilities, transition probabilities, and excited-state properties . J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 2801--2816

    1998

  68. [76]

    Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen . J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007--1023

    1989

  69. [77]

    A.; Dunning, T

    Kendall, R. A.; Dunning, T. H.; Harrison, R. J. Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions . J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 6796--7006

    1992

  70. [78]

    E.; Dunning, T

    Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated calculations. IV. Calculation of static electrical response properties . J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 2975--2988

    1994

  71. [79]

    P.; Altarawy, D.; Didier, B.; Gibson, T

    Pritchard, B. P.; Altarawy, D.; Didier, B.; Gibson, T. D.; Windus, T. L. New Basis Set Exchange: An Open, Up-to-Date Resource for the Molecular Sciences Community . J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 4814--4820

    2019

  72. [80]

    C.; Blunt, N

    Sun, Q.; Berkelbach, T. C.; Blunt, N. S.; Booth, G. H.; Guo, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.; McClain, J. D.; Sayfutyarova, E. R.; Sharma, S.; Wouters, S.; Chan, G. K. L. PySCF: the Python‐based simulations of chemistry framework . Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1340

    2018

  73. [81]

    Geometric Numerical Integration , 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2006

    Hairer, E.; Lubich, C.; Wanner, G. Geometric Numerical Integration , 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2006

    2006

  74. [82]

    Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena , 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Burlington, 2006

    Diels, J.-C.; Rudolph, W. Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena , 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Burlington, 2006

    2006

  75. [83]

    Johnson III (Ed.), R. D. NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 101, Release 20, August 2019. http://cccbdb.nist.gov/, Accessed: 2020-04-20

    2019

  76. [84]

    A.; Caricato, M.; Schlegel, H

    Sonk, J. A.; Caricato, M.; Schlegel, H. B. TD-CI Simulation of the Electronic Optical Response of Molecules in Intense Fields: Comparison of RPA, CIS, CIS(D), and EOM-CCSD . J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 4678--4690

    2011

  77. [85]

    Computation of high-harmonic generation spectra of H _2 and N _2 in intense laser pulses using quantum chemistry methods and time-dependent density functional theory

    Luppi, E.; Head-Gordon, M. Computation of high-harmonic generation spectra of H _2 and N _2 in intense laser pulses using quantum chemistry methods and time-dependent density functional theory . Mol. Phys. 2012, 110, 909--923

    2012

  78. [86]

    P.; Schreiber, M.; Silva-Junior, M

    Sauer, S. P.; Schreiber, M.; Silva-Junior, M. R.; Thiel, W. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: a comparison of noniterative and iterative triples corrections in linear response coupled cluster methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3 . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 555--564

    2009

  79. [87]

    Bartlett, R. J. Coupled-cluster theory and its equation-of-motion extensions . Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 126--138

    2012

  80. [88]

    Koch, H.; Jensen, H. J. A.; J rgensen, P.; Helgaker, T. Excitation energies from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function (CCSDLR). Applications to Be, CH ^+ , CO, and H _2 O . J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 3345--3350

    1990

  81. [89]

    D.; Bartlett, R

    Watts, J. D.; Bartlett, R. J. The inclusion of connected triple excitations in the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster method . J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 3073--3078

    1994

  82. [90]

    D.; Bartlett, R

    Watts, J. D.; Bartlett, R. J. Economical triple excitation equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for excitation energies . Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 233, 81--87

    1995

  83. [91]

    R.; Simons, J.; Ortiz, J

    Hirata, S.; Hermes, M. R.; Simons, J.; Ortiz, J. V. General-order many-body greens function method . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 1595--1606

    2015

  84. [92]

    X-ray absorption spectra and core-ionization potentials within a core-valence separated coupled cluster framework

    Coriani, S.; Koch, H. X-ray absorption spectra and core-ionization potentials within a core-valence separated coupled cluster framework . J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 181103 mcitethebibliography manuscript.bib0000664000000000000000000007515213767355361012453 0ustar rootroot@artic...

    1998 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.