Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Doubly Modulated Optical Lattice Clock Interference and Topology

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Doubly modulated strontium clock maps to a topological insulator and shows its phase transitions.

desk verdict A genuinely new double-modulation OLC experiment with clean parameter-free Floquet theory, but the topological winding-number claim goes beyond what the eigen-energy data can show. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.11671 v2 pith:A32IKJ24 submitted 2020-09-24 cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

Xiao-Tong Lu , Tao Wang , Ting Li , Chi-Hua Zhou , Mo-Juan Yin , Ye-Bing Wang , Xue-Feng Zhang , Hong Chang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords doublymodulatedopticallatticeclockFloquetsidebandsrelativephaseinterferenceBesselfunctionRabifrequencytopologicalinsulatorsimulationwindingnumberstrontium-87spectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports what happens when two parameters of an optical lattice clock are modulated at the same time and at the same frequency: the lattice-laser frequency and the clock-laser Rabi frequency. Because both drives are synchronized, their relative phase cannot be removed by a gauge choice, and it becomes a physical control knob. The authors show that this phase controls interference between two Floquet excitation channels, captured by an effective Rabi frequency for each sideband that is a sum of two Bessel-function terms carrying opposite phase factors. The measured Rabi spectra change with the relative phase exactly as this interference formula predicts, including the symmetry relating shifts of ψ and π−ψ. The same effective Hamiltonian is then interpreted as a one-dimensional topological insulator, and measured eigen-energy gap closings at K=1.84(8) and K=3.10(11) match the predicted winding-number transition points. If correct, this turns an optical clock into a precise simulator of Floquet interference and topological phases.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective Rabi frequency Ω_nd^n = $e^{{i nd ψ}}$(Ω_n/2)(J_{nd−1}[K] $e^{{−iψ}}$ + J_{nd+1}[K] $e^{{iψ}}$) for the nd-th Floquet sideband of the doubly modulated Hamiltonian. It is the sum of two Bessel-function amplitudes, each carrying the phase of a different longitudinal Floquet mode, so it converts the relative phase ψ into a measurable interference between two excitation channels. The same object, viewed as the transverse component of an effective magnetic field h_nd = B_{nd−1} + B_{nd+1}, carries the topological information: its closed path as ψ runs from −π to π has a winding number that changes at values of K where the two Bessel amplitudes have equal magnitude.

What would settle it

Monitor the relative phase between the lattice-frequency modulation and the clock-laser amplitude modulation directly with a phase detector during a Rabi-spectrum scan. If the phase jitters by more than a few degrees over the measurement time, or if an independently measured K value at the first gap closing deviates from 1.8412 by more than the stated uncertainty, the interference interpretation and the topological transition point would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under simultaneous modulation of the longitudinal field (lattice-laser frequency) and the transverse field (clock-laser Rabi frequency) at the same frequency ωs, the system is described by H = (ℏ/2)[(δ + A cos(ωs t + ψ))σz + Ω_n cos(ωs t) σx]. The central result is that the effective Rabi frequency of the nd-th Floquet sideband is Ω_nd^n = $e^{{i nd ψ}}$ (Ω_n/2)(J_{nd−1}[K] $e^{{−i ψ}}$ + J_{nd+1}[K] $e^{{i ψ}}$), with K = A/ωs. This formula is an interference of two amplitudes that acquire phases (nd∓1)ψ through two transverse Floquet channels, so the relative phase 2ψ between the channels changes the sideband strengths. The authors observe this phase-dependent interference in the Rabi spectrum of 87Sr and, by measuring eigen-energies versus K, identify gap closings at K=1.8412 and K=3.10 where the winding number of the effective magnetic field changes (0→2 for the first sideband, 1→3 for the second).

Load-bearing premise

The whole demonstration rests on the two modulation channels keeping a fixed, well-defined relative phase over the measurement time, and on the amplitude-modulated clock laser with its phase-compensation waveform behaving exactly like a clean cosine drive; if the phase drifts or the compensation generates extra harmonics, the observed spectra would not uniquely show two-channel interference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The relative phase between two synchronized modulations becomes a controllable experimental parameter in a quantum simulator, not an irrelevant initial phase.
  • Each Floquet sideband of a doubly modulated clock inherits winding numbers nd−1 and nd+1, so the nd-th sideband simulates a one-dimensional topological insulator with high winding number.
  • Eigen-energy gap closings of the sideband effective Hamiltonians provide a direct spectroscopic signature of topological transitions, with measured critical values matching theory to within the reported uncertainty.
  • Because the clock's coherence time extends to seconds, dynamical phenomena near the topological transition can potentially be studied with high precision on this platform.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the strong agreement between measured and predicted gap closings suggests that the same sideband-resolved spectroscopy could measure winding numbers directly from the phase dependence of Rabi frequencies, without needing time-resolved dynamics.
  • Editorial inference: the Bessel-function formula predicts additional topological transitions at larger K where the magnitudes of B_{nd−1} and B_{nd+1} cross again, so the winding number should oscillate between nd−1 and nd+1; scanning K beyond the first two critical points would test this prediction.
  • Editorial inference: if the square-wave phase compensation is imperfect, higher harmonics of the drive would appear; a search for nonzero amplitudes at even sidebands beyond the observed noise floor would bound the validity of the clean-cosine model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports theoretical and experimental results for a 87Sr optical lattice clock in which two parameters are simultaneously modulated at a common frequency: the lattice-laser frequency (longitudinal modulation, entering the σz term) and the clock-laser Rabi amplitude (transverse modulation, entering the σx term). The central theoretical result is Eq. (9), an effective Floquet sideband Rabi frequency that is a coherent superposition of two Bessel-function-weighted channels carrying a relative phase 2ψ; this predicts destructive or constructive interference of Floquet sidebands as a function of the relative phase ψ. The experiments show Rabi spectra that change with ψ, extract eigen-energy gap closings at K_c1 = 1.84(8) and K_c2 = 3.10(11) for the first and second Floquet sidebands, and associate these with winding-number transitions (0→2 and 1→3) of an effective 1D topological Hamiltonian. The paper argues that the OLC platform enables stable, fine-tunable relative phases between two modulations and demonstrates a Floquet-interference phenomenon that is absent for single-parameter modulation.

Significance. The theoretical derivation leading to Eq. (9) is analytic and essentially parameter-free, and the reported agreement of the measured critical value K_c1 = 1.84(8) with the Bessel-function prediction K_c1 = 1.8412 is a strong quantitative test of the doubly modulated Hamiltonian. Using an optical lattice clock as a Floquet simulator with a stable, tunable relative phase is a promising and timely direction, and the interference data in Fig. 3 show nontrivial phase-dependent behavior that appears consistent with the theory. However, the winding-number and topological-transition claims go beyond what the reported eigen-energy measurements can certify, because the experiment measures only the modulus of the effective field. If the authors reword or supplement those claims, this would be a valuable contribution to Floquet engineering and quantum simulation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Double modulation and topology (Fig. 4 and text after Eq. 9)] The winding-number transition is not experimentally demonstrated, and the manuscript itself states the limitation: 'Because the Rabi oscillation is only related to the modulus of effective Rabi frequency |h_nd|, we can experimentally measure the Rabi oscillation and extract the eigen-energies.' The winding number W = (1/2πi)∫d ln(h_x − i h_y) depends on the phase of the complex vector (h_x, h_y) separately, not on its modulus. Infinitely many closed curves can have the same |h_nd(ψ)| and the same zeros at ψ = ±π/2 while possessing different winding numbers. The reported agreement of K_c1 and K_c2 with the Bessel-function equality locates the loop through the origin but does not determine the integer W. Thus the abstract's claim that the experiment 'demonstrate[s] the relation between effective Floquet Hamiltonian and 1-D topological insulator with high winding number' overstates the evidence; the 0→2 and 1→3 changes are theoretical consequences of Eq. (9). The authors should either explicitly restrict the experimental claim to the observed gap closings and state that W is a theoretical inference, or add a phase-sensitive measurement (e.g., interferometric readout or quench dynamics) that determines W directly.
  2. [Figs. 2-4 and associated text; Supplemental Material [26]] The two quantitative headline results, K_c1 = 1.84(8) and K_c2 = 3.10(11), are reported without the supporting data or uncertainty procedure in the main text, and the supplement cited as [26] is not available in the arXiv version. The main text states that the theoretical and experimental spectra are 'quite consistent' but provides no repetition counts, no error bars on spectral peaks, and no residuals or goodness-of-fit measure. Because these critical values are the central quantitative validation of the parameter-free theory, the manuscript should include at least the fitted spectra, the data points from which the eigen-energies are extracted, and a clear description of how the uncertainties were estimated.
  3. [Eqs. (3)-(4) and Fig. 2] The equivalence between the square-wave phase-compensated Rabi drive and the clean transverse term h_x = Ω/2 cos(ωs t) σx in Eq. (8) is the experimental linchpin of the double-modulation Hamiltonian. The text asserts this equivalence verbally and cites Fig. 2(c), but it does not provide a quantitative validation. A residual DC component or second harmonic in h_x(t) would appear in the effective Floquet Hamiltonian (9) for other sidebands and would change the interference and topology. Please provide a quantified bound on the residual nt = 0 and |nt| ≥ 2 components (for example, the measured suppression relative to the noise floor in Fig. 2(c)), or publish the corresponding calibration data in the supplement.
  4. [Fig. 4(a,d) and text on dephasing] The statement that small deviations between theory and experiment at low effective Rabi frequency are 'due to the dephasing of the Rabi oscillation' introduces an implicit fitting parameter. If the theoretical curves in Fig. 4 include a dephasing or frequency-shift correction, the parameter-free nature of the comparison is weakened. The manuscript should specify the dephasing model, state whether the dephasing rate was fitted or fixed, and report its value or bound.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] The word 'longitude' should be 'longitudinal' in several places, including the headings 'Longitude modulation' and the phrase 'longitude driving frequency'.
  2. [Fig. 4] In the caption, 'dash line' should be 'dashed line', and the legend should identify which curves are theory and which are experiment for each panel, as well as the exact plotted quantity (e.g., E_±^{nd}/Ω0 versus ψ).
  3. [Fig. 3] The caption says the spectra are shown for 'different ψ at K = 1.38' but does not list the actual phase values; please state the values of ψ used in panels (a)-(c).
  4. [Eq. (9)] For clarity, state explicitly that J_n denotes the Bessel function of the first kind, and give the predicted theoretical value of K_c2 alongside the experimental K_c2 = 3.10(11).
  5. [References] References [27]-[31] do not appear to be cited in the body of the text; either cite them where relevant or remove them from the reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central predictions derive from ab initio Floquet theory with independently set parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the effective Rabi frequency Ω_nd = e^{i nd ψ} Ω/2 (J_{nd-1}[K] e^{-iψ} + J_{nd+1}[K] e^{iψ}) follows from the doubly modulated Hamiltonian in Eq. (8) via the Jacobi-Anger expansion and Floquet theory. This derivation is self-contained: it starts from the explicitly written Hamiltonian and does not use the experimental data as an input. The critical points K_c1 = 1.8412 and K_c2 are zeros of Bessel-function combinations obtained from the theory, not fitted to the measured spectra; the experimental values are reported with uncertainties and compared, rather than used to define the theory. The winding-number statements are theoretical inferences from the derived effective field, while the experiment detects eigen-energy moduli (gap closings) as evidence, which the paper acknowledges by saying the Rabi oscillation is only related to |h_nd|. No load-bearing self-citation is present: reference [32], a prior experiment by the same group, is used only to establish that the longitudinal modulation alone produces resolved sidebands with phase-irrelevant spectra, which is context rather than a supporting premise for the novel two-channel interference result. The dephasing correction invoked at low effective Rabi frequency is a phenomenological amendment to the comparison, not a parameter fitted to the topological transition points. Thus the derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is built on standard Floquet theory, RWA, and Jacobi-Anger mathematics, with physical domain assumptions about a magic-wavelength clock and resolved sidebands. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; 'Floquet photons' is a dressed-state analogy rather than a new entity. The square-wave phase-compensation waveform is an ad hoc modeling choice specific to this experiment, and a phenomenological dephasing correction is mentioned but not quantified.

free parameters (1)
  • Phenomenological Rabi dephasing parameters = not specified
    The main text attributes deviations between theory and experiment at low effective Rabi frequency to dephasing [35,36] without giving the model or rates; any curves in Fig. 4 may depend on unstated broadening parameters.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The two clock states feel identical lattice potentials at the magic wavelength, so the lattice-frequency modulation acts only as a detuning modulation A cos(ω_s t + ψ) and not as a differential light shift.
    Invoked in 'Longitude modulation' to write Eq. (2); any differential Stark shift from the 813 nm modulation would add spin-dependent terms to the effective Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The resolved sideband condition ω_s much larger than Ω_max holds, so the Floquet-Magnus expansion and the effective Hamiltonian Eq. (5) are valid.
    Used in 'Transverse modulation' to derive Eq. (5); with ω_s/2π = 100 Hz and Ω0/2π about 9 Hz the condition is satisfied but is still an approximation.
  • domain assumption The rotating-wave approximation drops counter-rotating terms in the clock-laser coupling.
    Used in Eq. (3) when writing the Rabi coupling as σ+ e^(i f(t)) + h.c.; standard for near-resonant optical drives.
  • domain assumption The ensemble can be treated as independent pseudo-spin-1/2 atoms in isolated lattice sites with negligible intersite tunneling (V0 about 90E_r).
    Used in 'Experiment setup' and in Eq. (7), where the signal is an incoherent Boltzmann-weighted sum over external harmonic states.
  • ad hoc to paper The square-wave phase modulation f(t) in Eq. (4) exactly compensates the π phase discontinuity of the amplitude-modulated Rabi drive, so the transverse drive is effectively Ω/2 cos(ω_s t) σ_x.
    This compensating waveform is introduced by the authors to model their apparatus; the derived sideband amplitudes Eq. (6) depend on it.
  • domain assumption The excited-state lifetime (160 s) and the measurement time (hundreds of ms) justify neglecting spontaneous emission and decoherence in the model Hamiltonian.
    Stated in 'Experiment setup'; this supports the coherent Rabi-oscillation description.
  • standard math The Jacobi-Anger expansion expresses e^(iK sin θ) as a sum of Bessel functions, used to obtain Eq. (9).
    Applied in 'Double modulation and interference' to derive the effective Rabi frequency; no free parameters introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Doubly Modulated Optical Lattice Clock Interference and Topology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A32IKJ24

@misc{pith2026200911671,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Doubly Modulated Optical Lattice Clock Interference and Topology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A32IKJ24}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.11671}
}
read the original abstract

The quantum system under periodical modulation is the simplest path to understand the quantum non-equilibrium system, because it can be well described by the effective static Floquet Hamiltonian. Under the stroboscopic measurement, the initial phase is usually irrelevant. However, if two uncorrelated parameters are modulated, their relative phase can not be gauged out, so that the physics can be dramatically changed. Here, we simultaneously modulate the frequency of the lattice laser and the Rabi frequency in an optical lattice clock (OLC) system. Thanks to ultra-high precision and ultra-stability of OLC, the relative phase could be fine-tuned. As a smoking gun, we observed the interference between two Floquet channels. Finally, by experimentally detecting the eigen-energies, we demonstrate the relation between effective Floquet Hamiltonian and 1-D topological insulator with high winding number. Our experiment not only provides a direction for detecting the phase effect, but also paves a way in simulating quantum topological phase in OLC platform.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.11671 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic picture of experiment setup and in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The transverse modulation. (a) The Rabi fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The topology of Floquet effective Hamiltonians. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    [25, 27–32, 36]

    See Supplemental Material at ** for more details about 6 the experimental realizations, Floquet methods, driving stability, Frequency shift, Eigen-energy measurement and uncertainty of Kc, which includes Refs. [25, 27–32, 36]

    work page

  2. [1]

    Eckardt, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  3. [2]

    Oka, and S

    T. Oka, and S. Kitamura, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387-408 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Kiefer, F

    P. Kiefer, F. Hakelberg, M. Wittemer, A. Berm´ udez, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz,Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213605 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Roushan, et al

    P. Roushan, et al. , Nat. Phys. 13, 146 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Plenio, Fedor Jelezko, and Jian- ming Cai, Phys

    Zijun Shu, Yu Liu, Qingyun Cao, Pengcheng Yang, Shao- liang Zhang, Martin B. Plenio, Fedor Jelezko, and Jian- ming Cai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 210501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [6]

    Thomson, and Nathan Goldman, Phys

    Sebabrata Mukherjee, Marco Di Liberto, Patrik hberg, Robert R. Thomson, and Nathan Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 075502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    Feng Mei, Qihao Guo, Ya-Fei Yu, Liantuan Xiao, Shi- Liang Zhu, and Suotang Jia,Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 160503 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 38 references
  1. [8]

    X. G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11413 (1989)

    1989

  2. [9]

    Frederik G¨ org, Kilian Sandholzer, Joaquin Minguzzi, Remi Desbuquois, Michael Messer and Tilman Esslinger, Nat. Phys. 15, 1161 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Greschner, L

    S. Greschner, L. Santos, and D. Poletti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 183002(2014)

    2014

  4. [11]

    H. Zhao, J. Knolle, and F. Mintert, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053610(2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    H. Zhao, J. Vovrosh, F. Mintert, and J. Knolle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 160604(2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Zheng, and S

    Y. Zheng, and S. Yang, New Journal of Phys. 18, 013005(2016)

    2016

  7. [14]

    Takamoto, F.-L

    M. Takamoto, F.-L. Hong, R. Higashi, and H. Katori, Nature 435, 321-324 (2005)

    2005

  8. [15]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    N. Poli, C. W. Oates, P. Gill, and G. M. Tino, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 36 555 (2013)

    2013

  10. [17]

    Katori, M

    H. Katori, M. Takamoto, V. G. Palchikov, and V. D. Ovsiannikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003)

    2003

  11. [18]

    P. G. Westergaard, J. Lodewyck, L. Lorini, A. Lecallier, E. A. Burt, M. Zawada, J. Millo, and P. Lemonde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 210801 (2011)

    2011

  12. [19]

    Edward Marti, Ross B

    G. Edward Marti, Ross B. Hutson, Akihisa Goban, Sara L. Campbell, Nicola Poli, and Jun Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 103201 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    Hut- son, Akihisa Goban, Thomas Bilitewski, Lingfeng Yan, William R

    Lindsay Sonderhouse, Christian Sanner, Ross B. Hut- son, Akihisa Goban, Thomas Bilitewski, Lingfeng Yan, William R. Milner, Ana M. Rey, and Jun Ye, Nat. Phys. 16 1216 (2020)

    2020

  14. [21]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, Derek F. Jack- son Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Kolkowitz, I

    S. Kolkowitz, I. Pikovski, N. Langellier, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. D 94, 124043 (2016)

    2016

  16. [23]

    M. A. Norcia, J. R. K. Cline, and J. K. Thompson, Phys. Rev. A 96, 042118 (2017)

    2017

  17. [24]

    Kolkowitz, L

    S. Kolkowitz, L. Bromley, T. Bothwell, M. L. Wall, G. E. Marti, A. P. Koller, X. Zhang, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Nature 542, 66-70 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    Blatt, J

    S. Blatt, J. W. Thomsen, G. K. Campbell, A. D. Ludlow, M. D. Swallows, M. J. Martin, M. M. Boyd, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052703 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Lignier, C

    H. Lignier, C. Sias, D. Ciampini, Y. Singh, A. Zen- esini, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220403 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    G. K. Campbell et al. , Science 324, 360 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    Goban, et al

    A. Goban, et al. , Nature 563, 369 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    M. D. Swallows, IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr. 59, 416. (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    M. J. Martin, M. Bishof, M. D. Swallows, X. Zhang, C. Benko, J. von Stecher, A. V. Gorshkov, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye. Science, 341, 632, (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Mo-Juan Yin, Tao Wang, Xiao-Tong Luet al Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 073201 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W. P. Su, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    M. Z. Hasan, and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045(2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Marmet and A.A

    L. Marmet and A.A. Madej, Can. J. Phys. 78: 495.(2000)

    2000

  28. [36]

    Rey, A.V

    A.M. Rey, A.V. Gorshkov, C.V. Kraus, M.J. Martin, M. Bishof, M.D. Swallows, X. Zhang, C. Benko, J. Ye, N.D. Lemke , A.D. Ludlow, Annals of Physics 340, 311- 351(2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    S. L. Campbell, et.al., Science 358, 90 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Ren Zhang, Yanting Cheng, Peng Zhang, Hui Zhai, Na- ture Reviews Physics, 2, 213 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.