Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Matrix orthogonality in the plane versus scalar orthogonality in a Riemann surface

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that, for rational diagonalizable matrix weights, the matrix Christoffel–Darboux kernel is equivalent to a scalar reproducing kernel on an r-sheeted Riemann surface, and when that surface has genus 0, to a scalar…

desk verdict A genuinely more general and mostly clean equivalence between matrix and scalar CD kernels; the main caveat is an existence assumption that the abstract should state. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.13098 v3 pith:FQVYE7WC submitted 2020-09-28 math.CA math-phmath.MP

Christophe Charlier This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath-phmath.MP MSC 42C0530F1030E25
keywords matrixorthogonalpolynomialsChristoffel-DarbouxkernelRiemannsurfacegenuszeroreproducinglozengetilingsdoublyperiodicweightingsRiemann-Hilbertproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that a non-Hermitian matrix orthogonality on a plane contour, encoded in a matrix Christoffel–Darboux (CD) kernel, is exactly the same data as a scalar orthogonality once the weight's eigenvalue structure is lifted to a Riemann surface. If that surface has genus 0, the scalar orthogonality lives in the plane again, and the matrix kernel is fully recovered from a scalar reproducing kernel for polynomial spaces $V$ and $V^*$ of dimension $rN$. Only when those spaces are the full space of polynomials of degree at most $rN-1$ is the scalar kernel an ordinary scalar CD kernel; otherwise it is a reproducing kernel for a smaller, non-standard family. This matters because correlation kernels of doubly periodic lozenge tilings are double contour integrals that contain a matrix CD kernel, and the paper rewrites them so the only large-parameter dependence is through a scalar CD kernel, which is far more tractable. The whole statement is conditional on the matrix CD kernel existing, which is not automatic for non-Hermitian weights.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the conjugation of the matrix CD kernel by the eigenvector functions $e$ and $e^{-1}$ of the weight, promoted to meromorphic functions on the $r$-sheeted Riemann surface $\mathbb{M}$: $R^\lambda_N(w,z)=e^{-1}(w)R^W_N(w,z)e(z)$. This turns the matrix reproducing property into two scalar reproducing properties for the spaces $L_N$ and $L^*_N$ on the contour $\gamma_{\mathbb{M}}$. In genus 0, a uniformizing map $\varphi$ from the Riemann sphere to $\mathbb{M}$ pulls everything back to the plane; the rational factors $h$ and $\hat h$ strip poles so that $V$ and $V^*$ are polynomial spaces, and the scalar weight $\mathbf{W}=\lambda\varphi'/(h\hat h)$ carries the original orthogonality. The final criterion is the divisor balance $-\sum_{z\in Z\cup Q} n_z = r-1$, which says the zero-and-pole deficit of $e$ is exactly enough to make $V$ the full space $\mathcal{P}_{rN-1}$.

What would settle it

In Example 1.17 with odd $k>1$, Theorem 1.16 predicts that $\mathbf{R}^W_{2N}$ is a reproducing kernel for $V=\{P_1(\zeta^2)+\zeta^kP_2(\zeta^2):P_1,P_2\in\mathcal{P}_{N-1}\}$ but is not the scalar CD kernel for the weight $2\zeta^{-2M-k+1}(1+\zeta^k)^L$. Computing both kernels explicitly for small $N$ (for instance $N=2$, $k=3$) and checking whether (1.27) holds for every polynomial of degree at most $2N-1$ would settle the claim: any violation on $\mathcal{P}_{2N-1}$ would disprove the theorem, while agreement for $k>1$ would contradict criterion (e).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the matrix CD kernel $R^W_N$ contains exactly the same information as the scalar kernel $R^\lambda_N(w,z)=e^{-1}(w)R^W_N(w,z)e(z)$ on the Riemann surface, and, in the genus-0 case, the same information as $\mathbf{R}^W_{rN}(\omega,\zeta)=\hat h(\omega)e^{-1}(\varphi(\omega))R^W_N(\varphi(\omega),\varphi(\zeta))e(\varphi(\zeta))h(\zeta)$. This scalar kernel reproduces polynomial spaces $V$ and $V^*$ of dimension $rN$ with respect to a scalar weight $\mathbf{W}$ on a contour $\gamma_{\mathbb{C}}$. It coincides with the ordinary scalar CD kernel $R^W_{rN}$ if and only if $V=\mathcal{P}_{rN-1}$ (equivalently, $V^*=\mathcal{P}_{rN-1}$); in general the scalar kernel reproduces a smaller, non-standard polynomial space. As a corollary in the tiling setting, the correlation kernel of any lozenge tiling with $2\times 1$ or $2\times 2$ periodic weightings is a double contour integral whose only large-parameter dependence is through a scalar CD kernel, simplifying a formula of Duits and Kuijlaars.

Load-bearing premise

The entire reduction assumes the matrix Christoffel–Darboux kernel $R^W_N$ exists; for non-Hermitian weights this is not automatic, and if it fails every equivalence in Theorems 1.5, 1.16, 2.4, 2.6 and 2.8 is vacuous.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any weight satisfying Assumption 1.1 whose Riemann surface is connected of genus 0, the matrix CD kernel can be recovered from the scalar kernel $\mathbf{R}^W_{rN}$ via (1.21), so matrix results translate to scalar results without loss of information.
  • In the case $V=\mathcal{P}_{rN-1}$, Theorem 1.19 rewrites the CD kernel as a scalar CD formula with monic scalar orthogonal polynomials $p_{rN}$ and $q_{rN-1}$, and Theorem 1.20 reduces a $2r\times 2r$ Riemann–Hilbert problem to a $2\times 2$ one.
  • For lozenge tiling models with $2\times 1$ or $2\times 2$ periodic weightings, Theorems 2.6 and 2.8 give double contour integral formulas for the correlation kernel in which the parameters $L,M,N$ appear only in scalar factors and in the scalar CD kernel $\mathbf{R}^W_N$.
  • When the Riemann surface has positive genus or is disconnected, the reduction still produces a scalar kernel on $\gamma_{\mathbb{M}}$ (formula (2.11)), so the matrix-to-scalar reduction survives even though the plane-polynomial picture does not.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the genus-zero equivalence suggests the $2r\times 2r$ Riemann–Hilbert problem for the original weight can be replaced by a $2\times 2$ problem even when $V\neq\mathcal{P}_{rN-1}$, provided one allows a modified scalar weight with constraints; the paper proves this only in the full-space case.
  • The paper does not analyze asymptotics from (2.11) in positive genus; a natural next step is to run the steepest-descent method on that scalar Riemann-surface kernel, where the large parameters are already scalar.
  • The non-CD scalar kernels for $V\subsetneq\mathcal{P}_{rN-1}$ form a family of constrained orthogonal polynomials; one could test whether their zeros satisfy a Riccati equation or a Lax pair inherited from the matrix problem, a question the paper does not address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the matrix CD kernel $R^W_N$ contains exactly the same information as the scalar kernel $R^\lambda_N(w,z)=e^{-1}(w)R^W_N(w,z)e(z)$ on the Riemann surface, and, in the genus-0 case, the same information as $\mathbf{R}^W_{rN}(\omega,\zeta)=\hat h(\omega)e^{-1}(\varphi(\omega))R^W_N(\varphi(\omega),\varphi(\zeta))e(\varphi(\zeta))h(\zeta)$. This sca

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework for reducing non-Hermitian matrix orthogonality on a contour to scalar orthogonality on the associated spectral curve. Under Assumption 1.1 (rational, diagonalizable matrix weight) and the explicit hypothesis that the matrix Christoffel–Darboux kernel R^W_N exists, Theorem 1.5 shows that the conjugated kernel R^λ_N is a scalar reproducing kernel for two rN-dimensional spaces L_N and L^*_N of meromorphic functions on the spectral curve M. If M has genus 0, Theorem 1.16 produces a scalar kernel R^W_{rN} and polynomial spaces V and V^* of dimension rN, and characterizes when this scalar kernel is the usual scalar CD kernel. The paper also gives MOP and Riemann–Hilbert reformulations and applies the results to lozenge tiling models with periodic weightings, obtaining simplified double contour integral formulas, including explicit scalar-CD-kernel formulas for 2×1 and 2×2 periodic weightings.

Significance. If the technical hypotheses hold, the conceptual reduction is valuable: a non-Hermitian matrix CD kernel is shown to be equivalent to a scalar reproducing kernel on a genus-zero spectral curve, and the RH reformulation reduces a 2r×2r problem to a 2×2 problem. The proofs of Theorems 1.5 and 1.16 are direct and use only the defining reproducing properties and a change of variables; the constructions of h, \hat h, V, and V^* are explicit and verifiable. The tiling applications are concrete and parameter-free, and the examples (1.17 and 1.18) and Proposition 2.5 make the abstract machinery tangible. The main caveat is the existence assumption on R^W_N, which is explicit in the theorem statements but not in the advertised summary of the paper.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract; Section 1 after (1.6)] The advertised statement omits the hypothesis that the matrix CD kernel R^W_N exists. This is not a technicality: for W(z)=z^{-3}[[1,1],[z,1]] on the unit circle, W is rational and diagonalizable for all z≠0 and the spectral curve η²=z is connected of genus 0, yet the block moment matrix (∫ w^{j+k}W(w)dw)_{j,k=0}^1 has M_{0,0}=0, so no R^W_1 satisfying (1.5) can exist. The theorems themselves (1.5, 1.16, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8) all state the existence assumption, but the abstract's first sentence and the informal summary 'if W satisfies Assumption 1.1...' should be amended to include it. In the tiling context existence is supplied by [25, Lemma 4.8], so the applications are not affected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The first sentence contains the typo 'conto ur' for 'contour'; the text also has several similar OCR-level artifacts that should be cleaned before final submission.
  2. [Definition 1.12; proof of Theorem 1.16(c)] The rational factors h and \hat h can have poles at φ^{-1}(Z) (the preimages of zeros of e), so the expression in (1.21) is only formal at those points; the definition should explicitly say that the kernel is extended by continuity at this finite set of removable singularities.
  3. [Theorem 1.5(d); Theorem 1.16(d)] The proofs of the right-reproducing properties are omitted as 'similar'; since these properties are used in the applications, one sentence indicating that one starts from (1.6) and repeats the same change of variables would make the symmetry precise.
  4. [Theorem 2.6] In the displayed definition of W(ω), the right-hand side contains ζ where ω is intended: the factors ((b0+b1+ζ)/2)^L and (ζ²-(b0-b1)²)^{-(M+N)/2} should be evaluated at ω.
  5. [Section 1.1, after (1.35)] The sentence saying that formula (1.35) holds 'if and only if' all Q^R_0,...,Q^R_{N-1} exist is in tension with the following sentence saying that Q^R_{N-1} alone suffices for the existence of R^W_N; please rephrase to distinguish the validity of the finite sum representation (1.35) from the existence of the CD kernel via (1.36).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central equivalence is a transparent change of variables from the matrix CD kernel, and the tiling simplifications are algebraic substitutions; the single self-citation [16] is motivational only.

full rationale

The central Theorem 1.5 defines R^lambda_N = e^{-1} R^W_N e in (1.14) and derives its reproducing properties directly from the matrix reproducing identities (1.5)-(1.6); this is an explicit reformulation, not a hidden fit or a prediction assembled from its own output. Theorem 1.16 constructs h, \hat h, W, V, and V^* precisely to move this equivalence to a genus-zero Riemann surface, and criterion (e) follows from the elementary classification of V in Remark 1.15 together with the uniqueness of Christoffel-Darboux kernels. The tiling applications in Section 2 substitute the spectral decomposition A = E \hat\Lambda E^{-1} and change variables z = \phi(\zeta); these are algebraic identities and do not fit parameters to a subset of data. The only self-citation, [16], is cited as inspiration and as a special case, and the proof of Theorem 2.4 does not use it as a load-bearing ingredient. The paper itself flags the conditional status of the main result: 'there is in general no guarantee of existence for R^W_N, although in concrete situations one can sometimes prove it' (Section 1, discussion of the CD kernel), and the tiling application invokes [25, Lemma 4.8] for existence in those concrete situations. This is a scope limitation, not circularity. The score of 1 reflects the presence of one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation; the central mathematical claims are self-contained and do not reduce to their own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the spectral decomposition of W, the existence of the matrix CD kernel, and standard facts from Riemann surface theory and analytic perturbation theory. No free parameters are fitted; all auxiliary functions are constructed from W, gamma, and N.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption W is rational, has no pole on gamma, and is diagonalizable for all but finitely many z (Assumption 1.1).
    Needed for the meromorphic eigenvalue and eigenvector functions lambda, e, and e^{-1} on a compact Riemann surface; excludes Jordan-block weights.
  • domain assumption The matrix CD kernel R^W_N exists and is unique (equations (1.5)-(1.6)).
    Assumed in the main theorems; existence is not automatic for non-Hermitian weights and is provided for tilings by [25, Lemma 4.8].
  • standard math Kato's analytic perturbation theory allows eigenvectors and eigenprojections to be chosen meromorphically on M (Appendix A).
    Used to construct e and e^{-1} as meromorphic functions on the Riemann surface.
  • standard math A compact Riemann surface of genus 0 is biholomorphic to the Riemann sphere, so a bijection phi exists (Definition 1.11).
    Standard classification result used in the genus-zero reduction.
  • standard math Scalar Christoffel-Darboux kernels exist and are unique for the polynomial spaces V and V^* (referenced [24, Proposition 2.4]).
    Used to identify R^W_{rN} with the scalar CD kernel when V = P_{rN-1} in Theorem 1.16(e).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Matrix orthogonality in the plane versus scalar orthogonality in a Riemann surface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQVYE7WC

@misc{pith2026200913098,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Matrix orthogonality in the plane versus scalar orthogonality in a Riemann surface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQVYE7WC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.13098}
}
abstract

We consider a non-Hermitian matrix orthogonality on a contour in the complex plane. Given a diagonalizable and rational matrix valued weight, we show that the Christoffel--Darboux (CD) kernel, which is built in terms of matrix orthogonal polynomials, is equivalent to a scalar valued reproducing kernel of meromorphic functions in a Riemann surface. If this Riemann surface has genus $0$, then the matrix valued CD kernel is equivalent to a scalar reproducing kernel of polynomials in the plane. Interestingly, this scalar reproducing kernel is not necessarily a scalar CD kernel. As an application of our result, we show that the correlation kernel of certain doubly periodic lozenge tiling models admits a double contour integral representation involving only a scalar CD kernel. This simplifies a formula of Duits and Kuijlaars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.13098 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: the graph GH. The dashed lines emphasize the 2 × 3 periodicity, but are not part of GH. Right: the assignment of the weights on a 2 × 3 block of GH . We define q matrices A0, . . . , Aq−1, each of them of size r × r, by Aℓ(z) =   bℓ,0 aℓ,0 0 0 · · · 0 0 0 0 bℓ,1 aℓ,1 0 · · · 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 · · · 0 bℓ,r−2 aℓ,r−2 zaℓ,r−1 0 0 0 · · · 0 0 bℓ,r−1   , ℓ = … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: a hexagon with 2 × 3 periodic weightings, and N = 3, M = 2, and L = 6. Middle: a system of N non-intersecting paths, and the associated points. Right: The corresponding lozenge tiling of the hexagon. Since the weights on the edges are positive, this defines a probability measure over the set {T } by P(T ) = weight of T P T ′ weight of T ′ , (2.5) where the sum is taken over all tilings. By placing points on th… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Doubly periodic lozenge tilings of a hexagon and matrix valued orthogonal polynomials

    C. Charlier, Doubly periodic lozenge tilings of a hexag on and matrix valued orthogonal polynomials, to appear in Stud. Appl. Math. , arXiv:2001.11095

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  2. [1]

    Universality for Lozenge Tiling Local Statistics

    A. Aggarwal, Universality for Lozenge Tiling Local Stat istics, arXiv:1907.09991

    work page Pith review arXiv 1907

  3. [2]

    Aldenhoven, E

    N. Aldenhoven, E. Koelink, and P. Rom´ an, Matrix-valued orthogonal polynomials related to the quan- tum analogue of (SU(2) × SU(2),diag), Ramanujan J. 43 (2017), 243–311

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    ´Alvarez-Fern´ andez, G

    C. ´Alvarez-Fern´ andez, G. Ariznabarreta, J.C. Garc ´ ıa-Ardila, M. Ma˜ nas and F. Marcell´ an, Christoffel transformations for matrix orthogonal polynomials in the r eal line and the non-Abelian 2D Toda lattice hierarchy, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2017, 1285–1341

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Aptekarev, E.M

    A.I. Aptekarev, E.M. Nikishin, The scattering problem f or a discrete Sturm-Liouville operator, Mat. Sb. 121 (1983), 327–358

    work page 1983

  6. [5]

    Ariznabarreta and M

    G. Ariznabarreta and M. Ma˜ nas, Matrix orthogonal Laure nt polynomials on the unit circle and Toda type integrable systems, Adv. Math. 264 (2014), 396–463

    work page 2014

  7. [6]

    J. Baik, T. Kriecherbauer, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, and P. D. Miller, Discrete Orthogonal Polynomials: Asymptotics and Applications, Annals of Math. Studies 164, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    Beffara, S

    V. Beffara, S. Chhita, and K. Johansson, Airy point proces s at the liquid-gas boundary, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), 2973–3013

    work page 2018

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    Beffara, S

    V. Beffara, S. Chhita, and K. Johansson, Local Geometry of the rough-smooth interface in the two- periodic Aztec diamond, arXiv:2004.14068

    2004 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Berggren, Domino tilings of the Aztec diamond with dou bly periodic weightings, arXiv:1911.01250

    T. Berggren, Domino tilings of the Aztec diamond with dou bly periodic weightings, arXiv:1911.01250

    1911 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Berggren and M

    T. Berggren and M. Duits, Correlation functions for det erminantal processes defined by infinite block Toeplitz minors, Adv. Math. 356 (2019), 106766

    2019

  4. [11]

    Bothner, On the origins of Riemann-Hilbert problems in mathematics, arXiv:2003.14374

    T. Bothner, On the origins of Riemann-Hilbert problems in mathematics, arXiv:2003.14374

    2003 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Cafasso and M.D

    M. Cafasso and M.D. de la Iglesia, Non-commutative Pain lev equations and Hermite-type matrix or- thogonal polynomials, Comm. Math. Phys. 326 (2014), 559–583

    2014

  6. [13]

    Cafasso and M.D

    M. Cafasso and M.D. de la Iglesia, The Toda and Painlev´ e systems associated with semiclassical matrix- valued orthogonal polynomials of Laguerre type, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 14 (2018), 17 pp

    2018

  7. [14]

    Cantero, L

    M.J. Cantero, L. Moral, and L. Vel´ azquez, Matrix ortho gonal polynomials whose derivatives are also orthogonal, J. Approx. Theory 146 (2007), 174–211

    2007

  8. [15]

    G. A. Cassatella-Contra and M. Ma˜ nas, Riemann-Hilber t problems, matrix orthogonal polynomials and discrete matrix equations with singularity confinement, Stud. Appl. Math. , 128 (2012), 252–274

    2012

  9. [17]

    Charlier, M

    C. Charlier, M. Duits, A.B.J. Kuijlaars and J. Lenells, A periodic hexagon tiling model and non- Hermitian orthogonal polynomials, to appear in Comm. Math. Phys

  10. [18]

    Chhita and B

    S. Chhita and B. Young, Coupling functions for domino ti lings of Aztec diamonds, Adv. Math. 259 (2014), 173–251

    2014

  11. [19]

    Chhita and K

    S. Chhita and K. Johansson, Domino statistics of the two -periodic Aztec diamond, Adv. Math. 294 (2016), 37–149

    2016

  12. [20]

    Damanik, A

    D. Damanik, A. Pushnitski and B. Simon, The analytic the ory of matrix orthogonal polynomials, Surv. Approx. Theory 4 (2008), 1–85. 27

    2008

  13. [21]

    Dea˜ no, B

    A. Dea˜ no, B. Eijsvoogel and P. Rom´ an, Ladder relation s for a class of matrix valued orthogonal poly- nomials, arXiv:1907.07447

    1907 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Deift, Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann–Hilbert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes 3, New York University, New York, 1999

    P. Deift, Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann–Hilbert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes 3, New York University, New York, 1999

    1999

  15. [23]

    Deift and X

    P. Deift and X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscil latory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation, Ann. Math. 137 (1993), 295–368

    1993

  16. [24]

    Delvaux, Average characteristic polynomials for mu ltiple orthogonal polynomial ensembles, J

    S. Delvaux, Average characteristic polynomials for mu ltiple orthogonal polynomial ensembles, J. Approx. Theory 162 (2010), 1033–1067

    2010

  17. [25]

    Duits and A.B.J

    M. Duits and A.B.J. Kuijlaars, The two periodic Aztec di amond and matrix orthogonal polynomials, to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc. , preprint arXiv:1712.05636

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Dur´ an, On orthogonal polynomials with respect to a positive definite matrix of measures, Canad

    A.J. Dur´ an, On orthogonal polynomials with respect to a positive definite matrix of measures, Canad. J. Math. 47 (1995), 88–112

    1995

  19. [27]

    Dur´ an, Markov’s theorem for orthogonal matrix po lynomials, Canad

    A.J. Dur´ an, Markov’s theorem for orthogonal matrix po lynomials, Canad. J. Math. 48 (1996), 1180– 1195

    1996

  20. [28]

    Dur´ an and F.A

    A.J. Dur´ an and F.A. Gr¨ unbaum, A survey on orthogonal m atrix polynomials satisfying second order differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 178 (2005), 169–190

    2005

  21. [29]

    Dur´ an and W

    A.J. Dur´ an and W. Van Assche, Orthogonal matrix polyno mials and higher-order recurrence relations, Linear Algebra Appl. 219 (1995), 261–280

    1995

  22. [30]

    Eynard and M.L

    B. Eynard and M.L. Mehta, Matrices coupled in a chain I. E igenvalue correlations, J. Phys A. 31 (1998), 4449–4456

    1998

  23. [31]

    Fokas, A.R

    A.S. Fokas, A.R. Its, and A.V. Kitaev, The isomonodromy approach to matrix models in 2D quantum gravity, Comm. Math. Phys. 147 (1992), 395–430

    1992

  24. [32]

    Fuhrmann, Orthogonal matrix polynomials and syst em theory, Rend

    P.A. Fuhrmann, Orthogonal matrix polynomials and syst em theory, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino (1987), Special Issue, 68–124

    1987

  25. [33]

    Geronimo, Scattering theory and matrix orthogona l polynomials on the real line, Circuits Systems Signal Process 1 (1982), 471–495

    J.S. Geronimo, Scattering theory and matrix orthogona l polynomials on the real line, Circuits Systems Signal Process 1 (1982), 471–495

    1982

  26. [34]

    Gessel and G

    I. Gessel and G. Viennot, Binomial determinants, paths , and hook length formulae, Adv. Math. 58 (1985), 300–321

    1985

  27. [35]

    Gorin, Nonintersecting paths and the Hahn orthogo nal polynomial ensemble, Funct

    V.E. Gorin, Nonintersecting paths and the Hahn orthogo nal polynomial ensemble, Funct. Anal. Appl. 42 (2008), 180–197

    2008

  28. [36]

    Gr¨ unbaum, M.D

    F.A. Gr¨ unbaum, M.D. de la Iglesia and A. Mart ´ ınez-Fin kelshtein, Properties of matrix orthogonal polynomials via their Riemann-Hilbert characterization, SIGMA 7 (2011), 31 pp

    2011

  29. [37]

    Gr¨ unbaum, I

    F.A. Gr¨ unbaum, I. Pacharoni, and J. Tirao, Matrix valu ed spherical functions associated to the complex projective plane, J. Funct. Anal. 188 (2002), 350–441

    2002

  30. [38]

    Ismail, E

    M. Ismail, E. Koelink and P. Rom´ an, Burchnall-type identities for matrix-valued orthogonal polynomials, To appear in Advances in applied mathematics, 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Johansson, Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices, Probab

    K. Johansson, Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices, Probab. Theory and Related Fields 123 (2002), 225–280

    2002

  32. [40]

    Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, Reprint of the 1980 edition

    T. Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, Reprint of the 1980 edition

    1995

  33. [41]

    Knopp, Theory of functions , Part II

    K. Knopp, Theory of functions , Part II. New York: Dover 1945

    1945

  34. [42]

    Koelink, M

    E. Koelink, M. van Pruijssen, and P. Rom´ an, Matrix-val ued orthogonal polynomials related to (SU(2) × SU(2),diag), Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2012 (2012), 5673–5730

    2012

  35. [43]

    Koelink, M

    E. Koelink, M. van Pruijssen, and P. Rom´ an, Matrix-val ued orthogonal polynomials related to (SU(2) × SU(2),diag), II, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 49 (2013), 271–312. 28

    2013

  36. [44]

    Koelink, M

    E. Koelink, M. van Pruijssen and P. Rom´ an, Matrix eleme nts of irreducible representations of SU (n +

  37. [45]

    × SU (n + 1) and multivariable matrix-valued orthogonal polynomia ls, Journal of Functional Analysis 278 (7) (2020), 48 pp

    2020

  38. [46]

    Koornwinder, Matrix elements of irreducible repres entations of SU(2) × SU(2) and vector-valued or- thogonal polynomials, SIAM J

    T. Koornwinder, Matrix elements of irreducible repres entations of SU(2) × SU(2) and vector-valued or- thogonal polynomials, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 16 (1985), 602–613

    1985

  39. [47]

    Krein, On a generalization of some investigations of G

    M. Krein, On a generalization of some investigations of G. Szeg˝ o, V. Smirnoff and A. Kolmogoroff, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 46 (1945), 91–94

    1945

  40. [48]

    Krein, Infinite J-matrices and a matrix-moment probl em, Dokl

    M. Krein, Infinite J-matrices and a matrix-moment probl em, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 69 (1949), 125–128 [Russian]

    1949

  41. [49]

    Lindstr¨ om, On the vector representations of induce d matroids, Bull

    B. Lindstr¨ om, On the vector representations of induce d matroids, Bull. London Math. Soc. 5 (1973), 85–90

    1973

  42. [50]

    Mart ´ ınez–Finkelshtein and R

    A. Mart ´ ınez–Finkelshtein and R. Orive, Riemann-Hilbert analysis of Jacobi polynomials orthogonal on a single contour, J. Approx. Theory 134 (2005), 137–170

    2005

  43. [51]

    Miranian, Matrix-valued orthogonal polynomials on the real line: some extensions of the classical theory, J

    L. Miranian, Matrix-valued orthogonal polynomials on the real line: some extensions of the classical theory, J. Phys. A 38 (2005), 5731–5749

    2005

  44. [52]

    van Pruijssen and P

    M. van Pruijssen and P. Rom´ an, Matrix valued classical pairs related to compact Gelfand pairs of rank one, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 10 (2014), 28 pp

    2014

  45. [53]

    Schlag, A Course in Complex Analysis and Riemann Surfaces , Graduate Studies in Mathematics (Providence Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society) 154 (2014)

    W. Schlag, A Course in Complex Analysis and Riemann Surfaces , Graduate Studies in Mathematics (Providence Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society) 154 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Sinap and W

    A. Sinap and W. Van Assche, Polynomial interpolation an d Gaussian quadrature for matrix-valued functions, Linear Algebra Appl. 207 (1994), 71–114

    1994

  47. [55]

    Sinap and W

    A. Sinap and W. Van Assche, Orthogonal matrix polynomia ls and applications, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 66 (1996), 27–52. 29

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.