Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 152 references

Geometry of quantum hydrodynamics in theoretical chemistry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper's central claim is that a generalized density-matrix factorization, a cold-fluid nuclear closure, and a smoothed quantum potential yield a finite-dimensional mixed quantum-classical model of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics.

desk verdict Genuinely new geometric mechanics in Chapters 3–7, but the flagship Bohmion model in Section 5.3.3 has a normalization inconsistency that breaks the claimed derivation; the surrounding thesis work largely holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.13601 v1 pith:Y46XNTUF submitted 2020-09-28 math-ph math.MPphysics.chem-phquant-ph

Michael S. Foskett This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPphysics.chem-phquant-ph MSC 81Q7081V5570H05
keywords quantumhydrodynamicsgeometricmechanicsEuler-PoincaréreductionLie-PoissonbracketexactfactorizationnonadiabaticdynamicsBohmionBerryconnection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This thesis develops geometric approaches to quantum hydrodynamics (QHD) and applies them to nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. It tries to establish that a generalized factorization of the molecular density matrix, combined with a cold-fluid nuclear closure and a regularized quantum potential, yields a finite-dimensional mixed quantum-classical model of electron-nuclear dynamics. The quantum potential is the $\hbar^2$ term in the hydrodynamic energy that normally blocks point-particle solutions; smoothing it is what makes the trajectory model possible. If the model is correct, it gives chemists a trajectory-based description that keeps $\hbar^2$ electron-nuclear coupling terms instead of losing them in the usual $\hbar\to 0$ classical limit. The same geometric machinery is also used to give exact factorization Euler-Poincaré and Lie-Poisson structures, to rewrite QHD with a $\mathfrak{u}(1)$ connection that carries holonomy and vortex filaments, and to reinterpret the Berry connection and quantum geometric tensor through non-Abelian connections.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the momentum-map formulation of quantum hydrodynamics: the probability density $D=|\psi|^2$ and the momentum $\mu=\hbar\,\mathrm{Im}(\psi^*\nabla\psi)$ are collective variables on a semidirect-product Lie algebra (vector fields combined with advected functions), producing Euler-Poincaré and Lie-Poisson equations. On this basis the new model uses three moves. A generalized factorization of the molecular density matrix (5.49) extends exact factorization to mixed nuclear states. The cold-fluid closure (5.62) replaces the nuclear density matrix by a phase-space Wigner function $\delta(p-mu(x))$, eliminating the quantum potential from the energy without a formal $\hbar\to 0$ limit. The Bohmion regularization (5.67)--(5.69) smooths the remaining $\hbar^2$ terms through a kernel $K$, admitting point-particle solutions $q_a(t)$ with attached electronic density matrices $\varrho_a(t)$; these Bohmions are the particle-like singular solutions of the regularized QHD equations. Equations (5.71)--(5.72) are the direct output of these three steps.

What would settle it

A numerical comparison would settle the model: initialize a two-level spin-boson or $E\otimes\epsilon$ Jahn-Teller system in the factorized cold-fluid form (5.49)--(5.62), evolve (5.71)--(5.72) with $N$ Bohmions, and compare the nuclear moments and electronic population transfer to the exact solution of the molecular von Neumann equation. Deviations would indicate that the cold-fluid closure does not faithfully represent the nuclear subsystem; a direct check is whether the exact nuclear reduced density matrix can be written in the phase form (5.62) at all times.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central constructive claim is that exact factorization—the ansatz $\Psi=\Omega\psi$ separating nuclear and electronic factors—can be lifted from wavefunctions to density matrices and then closed classically without discarding quantum coupling. Concretely, factorizing the molecular density operator as $\hat{\rho}(r,r')=\rho_n(r,r')\psi(r)\psi^\dagger(r')$ (equation (5.49)), applying the cold-fluid closure $\rho_n(r,r')=D((r+r')/2)\exp[iM(r-r')\cdot v((r+r')/2)/\hbar]$ (equation (5.62)), and regularizing the quantum potential by convolution with a kernel $K$ makes the singular Bohmion densities $D=\sum_a w_a\delta(r-q_a)$ and $\tilde{\rho}=\sum_a \varrho_a\delta(r-q_a)$ admissible (equation (5.69)). The resulting equations (5.71)--(5.72) couple finitely many nuclear trajectories to electronic density matrices through a smoothed quantum potential, retaining $\hbar^2$ terms that the standard $\hbar\to 0$ classical limit would drop. The paper also claims the broader geometric framework: momentum-map QHD with Euler-Poincaré/Lie-Poisson structure for exact factorization, a $\mathfrak{u}(1)$-connection formulation of QHD with holonomy and vortex filaments, and non-Abelian connections in which the Berry connection is a $\mathrm{U}(1)$ projection and the quantum geometric tensor (the Hermitian tensor measuring how the electronic state changes with nuclear position) is a covariance.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cold-fluid closure (5.62) faithfully represents the nuclear subsystem inside the factorized molecular density operator; the paper itself notes that the corresponding phase-space Wigner function $\delta(p-mu(x))$ does not identify a quantum state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The density-matrix factorization (5.49) generalizes exact factorization to mixed nuclear states, so the model can represent nuclear decoherence while keeping a pure electronic factor.
  • The cold-fluid closure removes the nuclear quantum potential without taking $\hbar\to 0$, so classical-limit nuclear trajectories remain coupled to electrons through order-$\hbar^2$ terms.
  • The Bohmion regularization makes the $\hbar^2\to 0$ limit regular and replaces the singular quantum potential by a smoothed version, giving finite-dimensional equations with potentially long-range coupling through the smoothing kernel.
  • In the exact-factorization hydrodynamic picture, the circulation of the nuclear flow is generated by the electronic Berry curvature and the quantum geometric tensor, so geometric phase enters the fluid dynamics as a dynamical quantity.
  • The phase-connection formulation of QHD permits non-zero vorticity and vortex-filament solutions, removing the irrotational constraint on quantum fluid flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test the Bohmion equations numerically; a natural next step would be a benchmark against exact quantum dynamics on small spin-boson or Jahn-Teller systems, treating the number $N$ of trajectories as a convergence parameter.
  • Replacing the cold-fluid delta Wigner function by a narrow positive Wigner function would provide a genuinely quantum nuclear closure; whether the equations still close in $(D,u)$ would directly probe how much the model depends on the non-positive closure.
  • Because the non-Abelian connection picture identifies the quantum geometric tensor as a covariance of connection components, the derived uncertainty relations could bound how sharply electron-nuclear coupling can be localized in a molecule; the paper leaves such quantitative estimates open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This PhD thesis develops geometric formulations of quantum hydrodynamics and applies them to nonadiabatic quantum chemistry, especially exact factorization. Chapters 3 and 4 introduce momentum-map and Euler-Poincaré/Lie-Poisson structures for QHD, a regularized Lagrangian with singular 'Bohmion' solutions, and a cold-fluid closure for mixed states. Chapter 5 extends exact factorization first by writing electronic dynamics in the nuclear hydrodynamic frame and then by factorizing the molecular density operator rather than the wavefunction; the final construction applies the Bohmion regularization to obtain a finite-dimensional mixed quantum-classical model (equations 5.71-5.72). Chapters 6 and 7 formulate QHD in terms of U(1) and non-Abelian connections, with applications to Berry phase, vortex filaments, and the quantum geometric tensor. The central claim is that the density-matrix factorization (5.49), together with the cold-fluid closure and Bohmion regularization, yields a new trajectory-based nonadiabatic model that retains quantum coupling terms beyond the naive ℏ→0 limit.

Significance. If the central construction is correct, the Bohmion model in Theorem 5.11 is a genuinely new finite-dimensional mixed quantum-classical description of nonadiabatic dynamics, with possible practical value for quantum chemistry. The geometric reformulations themselves are also valuable: the Euler-Poincaré derivation of exact factorization, the circulation theorem (4.65), the connection-based formulations of holonomy in Chapters 6-7, and the identification of the quantum geometric tensor with a covariance are original and insightful contributions. The manuscript is largely self-contained and the formal derivations are generally consistent; for example, the reduced EF system (5.9)-(5.11) correctly reproduces the earlier hydrodynamic form (4.55). However, the central Bohmion reduction contains a normalization inconsistency that must be repaired before the main claimed model can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.3.3, Eqs. (5.69)-(5.72)] The Bohmion ansatz in (5.69) violates the defining relation ρ̃ = Dρ used throughout Section 5.3. Because D(r,t) = Σ_a w_a δ(r−q_a(t)) with Σ_a w_a = 1, while each ϱ_a is chosen as a trace-one projection (ϱ_a(0)=φ_a^{(0)}φ_a^{(0)†}, so Tr(ϱ_a)=1), the integral ∫ Tr_e ρ̃ d³r equals N, not 1. Therefore (5.69) does not satisfy the normalization required by ρ̃ = Dρ except in the single-Bohmion case. Consequently, the reduction from the regularized Lagrangian (5.68) to (5.70) is not correct: the electronic term should read w_a⟨ρ_a, iℏξ_a − Ĥe(q_a)⟩ with ρ_a = ϱ_a/w_a and Tr(ρ_a)=1, and analogous weights must appear in the regularized potential term. As written, equations (5.71)-(5.72) do not follow from the field-theoretic Lagrangian (5.68). This is a load-bearing mathematical inconsistency in the central construction and must be fixed by re-deriving the singular reduction with the correct weighting.
  2. [§3.3, Remark 3.3 and §5.3.2, Eq. (5.62)] The cold-fluid closure (3.37) is explicitly acknowledged in Remark 3.3 to produce the Wigner function δ(p − mu(x)), which does not identify a quantum state. This closure is then used in Section 5.3.2 to represent the nuclear density matrix in the factorized molecular density operator (5.49), and it is the basis of the Bohmion model in Theorem 5.11. The manuscript does not explain in what controlled sense a non-quantum, sign-indefinite nuclear density operator can serve as a physical approximation in the molecular density matrix, nor does it quantify the resulting error. This is a separate but compounding concern: even after repairing the normalization inconsistency, the physical validity of the mixed quantum-classical model requires an argument that the cold-fluid closure is a legitimate classical limit or controlled approximation for the nuclear subsystem.
  3. [§5.3.2, Eq. (5.63) and Appendix C] The key reduction of the factorized molecular Hamiltonian (5.53) to the hydrodynamic Hamiltonian (5.63) is stated to follow from 'lengthy but straightforward computations' relegated to Appendix C. This computation is the bridge between the exact density-matrix factorization and the classical closure used for the Bohmion model. Because the closure is not a positive-definite quantum state and because the central model depends on the explicit form of the resulting energy functional, the full computation should be presented in the main text or an appendix with enough detail for the reader to verify the trace normalization and the cancellation of the quantum potential term.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1.4] The sentence 'a new regularised Lagrangian which allows for singular solutions called Bohmions as well as a cold fluid classical closure quantum mixed states' is ungrammatical and should be rephrased.
  2. [Chapter 2 heading and page v] The heading 'preqrequisite material' contains a typo; it should read 'prerequisite material.'
  3. [§3.1.3, Eq. (3.24)] The notation d³x₀ appears here while the surrounding text writes the reference coordinate as x₀; please standardize the notation for reference coordinates.
  4. [§5.1, Eq. (5.19)] The bracket (5.19) is claimed to be Lie-Poisson on the dual of a semidirect product algebra, but the proof would benefit from an explicit statement of the Lie algebra action and the sign conventions used in the pairing, especially since a previous erroneous form is acknowledged later in the chapter.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the new models are explicit ansatz-based reductions from variational principles, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's new results are obtained by direct substitution into explicitly stated variational structures, not by assuming the target result. The cold-fluid closure (3.37) and the Bohmion ansatz (5.69) are presented as closures/ansatze, and the resulting equations (5.71)-(5.72) follow by calculation from the regularized Lagrangian (5.68). This is a standard reduction from a clearly stated ansatz rather than a tautology. The exact-factorization dynamics are rederived from the Dirac-Frenkel variational principle in Theorems 4.4 and 4.7, with the calculations shown in the text. The author's self-citations [44,45] are used as references to previously published versions of the material, but the thesis reproduces the derivations rather than relying on those citations for the load-bearing conclusions. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The skeptical concern about the normalization consistency of the Bohmion ansatz (rho-tilde = D rho versus the sum of projections) is an internal mathematical-consistency issue, not a circularity; it does not make the derived model equivalent to its inputs by construction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central models rest on explicit ansatze and closures: the cold-fluid closure (3.37), the density-matrix factorization (5.49), and the smoothing kernel K. These are not derived from first principles and no numerical evidence is given. The free parameters are the kernel and the Bohmion weights. The invented entities are mathematical constructs, not empirically validated objects.

free parameters (2)
  • Smoothing kernel K = Not specified; examples include Green's function of (1 - α²Δ) or a Gaussian
    Introduced in Eq. (3.27) to regularize the quantum potential. The Bohmion equations (3.32) and (5.71)-(5.72) depend explicitly on K, but no canonical choice or physical criterion is provided; the parameter α (if Helmholtz kernel) is a free length scale.
  • Bohmion weights w_a = ∑_a w_a = 1
    The singular density ansatz (3.29) and its generalization (5.69) assign weights w_a to each Bohmion. They are chosen by hand as part of the ansatz and affect the coupling terms in the resulting equations; they are not determined by the theory.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics: Hilbert space, Schrödinger equation, von Neumann equation, density matrices
    Used throughout as background, e.g., Sec. 2.1. No new physics is introduced at this level.
  • standard math Madelung transform and equivalence of QHD to Schrödinger equation, including Wallstrom's quantized circulation condition
    Taken as known background from [95,96,134,145], used in Sec. 2.1.3 and Chapter 3.
  • standard math Euler-Poincaré reduction and Lie-Poisson brackets for ideal fluids with advected quantities
    The geometric core of the thesis, cited from [70] and applied in Chapters 3-7.
  • domain assumption Existence of exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction, provided the nuclear factor Ω has no nodes
    Invoked in Sec. 2.2.2 based on [2]; underpins the EF equations used in Chapters 4-5.
  • ad hoc to paper Cold-fluid closure ρ_n(r,r') = D((r+r')/2) exp[iM/ℏ (r-r')·v((r+r')/2)] is a valid classical closure for the nuclear density matrix
    Eq. (3.37)/(5.62). Remark 3.3 admits the corresponding Wigner function is not a quantum state; the thesis nevertheless uses this closure to eliminate the quantum potential and to derive the central mixed quantum-classical model.
  • ad hoc to paper The factorized molecular density operator ansatz ρ(r,r') = ρ_n(r,r') ψ(r)ψ†(r')
    Eq. (5.49). This restricts the electronic state to a single pure product form at each nuclear pair and is not exact for arbitrary molecular density matrices, though the thesis presents it as a 'generalised factorisation ansatz'.
  • ad hoc to paper Smoothing kernel K has positive-definite, symmetric, exponentially decaying properties, and singular Bohmion ansatz D = ∑ w_a δ(x - q_a(t)) is admissible in the regularized Lagrangian
    Sec. 3.2 and Theorem 5.11. The entire Bohmion model depends on these regularity and solution-class assumptions.
invented entities (3)
  • Bohmions
    purpose: Finite-dimensional singular particle solutions of a regularized quantum hydrodynamic Lagrangian, whose dynamics include a smoothened quantum potential.
    Defined in Sec. 3.2 via the singular density ansatz (3.29) and generalized to electronic density matrices in Theorem 5.11 (Eqs. 5.69-5.72). No experimental prediction or external benchmark is provided; they are a mathematical construction.
  • u(H) non-Abelian connection
    purpose: A connection 1-form derived from the unitary evolution of quantum states, used to reinterpret the Berry connection and the quantum geometric tensor.
    Introduced in Chapter 7 (as described in the abstract and outline). It is a reformulation of known geometric objects (Berry connection, QGT) in terms of a connection, not a new physical entity with falsifiable consequences.
  • so(3) spin connection
    purpose: A connection associated with the dynamics of the spin vector in the Pauli equation, leading to new reduced equations for two-level EF systems.
    Described in Chapter 7 and in Sec. 5.2 for two-level systems. It is a mathematical reformulation with no independent experimental handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometry of quantum hydrodynamics in theoretical chemistry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y46XNTUF

@misc{pith2026200913601,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometry of quantum hydrodynamics in theoretical chemistry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y46XNTUF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.13601}
}
abstract

This thesis investigates geometric approaches to quantum hydrodynamics (QHD) in order to develop applications in theoretical quantum chemistry. Based upon the momentum map geometric structure of QHD and the associated Lie-Poisson and Euler-Poincar\'e equations, alternative geometric approaches to the classical limit in QHD are presented. These include a new regularised Lagrangian which allows for singular solutions called 'Bohmions' as well as a 'cold fluid' classical closure quantum mixed states. The momentum map approach to QHD is then applied to the nuclear dynamics in a chemistry model known as exact factorization. The geometric treatment extends existing approaches to include unitary electronic evolution in the frame of the nuclear flow, with the resulting dynamics carrying both Euler-Poincar\'e and Lie-Poisson structures. A new mixed quantum-classical model is then derived by considering a generalised factorisation ansatz at the level of the molecular density matrix. A new alternative geometric formulation of QHD is then constructed. Introducing a $\mathfrak{u}(1)$ connection as the new fundamental variable provides a new method for incorporating holonomy in QHD, which follows from its constant non-zero curvature. The fluid flow is no longer irrotational and carries a non-trivial circulation theorem, allowing for vortex filament solutions. Finally, non-Abelian connections are then considered in quantum mechanics. The dynamics of the spin vector in the Pauli equation allows for the introduction of an $\mathfrak{so}(3)$ connection whilst a more general $\mathfrak{u}(\mathscr{H})$ connection is introduced from the unitary evolution of a quantum system. This is used to provide a new geometric picture for the Berry connection and quantum geometric tensor, whilst relevant applications to quantum chemistry are then considered.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.13601 by the authors.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Schematic description of geometric relationships between the Schrödinger and hy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Schematic description of the various geometric formulations of EF dynamics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_5_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Schematic summary of key results from Sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_6_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

152 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T., & Gross, E

    Abedi, A., Maitra, N. T., & Gross, E. K. Exact factorization of the time-dependent electron-nuclear wave function.Physical review letters, 105(12), 123002, (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    T., & Gross, E

    Abedi, A., Maitra, N. T., & Gross, E. K. U. Correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factoriza- tion of the molecular wavefunction.The Journal of chemical physics, 137(22), 22A530, (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    comment on ‘correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction

    Abedi, A., Maitra, N. T. & Gross, E. K. U. Response to “comment on ‘correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction”’[j. chem. phys. 139, 087101 (2013)]. J. Chem. Phys., 139(8):087102, (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    K., Maitra, N

    Agostini, F., Abedi, A., Suzuki, Y., Min, S. K., Maitra, N. T., & Gross, E. K. U. The exact forces on classical nuclei in non-adiabatic charge transfer.The Journal of chemical physics, 142(8), 084303, (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Agostini, F., & Curchod, B. F. When the exact factorization meets conical intersections... The European Physical Journal B, 91(7), 141, (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    K., Abedi, A., & Gross, E

    Agostini, F., Min, S. K., Abedi, A., & Gross, E. K. U. Quantum-classical nonadiabatic dynamics: Coupled-vs independent-trajectory methods. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 12(5), 2127-2143, (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution.Physical Review Letters, 58(16), 1593, (1987)

    Aharonov, Y., & Anandan, J. Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution.Physical Review Letters, 58(16), 1593, (1987)

    1987

  8. [8]

    & Bohm, D

    Aharonov, Y. & Bohm, D. Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory.Phys. Rev., 115(3), 485, (1959)

    1959

Show all 152 references
  1. [9]

    Correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction

    Alonso, J. L., Clemente-Gallardo, J., Echenique-Robba, P., & Jover-Galtier, J,A. Comment on “Correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: Exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction” [J. Chem. Phys. 137, 22a530 (2012)].J. Chem. Phys., 139, 087101, (2013). 211 212 References

    2012

  2. [10]

    Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: electronic nonadiabatic coupling terms and conical intersec- tions

    Baer, M. Beyond Born-Oppenheimer: electronic nonadiabatic coupling terms and conical intersec- tions. John Wiley & Sons, (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    & Weinstein, A.Lectures on the Geometry of Quantization

    Bates, S. & Weinstein, A.Lectures on the Geometry of Quantization. Vol. 8. American Mathematical Soc, (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Berry, M.V.Quantalphasefactorsaccompanyingadiabaticchanges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 392(1802), 45-57, (1984)

    1984

  5. [13]

    & Samuel, J

    Bhandari, R. & Samuel, J. Observation of topological phase by use of a laser interferometer.Phys. Rev. Lett., 60(13), 1211, (1988)

    1988

  6. [14]

    & Bialynicka-Birula, Z

    Bialynicki-Birula, I. & Bialynicka-Birula, Z. Magnetic monopoles in the hydrodynamic formulation of quantum mechanics.Phys. Rev. D, 3(10), 2410, (1971)

    1971

  7. [15]

    & Sliwa, C

    Bialynicki-Birula, I., Bialynicka-Birula, Z. & Sliwa, C. Motion of vortex lines in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A, 61(3), 032110, (2000)

    2000

  8. [16]

    Polon.26: 1201-1208, (1995)

    Bialynicki-Birula, I., Hydrodynamic form of the Weyl equation.Acta Phys. Polon.26: 1201-1208, (1995)

    1995

  9. [17]

    Bialynicki-Birula, I., & Morrison, P. J. Quantum mechanics as a generalization of Nambu dynamics to the Weyl-Wigner formalism.Physics Letters A, 158(9), 453-457, (1991)

    1991

  10. [18]

    Bohm, A., Boya, L. J. & Kendrick, B. Derivation of the geometrical phase.Phys. Rev. A, 43(3), 1206, (1991)

    1991

  11. [19]

    Bohm, A., Kendrick, B., & Loewe, M. E. The Berry phase in molecular physics.International journal of quantum chemistry, 41(1), 53-75, (1992)

    1992

  12. [20]

    & Mostafazadeh, A.The geometric phase in quantum systems: foundations, mathematical concepts, and applications in molecular and condensed matter physics

    Bohm, A., Koizumi, H., Niu, Q., Zwanziger, J. & Mostafazadeh, A.The geometric phase in quantum systems: foundations, mathematical concepts, and applications in molecular and condensed matter physics. Springer, (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    A Suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables, I.Phys

    Bohm, D. A Suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables, I.Phys. Rev. 85, 166-179, (1952)

    1952

  14. [22]

    & Schiller, R., A causal interpretation of the Pauli equation (B)

    Bohm, D. & Schiller, R., A causal interpretation of the Pauli equation (B). Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 1.1: 67-91, (1955)

    1955

  15. [23]

    & Tiomno, J., A causal interpretation of the Pauli equation (A).Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 1: 48-66, (1955)

    Bohm, D., Schiller, R. & Tiomno, J., A causal interpretation of the Pauli equation (A).Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 1: 48-66, (1955)

    1955

  16. [24]

    & Vigier J

    Bohm, D. & Vigier J. P. Model of the causal interpretation of quantum theory in terms of a fluid with irregular fluctuations.Phys. Rev.96.1: 208, (1954)

    1954

  17. [25]

    I., Gay-Balmaz, F., & Tronci, C

    Bondar, D. I., Gay-Balmaz, F., & Tronci, C. Koopman wavefunctions and classical–quantum corre- lation dynamics. Proc. Royal Society A, 475(2229), 20180879, (2019). References 213

    2019

  18. [26]

    Geometry and symmetry of quantum and classical-quantum variational principles

    Bonet Luz, E., & Tronci, C. Geometry and symmetry of quantum and classical-quantum variational principles. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 56(8), 082104, (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Beweis des adiabatensatzes.Zeitschrift für Physik, 51(3-4), 165-180, (1928)

    Born, M., & Fock, V. Beweis des adiabatensatzes.Zeitschrift für Physik, 51(3-4), 165-180, (1928)

    1928

  20. [28]

    Dynamical theory of crystal lattices

    Born, M., & Huang, K. Dynamical theory of crystal lattices. Clarendon press, (1954)

    1954

  21. [29]

    & Oppenheimer, R

    Born, M. & Oppenheimer, R. Zur quantentheorie der molekeln.Ann. Physik, 389(20):457– 484, (1927)

    1927

  22. [30]

    Bohr, N. LXXIII. On the constitution of atoms and molecules.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 26(155), 857-875, (1913)

    1913

  23. [31]

    Quantum theory of concerted electronic and nuclear fluxes associated with adiabatic intramolecular processes

    Bredtmann T, Diestler DJ, Li SD, Manz J, Pérez-Torres JF, Tian WJ, Wu YB, Yang Y, Zhai HJ. Quantum theory of concerted electronic and nuclear fluxes associated with adiabatic intramolecular processes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17(44):29421-64, (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Brody, D. C. & Hughston, L. P. Statistical geometry in quantum mechanics.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 2445-2475. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0266), (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement

    de Broglie, L. La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement. J. Phys. Radium8, n. 5, 225-241, (1927)

    1927

  26. [34]

    Burghardt, I., Møller, K. B. & Hughes, K. H. Quantum Hydrodynamics and a Moment Approach to Quantum-Classical Theory.Quantum Dynamics of Complex Molecular Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 391-421, (2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    & Holm, D

    Camassa, R. & Holm, D. D., An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 71(11), p.1661, (1993)

    1993

  28. [36]

    Geometry of quantum phase transitions.Physics Reports, 838, 1-72, (2020)

    Carollo, A., Valenti, D., & Spagnolo, B. Geometry of quantum phase transitions.Physics Reports, 838, 1-72, (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Cederbaum, L. S. Born–Oppenheimer approximation and beyond for time-dependent electronic processes. The Journal of chemical physics, 128(12), 124101, (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Geometric phases in classical and quantum mechanics (Vol

    Chruscinski, D., & Jamiolkowski, A. Geometric phases in classical and quantum mechanics (Vol. 36). Springer Science & Business Media, (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Basics of quantum mechanics, geometrization and some appli- cations to quantum information.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 5(06), 989-1032, (2008)

    Clemente-Gallardo, J., & Marmo, G. Basics of quantum mechanics, geometrization and some appli- cations to quantum information.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 5(06), 989-1032, (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    F., & Agostini, F

    Curchod, B. F., & Agostini, F. On the dynamics through a conical intersection.The journal of physical chemistry letters, 8(4), 831-837, (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    F., Bouduban, M

    de Carvalho, F. F., Bouduban, M. E., Curchod, B. F., & Tavernelli, I. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics based on trajectories.Entropy, 16(1), 62-85, (2014). 214 References

    2014

  34. [42]

    Approximate methods

    Dirac, P. A. M. "Approximate methods." In The collected works of PAM Dirac: 1924-1948. Edited by R. H. Dalitz. Cambridge Univ. Press, (1995)

    1995

  35. [43]

    & Ventriglia, F

    Facchi, P., Kulkarni, R., Man’ko, V.I., Marmo, G., Sudarshan, E.C.G. & Ventriglia, F. Classical and quantum Fisher information in the geometrical formulation of quantum mechanics.Phys. Lett. A, 374(48), pp.4801-4803, (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    S., Holm, D

    Foskett, M. S., Holm, D. D., & Tronci, C. Geometry of nonadiabatic quantum hydrodynamics.Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 162(1), 63-103, (2019)

    2019

  37. [46]

    Wave mechanics; advanced general theory, Claredon Press, Oxford, (1934)

    Frenkel, J. Wave mechanics; advanced general theory, Claredon Press, Oxford, (1934)

    1934

  38. [47]

    The Madelung transform as a momentum map

    Fusca, D. The Madelung transform as a momentum map. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.04611v2, (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  39. [48]

    & Ratiu, T

    Gay-Balmaz, F. & Ratiu, T. S. The geometric structure of complex fluids.Adv. Applied Math., 42(2):176–275, (2009)

    2009

  40. [49]

    Gay-Balmaz, F., Ratiu, T. S. & Tronci, C. Euler-Poincaré Approaches to Nematodynamics.Acta Appl Math, 120:127–151, (2012)

    2012

  41. [50]

    Gay-Balmaz, F., Ratiu, T. S. & Tronci, C. Equivalent theories of liquid crystal dynamics.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 210(3):773–811, (2013)

    2013

  42. [51]

    Madelung transform and probability densities in hybrid classical- quantum dynamics

    Gay-Balmaz, F., & Tronci, C. Madelung transform and probability densities in hybrid classical- quantum dynamics. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1907.06624, (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Reduction theory for symmetry breaking with applications to nematic systems

    Gay-Balmaz, F., & Tronci, C. Reduction theory for symmetry breaking with applications to nematic systems. Phys. D239, 1929-1947, (2010)

    2010

  44. [53]

    Gherib, R., Ryabinkin, I. G. & Izmaylov, A. F. Why do mixed quantum-classical methods describe short-time dynamics through conical intersections so well? Analysis of geometric phase effects.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 11(4), 1375-1382, (2015)

    2015

  45. [54]

    D., & Tronci, C

    Gibbons, J., Holm, D. D., & Tronci, C. Geometry of Vlasov kinetic moments: a bosonic Fock space for the symmetric Schouten bracket.Physics Letters A, 372(23), 4184-4196, (2008)

    2008

  46. [55]

    D., & Tronci, C

    Gibbons, J., Holm, D. D., & Tronci, C. Vlasov moments, integrable systems and singular solutions. Physics Letters A, 372(7), 1024-1033, (2008)

    2008

  47. [56]

    & Sharp, D.H

    Goldin, G.A., Menikoff, R. & Sharp, D.H. Diffeomorphism groups and quantized vortex filaments. Phys. Rev. Lett.58, n. 21, 2162-2164, (1987)

    1987

  48. [57]

    A., Menikoff, R., & Sharp, D

    Goldin, G. A., Menikoff, R., & Sharp, D. H. Quantum vortex configurations in three dimensions. Physical review letters, 67(25), 3499, (1991). References 215

    1991

  49. [58]

    J., & Kan, K

    Griffin, J. J., & Kan, K. K. Colliding heavy ions: Nuclei as dynamical fluids.Reviews of Modern Physics, 48(3), 467, (1976)

    1976

  50. [59]

    Symplectic techniques in physics

    Guillemin, V., & Sternberg, S. Symplectic techniques in physics. Cambridge university press, (1990)

    1990

  51. [60]

    The moment map and collective motion.Annals of Physics, 127(1), 220-253, (1980)

    Guillemin, V., & Sternberg, S. The moment map and collective motion.Annals of Physics, 127(1), 220-253, (1980)

    1980

  52. [61]

    Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik

    Heisenberg, W. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. In Original Scientific Papers Wissenschaftliche Originalarbeiten(pp. 478-504). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (1985)

    1985

  53. [62]

    Heller, E. J. Time dependent variational approach to semiclassical dynamics.J. Chem. Phys., 64(1), 63-73, (1976)

    1976

  54. [63]

    Herzberg, G., & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. Intersection of potential energy surfaces in polyatomic molecules. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 35, 77-82, (1963)

    1963

  55. [64]

    O., Goebel, C

    Hirschfelder, J. O., Goebel, C. J., & Bruch, L. W. Quantized vortices around wavefunction nodes. II. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 61(12), 5456-5459, (1974)

    1974

  56. [65]

    Holm, D. D. Euler-Poincaré dynamics of perfect complex fluids. In Geometry, mechanics, and dynamics, pages 169–180. Springer, (2002)

    2002

  57. [66]

    Holm, D. D. Geometric Mechanics: Part II: Rotating, Translating and Rolling. World Scientific Publishing Company, (2008)

    2008

  58. [67]

    Gyroscopic analogs for collective motion of a stratified fluid.J

    Holm, D.D. Gyroscopic analogs for collective motion of a stratified fluid.J. Math. Anal. App.117, 57-80, (1986)

    1986

  59. [68]

    Magnetic tornadoes: three-dimensional affine motions in ideal magnetohydrodynamics

    Holm, D.D. Magnetic tornadoes: three-dimensional affine motions in ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Phys. D8, n. 1-2, 170-182, (1983)

    1983

  60. [69]

    Holm, D. D. & Marsden, J. E.Momentum maps and measure-valued solutions (peakons, filaments, and sheets) for the EPDiff equation. In The breadth of symplectic and Poisson geometry (pp. 203- 235). Birkhäuser Boston, (2005)

    2005

  61. [70]

    D., Marsden, J

    Holm, D. D., Marsden, J. E., & Ratiu, T. S. The Euler–Poincaré equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories.Advances in Mathematics, 137(1), 1-81, (1998)

    1998

  62. [71]

    D., ÓNáraigh, L

    Holm, D. D., ÓNáraigh, L. & Tronci, C., Singular solutions of a modified two-component Camassa- Holm equation.Phys. Rev. E, 79(1), p.016601, (2009)

    2009

  63. [72]

    Holm, D. D. Rasetti-Regge Dirac bracket formulation of Lagrangian fluid dynamics of vortex fila- ments. Math. Comp. Simulation, 62 53-63, (2003)

    2003

  64. [73]

    D., Schmah T., & Stoica C.Geometric mechanics and symmetry: from finite to infinite dimensions

    Holm D. D., Schmah T., & Stoica C.Geometric mechanics and symmetry: from finite to infinite dimensions. Oxford University Press, (2009). 216 References

    2009

  65. [74]

    Holm, D. D. & Stechmann, S. N. Hasimoto transformation and vortex soliton motion driven by fluid helicity. arXiv preprint nlin/0409040, (2004)

    2004 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Holm, D. D. & Tronci, C., Geodesic flows on semidirect-product Lie groups: geometry of singular measure-valued solutions.Proc. R. Soc. A, 465 (2102): 457-476, (2009)

    2009

  67. [76]

    D., & Tronci, C

    Holm, D. D., & Tronci, C. Geodesic Vlasov equations and their integrable moment closures.Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 1(2), 181-208, (2009)

    2009

  68. [77]

    International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 9(2), 237-242, (1975)

    Hunter, G.Conditionalprobabilityamplitudesinwavemechanics. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 9(2), 237-242, (1975)

    1975

  69. [78]

    Izmaylov, A. F. & Franco, I. Entanglement in the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation.Journal of chemical theory and computation, 13 (1), 20-28, (2016)

    2016

  70. [79]

    A., & Teller, E

    Jahn, H. A., & Teller, E. Stability of polyatomic molecules in degenerate electronic states-I—Orbital degeneracy. Proc. R. Soc. A, 161(905), 220-235, (1937)

    1937

  71. [80]

    Jin, S. & Li, X. Multi-phase computations of the semiclassical limit of the Schrödinger equation and related problems: Whitham vs Wigner.Phys. D. 182(1-2):46-85, (2003)

    2003

  72. [81]

    Kendrick, B. K. Geometric phase effects in chemical reaction dynamics and molecular spectra.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 107(35), 6739-6756, (2003)

    2003

  73. [82]

    & Modin, K

    Khesin, B., Misiolek, G. & Modin, K. Geometric hydrodynamics via Madelung transform.Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(24), 6165-6170, (2018)

    2018

  74. [83]

    Kibble, T.W.B.Geometrizationofquantummechanics. Comm. Math. Phys., 65(2):189–201, (1979)

    1979

  75. [84]

    Multivalued Fields in Condensed Matter, Electromagnetism, and Gravitation.World Scientific, (2008)

    Kleinert, H. Multivalued Fields in Condensed Matter, Electromagnetism, and Gravitation.World Scientific, (2008)

    2008

  76. [85]

    Foundations of differential geometry (Vol

    Kobayashi, S., & Nomizu, K. Foundations of differential geometry (Vol. 1, No. 2). New York, (1963)

    1963

  77. [86]

    Mehta, P

    Kolodrubetz, M., Sels, D. Mehta, P. & Polkovnikov, A. Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems,Phys. Rep.697, 1, (2017)

    2017

  78. [87]

    Kuznetsov, E. A. & Ruban, V. P. Hamiltonian dynamics of vortex and magnetic lines in hydrody- namic type systems.Phys. Rev. E, 61(1), 831, (2000)

    2000

  79. [88]

    Kuznetsov, E. A. & Ruban, V. P. Hamiltonian dynamics of vortex lines in hydrodynamic-type systems. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett., 67(12), 1076-1081, (1998)

    1998

  80. [89]

    J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A

    Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system.Reviews of Modern Physics, 59(1), 1, (1987)

    1987

  81. [90]

    & Reinsch, M

    Littlejohn, R.G. & Reinsch, M. Gauge fields in the separation of rotations and internal motions in the n-body problem.Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, n. 1, 213-275, (1997). References 217

    1997

  82. [91]

    The semiclassical evolution of wave packets.Phys

    Littlejohn, R.G. The semiclassical evolution of wave packets.Phys. Rep. 138, n. 4 & 5, 193-291, (1986)

    1986

  83. [92]

    C., Öpik, U., Pryce, M

    Longuet-Higgins, H. C., Öpik, U., Pryce, M. H. L., & Sack, R. A. Studies of the Jahn-Teller effect. II. The dynamical problem.Proc. R. Soc. A, 244(1236), 1-16, (1958)

    1958

  84. [93]

    Longuet-Higgins, H. C. The intersection of potential energy surfaces in polyatomic molecules.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 344(1637), 147-156, (1975)

    1975

  85. [94]

    From quantum to classical molecular dynamics: reduced models and numerical analysis

    Lubich, C. From quantum to classical molecular dynamics: reduced models and numerical analysis. European Mathematical Society, (2008)

    2008

  86. [95]

    Eine anschauliche deutung der gleichung von Schrödinger.Naturwissenschaften

    Madelung, E. Eine anschauliche deutung der gleichung von Schrödinger.Naturwissenschaften. 14.45: 1004, (1926)

    1926

  87. [96]

    Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form.Z

    Madelung, E. Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form.Z. Phys.40 (3-4): 322-326, (1927)

    1927

  88. [97]

    & Ratiu, T.S.Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: a basic exposition of classical mechanical systems

    Marsden, J.E. & Ratiu, T.S.Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: a basic exposition of classical mechanical systems. Springer, (2013)

    2013

  89. [98]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics around a conical intersection: Li (2p)+ H2

    Martínez, Todd J. "Ab initio molecular dynamics around a conical intersection: Li (2p)+ H2." Chemical physics letters, 272, no. 3-4: 139-147, (1997)

    1997

  90. [99]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics: basic theory and advanced methods

    Marx, D., & Hutter, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics: basic theory and advanced methods. Cam- bridge University Press, (2009)

    2009

  91. [100]

    Mead, C. A. The geometric phase in molecular systems.Reviews of modern physics, 64(1), 51, (1992)

    1992

  92. [101]

    Mead, C. A. The molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect in bound states.Chemical Physics, 49(1), 23-32, (1980)

    1980

  93. [102]

    A., & Truhlar, D

    Mead, C. A., & Truhlar, D. G. On the determination of Born-Oppenheimer nuclear motion wave- functions including complications due to conical intersections and identical nuclei.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 70(5), 2284-2296, (1979)

    1979

  94. [103]

    D., & Ho, T

    Mermin, N. D., & Ho, T. L. Circulation and angular momentum in the a phase of superfluid Helium-3. Phys. Rev. Lett., 36(11), 594, (1976)

    1976

  95. [104]

    & Gross, E.K.U

    Min, S.K., Abedi, A., Kim, K.S. & Gross, E.K.U. Is the molecular Berry phase an artifact of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation?.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, n. 26, 263004. (2014)

    2014

  96. [105]

    & Gross, E.K.U

    Min, S.K.; Agostini, F. & Gross, E.K.U. Coupled-trajectory classical-quantum approach to elec- tronic decoherence in nonadiabatic processes.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 073001, (2015). 218 References

    2015

  97. [106]

    K., Agostini, F., Tavernelli, I., & Gross, E

    Min, S. K., Agostini, F., Tavernelli, I., & Gross, E. K. Ab initio nonadiabatic dynamics with coupled trajectories: A rigorous approach to quantum (de) coherence. The journal of physical chemistry letters, 8(13), 3048-3055, (2017)

    2017

  98. [107]

    Heisenberg and isoholonomic inequalities.Symplectic Geometry and Mathematical Physics, Editors P

    Montgomery, R. Heisenberg and isoholonomic inequalities.Symplectic Geometry and Mathematical Physics, Editors P. Donato et. al., Birkhäuser, Boston, pages 303–325, (1991)

    1991

  99. [108]

    Nelson, E., Dynamical theories of Brownian motion. Vol. 3. Princeton university press, (1967)

    1967

  100. [109]

    A., & Chuang, I

    Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, (2010)

    2010

  101. [110]

    C., & Chancey, C

    O’Brien, M. C., & Chancey, C. C. The Jahn–Teller effect: An introduction and current review. American Journal of Physics, 61(8), 688-697, (1993)

    1993

  102. [111]

    Time-dependent variational principle with constraints.Chem

    Ohta, K. Time-dependent variational principle with constraints.Chem. Phys. Lett., 329(3): 248– 254, (2000)

    2000

  103. [112]

    Generalized theory of interference and its applications.Proc

    Pancharatnam, S. Generalized theory of interference and its applications.Proc. Indian Ac. Sci. A (Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 398-417). Springer India, (1956)

    1956

  104. [113]

    Zur Quantenmechanik des magnetischen Elektrons.Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(9-10), 601- 623, (1927)

    Pauli, W. Zur Quantenmechanik des magnetischen Elektrons.Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(9-10), 601- 623, (1927)

    1927

  105. [114]

    & Spera, M

    Penna, V. & Spera, M. A geometric approach to quantum vortices.J. Math. Phys., 30(12), 2778- 2784, (1989)

    1989

  106. [115]

    & Spera, M

    Penna, V. & Spera, M. On coadjoint orbits of rotational perfect fluids.J. Math. Phys., 33(3), 901-909, (1992)

    1992

  107. [116]

    Provost, J. P. & Vallee, G. Riemannian Structure on Manifolds of Quantum States,Comm. Math. Phys. 76, 289-301, (1980)

    1980

  108. [117]

    & Regge, T

    Rasetti, M. & Regge, T. Vortices in He II, current algebras and quantum knots.Physica A, 80(3), 217-233, (1975)

    1975

  109. [118]

    R., & Gross, E

    Requist, R., Proetto, C. R., & Gross, E. K. U. Asymptotic analysis of the Berry curvature in the E⊗e Jahn-Teller model.Physical Review A, 96(6), 062503, (2017)

    2017

  110. [119]

    & Gross, E

    Requist, R., Tandetzky, F. & Gross, E. K. U. Molecular geometric phase from the exact electron- nuclear factorization.Phys. Rev. A, 93(4), 042108, (2016)

    2016

  111. [120]

    Robertson, H. P. The uncertainty principle.Physical Review, 34(1), 163, (1929)

    1929

  112. [121]

    G., Joubert-Doriol, L

    Ryabinkin, I. G., Joubert-Doriol, L. & Izmaylov, A. F. Geometric phase effects in nonadiabatic dynamics near conical intersections.Acc. Chem. Res., 50(7), 1785-1793, (2017). References 219

    2017

  113. [122]

    G., Joubert-Doriol, L

    Ryabinkin, I. G., Joubert-Doriol, L. & Izmaylov, A. F. When do we need to account for the geometric phase in excited state dynamics?.J. Chem. Phys., 140(21), 214116, (2014)

    2014

  114. [123]

    Ryabinkin, I. G. & Izmaylov, A. F. Geometric phase effects in dynamics near conical intersections: Symmetry breaking and spatial localization.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(22), 220406, (2013)

    2013

  115. [124]

    G.Vortex dynamics.Cambridge university press, (1992)

    Saffman, P. G.Vortex dynamics.Cambridge university press, (1992)

    1992

  116. [125]

    General setting for Berry’s phase.Physical Review Letters, 60(23), 2339, (1988)

    Samuel, J., & Bhandari, R. General setting for Berry’s phase.Physical Review Letters, 60(23), 2339, (1988)

    1988

  117. [126]

    Samuelsson, P., Sukhorukov, E. V. & Büttiker, M. Two-particle Aharonov-Bohm effect and entan- glement in the electronic Hanbury Brown Twiss setup.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, n. 2, 026805, (2004)

    2004

  118. [127]

    An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules.Physical review, 28(6), 1049, (1926)

    Schrödinger, E. An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules.Physical review, 28(6), 1049, (1926)

    1926

  119. [128]

    Zum heisenbergschen unschärfeprinzip.Akademie der Wissenschaften, (1930)

    Schrödinger, E. Zum heisenbergschen unschärfeprinzip.Akademie der Wissenschaften, (1930)

    1930

  120. [129]

    Principles of quantum mechanics

    Shankar, R. Principles of quantum mechanics. Springer Science & Business Media, (2012)

    2012

  121. [130]

    Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase.Physical Review Letters, 51(24), 2167, (1983)

    Simon, B. Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase.Physical Review Letters, 51(24), 2167, (1983)

    1983

  122. [131]

    Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrödinger and Pauli equations.Int

    Spera, M. Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrödinger and Pauli equations.Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 13(04), 1630004, (2016)

    2016

  123. [132]

    E., Ouyang, W., & Landry, B

    Subotnik, J. E., Ouyang, W., & Landry, B. R. Can we derive Tully’s surface-hopping algorithm from the semiclassical quantum Liouville equation? Almost, but only with decoherence.The Journal of chemical physics, 139(21), 211101, (2013)

    2013

  124. [133]

    Bohmian mechanics in the exact factorization of electron-nuclear wave functions

    Suzuki, Y., & Watanabe, K. Bohmian mechanics in the exact factorization of electron-nuclear wave functions. Physical Review A, 94(3), 032517, (2016)

    2016

  125. [134]

    On the formulation of quantum mechanics associated with classical pictures.Prog

    Takabayasi, T. On the formulation of quantum mechanics associated with classical pictures.Prog. Theor. Phys., 8(2), 143-182, (1952)

    1952

  126. [135]

    Takabayasi, T., The vector representation of spinning particle in the quantum theory, I.Prog. Theor. Phys.14.4: 283-302, (1955)

    1955

  127. [136]

    Vortex, spin and triad for quantum mechanics of spinning particle

    Takabayasi, T. Vortex, spin and triad for quantum mechanics of spinning particle. I: general theory. Prog. Theor. Phys., 70(1), 1-17, (1983)

    1983

  128. [137]

    & Yamada, H

    Tonomura, A., Osakabe, N., Matsuda, T., Kawasaki, T., Endo, J., Yano, S. & Yamada, H. Evidence for Aharonov-Bohm effect with magnetic field completely shielded from electron wave.Phys. Rev. Lett., 56(8), 792, (1986). 220 References

    1986

  129. [138]

    Hybrid models for perfect complex fluids with multipolar interactions.J

    Tronci, C. Hybrid models for perfect complex fluids with multipolar interactions.J. Geom. Mech. 4, 333-363, (2012)

    2012

  130. [139]

    Momentum maps for mixed states in quantum and classical mechanics.J

    Tronci, C. Momentum maps for mixed states in quantum and classical mechanics.J. Geom. Mech., 11(4), 639, (2019)

    2019

  131. [140]

    Nonadiabatic dynamics

    Tully, J. C. "Nonadiabatic dynamics." In Modern methods for multidimensional dynamics compu- tations in chemistry, pp. 34-72, (1998)

    1998

  132. [141]

    Tully, J. C. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 93(2), 1061-1071, (1990)

    1990

  133. [142]

    C., & Zanardi, P

    Venuti, L. C., & Zanardi, P. Quantum critical scaling of the geometric tensors.Physical review letters, 99(9), 095701, (2007)

    2007

  134. [143]

    Volovik, G. E. From quantum hydrodynamics to quantum gravity. arXiv preprint gr-qc/0612134, (2006)

    2006 arXiv

  135. [144]

    Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics: New edition

    Von Neumann, J. Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics: New edition. Princeton uni- versity press, (2018)

    2018

  136. [145]

    Wallstrom, T. C. Inequivalence between the Schrödinger equation and the Madelung hydrodynamic equations. Phys. Rev. A, 49(3), 1613, (1994)

    1994

  137. [146]

    Dynamics in the Hopf bundle, the geometric phase and implications for dynamical systems, Doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey (United Kingdom), (2008)

    Way, R. Dynamics in the Hopf bundle, the geometric phase and implications for dynamical systems, Doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey (United Kingdom), (2008)

    2008

  138. [147]

    Geometric phases in physics (Vol

    Wilczek, F., & Shapere, A. Geometric phases in physics (Vol. 5). World Scientific, (1989)

    1989

  139. [148]

    Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems.Physical Review Letters, 52(24), 2111, (1984)

    Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems.Physical Review Letters, 52(24), 2111, (1984)

    1984

  140. [149]

    Wyatt, R. E. Quantum dynamics with trajectories: introduction to quantum hydrodynamics (Vol. 28). Springer Science & Business Media, (2006)

    2006

  141. [150]

    Yarkony, D. R. Diabolical conical intersections.Reviews of Modern Physics, 68(4), 985, (1996)

    1996

  142. [151]

    Laser-induced electron localization in h 2+: mixed classical-quantum dynamics based on the exact time-dependent potential energy surface

    Yasumitsu Suzuki, Ali Abedi, Neepa T Maitra, & EKU Gross. Laser-induced electron localization in h 2+: mixed classical-quantum dynamics based on the exact time-dependent potential energy surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17(43):29271–29280, (2015)

    2015

  143. [152]

    & Curtright, T.Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space: An Overview with Selected PapersWorld Scientific, Vol

    Zachos, C., Fairlie, D. & Curtright, T.Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space: An Overview with Selected PapersWorld Scientific, Vol. 34, (2005)

    2005

  144. [153]

    Information-theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase transitions

    Zanardi, P., Giorda, P., & Cozzini, M. Information-theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase transitions. Physical review letters, 99(10), 100603, (2007). List of publications Foskett, M. S., Holm, D. D., & Tronci, C. Geometry of nonadiabatic quantum hydrodynamics. Acta ...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.