{"as_of":"2026-08-09T02:55:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7e251b04be378310a786dfdc5c36072c1285ace55f9da72afc4b4ddf135e8428","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:52:41.243301Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T00:07:27.802978Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","last_updated":"2022-08-22T15:38:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:08:39.910786Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-26T17:05:13Z","title":"Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learning","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2010.13723","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:52:41.243301Z","title":"Optimal client sampling for federated learning","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.23555","last_updated":"2025-07-13T03:55:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:41:11.257780Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-29T15:31:37Z","title":"Adaptive Federated LoRA in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks with Independent Sampling","version":3},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:52:41.243301Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2010.13723","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.23555"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b8333355540e2ba7c05430ce78ae3476feb2c3e90ff92cb2a803f6ad5c6f50c2","observation_id":"a49e624b-4971-4ca6-a777-0a3a70db2a9e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:52:41.243301Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","last_updated":"2022-08-22T15:38:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:08:39.910786Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-26T17:05:13Z","title":"Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learning","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2010.13723","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T22:50:19.319745Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.20518","last_updated":"2025-06-25T15:05:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T09:30:55.890624Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T15:05:01Z","title":"WallStreetFeds: Client-Specific Tokens as Investment Vehicles in Federated Learning","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T22:50:19.319745Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2010.13723","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.20518"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52064bda9032ada4597c80bcb7c7901a675074621dbdd20a102bb3e334a27fb1","observation_id":"267e1983-2aae-4408-93d6-ad5074267975","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T22:50:19.319745Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","last_updated":"2022-08-22T15:38:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:08:39.910786Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-26T17:05:13Z","title":"Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learning","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2010.13723","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T00:07:27.802978Z","title":"Optimal client sampling for federated learning","venue":null,"work_id":"2d52c910-06e6-43d7-8a00-bd7d9fe93ad4","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.17398","last_updated":"2026-04-08T13:39:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:46:14.644658Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-22T06:57:46Z","title":"Optimizing Split Federated Learning with Unstable Client Participation","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-18T15:24:04.079011Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2010.13723","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.17398"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5a12f6bc38723d9cce0d66b95e9634e5d886347b25bde5ac467c0c43de7eb6b","observation_id":"7e87d133-6fd2-4b16-a5e9-5e68d63f03e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-18T15:26:33.786095Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","last_updated":"2022-08-22T15:38:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:08:39.910786Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-26T17:05:13Z","title":"Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learning","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2010.13723","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T00:07:27.802978Z","title":"Optimal client sampling for federated learning","venue":null,"work_id":"2d52c910-06e6-43d7-8a00-bd7d9fe93ad4","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.10124","last_updated":"2026-06-22T21:05:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T17:42:39.050366Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-08T19:55:45Z","title":"FedSteer: Taming Extreme Gradient Staleness in Federated Learning with Corrective Projections and Caching","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-27T17:31:55.976607Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2010.13723","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.10124"},"observation_digest":"sha256:92676bc74d23cf5058a31b19867d710875cf4bb8f6238cb19829ae09ff6da21f","observation_id":"6232081b-f19c-4104-81f7-453eecddbeaf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-03T00:07:27.804440Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2010.13723/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2010.13723/integrity","json":"/paper/2010.13723/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2010.13723"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.13723","last_updated":"2022-08-22T15:38:15Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:08:39.910786Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-26T17:05:13Z","title":"Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learning"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T06:31:55.24221+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2010.13723."}