{"as_of":"2026-08-08T05:03:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:cab117b6b239ee19c01319c802fc4f3b07dece954f5dd8fca2a03f8297677cfd","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:56:53.267999Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.616624Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.13868","last_updated":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:53:21.486703Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2103.13868","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:56:53.267999Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.03913","last_updated":"2025-06-04T13:05:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:50:59.321540Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T13:05:37Z","title":"When Fairness Isn't Statistical: The Limits of Machine Learning in Evaluating Legal Reasoning","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:56:53.267999Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.13868","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.03913"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af4dad0655be3bd5891ca7436fe1688329a2ef6702b74017927a859bed2e0645","observation_id":"ccba31f6-7623-4f6b-98a6-f9170f855ffd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:56:53.267999Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.13868","last_updated":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:53:21.486703Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2103.13868","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2103.13868","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.616624Z","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"8f0f6f9b-7abb-4e44-bd06-2390ef98c77b","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:15:10.100333Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.553796Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.13868","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b83c6f4d46bfbc91d91c9ceb2f55de2830ef5d34467a761bcd73be891207d724","observation_id":"0827bd76-9b22-4751-a676-1664001362ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.620139Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2103.13868/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2103.13868/integrity","json":"/paper/2103.13868/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2103.13868"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.13868","last_updated":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T10:53:21.486703Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2103.13868."}